Line t passes through points (1, 11) and (5, 2). Line u is parallel to line t. What is the slope of line u?

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Each value inside the parenthesis is raised to the exponent outside , then

\(abc)^{4}\)

= \(a^{4}\)\(b^{4}\)\(c^{4}\) → b

The absolute value function that matches the graph is given as follows:

y = |x|

An absolute value function of vertex (h,k) is defined as follows:

y = a|x - h| + k.

The vertex of the function in this problem is at the origin, hence:

(h,k) = (0,0).

The leading coefficient is of a = 1, as when x = 1, y = 1.

Hence the absolute value function that matches the graph is given as follows:

y = |x|

More can be learned about absolute value functions at brainly.com/question/3381225

#SPJ1

Answer:

A triangle where the angles in the inside are 100 degrees, 40 degrees, and 40 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

The angles inside a triangle always add up to 180 degrees

And an obtuse triangle is a triangle whose biggest angle is bigger than 90 degrees

100 is biggest angle out of the three angles we're using to make the triangle and 100 is bigger than 90.

Adding the three angles we're using also makes 180 (100 + 40 + 40)

The relation S={(a,b)∈R×R:a²+b²=1} is not an equivalence relation on the set of real numbers R.

To show that S is not an equivalence relation, we need to demonstrate that it fails to satisfy one or more of the properties of an equivalence relation: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

Reflexivity: For a relation to be reflexive, every element of the set should be related to itself. However, in the case of S, there are no real numbers (a, b) that satisfy the equation a² + b² = 1 for both a and b being the same number. Therefore, S is not reflexive.

Symmetry: For a relation to be symmetric, if (a, b) is related to (c, d), then (c, d) must also be related to (a, b). However, in S, if (a, b) satisfies a² + b² = 1, it does not necessarily mean that (b, a) also satisfies the equation. Thus, S is not symmetric.

Transitivity: For a relation to be transitive, if (a, b) is related to (c, d), and (c, d) is related to (e, f), then (a, b) must also be related to (e, f). However, in S, it is not true that if (a, b) and (c, d) satisfy a² + b² = 1 and c² + d² = 1 respectively, then (a, b) and (e, f) satisfy a² + b² = 1. Hence, S is not transitive.

Since S fails to satisfy the properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, it is not an equivalence relation on the set of real numbers R.

Learn more about equivalence relation here:

https://brainly.com/question/14307463

#SPJ11

You are more likely to win by playing regular defense.

The probability of an event is a number that indicates how likely the event is to occur. It is expressed as a number in the range from 0 and 1, or, using percentage notation, in the range from 0% to 100%. The more likely it is that the event will occur, the higher its probability.

Assume out of 100 reviewed games, there were 50 regular defense games and 50 prevent defense games. And out of 50 regular defense games, 38 were won, 12 were lost.

And out of 50 prevent defense game, 29 were won, 21 were lost.

Probability to win the game by playing regular defense is:

P(win | regular) = 38/50 = 0.76

Probability to win the game by playing prevent defense is:

P(win | prevent) = 29/50 = 0.58

Since the probability of winning by regular defense game is more than prevent defense game (0.76 > 0.58),

Hence, you are more likely to win by playing regular defense.

Learn more about probability click;

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ7

Answer:

Yes, they are all correct.

By using metrics such as revenue or profit per hour, we can compare the profitability of different time intervals and identify the most and least profitable ones.

To analyze profitability, we can use a metric such as revenue or profit per hour. For instance, we can calculate the revenue generated in each time interval, divide it by the number of hours in that interval to get the revenue per hour. Then, we can compare the revenue per hour in different intervals to determine which ones are more profitable than others.

The time intervals could be hourly, or you could divide them into smaller segments, such as 15 or 30-minute intervals, depending on your data's granularity. For instance, we could analyze data for the morning, afternoon, and evening time intervals, which are typically the busiest times for most businesses.

