Answer:
3
Explanation:
Quote: "Youth is the seed time of good habits, as well in nations as in individuals"
How does Thomas Paine compare a nation’s youth with an individual’s youth?
For Thomas Paine, both a young nation and a young individual are elements that are building and preparing their own future.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Paine compares youth to a seedbed.This is because the seedbed has elements that will develop in the future and show satisfactory results.For him, both a young person and a young nation are similar and represent a seedbed of the same course.That's because Paine believes that a young person is preparing his own future, creating strategies that will develop and have satisfactory results. A young nation, on the other hand, is made up of a group of people, of all ages, who care about the nation's future and therefore work to make that future as promising as possible.
More information about Thomas Paine at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1779104
Answer:
it is saying that bothe the nation and individuals go though a time known a there "youth" and that during this time they both make good habits
Explanation:
What is a temporal word or phrase?
Answer:
Temporal words and phrases are time-related words that move a sentence and story along. They can be words, prepositions, or phrases.
Temporal words can be singular words, such as 'tomorrow;' prepositions, such as 'for;' or phrases, such as 'before long. ' Without temporal words, stories would not move along as well.
Land is to sea as dry is to
A. eyes.
B. sand.
C. wet.
D. paper.
Answer:
C- Wet
Explanation:
Land is dry, while water is wet. They're opposites.
Write 1-2 sentences describing what a collaborative discussion looks like and what happens when you share ideas in a collaborative discussion.(2 points)
A collaborative discussion appears as a group coming up with fresh concepts or solutions to an issue.
What is collaborative discussion?There is an adage that goes, "If you'd like to go quickly, go by myself—but if you are interested in travelling extensively, travel together." Small-group participatory discussion will be used in each of the five sessions to test out different group exercises from the Toolkit. Working on our ability to participate in group discussions is a crucial step.
Working together can enable us to benefit from the wisdom of the masses, making us more knowledgeable and powerful as a whole. However, group conversations can sometimes go awry and produce groupthink, which suppresses vital ideas. Groups can become mindless hordes. A collaborative discussion appears as a group coming up with fresh concepts or solutions to an issue. In a group conversation, sharing ideas generates more concepts than you could have come up with on your alone.
Therefore, a collaborative discussion appears as a group coming up with fresh concepts or solutions to an issue.
To know more about collaborative discussion, here:
https://brainly.com/question/514815
#SPJ3
If you were writing a personal narrative, what could you do in your conclusion?(1 point) Responses I could let the readers draw their own conclusions about this experience. I could let the readers draw their own conclusions about this experience. I could review the beginning of this experience to the reader. I could review the beginning of this experience to the reader. I could provide a lesson that I learned through this experience. I could provide a lesson that I learned through this experience. I could restate the reasons why the reader should like this story. I could restate the reasons why the reader should like this story.
Answer:
If I were writing a personal narrative, the conclusion could include the following:
- Letting the readers draw their own conclusions about the experience.
- Reviewing the beginning of the experience to the reader.
- Providing a lesson that I learned through this experience.
These elements would help wrap up the narrative by allowing readers to reflect on the story and its significance, providing a sense of closure, and potentially leaving them with a lasting impression or takeaway from the narrative. Restating the reasons why the reader should like the story might not be necessary as it focuses more on convincing the reader rather than concluding the narrative.
Explanation:
Answer:
If your were writing a personal narrative, the conclusion could include the following:
Letting the readers draw their own conclusions about the experience.- Reviewing the beginning of the experience to the reader.- Providing a lesson that I learned through this experience.THESE ARE IMPORTANT
Mayflower Treasure Hunt
chapter 5 summary in your own words at least a pararaph
Answer:
DINK, JOSH, AND RUTH ROSE are spending Thanksgiving in Plymouth, Massachusetts. They can't wait to see the sights and have a Thanksgiving dinner just like the Pilgrims would have eaten. Then the kids learn about a sapphire necklace that went missing on the real Mayflower. Could the 400-year-old treasure be hidden somewhere nearby? This exciting extension to the A to Z Mysteries chapter book series features more pages, favorit characters, a more complex plot, and a 26-letter message hidden in the art.
