seth attended a conference at which a speaker discussed food insecurity. a few days later, he remembers the first couple of topics discussed but has trouble recalling the topics discussed toward the end of the speech. which concept would explain this?

Seth attended a conference at which a speaker discussed food insecurity. a few days later, he remembers the first couple of topics discussed but has trouble recalling the topics discussed toward the end of the speech is B. The recency effect.

The recency effect is a cognitive bias in which the most recent information that a person has encountered is more likely to be remembered and recalled than earlier information. This is because the most recent information is still fresh in the person's memory and has not been displaced by new information.

In Seth's case, he was able to remember the first couple of topics discussed because they were at the beginning of the speech and therefore more easily recalled due to the primacy effect. However, as the speaker continued and discussed more topics, Seth's ability to remember them decreased, likely due to the recency effect. The later topics were not as strongly ingrained in his memory as the earlier ones because they were not as recent.

To improve recall in situations like this, it can be helpful to take notes during the speech or engage in active listening techniques, such as asking questions or summarizing key points as they are presented. Additionally, reviewing the material shortly after the presentation can help reinforce memory and mitigate the effects of the recency effect. Therefore, the correct option is B.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

seth attended a conference at which a speaker discussed food insecurity. a few days later, he remembers the first couple of topics discussed but has trouble recalling the topics discussed toward the end of the speech. which concept would explain this?

A. Internal previewing

B. The recency effect

C. The primacy effect

D.  Mental outlining

Know more about Recency effect here:

https://brainly.com/question/30332694

#SPJ11

In a paragraph (5 to 7 sentences) write about what is language

What is the title of good source for checking the history, or etymology, of a word?

Aaron is buying a new pair of Under Armor tennis shoes that cost $80. If they are on sale for 30% off, how much money will Aaron save?

how much would the titanic’s classes cost? (ex. second class,first class etc..) then and now?- please help-

How does Walker use symbolism to reveal the narrator's character in this
passage?

By explaining that she wants to be famous

B. By revealing that she wants to appear on television

C. By describing her dream of connecting more with Dee

D. By pointing out that she wants to move

What does the willow tree represent to the narrator?


A his personal history
B his lost childhood dreams
C a love of the outdoors

Which two print features can help emphasize important text in a document? bolding the text paraphrasing the text italicizing the text resizing the text numbering the text.

The underlined word in Line
111 of Whitman's "Song of
Myself" is an example of what
sound device?
Sec 33 Line 111: "The whizz
of limbs, heads, stone, wood,
iron, high in the air."
A. assonance (repetition of the same
vowel sound in multiple words in close
proximity)
B. alliteration (repetition of the same first
consonant sound in a string of words)
C. onomatopoeia (a word that sounds like
its definition)

chapters 1-21 forensic science in to kill a mocking bird

Which words from "Monet’s ‘Waterlilies’” by Robert Hayden most appeals to the sense of sight?

“poisons the air”
“I come again to see”
“through refracting tears”
“the seen, the known”

When Delia says these lines, what does the reader know that Delia does not know?

In the third paragraph (lines 13-24), the author discusses the dialogue he read primarily to?​

Write 5 sentences using the following questions How? Who? when? Why? Which?​

I must thank Margaret for her generous time to read through the manuscript and to correct errors in my use of scripture and to question my interpretation.

please answer the question in the screenshot

Circle the word with a different sound!plis!

Which of these did Frederick Douglass use in his writing to build credibility, or
ethos?

Read this topic sentence: Exercise is important to one's physical and mental health.

Which piece of supporting evidence would best support the topic sentence?

A) Last year, 1 in every 10 people over the age of 70 suffered a hip injury.

B) Too much caffeine can lead to headaches during exercise.

C) Regular exercise builds muscle tone and reduces stress.

D) A healthy diet plays an important role in weight loss.

HELPPP RN FOR BRAINELST

kareem wants to brainstorm a list of possible speech topics that are meaningful and relevant to himself. which technique would be the most suited to his goal? multiple choice question.

Reason why people have conflict?
2 sentences

How does Harrison Bergeron’s physical description help to create satire? The contrast of military neatness with Harrison’s appearance highlights the importance of sameness. The absurdity of Harrison’s exaggerated handicaps ridicules society’s obsession with equality. The humorous description of Harrison’s appearance suggests that good looks are unimportant. The numerous handicaps issued to Harrison criticize society’s obsession with superficial appearances.

Discuss the significance of Mr.Douglas’s brand and the moat?

5x-4_>5
1.-6
2.2
3.6

Which of the following values are solutions to the inequality

How were Munodi's lands and home different from the others in the area?
a. His were twice the size of everyone else's. C. His home was filled with art works and
expensive furniture. His lands were covered
with landscaped gardens.
b. He was antiquated, without the modern d. His were well built, well maintained, and
conveniences of his neighbors.
productive.

Pliss help here no links ok

Read the excerpt from "If—” by Rudyard Kipling.

If you can dream—and not make dreams your master;
If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build ’em up with worn-out tools:

How do the capital letters affect the meaning of the poem?

They emphasize experiences that everyone faces.
They suggest that challenges can ruin even the best-laid plans.
They highlight the shared abilities of successful people.
They contrast sincerity and dishonesty.

according to the author, how did the real lives of charlie chaplin and marlon brando promote the american dream>

What type of figurative language is being used in the following sentence?

These cookies are garbage!
simile
metaphor
hyperbole
personification

Read the passage. excerpt from Federalist No. 78 by Alexander Hamilton In 1787 and 1788, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote the Federalist Papers to persuade voters to ratify the proposed Constitution of the United States of America. These papers included essays about all three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton focused specifically on the judicial branch. Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments. This simple view of the matter suggests several important consequences. It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks. It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive. For I agree, that "there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers.'' And it proves, in the last place, that as liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have every thing to fear from its union with either of the other departments; that as all the effects of such a union must ensue from a dependence of the former on the latter, notwithstanding a nominal and apparent separation; that as, from the natural feebleness of the judiciary, it is in continual jeopardy of being overpowered, awed, or influenced by its co-ordinate branches; and that as nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office, this quality may therefore be justly regarded as an indispensable ingredient in its constitution, and, in a great measure, as the citadel of the public justice and the public security. The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified exceptions to the legislative authority; such, for instance, as that it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex-post-facto laws, and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing. How does Hamilton support and advance his purpose in Paragraph 2 by using the word feebleness in this excerpt? . . . that as, from the natural feebleness of the judiciary, it is in continual jeopardy of being overpowered, awed, or influenced by its co-ordinate branches . . . This word allows Hamilton to stress the idea that the judiciary plays a naturally passive role in the government—reacting to the other branches—so its independence must be guaranteed. The word lets Hamilton suggest that the efforts of the judiciary are mostly ineffective, so it should not be linked to any other branches lest it negatively influence them. The word conveys Hamilton's belief that the judiciary's function will be irrelevant unless it is allowed to exist under the strong and guiding power of the other branches of government. The word captures Hamilton's view that the judiciary is of questionable value, so it ought to be granted complete independence so it can prove its worth to the government.