primarily house those convicted of felony offenses that require longer periods of incarceration. a. jails b. halfway houses c. prisons d. treatment facilities

Answer:

Explanation:

Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:

Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.

Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.

Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.

Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.

Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.

Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.

Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.

Regarding scientific theories and laws, these claims are accurate. An idea is not an

A theoretical model is more than just a list of assumptions. A hypothesis is a prediction of what will happen, not why it will happen. Predictions devoid of reason are not theories. Strong theory papers are related and simple at the same time. A theory never turns into reality. It is a justification for a truth or facts. Until it is refuted, a well-supported, fact-based theory is accepted. That is a fact. It never becomes a fact. A well considered explanation for observations of the natural world that has been developed through the scientific method and that combines numerous facts and hypotheses is known as a theory.

To learn more about theories refer to

https://brainly.com/question/28427679

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is law enforcement

Law enforcement are generally beyond the responsibility of local government.

Law enforcement are government agency or body that enforce law.

These people act in a well organized way to make sure that rules and regulations are abided to.

Local government responsibility is not to manage or enforce law.

Therefore, Law enforcement are generally beyond the responsibility of local government.

Learn more on Law enforcement here,

https://brainly.com/question/7284226

Question:

A(n) ________ is a person authorized by the state or county to do certain legal tasks like certifying contracts.

Answer:

Notary

Thesis: Citizen engagement in civil rights matters is a worthwhile effort as it fosters an active and informed citizenry, promotes social progress, and upholds the fundamental principles of equality and justice.

Civil rights refer to the basic rights and freedoms that are guaranteed to all individuals by law, regardless of their race, gender, nationality, religion, or any other characteristic. These rights are essential for promoting equality, justice, and fairness within a society.

Civil rights encompass a wide range of protections, such as the right to life, liberty, and security of person; freedom of expression, assembly, and association; equal protection under the law; and the right to participate in political and public affairs. They ensure that every person has the opportunity to fully participate in society without facing discrimination or prejudice.

To know more about Civil rights refer to-

brainly.com/question/21057720

#SPJ4

Interest rates usually fall during a recession. This is because during a recession, the demand for money decreases as people and businesses cut back on spending due to reduced real income. The given statement is TRUE.

As a result, banks and other lenders have excess funds to lend out, which leads to a reduction in interest rates. Additionally, central banks typically respond to a recession by cutting interest rates to encourage borrowing and spending, which can help stimulate economic growth.

However, it is important to note that the relationship between interest rates and economic conditions can be complex and may vary depending on a variety of factors.

For more such questions on Interest rates , click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30005476

#SPJ11

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Once authorized to prosecute the offence, a private prosecutor must continue to prosecute the case until the end of the trial, even if the authority has been revoked or otherwise withdrawn. Anyone may conduct the prosecution, either personally or through a pleader.

For a trial waiting in a Magistrate Court, the victim/complainant or his lawyer may conduct prosecution if the Magistrate Court allows it. If such permission is provided, the prosecution is going to be conducted entirely by the victim and his lawyer. This can occur even in cases instituted in the basis of a charge sheet filed by police; however, the limitation is that the case must be triable by a Magistrate (rather than a Sessions Court) and the Magistrate must permit it.

Thus, once authorized to prosecute the offence, a private prosecutor must continue to prosecute the case until the end of the trial, even if the authority has been revoked or otherwise withdrawn.

Learn more about prosecutor, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12057544

#SPJ2

While the researcher took steps to protect the student's privacy, he did not obtain parental consent or include the parents of the students in the survey.  This violates justice.

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is an administrative body established to protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.

The fundamental principles that the IRB uses to decide whether research involving human persons is ethical or not are respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.

When minors are involved, parental approval should be obtained by the researcher.  Research of this nature could indirectly exacerbate drug addiction and dependency instead of controlling them.

This is why the researcher should broaden it to parents so that their views could be incorporated into the study.

Thus, justice requires that everybody is treated fairly.  Parents of students should be involved in this study.

Learn more about the IRB principles at https://brainly.com/question/17340354

#SPJ1

You are on the IRB committee and need to determine if the project is ethical or not. Justify your answers below. Then, if you stated the project had an ethical violation, provide a way in which the researcher could modify the study to make it more ethical.

The statement "One of the unintended effects of the law might be that some people who earned 13 before working at job X no longer have job X if they have to be paid 20 an hour" is true.

One of the possible unintended effects of a minimum wage hike is that some people who previously earned less than the new minimum wage would lose their jobs because their employer could no longer afford to pay them the higher wage.

As a result, the employer might decide to hire fewer workers or rely more on automation or outsourcing. Furthermore, the employer could decide to raise prices to pay for the higher wages, which could result in a reduction in sales if customers opt to shop elsewhere or forgo buying the goods or services entirely.

To more know about unintended visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31714739

#SPJ11

The significance of the Jon Benet Ramsey case with the impact on law enforcement protocol is that it helped to establish the protocol that would be used in securing a crime scene so as not to have it contaminated by other people.

This was the homicide case of the lady named JonBennet that had been killed in what the law enforcement agents ruled as homicide. The cause of death that she had was from the fact that she was strangled and suffered from asphyxiation due to the act.

