Please help me correct this!!

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation:

C is the only statement that is correct

it's all based on negative numbers :)

Answer:

34, 15, -4, -23 and -42

Step-by-step explanation:

We are to find the first five sequence

when n = 1

f(2) = f(1) - 19

f(2) = 34 - 19

f(2) = 15

when n = 2

f(2+1) = f(2) - 19

f(3) = f(2) - 19

f(3) = 15 - 19

f(3) = -4

when n = 3

f(3+1) = f(3) - 19

f(4) = f(3) - 19

f(4) = -4 - 19

f(4) = -23

when n = 4

f(4+1) = f(4) - 19

f(5) = f(4) - 19

f(5) = -23 - 19

f(5) = -42

Hence the first five terms  in the arithmetic sequence are 34, 15, -4, -23 and -42

We have shown that P(N < aJ) ≤ 1 - J for nonnegative values aj.N is a nonnegative integer-valued random variable

To prove the given inequality, let's start by defining the indicator random variable Ij, which takes the value 1 if aj ≤ N and 0 otherwise.

We have:

Ij = {1 if aj ≤ N; 0 if aj > N}

Now, we can express the expectation E(Ij) in terms of the probabilities P(aj ≤ N):

E(Ij) = 1 * P(aj ≤ N) + 0 * P(aj > N)

= P(aj ≤ N)

Since N is a nonnegative integer-valued random variable, its probability distribution can be written as:

P(N = n) = P(N ≤ n) - P(N ≤ n-1)

Using this notation, we can rewrite the expectation E(Ij) as:

E(Ij) = P(aj ≤ N) = P(N ≥ aj) = 1 - P(N < aj)

Now, let's consider the sum of the expectations over all values of j:

∑ E(Ij) = ∑ (1 - P(N < aj))

Expanding the sum, we have:

∑ E(Ij) = ∑ 1 - ∑ P(N < aj)

Since ∑ 1 = J (the total number of values of j) and ∑ P(N < aj) = P(N < aJ), we can write:

∑ E(Ij) = J - P(N < aJ)

Now, let's look at the expectation E(∑ Ij):

E(∑ Ij) = E(I1 + I2 + ... + IJ)

By linearity of expectation, we have:

E(∑ Ij) = E(I1) + E(I2) + ... + E(IJ)

Since the indicator random variables Ij are identically distributed, their expectations are equal, and we can write:

E(∑ Ij) = J * E(I1)

From the earlier derivation, we know that E(Ij) = P(aj ≤ N). Therefore:

E(∑ Ij) = J * P(a1 ≤ N) = J * P(N ≥ a1) = J * (1 - P(N < a1))

Combining the expressions for E(∑ Ij) and ∑ E(Ij), we have:

J - P(N < aJ) = J * (1 - P(N < a1))

Rearranging the terms, we get:

P(N < aJ) = 1 - J * (1 - P(N < a1))

Since 1 - P(N < a1) ≤ 1, we can conclude that:

P(N < aJ) ≤ 1 - J

Therefore, we have shown that P(N < aJ) ≤ 1 - J for nonnegative values aj.

Learn more about Probabilities here,https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Since x > 0, the tangent of f'(x) is always positive, and the denominator is always positive. Therefore, f'(x) is always positive, which means that f(x) is always increasing and can only cross the x-axis once. Hence, f(x) has only one root on its entire domain.

To find the y-intercept of line L, we need to determine the equation of line L.

Since line L is tangent to the graph of y = ex at the point (k, ek), the slope of line L must be equal to the slope of the tangent line to y = ex at (k, ek), which is simply ek.

Therefore, the equation of line L is:

y - ek = ek(x - k)

Simplifying, we get:

y = ekx - ek2

To find the y-intercept, we set x = 0 and solve for y:

y = ek(0) - ek2 = -ek2

Therefore, the y-intercept of line L is -ek2.

We need to find the value of k such that the y-intercept of line L is 1/2.

-ek2 = 1/2

Solving for k, we get:

k = ln(sqrt(2))

So the answer is (A) 0.405.

To prove that the function has only one root on its entire domain, we take the derivative of f(x) and show that it is always positive.

f(x) = ln(x) - 1/x

f'(x) = 1/x + 1/x^2 = (x+1)/x^2

To know more about tangent,

https://brainly.com/question/30146742

#SPJ11

Bayesian regression with undirected network predictors offers a powerful framework for analyzing brain connectome data and gaining a deeper understanding of the relationships between brain connectivity and various outcomes of interest.

Bayesian regression with undirected network predictors refers to a statistical modeling approach that combines Bayesian inference principles with regression analysis when the predictors are represented as an undirected network. This approach is particularly useful when dealing with data that has a network structure, such as brain connectome data.

In the context of brain connectome data, a connectome represents the structural or functional connectivity between different regions or nodes of the brain. Each node can be seen as a predictor variable, and the relationships between nodes are represented by edges in the network.

Bayesian regression allows for flexible modeling of the relationships between predictors and the response variable, taking into account uncertainty in the parameter estimates. By incorporating the network structure of the predictors, Bayesian regression with undirected network predictors can capture complex dependencies and interactions among brain regions, providing insights into the relationships between brain connectivity and the outcome of interest.

To know more about undirected network,

https://brainly.com/question/33196438

#SPJ11

Answer:

B) 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The (-) represents a flip over the X-Axis.

The |X-5| represents a Horizontal shift right because it's in between the parenthesis.

The 3 represents a positive vertical shift upwards.

The given equation is

We multiply 8 by each term in the bracket on the right side

Then we used the distributive property

The answer is D

Answer:

1. f(x)=18X +100

2:108

3. 7.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-i

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

30,200$

Step-by-step explanation:

3 times 17 is 51 which is interesting and 1.51 times 20,000 is 30,200$.

Answer:

the answer is (a) 28.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given situation can be represented by a linear equation of the form:

Cost = mx + b

where "m" is the slope (the rate of change of cost with respect to time), "x" is the number of hours of the tour, and "b" is the y-intercept (the cost when x = 0).

In this case, the y-intercept is $60, which represents the one-time fee. The cost increases by $28 per hour, so the slope is:

m = $28/hour

Therefore, the answer is (a) 28.

If cholesterol level were changed to being measured in grams instead of milligrams, the correlation between fat content and cholesterol level would not be affected.

This is because correlation is a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables, and converting the units of measurement does not change the underlying relationship between the variables. So, the correlation coefficient of 0.75 would remain the same whether cholesterol level is measured in milligrams or grams.

The correlation between fat content and cholesterol level for the 20 different brands of American cheese slices is 0.75. If you change the measurement of cholesterol level from milligrams to grams (1 gram = 1000 milligrams), it will not affect the correlation. The correlation coefficient will remain 0.75, as it is unit-less and only represents the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables.

Visit here to learn more about correlation coefficient  : https://brainly.com/question/27226153
#SPJ11

Answer:

y=x-6

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) The mean of Z in case (a) is -60 and the variance is 400.

(b) The mean of Z in case (b) is 280 and the variance is 3600.

(c) The mean of Z in case (c) is 60 and the variance is 65.

(d) The mean of Z in case (d) is -20 and the variance is 65.

(e) The mean of Z in case (e) is 80 and the variance is 505.

To find the mean and variance of the random variable Z for each case, we can use the properties of means and variances.

(a) Z = 40 - 5X

Mean of Z:

E(Z) = E(40 - 5X) = 40 - 5E(X) = 40 - 5 * 20 = 40 - 100 = -60

Variance of Z:

Var(Z) = Var(40 - 5X) = Var(-5X) = (-5)² * Var(X) = 25 * Var(X) = 25 * (4)² = 25 * 16 = 400

Therefore, the mean of Z in case (a) is -60 and the variance is 400.

(b) Z = 15X - 20

Mean of Z:

E(Z) = E(15X - 20) = 15E(X) - 20 = 15 * 20 - 20 = 300 - 20 = 280

Variance of Z:

Var(Z) = Var(15X - 20) = Var(15X) = (15)² * Var(X) = 225 * Var(X) = 225 * (4)² = 225 * 16 = 3600

Therefore, the mean of Z in case (b) is 280 and the variance is 3600.

(c) Z = X + Y

Mean of Z:

E(Z) = E(X + Y) = E(X) + E(Y) = 20 + 40 = 60

Variance of Z:

Var(Z) = Var(X + Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y) = (4)² + (7)² = 16 + 49 = 65

Therefore, the mean of Z in case (c) is 60 and the variance is 65.

(d) Z = X - Y

Mean of Z:

E(Z) = E(X - Y) = E(X) - E(Y) = 20 - 40 = -20

Variance of Z:

Var(Z) = Var(X - Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y) = (4)² + (7)² = 16 + 49 = 65

Therefore, the mean of Z in case (d) is -20 and the variance is 65.

(e) Z = -2X + 3Y

Mean of Z:

E(Z) = E(-2X + 3Y) = -2E(X) + 3E(Y) = -2 * 20 + 3 * 40 = -40 + 120 = 80

Variance of Z:

Var(Z) = Var(-2X + 3Y) = (-2)² * Var(X) + (3)² * Var(Y) = 4 * 16 + 9 * 49 = 64 + 441 = 505

Therefore, the mean of Z in case (e) is 80 and the variance is 505.

Learn more about Mean and Variance at

brainly.com/question/29253308

#SPJ4

A correlation measures the strength, direction, and form of the relationship between two variables, x and y. The strength of the relationship refers to how closely the variables are related, with values ranging from -1 to 1.

A value of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, the other decreases. A value of 1 indicates a perfect positive correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, the other also increases. A value of 0 indicates no correlation, meaning that the variables are not related.

The direction of the relationship refers to whether the variables move in the same direction or opposite directions. A positive correlation indicates that the variables move in the same direction, meaning that as one variable increases, so does the other.

A negative correlation indicates that the variables move in opposite directions, meaning that as one variable increases, the other decreases.

The form of the relationship refers to the pattern of the relationship between the variables. The form can be linear, meaning that the relationship between the variables can be described by a straight line, or nonlinear, meaning that the relationship between the variables cannot be described by a straight line.