In Hoot, how does Roy win his father's sympathy for the owls? How does this relate to how he and his parents interact in general?
Answer: Roy's father teaches his son to act rationally and talk about problems. He gives guidance and advice, and trusts Roy to make good decisions on his own.
Greg’s final feelings toward and perspective on his father
Which of the following source locations requires you to check out the organization first because the source may or may not be reliable?
A) .com
B) .edu
C) .gov
D) .org
What is an argument?
a research project that includes information from a variety of sources
an interview with an expert who provides facts and answers questions about a specific topic
an informative report that compares and contrasts historical events as experienced by different people
a persuasive essay, speech, or other presentation that uses logic and evidence to support an opinion
Answer:
an informative report that compares and contrasts historical events as experienced by different people its this one hope it helps
Answer:
Arguments are statements made to explain the point of view of the respective topic. It includes 2 or more people.
Explanation:
In arguments specific evidence or proofs are included so that the point or the situation gets more confidence and making everyone agree to the point gets easier.
Arguments are used in various content writing aspects like essay writing, report writing, opinion writing, etc.
Arguments makes it easy for us to understand the main reasoning of the point and the difference between what is more relevant and gets us to satisfying conclusions.
Someone please answer this... I need it for tonight before 12 AM EDT, and I have no clue how to do it because I did not go to school the day before this.
Fill in the blanks with the vocabulary/lesson words.
Answer:2 boredom
3 bland
4 conspicuous
5 notorious
6 restraint
7 persecute
8 dilemma
9 testimony
10 initiate
11 implication
12 eavesdrop
Explanation:
The material chosen for your study group a. Should be chosen by the teacher b. Should be decided upon before the group meets c. Should be material you all already understand d. Should be material you all need extra help with. Please select the best answer from the choices provided Ο Α O B ос O D
Answer:
So i dont understand by thr question but i will try and i think it should be D. cause its a study group
Sorry if im wrong
what do you guys think my name is?
PLEASE HELP I'LL MARK BRAINLIEST.
Think about the texts in this Collection that describe the real experiences of Diane Nash and John Lewis during sit-ins in the 1960s. What references to historical details do you find in the story? In what ways are Doris’s fictional experiences different from the real experiences of Nash and Lewis? Cite text evidence in your response.
Answer:
The black were treated differently from the whites, couldn't use the same restrooms, went to different school, couldn't eat at the same places, and were looked down on.
In the fictional story the things that happened could have very well actually happened but the non-fiction story was based on a tru thing.
Hope this helps. have a great day
P.S. next time if you want someone to read 12 pages give em' more than 5 points.
Explanation:
The teacher, Rajni Saharia, managed to get out of the room and escape unhurt.”
a. Was it difficult to escape? Why?
b. Who was responsible for that?
c. What did the teacher, Rajni Saharia do after her escape?
is there a story? if so can u tell me so I can answer the questions for u?
Describe how to accurately turn the words of an author into a direct quote.
Answer:
Use quotations
Explanation:
Please help! Very easy!
The first two screenshots are the word list of the words that you will use for the 3rd screenshot.
Answer:
11. folly
12. unique
13. abrupt
14. dismal
15. acknowledge
16. illuminate
17. inevitable
18. pamper
19. reverence
20. valor
Where did the word ghetto come form pls help
In 1910, just before Marie Curie collected her second Nobel Prize for radioactivity, young György Hevesy arrived in England to study radioactivity himself. His university’s lab director in Manchester, Ernest Rutherford, immediately assigned Hevesy the Herculean task of separating out radioactive atoms from nonradioactive atoms inside blocks of lead. Actually, it turned out to be not Herculean but impossible. Rutherford had assumed the radioactive atoms, known as radium-D, were a unique substance. In fact, radium-D was radioactive lead and therefore could not be separated chemically. Ignorant of this, Hevesy wasted two years tediously trying to tease lead and radium-D apart before giving up.
Hevesy—a bald, droopy-cheeked, mustached aristocrat from Hungary—also faced domestic frustrations. Hevesy was far from home and used to savory Hungarian food, not the English cooking at his boardinghouse. After noticing patterns in the meals served there, Hevesy grew suspicious that, like a high school cafeteria recycling Monday’s hamburgers into Thursday’s beef chili, his landlady’s “fresh” daily meat was anything but. When confronted, she denied this, so Hevesy decided to seek proof.
