PLZZZ HELP ME OUT........................ PLZZ​

Answer:

y<x+5

Step-by-step explanation:

Inequalities are just like equations with equals signs.

Using that y intercept you use on the graph you can input it as b in the y=mx+b slope intercept equation.

On this line, the y-intercept is 5. If it were a regular equation with the slope of 1. m=1 and b=5 the answer would be y=x+5. The inequality doesn't do much when looking at the graph (besides the shading) so the inequality is y<x+5.

— — — — — — — — — —

We can find the length of the missing side of the right triangle using the Pythagorean Theorem.

As you can see in the attached image, we are looking for b or the longer side/leg of the right triangle. (See the attached image for the right triangle.)

Using the formula c² = a² + b².

we let c=12.21 and a=7

By transposition/adding the additive inverse of 49.

The difference of 149.0841 - 49 is 100.084

Hence, the measures of the longer side/leg is 10 units.

— — — — — — — — — —

We can also find the longer leg of the right triangle using the formula

Substitute the given values of a and c to the given formula above, to get the unknown value (b).

_______________∞_______________

At maturity, using the U.S. rule, the interest calculated from the last partial payment is subtracted from beginning balance added to adjusted balance.

Here, we have,

The payment of money above the principal amount (the amount borrowed) at a predetermined rate to a lender or depositor by a borrower or deposit-taking financial institution is referred to as paying interest in the fields of finance and economics.

It is different from a fee that the borrower may pay to the lender or another entity.

It also differs from a dividend, which is money given to shareholders (owners) by a company from its profit or reserve, but not at a set rate predetermined beforehand, but rather on a pro rata basis as a portion of the rewards received by risk-taking businesspeople when revenue is earned that exceeds all costs.

To learn more about interest, visit:

brainly.com/question/26457073

#SPJ1

The equation for traveling x miles in the cab can be written as:

Cost = $0.60 + $0.14 * x. The cab charges $0.88 for a ride of 2 miles. And the cab charges $1.72 for a trip of 8 miles.

a. The equation for traveling x miles in the cab can be written as:

Cost = $0.60 + $0.14 * x

b. To find the number of miles for a cab ride that costs $0.88, we can set up the equation:

$0.88 = $0.60 + $0.14 * x

Subtracting $0.60 from both sides, we get:

$0.88 - $0.60 = $0.14 * x

$0.28 = $0.14 * x

Dividing both sides by $0.14, we find:

x = $0.28 / $0.14

x = 2 miles

Therefore, the cab charges $0.88 for a ride of 2 miles.

c. To calculate the cost of a trip of 8 miles, we can substitute x = 8 into the equation:

Cost = $0.60 + $0.14 * 8

Cost = $0.60 + $1.12

Cost = $1.72

Therefore, the cab charges $1.72 for a trip of 8 miles.

For more such questions on charges , Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30478263

#SPJ11

You can determine if the inverse of a polynomial function is a function by using the Horizontal Line Test on the inverse.

The Horizontal Line Test is a graphical method that can be used to determine whether a given function is one-to-one, meaning that for each output value, there is at most one input value that maps to it.

If the inverse of a polynomial function is a function, it must pass the Horizontal Line Test, meaning that no horizontal line intersects the graph of the inverse more than once.

In other words, if the inverse of a polynomial function passes the Horizontal Line Test, it is guaranteed to have an inverse, which will be a function itself. If the Horizontal Line Test fails, then the inverse is not a function and does not have an inverse.

To know more about Inverse function:

https://brainly.com/question/2541698

#SPJ4

The break-even quantity is 3 units. The profit for producing 470 units is $5624. 13 units must be produced for a profit of $120.here both cost and revenue are in dollars.

(a) To find the break-even quantity, we set the cost function C(x) equal to the revenue function R(x) and solve for x:

\(11x + 36 = 23x\)

\(36 = 12x\)

\(x = 3\)

Therefore, the break-even quantity is 3 units.

(b) The profit for producing 470 units can be calculated by subtracting the cost from the revenue:

\(Profit = Revenue - Cost\)

\(Profit = R(470) - C(470)\)

\(Profit = 23(470) - (11(470) + 36)\)

\(Profit = 10810 - 5186\)

\(Profit = $5624\)

The profit for producing 470 units is $5624.

