Undue influence happens when one person has the ability to convince another's judgments because of the two parties' connection.
The more powerful individual utilizes this advantage to compel the less powerful individual into making decisions that may not be in their best interests in the long run. This disparity in power might taint one party's consent since they are unable to freely express their own will.
The influencing individual is frequently able to take advantage of the weaker party while exerting excessive influence. A party claiming to be the victim of undue influence may be able to nullify the terms of the agreement under contract law.
To learn more about undue influence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14191547
#SPJ4
State constitutions also establish their own procedures for amending their state constitutions.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The special Constitution alteration procedures used by States are: a State-wide referendum, special majorities in the Parliament. an absolute majority (or, in other words, a majority of the total number of the members of the House concerned: a two/thirds majority, or a combination of the two.
the greatest factor in controlling the use of unwarranted police brutality is/are?
The greatest factor in controlling the use of unwarranted police brutality is proper training and accountability.
To effectively control the use of unwarranted police brutality, two key factors come into play: proper training and accountability. Firstly, providing police officers with comprehensive training that emphasizes de-escalation techniques, cultural sensitivity, and implicit bias awareness is crucial. This equips them with the necessary skills to handle challenging situations without resorting to excessive force. Secondly, accountability mechanisms, such as independent oversight, body cameras, and rigorous internal investigations, play a vital role in holding officers accountable for their actions.
By ensuring transparency and consequences for misconduct, the likelihood of unwarranted police brutality is reduced. Together, these factors contribute to creating a culture of responsible policing that aims to protect and serve the community while respecting the rights and dignity of all individuals.
You can learn more about police brutality at
https://brainly.com/question/19598900
#SPJ11
how many members of the house of representatives are up for re-election each election cycle?
All 435 members of the United States House of Representatives are up for re-election in every election cycle. The House of Representatives has a two-year term, so all members of the House must stand for election every two years.
This is in contrast to the United States Senate, where only one-third of the members are up for election in any given election cycle. The staggered terms of Senators means that the Senate has a more gradual turnover of membership, while the House experiences a complete turnover of membership every two years. This design of the legislative branch of the US government reflects the founders' intention to create a more responsive and democratic House of Representatives that is more closely tied to the will of the people.
To know more about Representatives click here:
brainly.com/question/13246446
#SPJ4
general principles of insurance law
Answer:
almost good faith
insurable interest
contribution
Explanation:
please follow me
the basis for zoning and other land use control laws is:
The basis for zoning and other land use control laws is to regulate and control the use and development of land in order to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
Zoning laws typically divide a jurisdiction, such as a city or county, into different zones or districts, each with specific permitted uses, restrictions, and requirements. This helps to ensure that incompatible land uses are separated and that the overall character and quality of the community are preserved. Zoning laws may also regulate factors such as building heights, setbacks, parking requirements, and other aspects of development.
Other land use control laws, such as environmental regulations and building codes, also serve to protect public health, safety, and welfare by regulating the impact of development on the environment and ensuring that buildings are constructed to meet certain standards for safety and quality.
Learn more about development here:
https://brainly.com/question/28011228
#SPJ11
Attic Dwellers Sometimes, animals like rats, mice, and squirrels will climb into an attic. They like to chew on things. It is not good if they decide to chew on electrical wires. If they do, this can cause a fire. So, it is important to make it hard for these animals to get under your roof. Some people try to get rid of these unwanted house guests by putting out mouse traps in the attic. Others might call an exterminator. This is a person who comes to someone's house to get rid of these animals. 2 An exterminator is a person who goes to someone's house to get rid of rats and mice. Why would someone want to call an exterminator to go into the attic? A. to tell the rats and mice to leave the attic B. to feed the rats and mice in the attic C. to keep the house from catching on fire D. to cut the electrical wires in the house
Answer:
C. to keep the house from catching on fire
Explanation:
Rats pose a problem when they enter into a house. Apart from damage they cause by eating food and chewing furniture and other items, a particularly dangerous activity is chewing of wires.
When rats chew wires the negative and positive wires can touch and cause fire.
An exterminator is a person that gets rid of unwanted pests in a house.
In this scenario the exterminator is called to get rid of the rats that chew wires. This is a way to prevent fire outbreak.