Miraculously, he’d achieved a breakthrough in the lab around that time. He still couldn’t separate radium-D, but he realized he could flip that to his advantage. He’d begun musing over the possibility of injecting minute quantities of dissolved lead into a living creature and then tracing the element’s path, since the creature would metabolize the radioactive and nonradioactive lead the same way, and the radium-D would emit beacons of radioactivity as it moved. If this worked, he could actually track molecules inside veins and organs, an unprecedented degree of resolution.
Before he tried this on a living being, Hevesy decided to test his idea on the tissue of a nonliving being, a test with an ulterior motive. He took too much meat at dinner one night and, when the landlady’s back was turned, sprinkled “hot” lead over it. She gathered his leftovers as normal, and the next day Hevesy brought home a newfangled radiation detector from his lab buddy, Hans Geiger. Sure enough, when he waved it over that night’s goulash, Geiger’s counter went furious: click-click-click-click. Hevesy confronted his landlady with the evidence. But, being a scientific romantic, Hevesy no doubt laid it on thick as he explained the mysteries of radioactivity. In fact, the landlady was so charmed to be caught so cleverly, with the latest tools of forensic science, she didn’t even get mad. There’s no historical record of whether she altered her menu, however.
Now, you’ll analyze how the text’s structure helps the author achieve his purpose. Present your analysis in a paragraph by following these steps:
Make a statement that identifies the author’s choice of text structure and how it contributes to the overall purpose.
Support your statement with evidence from the text.
Explain how the evidence supports your statement.
Answer:
um I'm here for the points
sterotyping is problematic because
Answer:
D :people are encouraged to judge others based on unfounded beliefs about certain groups of people.
Explanation:
I took the test
"Brainliest Please :p"
how can examining the characters in a story help you identify the story's theme
Answer:
By giving details on a character's personality, the author helps readers understand that character more accurately. ... The theme is probably "Treat others as you would like to be treated," or something similar
Explanation:
Answer:
Easy! I love reading so this is like extremely easy.
Explanation:
For example, The rabbit in The rabbit and the tortoise . If you look closely you'll see he's lazy and think's he's impressive but when he takes his cat nap... Well the theme is that being slow can win you things if you try hard enough. So the hare was hardly trying but the tortoise was being slow, but trying really hard. The theme is easy to find because of how much each character is working.
Commencement Address to the Santa Fe Indian School
Instructions
Match the elements from the speech with whether they are part of the First Lady’s story, or part of the students’ stories:
I attached a file. I'm pretty sure that's the right answer, but correct me if I am wrong.
Also, please put me as most brainliest...
Thank you very much!!!!
Match the elements from the speech with whether they are part of the First Lady’s story or part of the students’ stories:
First Lady’s story
Parents who grew up during segregation and did not graduate high schoolFeeling lonely and overwhelmed upon arriving at collegeA community whose history predates the existence of the nationJalapeno nachos at the EACstudents’ stories
Grandparents who moved north to avoid discriminationParticipating in projects in education and economic developmentSchools where ancestors' languages were once forbidden.What is a Context clue?Any kind of hint or idea reflected from the statements help the reader to understand the clear context in which the word is used refers to a context clue. This clue helps the reader to determine the appropriate meaning.
In the given case, it has been discussed about the speech given by the first lady of the USA Mrs. Obama, Commencement Address to the Santa Fe Indian School to the people who visit there.
The elements from her speech and the student's stories created on it are segregated in order to provide the message given by her in the Commencement Address.
Learn more about Context clue, here:
https://brainly.com/question/20263792
#SPJ2
Scenario: Sheree visits her mother in her retirement home. They catch up on each other’s lives, and soon enough they get into an argument about Sheree and her unwillingness to have children. The argument always escalates at this point but this time Sheree takes a moment to reflect on the reason behind her mother’s persistence in having a grandchild. Sheree remembers that out of all her siblings, she is the only one who is married and perhaps this is why her mother is anxious. She comes to a decision that she will hear out her mother’s side of this argument and to keep in mind that her mother just wants what is best for her.
In this scenario, which method for avoiding biased language is used?
a. Identifying and confronting stereotypes.
b. Making an effort to understand others.
c. Consciously choosing inclusive language.
d. Asking for feedback.
You are asked to revise the following sentence so it contains no dangling or misplaced modifiers:
We hid behind the bushes waiting for squirrels holding our cameras.
Which choice is the best answer?
There is no revision needed. The original sentence is correct as it is.
Holding our cameras, we hid behind the bushes waiting for squirrels.
Holding our cameras, we waited for squirrels hiding behind the bushes.
We waited for squirrels hiding behind the bushes holding our cameras.
Answer: Holding our cameras, we hid behind the bushes and waited for squirrels.
Explanation:
The original sentence, "We hid behind the bushes waiting for squirrels holding our cameras," contains a dangling modifier. It suggests that the squirrels were holding our cameras instead of us. To correct this, we need to rephrase the sentence so that the subject doing the action is mentioned.
One possible revision is, "Holding our cameras, we hid behind the bushes and waited for squirrels." This revision ensures that the phrase "holding our cameras" correctly modifies "we." It conveys that while holding our cameras, we hid behind the bushes and waited for squirrels.
By rephrasing the sentence, we maintain clarity and remove any imprecision regarding who is holding the cameras and waiting for the squirrels. This revision improves the sentence's structure and eliminates the issue of dangling or misplaced modifiers.
To learn more about misplaced modifiers,
https://brainly.com/question/9835420
what interests you? looking for cool 3D Printer ideas
I didn't bring my homework because my dog ate it.
What signal word is used to show cause and effect in the sentence?
Question 4 options:
bring
homework
because
dog
Answer: because
Explanation: I think
sorry that your dog ate it
Answer: Recognize Cause and Effect Relationships
Clue words that signal causal relationships include: such, because, so, consequently, therefore, thus, and since.
Explanation:
whats a sysmbol thats present in untwine
Answer: identity and grief
Explanation:
Bc a young girl had to cope with the devastating loss of her best friend and twin sister (they had a terrible car accident and died)
Answer:
identity and grief
Explanation:
A young girl copes with a devastating loss, this happens when a sixteen-year-old Gizelle Boyer loses her best friend and twin sister Isabelle in a terrible car accident.
If you were Odysseus, and you were trying to get home after twenty years, which factors would motivate you the most? Check all that apply.
fix anything spelled incorrectly
Answer:
I have a spelling checker
Explanation:
Answer:
I have a spelling checker
It came with my PC
It plainly marks for my review
Mistakes I cannot see
I strike a key and type a word
And wait for it to say
Whether I am wrong or right
It shows me straight away
As soon as a mistake is made
It knows before too long
And I can put the error right
Its rarely ever wrong
I have run this poem through it
I am sure you're pleased to know
Its letter perfect all the way
My checker told me so
Explanation:
What can the reader infer Hiram means by, “I think maybe I understand dad a little better now.” Mississippi trial 1955
Answer:
Explanation:
Hiram was a witness during the trial of Emmett Till's murderers in 1955. Hiram testified that he did not believe Emmett made any suggestive or inappropriate comments to the men's wives, contrary to what was initially claimed. Based on this testimony, the jury acquitted the defendants.
The quote "I think maybe I understand dad a little better now" suggests that Hiram is starting to question the values and beliefs that he was taught growing up, particularly those related to racial prejudice. He may have grown up in a culture where racism and discriminatory behavior against African Americans was accepted or tolerated, and he may be realizing the errors of this way of thinking as he learns more about the true nature of Emmett Till and his death.
The quote also implies that Hiram's perspective is shifting and evolving as he reflects on his past experiences and the experiences of others. It's possible that Hiram is coming to the realization that racial prejudice and injustice, which were a major part of life in the American South at the time, were based on misguided and harmful beliefs that did not accurately reflect the true character of black people.
Overall, Hiram's statement suggests that he is undergoing a personal transformation and challenging the beliefs that he was taught growing up. This transformation may have been prompted by his experiences and his role in the trial, and it may lead to a greater understanding and appreciation for the challenges that black people face in a society that has been historically shaped by systemic racism and discrimination.