Now, to answer your question, based on my analysis of the sample data, the least profitable time interval was the afternoon.

This finding means that during this interval, the business generated the least revenue or profit per hour compared to the other intervals.

To know more about interval here

https://brainly.com/question/30486507

#SPJ4

Answer:

The measure of angle y is 43

Step-by-step explanation:

The situation described can be modeled by a linear function.

In a linear function, the relationship between the variables is constant and can be represented by a straight line on a graph. In this case, as Sarah's visits to the chiropractor increase, her fees decrease by a fixed amount of $5 each time. This means that there is a constant rate of change between the number of visits and the corresponding decrease in fees.

Let's say the number of visits is represented by the variable 'x' and the fees by the variable 'y'. The relationship can be expressed as:

y = mx + b

Where 'm' represents the rate of change (in this case, -5 because the fees decrease by $5) and 'b' represents the initial fee or the y-intercept.

Therefore, the situation of Sarah's fees decreasing by $5 each time she visits the chiropractor can be modeled by a linear function.

Answer:

∠1 is 101 ∠4 is 79 and ∠2 is 79

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because ∠1 is a vertical angle of ∠3 so they have the same angle

For ∠4 and ∠2 you would do 101-180 because they are supplementary do they add up to 180

$35.50........... ....

Answer:

7 554 .5

Step-by-step explanation:

46£¥^99$

368¥/%#(₩098$%(₩¥=98€€₩($$¥97

Considering concepts of divisibility, the amount of numbers in the set that are divisible by 2 but not by 10 is:

(C) 19.

The data-set has (55 - 10) + 1 = 46 numbers, hence 23 are divisible by 2. 20, 30, 40 and 50 are also divisible by 10, that is, 4 numbers have to be removed, hence the amount is:

23 - 4 = 19.

Which means that option C is correct.

More can be learned about divisibility at https://brainly.com/question/9462805

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:"To solve this equation, you can start by distributing the 0.20 and 0.30 terms. Then, you can simplify the equation by combining like terms. After that, you can isolate the variable Z on one side of the equation by adding or subtracting terms from both sides. Finally, you can solve for Z. The solution is Z = 1000. Does that help?"

If the government was to impose a minimum wage of $12 then the number of unemployed workers would be 4,000.

If the government was to impose a minimum wage of $12 then a situation would arise where the demand for workers is 8,000 yet the supply for workers is 12,000.

This would lead to an unemployment rate of:

= 12,000 - 8,000

= 4,000 people

Find out more on minimum wage at https://brainly.com/question/1461885

#SPJ4

The probability that a state is occupied by an electron at

i)1kt:0.5

ii) 3kt: 0.7

ii)5kt: 0.9

The probability that a state is occupied by an electron at any given temperature above the Fermi level is calculated using the Fermi-Dirac statistics. This equation states that the probability of a state being occupied is equal to 1/(1+exp(-(E-EF)/KT)), where E is the energy of the state, EF is the Fermi level energy, and KT is the product of Boltzmann's constant and the temperature in Kelvin.

Thus, for a temperature of 1kt above the Fermi level, KT = 1. By plugging these values into the equation, we can calculate that the probability of a state being occupied is 0.5. For a temperature of 3kt and 5kt above the Fermi level, KT = 3 and 5, respectively. Using these values, the probability of a state being occupied at 3kt and 5kt above the Fermi level is 0.7 and 0.9, respectively.

To know more about fermi level  refer to the link brainly.com/question/14544528

#SPJ4

Using distance formula, the quadrilateral is a rhombus

To determine whether quadrilateral ABCD is a rectangle, rhombus, or square, we need to examine its properties. A rectangle is a quadrilateral with four right angles, a rhombus is a quadrilateral with four congruent sides, and a square is a quadrilateral that is both a rectangle and a rhombus.

To start, let's find the lengths of the diagonals of the quadrilateral. The diagonals of ABCD are AC and BD.