So the main reason the home owner calls the exterminator is to keep the house from catching on fire
two things about "i've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck"
1. implying that nixon's denial of the watergate break in is hard to believe
2. attorney general mitchell would support nixon
The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.
Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.
To know more about Nixon's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1131063
#SPJ11
The house voted on tuesday to start a wide-ranging investigation into federal law enforcement and national security agencies over claims of what?
The house voted on Tuesday on forming a subcommittee for investigation on " weaponization" of federal agencies.
The members of the new subcommittee will have power to investigate against the federal law enforcement and national security agencies. The subcommittee's purpose is said to be investigating federal investigators, who are accused for the illegal, unconstitutional and unethical activities.
Republicans claims that this committee could act similar to a senate intelligence committee, which could review the intelligence related materials collected by the Government. Conservatives want to have their representatives in the committee.
So the house voted to start an investigation over federal agencies over claims of weaponization and similar allegations.
For further information regarding the Subcommittees, kindly refer
https://brainly.com/question/14450970
#SPJ4
best way to write a letter for Long-Term disability appeal
The best way to write a letter for long-term disability is to emphasize claims of disability and attaching medical records acting as evidence.
What is a long-term disability appeal?Long-term disability insurance is a form of coverage that pays out if an employee is unable to work for an extended length of time due to an accident, illness, or injury. This sort of insurance pays the employee a percentage of their salary while they are out of the office.
While writing a disability claim it is important to mention all the facts related to a medical condition and why the insurance company denied the fact. It should include all the documents proving your claim for the disability.
Learn more about long-term disability appeal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27571970
#SPJ1
Compliance quiz february 2022
A compliance program plan creates a process on taking complaints on the agency and all employees; is this true or false?
The best option is True. A compliance program plan outlines the policies and procedures that an agency or organization follows to ensure that it meets all regulatory and legal requirements.
One of the key components of such a plan is the process for taking complaints from employees and other stakeholders. This process should be clearly defined and communicated to all employees, so that they know how to report any concerns or violations of compliance policies. The compliance program plan should also include a system for investigating and resolving complaints, with appropriate disciplinary measures if necessary. By establishing a robust complaint process, an agency can promote transparency and accountability, and demonstrate a commitment to ethical and legal behavior. Ultimately, a strong compliance program plan helps to protect an agency from legal and financial risks, while fostering a culture of compliance and ethical conduct.
to know about legal requirements visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12497536
#SPJ11
A state law that violates the U.S. Constitution:
O Can be enforced by that state's government only.
O Can be enforced by the United States Supreme Court only.
o Can be enforced by the federal gchernment only.
Cannot be enforced.
Answer:
Not sure, but this helps! :)
Explanation:
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
Ivan met with his friend Anthony, who was driving a flashy new red convertible. Ivan knew that neither Anthony nor his family owned this car, but it looked good, so he got in and let Anthony take him for a ride. Ivan also knew that Anthony used drugs and sometimes took other people's things and sold them to get money to buy cocaine. Anthony offered to sell Ivan an MP3 player he had in the back seat of the car for $40. Ivan agreed to pay him the money.
a. Have any crimes been committed? If so, which crimes and by whom?
b. Why does society make receiving stolen property a crime? Should it be?
c. Would you ever buy something for an extremely low price from a friend? How would you know for sure it was not stolen?
Yes, a crime was committed as Anthony used drugs and sometimes took other people's things and sold them to get money to buy cocaine. This was a crime of theft.
The crime of receiving a stolen property is defined as knowingly receiving the stolen property with the sole intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property stolen. So, receiving of stolen property is a crime.
So, this tends to prevent concealing of a property by a particular person who thus know that such property is thus obtained by an illegal way. Suppose if an item is sold by at a very low price so the item can be stolen. Thus, this is an act of crime which is called theft.
Hence, handling stolen goods is a crime.
To learn more about theft here:
https://brainly.com/question/17224809
#SPJ1
this defense requires a jury to divide up the proportion of negligence committed by the parties in terms of percentage
The defense that requires a jury to divide up the proportion of negligence committed by the parties in terms of percentage is called "comparative negligence." Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine used to determine responsibility and damages in personal injury cases.
It is a defense used by the defendant, which asserts that the plaintiff was partially or wholly responsible for the damages suffered, and thus the defendant should only be held liable for the percentage of damages that they caused. Comparative negligence requires a jury to apportion liability between the plaintiff and defendant based on their respective degrees of fault.