Nonlinear relationships can take various forms, such as quadratic, logarithmic, or exponential. The form of the relationship can have important implications for interpreting the correlation coefficient and making predictions based on the relationship between the variables.

To learn more about correlation click here:

brainly.com/question/29985055

#SPJ11

Answer: The population would be a total of 8,800 people.

Step-by-step explanation: Currently speaking, a town's population is 1,100 people in total.  Since it doubles every 60 years, it would double 3 times in total, because 180 / 60 equals 3.  2 x 1,100, then 2 x 2,200, and then 2x 4,400, gives you 8,800.

Have a great day! :)

Answer: see the image man

Step-by-step explanation: I Have tried my best to solve it .  Hope it helps .

The required bigger triangle is dilated with a scale factor of 3/7 to form a smaller triangle.

The scale factor is defined as the ratio of the modified change in length to the original length.

here,
To determine the scale factor for the given figure we have to determine the ratio of any corresponding sides,

So,
Scale factor = 12/28
Scale factor = 3/7

Thus, the required bigger triangle is dilated with a scale factor of 3/7 to form a smaller triangle.

Learn more about Scale factors here:

https://brainly.com/question/22312172

#SPJ1

The image in the question is missing, so the image attached is the suggested image of the solution given above.

Using an exponential equation, it is found that the estimate for the park's  elephant population for the year 2020 is of 12967.

An increasing exponential equation is modeled by:

\(A(t) = A(0)(1 + r)^t\)

In which:

In this problem:

Then:

\(A(t) = 8350(1 + 0.045)^t\)

\(A(t) = 8350(1.045)^t\)

2020 is 10 years after 2010, hence, we have to find A(10).

\(A(10) = 8350(1.045)^{10} = 12967\)

The estimate for the park's  elephant population for the year 2020 is of 12967.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/22733028

Answer:

x = 34

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of the three angles is 180 since they make a straight line

x+12 + 100 +x = 180

Combine like terms

2x+112=180

Subtract 112 from each side

2x+112-112= 180-112

2x = 68

Divide by 2

2x/2 =68/2

x = 34

Answer: x=34

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

f(-2) = 0

General Formulas and Concepts:
Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Algebra I

Functions

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

Identify given function.

f(x) = x² - 4

Step 2: Find f(-2)

∴ the function when x = -2 is equal to 0.

---

Learn more about Algebra I: https://brainly.com/question/15995023

---

Topic: Algebra I

Answer:300 m

Step-by-step explanation:

To represent the rolling of two dice and the events A and B, a probability tree diagram can be used. The diagram will illustrate the possible outcomes and their associated probabilities.

The probability tree diagram for rolling two dice and events A and B can be constructed as follows:

```

       1/6         1/6

    ------------ ------------

   |   A: 1/6   |   A: 1/6   |

1   |            |            |

   |            |            |

   ------------ ------------

        5/6         5/6

    ------------ ------------

   |   A: 5/6   |   A: 5/6   |

2   |            |            |

   |            |            |

   ------------ ------------

      B: 1/6     B: 1/6

```

In the diagram, the top level represents the possible outcomes of the first die roll, which can result in either a 1 or a 2 with equal probabilities of 1/6 each. From each outcome, two branches represent the possible outcomes of the second die roll. The left branch represents the event A, where the first die is a four, and the right branch represents the event B, where the second die is a four. Each branch is labeled with the corresponding probability.

This probability tree diagram visually represents the probabilities associated with the rolling of two dice and the events A and B, helping to illustrate the different outcomes and their likelihoods.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Hello ;)

I'm assuming the question is to find the slope so here ya go

Answer:

2/1

Let's solve the following equation to see where Maya made a mistake:

2 (3x + 6) = 3 (x - 10)

Step 1: Solving parenthesis

6x + 12 = 3x - 30

Step 2: Like terms

6x - 3x = -30 - 12

Step 3: Complete the subtractions at both sides

3x = -42

Step 4: Dividing by 3 at both sides

3x/3 = -42/3

x = -14

Maya didn't multiply correctly 3 * - 10

Yes, Javionery, option B is the correct one.

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Solution,

X = 16 [ Given]

Now,

\(x - ( - 20)\)

Plugging the value of X

\(16 - ( - 20)\)

\( = 16 + 20\)

\( = 36\)

Hope this helps..

Good luck on your assignment..

The image is missing, we have attached the image.

Answer: The of getting an even number in first and an odd number second is 1/4 or 0.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

Total number of outcomes = 36

We have to find the probability of rolling an even number first and an odd number second.

Solution,

Firstly we will find out the possible outcomes;

(2,1)(2,3)(2,5)(4,1)(4,3)(4,5)(6,1)(6,3)(6,5)

So the total number of outcomes = 9

Now according to the formula of probability, which is;

P(E)= total number of possible outcomes/total number of outcomes

Now on putting the values, we get;

P(of getting an even number in first and an odd number second)= 9/36 = 1/4 =0.25

Hence The of getting an even number in first and an odd number second is

1/4 or 0.25.

Hope this help

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

What is the question? Please explain further and I will help answer in the comment.

Step-by-step explanation: