Look at the flag of Sweden below, then answer the question based on the appearance of the lines on the flag
help please help

Answer:0<Y<500

The amount of water Left in the thing depends on the number of minutes it’s been draining so the dependent variable is the amount of water left in the tank.

The result of the number 1 trillion to the 10th power as required to be determined is; 10¹²⁰.

The result of the number 1 trillion to the 10th power is as follows;

Recall; 1 trillion = 1,000,000,000,000 = 10¹²

Hence; 1 trillion to the 10th power is; ( 10¹² )¹⁰.

From the laws of indices; we therefore have that;

= 10¹²⁰

Ultimately, the result is; 10¹²⁰.

Read more on indices;

https://brainly.com/question/170984

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

Team A time is    1 garden / ( 1 garden/ 2 hr + 1 garden/4 hr) = 1 1/3 hr

Team B =   1 / ( 1/3 + 1/3) =  1 1/2 hr

Team A wins !

No. The reported return rate appears lower than expected.

To determine whether the reported rate of return is reasonable or not, we can calculate the expected rate of return based on the investment amount and the ending value of the account.

First, we need to calculate the total number of quarters that have elapsed between the initial investment and the current quarter. Let's assume that the investment has been held for n quarters.

Then, we can use the following formula to calculate the expected rate of return:

Expected rate of return = (Ending value / Initial investment) ^ (1/n) - 1

Plugging in the given values, we get:

n = 1 (since we are only given information for a single quarter)

Initial investment = 26,245

Ending value = 26,292

Expected rate of return = (26,292 / 26,245) ^ (1/1) - 1 = 0.18%

Comparing the expected rate of return of 0.18% with the reported rate of return of -0.02%, we can see that they are quite different. However, it's important to note that a single quarter's rate of return may not be indicative of the overall performance of the investment.

Therefore, while the reported rate of return seems lower than expected, we would need to consider the performance over a longer period of time to make a more informed assessment of the investment's performance.

More on rate of returns can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/24232401

#SPJ1

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

a) they won 120 games out of 369 played  = 40/23=.325

b) they lost 248 out of 369 played = 248/369 = .672

c) Home games are 185 out of 369 = .501

d ) at home they won 72 out of (72+112+1) = 72/ 185 = .389

Answer:

(A)

Step-by-step explanation:

The survey follows of women's height a normal distribution.

The height of 98.51% of women that meet the height requirement are between 58 inches and 80 inches.

The new height requirements would be 57.7 to 68.6 inches

The given parameters are:

\mathbf{\mu = 63.5}μ=63.5 --- mean

\mathbf{\sigma = 2.5}σ=2.5 --- standard deviation

(a) Percentage of women between 58 and 80 inches

This means that: x = 58 and x = 80

When x = 58, the z-score is:

\mathbf{z= \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}}z=

σ

x−μ

This gives

\mathbf{z_1= \frac{58 - 63.5}{2.5}}z

1

=

2.5

58−63.5

\mathbf{z_1= \frac{-5.5}{2.5}}z

1

=

2.5

−5.5

\mathbf{z_1= -2.2}z

1

=−2.2

When x = 80, the z-score is:

\mathbf{z_2= \frac{80 - 63.5}{2.5}}z

2

=

2.5

80−63.5

\mathbf{z_2= \frac{16.5}{2.5}}z

2

=

2.5

16.5

\mathbf{z_2= 6.6}z

2

=6.6

So, the percentage of women is:

\mathbf{p = P(z < z_2) - P(z < z_1)}p=P(z<z

2

)−P(z<z

1

)

Substitute known values

\mathbf{p = P(z < 6.6) - P(z < -2.2)}p=P(z<6.6)−P(z<−2.2)

Using the p-value table, we have:

\mathbf{p = 0.9999982 - 0.0139034}p=0.9999982−0.0139034

\mathbf{p = 0.9860948}p=0.9860948

Express as percentage

\mathbf{p = 0.9860948 \times 100\%}p=0.9860948×100%

\mathbf{p = 98.60948\%}p=98.60948%

Approximate

\mathbf{p = 98.61\%}p=98.61%

This means that:

The height of 98.51% of women that meet the height requirement are between 58 inches and 80 inches.

So, many women (outside this range) would be denied the opportunity, because they are either too short or too tall.