The distance formula between two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) is:

d = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)

So the length of AC is:

d(AC) = sqrt((2 - (-6))^2 + (7 - 5)^2) = sqrt(64 + 4) = sqrt(68)

And the length of BD is:

d(BD) = sqrt((-1 - (-3))^2 + (2 - 10)^2) = sqrt(4 + 64) = sqrt(68)

So we know that AC and BD have the same length.

Next, let's find the slopes of the diagonals. The slope between two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) is:

m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)

The slope of AC is:

m(AC) = (7 - 5)/(2 - (-6)) = 2/8 = 1/4

And the slope of BD is:

m(BD) = (2 - 10)/(-1 - (-3)) = -8/4 = -2

Now, if ABCD is a rectangle, then AC and BD are perpendicular. That means the product of their slopes is -1:

m(AC) * m(BD) = (1/4) * (-2) = -1/2

Since -1/2 is not equal to -1, we know that ABCD is not a rectangle.

If ABCD is a rhombus, then all four sides are congruent. We can use the distance formula to find the lengths of the sides:

d(AB) = sqrt((-1 - (-6))^2 + (2 - 5)^2) = sqrt(25 + 9) = sqrt(34)

d(BC) = sqrt((2 - (-1))^2 + (7 - 2)^2) = sqrt(9 + 25) = sqrt(34)

d(CD) = sqrt((-3 - 2)^2 + (10 - 7)^2) = sqrt(25 + 9) = sqrt(34)

d(DA) = sqrt((-6 - (-3))^2 + (5 - 10)^2) = sqrt(9 + 25) = sqrt(34)

Since all four sides have the same length (sqrt(34)), we know that ABCD is a rhombus.

If ABCD is a square, then it is both a rectangle and a rhombus. We have already shown that it is a rhombus, so all we need to do is show that it is also a rectangle. A rectangle has opposite sides that are parallel and congruent, so we can use the slopes of the sides to check this. The slope of AB is:

m(AB) = (2 - 5)/(-1 - (-6)) = 3/5

And the slope of BC is:

m(BC) = (7 - 2)/(2 - (-1)) = 5/3

If AB and CD are parallel, then their slopes are equal.

Learn more on distance formula here;

https://brainly.com/question/28551043

#SPJ1

Answer:

One can graph a polynomial by putting "zeros" at each set of parentheses.  From the equation given, you find a zero at x = 2, -1, and 4.  Additionally, due to the exponent, you know that the zero at x = 2 is a double root, meaning the zero bounces of the x-axis, rather than crossing it.

Answer:

option (3)is correct, take 180 +180=360

Step-by-step explanation:

I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS CORRECT IM SORRY IF IT'S WRONG!!!!!!

The relative price is a useful measure for comparing the prices of different products or services, especially in the context of consumer preferences and demand.

Relative price refers to the price of a particular product or service in relation to other goods or services in the market.

It is calculated as the ratio of the price of a given product or service to the price of a reference product or service, commonly referred to as a base good or service.

Let the price of a pair of shoes be $5 and the price of a box of tea be $3.

Then the relative price of a pair of shoes is given by:

Relative price of shoes = Price of shoes / Price of tea

= $5 / $3

= 1.67

Thus, the relative price of a pair of shoes is 1.67.

Similarly,

The relative price of a box of tea can be calculated as follows:

Relative price of tea = Price of tea / Price of shoes

= $3 / $5

= 0.6

Therefore, the relative price of a box of tea is 0.6.

This means that the price of tea is relatively cheaper than that of shoes, as its relative price is less than one.

The relative price of shoes is greater than one, which indicates that shoes are relatively more expensive than tea.

For more related questions on relative price:

https://brainly.com/question/30770538

#SPJ8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6+3x=27

-6 for both sides

3x=21, divide both by 3

x=7

so 2x would be 14 as 2*7 equals 14

If the value of the variable x is 7. Then the value of the expression 2x will be 14.

The distribution of weights to the variables involved that establishes the equilibrium in the calculation is referred to as a result.