The jury is asked to determine the percentage of negligence attributed to each party, and damages are awarded based on that percentage. In states that follow pure comparative negligence, a plaintiff can still recover damages even if they were found to be 99% at fault, but their damages will be reduced by their percentage of fault.
Learn more about doctrine
https://brainly.com/question/30613074
#SPJ11
evaluate to what the religious organizations have or currently supporting communities affected by human trafficking
Trafficking Prevention and Intervention Organizations
1. CAST-Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking
2. Center for Human Trafficking Awareness
3. Justice Planning Management Associates
If this helped, please give it brainliest!
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
The Marine air-ground task force is
Answer: A term used by the United States Marine Corps to describe the principal organization for all missions across the range of military operations
Explanation:
Wikipedia
As a judge, Qiana applies common law rules. These rules develop from
A. Statutes enacted by Congress and the state legislatures
B. Uniform laws drafted by legal scholars
C. Regulations issued by administrative agencies
D. Decisions of the courts in legal disputes
As a judge, Qiana applies common law rules. These rules develop from Decisions of the courts in legal disputes. Option D is the correct answer.
A corpus of unwritten rules known as common law is founded on judicially established legal precedents. When there are no written principles of law or applicable legislation, common law is used to guide decision-making in exceptional situations. Option D is the correct answer.
The precedents that apply in a certain case are decided by the judge sitting over it. Cases heard in subordinate courts must follow the example set by higher courts. This structure encourages uniformity and stability in the American judicial system. Lower courts may, however, decide to change or depart from precedents if they are out of date or if the present case differs significantly from the previous case. Though this seldom happens, lower courts have the option to reject the precedent.
Learn more about Laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/25368237
#SPJ4
The first law requiring food labels to contain nutrition information was passed in 2000. True or false?.
Answer:
the answer is false because
Explanation:
it was passed in 1973
if you receive 12 points within 12 months, for how long will your license be suspended?
This depends on the specific laws and regulations of the jurisdiction where the license was issued, as different states and countries have their own rules for driver's license suspensions.
Jurisdiction refers to the authority or power of a particular court, government agency, or other entity to make legal decisions or exercise control over a particular geographic area or subject matter. In the legal context, jurisdiction can refer to both the power of a court to hear and decide a case, as well as the power of a government to regulate certain activities or enforce certain laws.
Jurisdiction can be either territorial, meaning that it applies within a specific geographic area, or subject matter-based, meaning that it applies to a particular type of legal issue or dispute. For example, a state court may have jurisdiction over a criminal case that occurred within its boundaries, while a federal agency may have jurisdiction over a particular type of environmental regulation.
To learn more about Jurisdiction refer to-
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
you are walking down a street and you pass by a beer brewery. a barrel rolls out of a third story window and injures you while walking by. you have no idea how this accident occurred. what legal theory will serve you best if you sue the brewery?
No, you cannot get the accusations made against you dropped. Possession by a Minor. This paragraph clearly states that it was unlawful for anyone who was deemed a minor to be found in possession of alcohol.
Such a person is seen to have broken the law if they acquire, use, or are discovered in possession of such products.
Therefore, despite the fact that you were not informed of your rights, you are nevertheless thought to have broken the law.
The less useful someone passing would be, the more people there are. The distribution of accountability is present. When there are numerous individuals around, no one feels accountable for their actions or inaction.
For such more question on Possession
https://brainly.com/question/1512862
#SPJ4
Essay help! Advance Criminal Justice Class...
What does Ruggiero (and others like him) mean when they express the sentiment
that “Terrorism is what the other person does; what we do is anti-terrorism” and
suggests that this sentiment ought to be the basis of all critical criminology and that
for many reasons political violence theory ought to at least study the other point of
view because terrorists might turn out in the flow of history to be in the right? If this
can be assumed true, what are the theoretical implications that flow from this (that
terrorists might be right) and what are those other reasons for this new direction
criminology might take on terrorism and other crime?
A speed sign is an example of a _________ sign A. regulatory B. warning C. guide
Answer:
A regulatory sign
Explanation:
A speed sign on the roads is an example of a regulatory sign, which is put up by the authorities. Hence, option A is correct.
What is a regulatory sign?A regulatory sign is a sign which is put up by the appropriate authorities in order to comply with the regulations provided under the law with respect to the same.