(b) Change of requirement

Shortest = 1%

Tallest = 2%

If the tallest is 2%, then the upper end of the shortest range is 98% (i.e. 100% - 2%).

So, we have:

Shortest = 1% to 98%

This means that:

The p values are: 1% to 98%

Using the z-score table

When p = 1%, z = -2.32635

When p = 98%, z = 2.05375

Next, we calculate the x values from \mathbf{z= \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}}z=

σ

x−μ

Substitute \mathbf{z = -2.32635}z=−2.32635

\mathbf{-2.32635 = \frac{x - 63.5}{2.5}}−2.32635=

2.5

x−63.5

Multiply through by 2.5

\mathbf{-2.32635 \times 2.5= x - 63.5}−2.32635×2.5=x−63.5

Make x the subject

\mathbf{x = -2.32635 \times 2.5 + 63.5}x=−2.32635×2.5+63.5

\mathbf{x = 57.684125}x=57.684125

Approximate

\mathbf{x = 57.7}x=57.7

Similarly, substitute \mathbf{z = 2.05375}z=2.05375 in \mathbf{z= \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}}z=

σ

x−μ

\mathbf{2.05375= \frac{x - 63.5}{2.5}}2.05375=

2.5

x−63.5

Multiply through by 2.5

\mathbf{2.05375\times 2.5= x - 63.5}2.05375×2.5=x−63.5

Make x the subject

\mathbf{x= 2.05375\times 2.5 + 63.5}x=2.05375×2.5+63.5

\mathbf{x= 68.634375}x=68.634375

Approximate

\mathbf{x= 68.6}x=68.6

Hence, the new height requirements would be 57.7 to 68.6 inches

Factor x square on the function on the function

then, equal the expression to 0 in order to find the x-intercepts

finally, if the product is equal to 0 it means that at least one of them is equal to 0

The graph of the function touches the x-axis and turns around at

x=0,-6.

About 21% of the animals at an animal shelter are dogs, which can be written as the fraction 21/100 or simplified to 3/14.

To convert the percentage of dogs at the animal shelter to a fraction, we can write 21% as a ratio of 21 dogs for every 100 animals.

This means that for every 100 animals at the shelter, there are 21 dogs. To express this as a fraction, we can write 21/100.

So, about 21/100 of the animals at the shelter are dogs. This fraction can be simplified to 3/14, which means that out of every 14 animals at the shelter, there are 3 dogs.

To know more about fraction:

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1

Answer:

1) 30 pounds is the weight of the bag all together

2) science book is the heaviest book

Step-by-step explanation:

bag=4 pounds

library book=2 pounds

maths book=2×4=8 pounds

science book=8×2=16 pounds

4+2+8+16=30 pounds all together

heaviest book= science book (16 pounds)

Answer:

x(x+2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer x(x+2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

If the question is (4/3) / (2/5), then the answer is 10/3 or 3 and 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the equations a × b = 5742 × 6368, a × c = 5748 × 6362, and c × b = 5738 × 6372, we need to determine the relationship between the three variables a, b, and c.

By comparing the given equations, we notice that the numbers on the right-hand side of each equation are very close to each other, differing only by small amounts. This suggests that a, b, and c are approximately equal.Since a × b, a × c, and c × b involve the same numbers with slight variations, we can conclude that a, b, and c are all very close in value.

Therefore, the inequality we can infer from this information is a ≈ b ≈ c, indicating that a, b, and c are approximately equal.

In simple terms, based on the given equations, it suggests that the values of a, b, and c are very similar or approximately equal to each other.

For more such questions on equations

https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ8

Answer:  

5x+3y=-6  

Step-by step explanation:  

(-3,3) (3,-7)  

Slope=(-7-3)/(3-(-3))=-10/6=-5/3  

y=mx+c  

y=-5/3*x-2[from graph]  

y=-5x-6/3  

3y=-5x-6  

3y+5y=-6  

5x+3y=-6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

y = mx + b

slope m = Δy/Δx =  (-7 - 3) / (3 - (-3)) = -10/6 = -5/3  

y intercept is read directly from the chart at x = 0

b = -2

y = (-5/3)x - 2

Answer:

x = 900/ 10 + 3fo

Step-by-step explanation:

Move all terms to the left side and set equal to zero. Then set each factor equal to zero.