The issue that resulted was that her father contaminated the scene of the crime when he went to get hold of the victims body thereby making it difficult to get the suspect that committed the murder.

The major lesson that was learnt from this was the need to always secure the crime scene first and block people from having the entrance to such areas.

Read more on law enforcement protocol here: https://brainly.com/question/21082629

#SPJ1

Answer:

hearsay evidence

Explanation:

is an inadmissible unless it falls within an exception or exclusion in the court

Note that in the above situation, it is right to state that;

A. Brandon has committed a tort of negligence. Emily will have to prove that Brandon was negligent and that the negligence caused her injuries.

B. Brandon is an independent contractor. Best will not be liable for his actions unless they are found to be negligent in hiring him.

C. Best will argue that Brandon was not acting within the scope of his employment when he got into the fight.

A tort is a wrongful act or injury that causes harm to another person, for which the injured party can seek compensation in civil court.

Torts can be intentional or accidental and can include actions such as negligence, defamation, and battery.

Learn more about Liability:
https://brainly.com/question/18484315
#SPJ1

Yes, the other player can be charged with assault. However, in a sporting event, physical contact and aggression are expected.

Therefore, it is not always easy to determine the limits of physical contact that should be tolerated. Any act that goes beyond what is considered fair play is considered a violation of the law.

The intentional physical attack on another player or anyone else is considered an assault. A player could be found guilty of assault if it can be established that the act was premeditated or that the action was beyond what was acceptable in the context of the game.

The player who knocked out Marco's teeth could be held responsible for the assault if it can be established that the act was beyond what was acceptable in the context of the game.

To learn more about assault, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/30228356

#SPJ11

The reasons there are more private security than police are:

In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.

Find out more about private security at https://brainly.com/question/7203143.

Answer: Classical conditioning involves associating an involuntary response and a stimulus, while operant conditioning is about associating a voluntary behavior and a consequence. In respondent conditioning, the US could be an appetitive or aversive stimulus. For instance, in appetitive conditioning, the US would be something desirable such as candy which makes us happy. Other examples could include water, food, sex, or drugs. For example, when lab rats press a lever when a green light is on, they receive a food pellet as a reward. When they press the lever when a red light is on, they receive a mild electric shock. As a result, they learn to press the lever when the green light is on and avoid the red light.

Explanation:

The common law was imposed on the Commonwealth countries where the vast majority of legal systems in the Commonwealth were founded on English common law.

The common law is considered to be the law which is declared by the judges, derived from precedent and custom. Thus, it is said to originate with the legal reforms of King Henry II in the 12th century and was called “common” because it tend to apply equally across the whole country.

So, it is said that the vast majority of legal systems in the Commonwealth are founded on English common law. Where it is purely not the case, the system is applied in interlocked or parallel with other legal systems.

Hence, the English common law originated in the early Middle Ages.

To learn more about the common law here:

https://brainly.com/question/8476406

#SPJ1

The stop and frisk rule, also known as Terry stop, refers to a legal principle that allows law enforcement officers to briefly detain and pat down individuals if they have reasonable suspicion that the person may be involved in criminal activity.

The stop and frisk rule is based on the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

It allows law enforcement officers to stop individuals in a public place and conduct a limited search of their outer clothing if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is engaged in criminal activity and poses a threat to the safety of the officer or others.

The purpose of this rule is to enable officers to take necessary measures for self-defense and prevent potential crimes. However, the application of the stop and frisk rule has been a topic of debate, as concerns regarding racial profiling and abuse of power have been raised in some cases.

Visit here to learn more about self-defense:

brainly.com/question/26470189

#SPJ11

Answer:

This is false

Indeed, calista is an enthusiastic gun owner and a supporter of extensive gun ownership rights. yet, she is not a member of the national rifle association or any other interest groups that lobbies for the rights of gun owners.

Calista is free riding on the efforts of the national rifle association as well as other pro-gun interest groups and their members.

About National rifle association

The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) is a U.S.-based organisation that promotes gun rights. The contemporary NRA, which was originally founded in 1871 to enhance rifle marksmanship, is a well-known gun rights advocacy group that still promotes firearm competence and safety. Additionally, the company produces a number of periodicals and supports professional shooting competitions. The NRA claims that as of December 2018, it has approximately 5 million members, however this number has not been officially verified. One of the most powerful advocacy organisations in American politics is the NRA.

To know more about National rifle association:

brainly.com/question/14211008

#SPJ4

Answer:

The difference between common sense and science. Plainly stated common sense is information gathered from everyday knowledge and science is thorough research on a particular subject with concluded facts.

The reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its​ uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it,

Basically, a common sense means a conventional intelligence that people gathered from everyday situations, events etc.

Science mean a knowledge about our world based on facts learned through numerous experiments,  observation etc.

In conclusion, the reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its​ uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it.