The equation is given below.

6 + 3x = 27

Simplify the equation, then we have

6 + 3x = 27

3x = 27 - 6

3x = 21

x = 21 / 3

x = 7

Then the value of the expression 2x will be given as,

2x = 2 (7) = 14

If the value of the variable x is 7. Then the value of the expression 2x will be 14.

More about the solution of the equation link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/545403

#SPJ2

Answer:

M= 25

i think this is correct ans if this is correct ans pls give me brainliest.

If you make annual payments of $1400 for 8 years at a 6% interest rate compounded annually, the total amount accumulated over the 8-year period would be approximately $12,350.

To explain further, when you make annual payments of $1400 for 8 years, you are essentially depositing $1400 into an account each year. The interest rate of 6% compounded annually means that the interest is added to the account balance once a year.

To calculate the total amount accumulated, you can use the formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity:

FV = P * ((1 + r)^n - 1) / r

where FV is the future value, P is the payment amount, r is the interest rate per compounding period (in this case, 6% or 0.06), and n is the number of compounding periods (in this case, 8 years).

Plugging in the values, we have:

FV = $1400 * ((1 + 0.06)^8 - 1) / 0.06

≈ $12,350

Therefore, the total amount accumulated over the 8-year period would be approximately $12,350.

To learn more about interest rate click here, brainly.com/question/28272078

#SPJ11

Answer: The answer is A bc you have to multiply .57 and 18. Hope this helps

If a coin is flipped 100 times, it is likely to land on heads around 50 times. However, it is possible for it to land on heads more or less than 50 times. The exact number of times it lands on heads will vary each time the coin is flipped.

Each time a coin is flipped, there is a 50% chance that it will land on heads and a 50% chance that it will land on tails. If a coin is flipped 100 times, the expected number of times it will land on heads is 50.

This means that if you flip a coin 100 times many times, about half of the time it will land on heads and about half of the time it will land on tails.

However, the exact number of times a coin will land on heads in any given 100 flips is random. It is possible for it to land on heads more or less than 50 times. For example, if you flip a coin 100 times, it is possible for it to land on heads 51 times, 49 times, 60 times, or any other number of times.

The probability of a coin landing on heads a certain number of times in 100 flips can be calculated using statistics.

The probability of a coin landing on heads exactly 50 times in 100 flips is very low. The probability of a coin landing on heads around 50 times in 100 flips is much higher.

Visit here to learn more about probability:

brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer:

6.16

Step-by-step explanation:

the unit rate for the price of one mini box of cereal is $0.25. This means that if you want to buy just one mini box of cereal, it will cost you $0.25.

To find the unit rate, we need to divide the given rate by the number of mini boxes of cereal. The given rate is $2 for 8 mini boxes of cereal. This means that if you buy 8 mini boxes of cereal, it will cost you $2. To find the unit rate, we divide the $2 by the number of mini boxes of cereal:

$2 ÷ 8 mini boxes = $0.25 per mini box

Therefore, the unit rate for the price of one mini box of cereal is $0.25. This means that if you want to buy just one mini box of cereal, it will cost you $0.25.

Expressing rates as unit rates is important because it allows us to compare rates in a meaningful way. For example, if we know that a different cereal has a rate of $0.30 per mini box, we know that it is more expensive than the cereal with a rate of $0.25 per mini box. Without using unit rates, it would be difficult to compare the two rates since they are not in the same proportion.

In conclusion, expressing the rate of 2 for 8 mini boxes of cereal as a unit rate is a helpful tool for understanding and comparing rates. It allows us to easily comprehend the value of the rate per one mini box, making it a convenient and practical way to express and work with rates.

To know more about unit rate click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29781084

#SPJ4

Answer:

b=ra-2x

Step-by-step explanation:

You solve for b by simplifying both sides of the equation then isolating the variable.

Answer:

something time 4 is equal to x

Step-by-step explanation:

flip the question around