Answer:

∠1 = 116 °  ,  ∠2 = 32°  , ∠3 = 116 ° and ∠4 = 32°

Step-by-step explanation:

∠2 = 32°  (The diagonals of a rhombus bisect pairs of opposite angles)

Opposite sides of a rhombus are parallel ,so

∠2 = ∠4   (Alternate interior angles )

∠4 = 32°

32° + ∠4 + ∠3 = 180° (angle sum property of a triangle)

64° + ∠3 = 180°

∠3 = 180 - 64

∠3 = 116°

∠3 =∠1    (in a rhombus opposite angles are equal )

∠1 = 116°

Answer:

We can assure the Ann Arbor officials that after look the information we conclude that the mean is 8 h

Step-by-step explanation:

From CI ( 95 % )  = ( 6,7 ; 9,3 )

And the information "large random size sample" we conclude that the population has a normal distribution; a normal distribution has a bell shape curve, and data must spread symmetrically with respect to the mean, therefore the mean is:

6,7 + 9,3 = 16

16/2 = 8

If we need t check we can use the other CI

CI ( 99 % ) = (6,257 , 9,743 )

6,257 + 9,743 = 16

16/2 = 8

We are sure the mean is 8 h  

The total number of workers that were studied can be found to be 139,340,000.

The percent of workers unemployed would be 5. 4 %.

Percentage of unemployed men is 5. 6 % and unemployed women is 5. 1%.

Number of employed workers :

= 74,624,000 + 64, 716, 000

= 139,340,000

Percentage unemployed :

= ( 4, 209,000 + 3,314,000 ) / 139,340,000

= 5. 4 %

Percentage of unemployed men :

= 4,209,000 / 74,624,000

= 5.6 %

Percentage of unemployed women:

= 3,314,000 / 64, 716, 000

= 5. 1 %

Find out more on unemployment at https://brainly.com/question/13280244

#SPJ1

The full question is:

a. How many workers were studied?

b. What percent of the workers were unemployed?

c. Compare the percent unemployed for the men and the women.

Answer:

What about congruency triangles i think you need a picture so we can see

Step-by-step explanation:

The best interpretation of the probability that the number landing face up will be less than 3 is \(\frac{1}{3}\).

For many rolls of the die, the long-run relative frequency of a number less than 3 landing face up is \(\frac{1}{3}\).

As per the given question a fair die with its faces numbered from 1 to 6 will be rolled.

Here we have to calculate the probability that the number landing face up will be less than 3.

The event of the number landing face up will be less than 3 is exhaustive, mutually exclusive, and independent face of a die = 6

(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)

Favorable number of faces of a die = 2

(1, 2)

Since the number landing faces up will be less than 3.

Therefore the probability that the number landing face up will be less than 3

\(=\frac{\text { Favourable Number }}{\text { Total Number }}$\)

\(& =\frac{2}{6} \\\)

\(& =\frac{1}{3}\)

Therefore the best interpretation of the probability that the number landing face up will be less than 3 is \(\frac{1}{3}\)

For more questions on probability

https://brainly.com/question/3160577

#SPJ4

The long-run relative frequency of a number less than 3 landing face up is 2/3.

The best interpretation of the probability that the number landing face up will be less than 3 is that for many rolls of the die, the long-run relative frequency of a number less than 3 landing face up is 2/3. This can be expressed mathematically as P(x<3) = 2/3, where P(x) is the probability of the number landing face up being less than 3.

For a single roll of the die, the probability of a number less than 3 landing face up is 1/2. This is because there are three numbers (1,2,3) which are less than 3, and 6 possible outcomes. Therefore, the probability of any one of those three numbers landing face up is 3/6, or 1/2.

For multiple rolls of the die, the probability of a number less than 3 landing face up is the sum of the probabilities of each of those three numbers landing face up. This can be expressed mathematically as P(x<3) = (1/2) + (1/2) + (1/2), or 2/3.

Therefore, for many rolls of the die, the long-run relative frequency of a number less than 3 landing face up is 2/3.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

True!

your very welcome

Answer:

8 to the power of 4

Step-by-step explanation:

since their are four 8, (8x8x8x8) , you have to put that into an exponent

still need proof?