Read more about Science

brainly.com/question/17216882

Answer:

during the "salutary neglect" British laws restricting colonies were poorly enforced

Explanation:

British laws on it's North American colonies restricted the colonies from having to trade with non British colonies and also other countries other than Britain. but these trade regulations was poorly enforced from the early to mid 18th century under then chief  minister  ROBERT WALPOLE  as long as the colonies remained loyal and contributed to the economic growth of the Britain

Answer:

Explanation:

The question has been raised as to whether the President is Commander in Chief of the Air Force established as a separate branch of the National Military? It is clear that the President is Commander in Chief of all the armed forces of the United States comprised within the national military establishment—the Air. Force as well as the Army and the Navy. Under the Constitution, the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy is the supreme military commander charged with the responsibility of protecting and defending the United States. The phrase “Army and Navy” is used in the Constitution as a means of describing all the armed forces of the United States. The fact that one branch of the armed forces is called the “Air Force,” a name not known when the Constitution was adopted, and the fact that the Congress has seen fit to separate the air arm of our armed forces from the land and sea arms cannot detract from the President’s authority as

Commander in Chief of all the armed forces : HAROLD I. BAYNTON

Acting Assistant to the Attorney General

I believe the two most important practices that should be incorporated into a security awareness policy are regular employee training and implementing multi-factor authentication.

The two most important practices to be included in a security awareness policy are:

1. Regular employee training: A security awareness policy should emphasize the importance of continuous education and training for all employees. This includes understanding the types of threats they may face, such as phishing attacks, malware, and social engineering. By conducting regular training sessions and providing up-to-date resources, employees will be better equipped to recognize and avoid potential security risks.

2. Implementing multi-factor authentication: Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is a security measure that requires users to provide two or more forms of identification before accessing a system or data. Incorporating MFA into a security awareness policy helps ensure that even if a password is compromised, unauthorized access is still prevented. By requiring employees to use MFA, the organization can significantly reduce the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access to sensitive information.

In summary, a security awareness policy should include regular employee training and the implementation of multi-factor authentication as key components to help protect the organization from potential security threats.

Learn more about Security awareness:

https://brainly.com/question/30301848

#SPJ11

Intrastate commerce, which refers to economic activities that occur within the boundaries of a single state, can indeed be regulated by the federal government if it has an impact on interstate commerce.

This authority stems from the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. The Supreme Court has recognized that intrastate activities can have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. This principle, known as the "substantial effects doctrine," allows the federal government to regulate intrastate activities if they have a substantial economic impact on interstate commerce or if they are part of a broader regulatory scheme addressing interstate commerce.

The rationale behind this approach is to ensure the uniformity of economic regulations and prevent states from enacting protectionist measures that could hinder the free flow of goods and services across state lines. By having the power to regulate intrastate commerce with interstate implications, the federal government can address potential disparities, promote fair competition, and maintain a cohesive national economic framework.

It is worth noting that the scope and extent of federal regulation in intrastate commerce have been subject to judicial interpretation and limitations to preserve the balance between federal and state powers. However, the ability of the federal government to regulate intrastate activities connected to interstate commerce remains an essential aspect of maintaining a unified national economy.

Know more about Interstate commerce here:

https://brainly.com/question/4656005

#SPJ8

The American Institute of Construction or the AIC do not have their own standard form of the construction contracts.

The correct option is option C.

A construction contract is basically a contract which is specifically negotiated for the purpose of construction of a particular asset or a combination of a few assets which are closely interrelated or are interdependent in the terms of their design, function, technology or their purpose or use.

A construction contract can possibly be negotiated for the construction of a single asset for example, a building, a bridge, a road, a dam etc. The American Institute of Construction do not have their own standard form of the construction contracts.

To know more about construction contract

https://brainly.com/question/15276606

#SPJ4

As an expert witness, a forensic scientist is ethically responsible for telling the whole truth. Forensic science is used in courts of law to investigate criminal offenses and civil lawsuits. Forensic science is the application of scientific knowledge and techniques to criminal and civil investigations and legal proceedings.

As an expert witness, a forensic scientist is called upon to provide specialized scientific knowledge and information to aid the court in deciding cases. Expert witnesses have an ethical obligation to tell the truth in their testimony, whether that testimony helps or hurts the prosecution or the defense.

Therefore, it is the duty of the forensic scientist to provide an accurate and unbiased assessment of the facts to the court, which is critical in ensuring justice is served. They should never deliberately lie or withhold information, which could potentially result in an innocent person being wrongfully convicted or a guilty person being allowed to go free.

To know more about Forensic visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/32330162

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

False. The statement is not accurate. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2019, state and federal courts convicted a combined total of 1.07 million adults on felony charges.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

The decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards is the lexicographic decision rule.

Lexicographic decision rule is a type of decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards.

The decision rule is often used in situations where a company is seeking to make a decision among a number of options that are all acceptable, but which differ in terms of their performance levels on various evaluative criteria.

In the lexicographic decision rule, the decision maker sets a minimum standard for each criterion and selects the option that performs best on the most important criterion, without considering the performance levels of the other criteria.

If there is a tie, the decision maker moves to the second most important criterion and selects the option that performs best on that criterion, and so on, until a decision is made. This rule is also known as the priority rule or the lexicographic ordering rule.

To know more about lexicographic decision rule, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29839779#

#SPJ11