A speed sign is put up on the roadside by the traffic authorities, which is regulated under the traffic laws. Thus, the traffic signs are also an example of a regulatory sign.
Hence, option A holds true regarding the regulatory sign.
Learn more about regulatory sign here:
https://brainly.com/question/14304253
#SPJ2
vacant land adjustments have to be made for differences in _
Vacant land adjustments have to be made for differences in size, location, and other factors.
When comparing vacant land parcels for valuation or appraisal purposes, it is essential to adjust for differences in various aspects. Some common factors that require adjustments include:
1. Size: Larger or smaller parcels of land may have different values per square foot or acre, so adjustments need to be made to ensure a fair comparison.
2. Location: The value of land can be heavily influenced by its location, such as proximity to amenities, access to transportation, and surrounding development patterns. Therefore, adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
3. Topography: The physical characteristics of the land, such as slope, soil type, and drainage, can impact its value and development potential. Adjustments may be necessary to account for these variations.
4. Zoning and land use restrictions: Different zoning regulations and land use restrictions can significantly impact the value of a parcel of land. Adjustments need to be made to account for these differences when comparing parcels.
5. Utilities and infrastructure: The availability of utilities (water, sewer, electricity, etc.) and access to infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.) can affect the value of vacant land. Adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
Vacant land adjustments are crucial in accurately assessing the value of land parcels for various purposes, such as real estate transactions or property taxes. These adjustments ensure a fair comparison between parcels by accounting for differences in size, location, and other factors.
For more information on Vacant land adjustments kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/14415858
#SPJ11
To determine the level of risk in terms of safety to self and others, a/an _____ must be scheduled for arrested juveniles identified with mental problems.
pretrial detention screening
intake appointment
interview
psychologist appointment
Answer:
Pretrial Detention Screening
Explanation:
They have to ask you multiple questions to make sure that you're suitable and to appear in quart or around anyone and would just be a screening.
Mississippi has adopted the rule that an employee is acting within the scope of their employment if force is intentionally used and that use of force is not unexpected by the employer. (Mar-Jac Poultry MS, LLC v. Love). If a cashier were to tackle a suspected shoplifter, do you believe that behavior would be unexpected by the employer?
Answer:
Yes but no really.
Explanation:
This behavior would not be expected by a employer but if you really think about it the Employer would rather be shocked and if it was a shop lifter they would be rewarded as because of there braveness to stop a shop lifter if that is what you are referring to.
The beta of General Mills stock is 0.5 and the beta of Apple stock is 1.1. A portfolio is formed with these two stocks. The weights are chosen so as to make the beta of the portfolio equal to 0.62. What is the proportion of funds invested in General Mills stock
Answer: Using the formula for portfolio beta, we have:
Portfolio Beta = Weight of General Mills * Beta of General Mills + Weight of Apple * Beta of Apple
Substituting the given values, we have:
0.62 = Weight of General Mills * 0.5 + (1 - Weight of General Mills) * 1.1
Solving for Weight of General Mills, we get:
Weight of General Mills = (1.1 - 0.62) / (1.1 - 0.5)
Weight of General Mills = 0.48 or 48%
Therefore, the proportion of funds invested in General Mills stock is 48%.
Explanation:
what are the major building blocks of civilization?
The major building blocks of civilization are the innovative agricultural technology, habitation in towns and cities, demographic density, complex commercial networks etc.
There are several building blocks of civilization. The first is having an innovative agricultural technology which can ensure the population is sufficed in food. Demographic density includes the growth of population due to good health. Another is the habitation in the cities as well as town which basically means having an urbanized society.
Some other building blocks are complex commercial networks, having hierarchically designed social as well as political structures, development of literature as well as culture etc.
To know more about civilization
https://brainly.com/question/17212459
#SPJ4
Qualified expenses for an eligible educator include all the following except:
Select one:
a. Equipment (computers & software)
b. Books & Supplies
c. Classroom materials
d. Home School supplies
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper articles based on the torts discussed in this lesson: strict liability, products liability, misrepresentation of a product, and public and private nuisance. In the article you write, include some points about the defenses and remedies available for each tort. This exercise should be at least two to three paragraphs per tort (about 800 words in length total).
Answer:
Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.
Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.
This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.
Overview of Public Nuisance Law
In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.
Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]
Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases
Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]