(c) To find the number of units that must be produced for a profit of $120, we set the profit equation equal to $120 and solve for x:

\(Profit = Revenue - Cost\)

\($120 = R(x) - C(x)\)

\($120 = 23x - (11x + 36)\)

\($120 = 12x - 36\)

\(12x = 156\)

\(x = 13\)

Therefore, 13 units must be produced for a profit of $120.

Learn more about profit here:

https://brainly.com/question/12634106

#SPJ11

Answer:

The supplementary angle of the first angle is 180 degrees minus the measure of the angle, which would be 156 degrees. The supplementary angle of the second angle is 180 degrees, so the sum of the two supplementary angles is 336 degrees.

According to the concept of inverse function, the domain of the function is explained below.

The term inverse function is defined as a function which is a square of a linear function.

Here we have know that we will restrict the domain of the function so that the function is one to one.

And then we will find the inverse and then we will find the domain of the inverse function.

Here we have given that the function is not one-to-one and then delete part of the domain so that the function that remains is one-to-one.

As we all know that a function is the set of inputs accepted by the function.

To know mire about function here.

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ4

Answer:

C = 12 + 1.5t

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$12 + x = y

Step-by-step explanation:

x = number of topping

y = total cost of pizza

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

(4, 3 )

Step-by-step explanation:

2x - 4y = - 4 → (1)

2x + y = 11 → (2)

subtract (2) from (1) term by term to eliminate x

(2x - 2x) + (- 4y - y) = - 4 - 11

0 - 5y = - 15

- 5y = - 15 ( divide both sides by - 5 )

y = 3

substitute y = 3 into either of the 2 equations and solve for x

substituting into (2)

2x + 3 = 11 ( subtract 3 from both sides )

2x = 8 ( divide both sides by 2 )

x = 4

solution is (4, 3 )

Answer:

The population of Lake Ronkonkoma is approximately 2 × 10^4 people, and the population of New York City is approximately 8 × 10^6 people. To find out how many times as great the population of New York City is compared to Lake Ronkonkoma, we need to divide the population of New York City by the population of Lake Ronkonkoma:

Population of New York City / Population of Lake Ronkonkoma = (8 × 10^6) / (2 × 10^4)

Simplifying the expression by canceling out the common factor of 10^4, we get:

Population of New York City / Population of Lake Ronkonkoma = (8 × 10^2) / 2

Dividing 8 by 2, we get:

Population of New York City / Population of Lake Ronkonkoma = 4

Therefore, the population of New York City is 4 times as great as the population of Lake Ronkonkoma.

(Please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest and a follow to my account would be really helpful.)

Answer:

Using the Pythagorean theorem:

c^2 = a^2 + b^2

where c is the length of the hypotenuse and a and b are the lengths of the other two sides.

Plugging in the given values:

c^2 = 48^2 + 14^2

c^2 = 2304 + 196

c^2 = 2500

Taking the square root of both sides:

c = √2500

c ≈ 50

Therefore, the length of the hypotenuse is about 50 cm (rounded to the nearest tenth).

The scale that Desmond used in the drawing is 11 inches : 4 feet

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Actual length of shopping center is 64 feet long

Scale length of shopping center is 176 inches long

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Scale = Scale length : Actual length

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Scale = 176 inches : 64 feet

Simplify the ration

Scale = 11 inches : 4 feet

Hence, the scale that Desmond used in the drawing is 11 inches : 4 feet

Read more about scale drawing at

https://brainly.com/question/29229124

#SPJ1

You can substitute the value of x into the formula to calculate the probability for any specific number of no-change audits.

To determine the probability that the sample has a specific number of no-change audits, we can use the binomial probability formula.

The binomial probability formula is given by:

\(P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^{(n - k)}\)

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of having exactly k successes (in this case, no-change audits),

n is the sample size,

k is the number of successes,

p is the probability of success in a single trial (in this case, the probability of a no-change audit), and

C(n, k) is the binomial coefficient, also known as "n choose k," which represents the number of ways to choose k successes from n trials.

In this scenario, n = 200 (sample size) and p = 0.9 (probability of no-change audit). We want to calculate the probability of having a specific number of no-change audits. Let's say we want to find the probability of having x no-change audits.

\(P(X = x) = C(200, x) * 0.9^x * (1 - 0.9)^{(200 - x)}\)

Now, let's calculate the probability of having a specific number of no-change audits for different values of x. For example, if we want to find the probability of having exactly 180 no-change audits:

\(P(X = 180) = C(200, 180) * 0.9^{180} * (1 - 0.9)^{(200 - 180)}\)

To know more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer: No.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 x 5 = 15,

but 10 x 5 = 50.

In order for the ratios to be equivalent, they would have to be written like this:

3/10 = 15/50

Therefore, it is not equivalent.

Hope this helps!

Logistic Regression is preferred over Linear Regression for classification problems for several reasons.

Firstly, the predicted values in Logistic Regression are much more interpretable as they lie in the range of 0 to 1, which represents the probability of a certain outcome occurring. In contrast, Linear Regression predicts continuous values which are difficult to interpret as probabilities.
Secondly, the sigmoid curve used in Logistic Regression fits the data better than a straight line used in Linear Regression. This is because the sigmoid curve captures the non-linear relationships between the input variables and the output variable, which is often the case in classification problems.
Lastly, Logistic Regression uses maximum likelihood estimation to estimate parameters, whereas Linear Regression minimizes the mean squared error. Maximum likelihood estimation is a more appropriate method for estimating parameters in classification problems as it takes into account the binary nature of the output variable. Linear Regression, on the other hand, does not consider this binary nature and may not produce accurate results in classification problems.

In summary, Logistic Regression is preferred over Linear Regression for classification problems because of its interpretable predicted values, better fit to non-linear relationships, and appropriate method of estimating parameters using maximum likelihood estimation.

We prefer Logistic Regression over Linear Regression for classification problems for the following reasons:

1) Predicted values in Logistic Regression are more interpretable as they lie in the range of 0 to 1, representing probabilities of class membership, while Linear Regression predicts continuous values which may not directly indicate class membership.

2) The sigmoid curve in Logistic Regression fits the data better for classification problems, as it represents a natural threshold between classes, while a straight line from Linear Regression may not provide clear separation between classes.

3) Logistic Regression uses maximum likelihood estimation to estimate parameters, which makes it more suitable for classification problems as it finds the best fit for the probability of class membership. Linear Regression minimizes the mean squared error, which focuses on minimizing the distance between predicted and actual values, but does not directly optimize for class membership probabilities.

Learn more about Linear Regression:

brainly.com/question/29665935

#SPJ11

Answer: 1 mile=1609.34 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply the mile amount by 1609.

Answer:

1.  Y = -1/4x + 1

3. Y = 2/5x + 1

5. Y = 4/5x + 5

7. Y = -x + 5

9. Y = -5/2x - 16

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the slope using the formula

Use the slope and one of the points to find the y-intercept

Once you know the value for m and the value for b, you can plug these into the slope-intercept form of a line (y = mx + b) to get the equation for the line.

R follows a geometric distribution with parameter p, the probability of either aaron or baron getting heads in a given round.

The number of rounds r follows a geometric distribution with parameter p, the probability of either aaron or baron getting heads in a given round. This is because the probability of r rounds occurring before either aaron or baron gets heads is equal to p^r, where p is the probability of either one of them getting heads in a given round. The probability of a tie is equal to p^2.

The geometric distribution is a discrete probability distribution that models the number of successes that occur in a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials before a specified (non-random) number of failures occur. The geometric distribution is the only discrete memoryless probability distribution, meaning that the probability of success in the next trial is independent of the previous outcomes. In the case of aaron and baron's coin game, the geometric distribution can be used to model the number of rounds that will occur before either aaron or baron gets heads. The probability of a given number of rounds occurring before either aaron or baron gets heads is equal to p^r, where p is the probability of either one of them getting heads in a given round. The probability of a tie is equal to p^2. Therefore, the number of rounds r follows a geometric distribution with parameter p.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

four billion two hundred fifty-eight million one hundred forty-five thousand three hundred ninety-seven

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Word form-

four billion, two hundred fifty-eight million, one hundred forty-five thousand, three hundred ninety-seven.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

dil krai chu chai chu chai chuu

In the above scenario, the best option would be to purchase two of the 4' x 2' x 2' oval tanks for a total cost of $280. Note that this is a decision making math prompt.

To determine which stock tank to purchase, we need to calculate the total volume of water required for the 82 calves and compare it to the volume of each tank. We can use the following formula to calculate the volume of a rectangular tank:

Volume = length x width x height

For the oval tanks, we need to break the tank down into a rectangle and two semi-circles, and then use the formula:

Volume = (length x width x height of rectangle) + (π x radius^2 x height of semi-circle)

Let's start by calculating the total water requirement for the 82 calves:

Total water requirement = 82 calves x 5 gal/head/day = 410 gallons/day

To determine the volume of each tank, we can use the formulas above and convert the result to gallons using the given conversion factor:

Using the given conversion factor, we can convert the volumes to gallons:

Based on the calculations, the 8' x 2' round tank has the largest volume and can hold enough water for the 82 calves. However, it is also the most expensive option at $500.

If cost is a consideration, we could purchase two of the 4' x 2' x 2' oval tanks for a total cost of $280, which can hold a total of 334.2 gallons, more than enough for the 410 gallons/day requirement. This would save us $220 compared to the round tank.

Therefore, the best option would be to purchase two of the 4' x 2' x 2' oval tanks for a total cost of $280.

Learn more about Decision Making at:

https://brainly.com/question/13244895

#SPJ1

Answer:

All of the above

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 4320 by 3, 9, and 10 and see if you have a real number. (There's also a rule for finding this, but I can't remember TwT)

4320/3=1440

4320/9=480

4320/10=432

-hope it helps

Answer:

9811

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The set of counting numbers, their opposites, and 0 is the set of integers. Integers are counting numbers, their opposites, and zero.

Step-by-step explanation:

To minimize the total area of an equilateral triangle and square, the side length of the square should be 2.167 and the side length of the triangle should be 3.833.

To find the dimensions that minimize the total area, we can set up equations based on the given information. Let's denote the side length of the square as 's' and the side length of the equilateral triangle as 't'. The perimeter of the square is 4s, and the perimeter of the equilateral triangle is 3t. Given that the combined perimeter is 13, we have the equation 4s + 3t = 13.

To minimize the total area, we need to consider the formulas for the areas of the square and equilateral triangle. The area of the square is given by A_square = \(s^2\), and the area of the equilateral triangle is given by A_triangle = (\(\sqrt{(3)}\)/4) *\(t^2\).

To find the values that minimize the total area, we can substitute s = (13 - 3t)/4 into the equation for A_square and solve for t. By finding the derivative of the total area with respect to t and setting it equal to zero, we can find the value of t that minimizes the area.

Similarly, to find the dimensions that maximize the total area, we follow the same process but this time maximize the total area by finding the value of t that maximizes the area.

Performing the calculations, we find that to minimize the total area, the side length of the square is approximately 2.167 and the side length of the triangle is approximately 3.833. To maximize the total area, the side length of the square is approximately 4.333 and the side length of the triangle is approximately 1.667.

Learn more about equilateral triangle here:

https://brainly.com/question/30176141

#SPJ11

The ordered pair which represents the points D is (-4, -4). So option A is correct.

Every point in a plane using a Cartesian coordinate system is uniquely identified by a pair of numerical coordinates.

Given here : the Point D in the graph.

An ordered pair of numbers, known as an x-coordinate and a y-coordinate respectively, can be used to represent each point in a graph. Parentheses are used to indicate ordered pairings (x-coordinate, y-coordinate).

The starting point is at (0,0).

It is easy to see that the point D is located to the right of the x-axis, -4 units and -4 points from the y-axis, respectively.

In the coordinate plane, it is likewise located in the third quadrant.

Hence, The point must be (-4,-4)

To know  more about co-ordinate system here:

brainly.com/question/29762404

#SPJ1

Answer:

5^43

Step-by-step explanation:

[5² . 5² . 5³. 125 . 125³ ]³ : [25² . 5² . 5]² =

= [5² . 5² . 5³. 5³ . (5³)³ ]³ : [(5²)² . 5² . 5]²

= [5² . 5² . 5³. 5³ . 5^9 ]³ : [5^4 . 5² . 5]²

= [5^19]³ : [5^7]²

= 5^57 : 5^14

= 5^43