8x8x8x8=4096

8 to the power of 4 = 4096

so to conclude, 8 to the power of 4 is the same thing as saying 8x8x8x8, it is jsut the exponent version

Answer:

100%?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

V = 523 in^3

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of a sphere is given by

V = 4/3 pi r^3

V = 4/3 ( 3.14) * 5^3

V = 523.33333repeating

Rounding to the nearest inch^3

V = 523 in^3

Answer:

\( 523.6 {in}^{3} \)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(v = \frac{4}{3} \pi {r}^{3} \\ = \frac{4}{3} \pi \times 5 \times 5 \times 5 \\ = 523.6 {in}^{3} \)

Answer: x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Translating the problem into mathematical terms:

Let's call the number x. Then the problem can be written as:

5 * (2x - 3) - (x + 8) = 13

Expanding the left side of the equation:

5 * 2x - 5 * 3 - x - 8 = 13

Simplifying the left side of the equation:

10x - 23 - x - 8 = 13

Combining like terms:

9x - 31 = 13

Adding 31 to both sides of the equation:

9x = 44

Dividing both sides of the equation by 9:

x = 4.88888...

Since x has to be a whole number, we round down to the nearest whole number:

x = 4

Therefore, the number that satisfies the equation is 4.

Answer:

F

Step-by-step explanation:

64x³ = -1

x³ = -1/64

x = ∛-1/∛64

x = -1/4

Answer:

x = - \(\frac{1}{4}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

64x³+1=0

Add 1 to both sides:

64x³=-1

Divide both sides by 64:

x³=-\(\frac{1}{64}\)

Find cubed root of both sides:

x=-\(\sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{64}}\)

Note that \(\sqrt[n]{\frac{a}{b}}=\frac{\sqrt[n]{a}}{\sqrt[n]{b}}\) :

x=-\(\frac{\sqrt[3]{1} }{\sqrt[3]{64} }\)

Evaluate:

x = - \(\frac{1}{4}\)

The best estimate for the number of fish is that there are 82 yellow fish and 18 green fish, which you can calculate using the rule of three. This estimate is expected to be accurate.

This can be calculated using a rule of three as follows. Let's start with the yellow fish:

53 = 65

x    = 100

53 x 100 / 65 = 82 yellow fish

Green fish:

12 = 65

x = 100

12 x 100 / 65= 18 green fish

This estimate is expected to be accurate; however, there might be small differences in real life such as 80 yellow fish and 20 green fish.

Learn more about estimates in https://brainly.com/question/17961193

#SPJ1

The mean of the distribution is 3

Arithmetic mean is defined as the ratio of the sum of observations to the total number of observations. It can be referred to as the average of a specific set of data or the arithmetic mean. One of the basic methods used to acquire a result, the term "Mean" is commonly used in the field of statistics.

The formula for the mean of a given set of data is as follows:

Mean = Sum of Observations/Total number of observations

According to the first graph,

Given the bar of observations as :

0, 5, 6, 3, 1, 1, 3, 6, 4, 1

Here the Sum of Observations = 30

And the total number of observations = 10

The mean of the distribution = 30/10

The mean of the distribution = 3

According to the second graph,

Given the bar of observations as :

0, 1, 3, 3, 9, 0, 9, 4, 4, 1

Here the Sum of Observations = 34

And the total number of observations = 10

The mean of the distribution = 34/10

The mean of the distribution = 3.4

The mean of the distribution = 4 (closest)

Learn more about Arithmetic means here:

brainly.com/question/13000783

#SPJ1

Using the method of mathematical induction, we show that the inequality σ(n) > H(n) holds for all n≥1. Thus, the inequality n≥1 is true for all n≥1.

It is a  a technique used in mathematics to prove that a statement is true for every positive integer or natural number. It consists of two steps:

We can calculate like this:

Base case: Show that the inequality holds for n=1.

Inductive hypothesis: Assume that the inequality holds for some arbitrary positive integer k, i.e., k ≤ 2^(σ(k)/Hk).

Inductive step: Show that the inequality also holds for k+1. Consider σ(k+1) and H(k+1). We can express them as σ(k+1) = σ(k) + k+1 and H(k+1) = H(k) + 1/(k+1).

Using the inductive hypothesis, we have:

So, we can raise both sides to the power of (k+1)/(kH(k+1)) to get:

By the AM-GM inequality, we know that σ(k+1)/k+1 ≥ H(k+1), so we can replace the denominator (kH(k+1)) with H(k+1) and simplify to get

Therefore, we have shown that k+1 ≤ 2^(σ(k+1)/H(k+1)), which means the inequality holds for all positive integers n by mathematical induction.

Find out more about inequality at:

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ1