Answer:
The Congressional Apportionment Amendment (originally titled Article the First) is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that addresses the number of seats in the House of Representatives. It was proposed by Congress on September 25, 1789, but was never ratified by the requisite number of state legislatures. As Congress did not set a time limit for its ratification, the Congressional Apportionment Amendment is still pending before the states. As of 2022, it is one of six unratified amendments.
In the 1st United States Congress, James Madison put together a package of constitutional amendments designed to address the concerns of Anti-Federalists, who were suspicious of federal power under the new constitution. The Congressional Apportionment Amendment is the only one of the twelve amendments passed by Congress which was never ratified; ten amendments were ratified as the Bill of Rights, while the other amendment (Article the Second) was ratified as the Twenty-seventh Amendment in 1992. A majority of the states did ratify the Congressional Apportion Amendment and, by the end of 1791, the amendment was just one state short of adoption. However, no state has ratified the amendment since 1792.
The amendment lays out a mathematical formula for determining the number of seats in the House of Representatives. It would initially have required one representative for every 30,000 constituents, with that number eventually climbing to one representative for every 50,000 constituents. However, there is some agreement that the last line contains a scrivener's error[1] (see Mathematical discrepancies). As the amendment was never passed, Congress has set the size of the House of Representatives by statute. Congress regularly increased the size of the House to account for population growth throughout the 19th century until it fixed the number of voting House members at 435 in 1911, where aside from a temporary increase to 437 members from 1959 through 1962 after Alaska and Hawaii were admitted to the Union, it has remained.
The population of the United States reached approximately 308.7 million in 2010 according to that year's nationwide census. Consequently, the number of representatives in the House could have grown to over 6,000 under the terms of this amendment.[2][3][4]
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In practice, cyber information and misinformation are controlled by users and hosts, motivated mostly by their:
Ensure the authenticity and integrity of the information they supply, and preserve their data and privacy.
Which word best encapsulates integrity?Honesty, honor, and probity are a few words that frequently describe integrity. All of these terms refer to "uprightness of character or deed," but integrity implies trustworthiness and incorruptibility to the point that one is unable to be unfaithful to a trust, responsibility, or commitment.
What does integrity in the workplace look like?Be Willing to Work Hard
Another illustration of integrity in the job is when you are working while on business time; you aren't watching from the sidelines and demanding that others complete the task for you. Even individuals in prominent positions ought to be aware that if you are never willing to do some work yourself, you will lose the respect of your subordinates.
To know more about integrity visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12881972
#SPJ1
How has the U.S. Supreme Court defined the legal use of the death penalty?
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
When making ethical decisions on behalf of your employer, should you consider the impact on others outside your employer? If so, who and why?
Please help me
In a situation in which I have to make ethical decisions on behalf of my employer, I should consider the impact of the people who are involved because my ethical behavior would be involved despite being on behalf of my employer.
Ethics is a term to refer to a subdiscipline of philosophy that focuses on the study of human behavior, its relationship with:
The notions of right and wrongThe moral preceptsDutyThe happinessThe common welfareAccording to the above, in a situation in which I must make an ethical decision on behalf of my boss, I must consider the impact that it will have on other people because my ethical actions will influence my decision. For example:
If my boss tells me that I should fire a co-worker because the company has lowered its profits, surely he considers that this is an ethical act for his benefit and his interests.However, I know that my partner depends on the salary he earns in the company and that he and his family would be affected by this decision. Then I could not fire him because he would be doing him a bad thing.Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/2630782
The term "manucaption" is used several times in Pierson v. Post, by Mr. Colden for the defendant, Lodowick Post, and by Judge Livingston, in dissent. Which of the following choices best explains the term "manucaption" as used in Pierson v. Post?
a) A common law form of action for stealing a fox.
b) Seizure in hand, physical control.
c) Emancipation of a beast, feræ naturæ.
d) A caption in a manuscript.
Answer:B
Explanation:Seizure in hand physical control
The term "manucaption" is used several times in Pierson v. Post, by Mr. Colden for the defendant, Lodowick Post, and by Judge Livingston, in dissent is used to refer to the act of: seizing or taking physical control of a wild animal. The correct option is C.
This term is particularly relevant to the case, as it concerns the question of who has the right to claim ownership of a wild fox that has been pursued and chased by two hunters.
Mr. Colden, who argues on behalf of the defendant, Lodowick Post, uses the term "manucaption" to suggest that his client has a superior claim to the fox, as he was the one who was able to capture and physically control the animal.
Judge Livingston, on the other hand, dissents from this view, arguing that manucaption is not sufficient to establish ownership of a wild animal, particularly when there are no established rules or customs governing the practice.
Ultimately, the court rules in favor of Post, but the case raises important questions about the nature of property rights and the limits of common law in cases involving wild animals.
To know more about dissent, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/307660973
#SPJ11
Complete question:
The term "manucaption" is used several times in Pierson v. Post, by Mr. Colden for the defendant, Lodowick Post, and by Judge Livingston, in dissent. Which of the following choices best explains the term "manucaption" as used in Pierson v. Post?
A. A common law form of action for stealing a fox.
B. Emancipation of a beast, feræ naturæ.
C. Seizure in hand, physical control.
D. A caption in a manuscript.
FILL IN THE BLANK. Whenever you are around construction sites, you should _____. A. Speed up so you get through it quicker and avoid falling rocks B. Maneuver so that you aren't caught behind a slower moving vehicle C. Shift to Neutral D. Slow down
Whenever you are around construction sites, you should slow down.
Construction sites can present various hazards such as uneven surfaces, debris, reduced lane width, or workers on foot. To ensure your safety and the safety of others, it is important to reduce your speed when approaching and passing through construction zones. Slowing down allows you to have better control of your vehicle, react to unexpected situations, and navigate any temporary changes to the road conditions. It also provides more time to observe and follow any posted signs or instructions provided by the construction workers or traffic control devices.
Remember, maintaining a reduced speed around construction sites promotes safer driving and helps prevent accidents.
To know more about Construction sites, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32669840
#SPJ11
Should the UK ratify the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)?
Answer:a
Explanation:
The law of which country provided the roots for U.S. law?
Answer:
Background. At both the federal and state levels, the law of the United States was mainly derived from the common law system of English law, which was in force at the time of the Revolutionary War. However, U.S. law has diverged greatly from its English ancestor both in terms of substance and procedure.
if you poop your pants at the lowest gravity possible it would float?
Apple or bark tree?
Why should a matriculant be aiming to achieve a bachelor's pass, regardless of what they plan for 2023 ?
The reason why a matriculant has to achieve a pass in their bachelor's regardless of the plans that they have in 2023 are:
To achieve fulfillment To be able to apply for jobs.What is a Bachelors?This is the degree that students who are able to fulfill all of the university requirements are awarded at the end of their school.
The person who is awarded this degree must be able to fulfill all of the school requirements by passing all of the required courses.
Read more on bachelors here:
https://brainly.com/question/17496239
What is the main idea of the Magna Carta?
It discouraged the idea of the social contract.
It called for limiting the power of the monarch.
It helped define justice by setting standards for courts.
It defined roles for government, such as the work of agencies.
The idea behind Magna Carta was that its called for limiting the power of the monarch. The Option B is correct.
What was the significance of Magna Carta in Britain?The Magna Carta is a fundamental document that guarantees the English people's liberties. It declares rights that have become part of English law and are now the foundation of every English-speaking country's constitution.
The Magna Carta, which means "great charter" in Latin, was written by English barons (nobles) and church leaders to limit the power of the king. They forced the tyrannical King John to agree to the charter in 1215.
According to the Magna Carta, the king must follow the law and cannot simply rule as he pleases. It was one of the first documents to declare citizens' rights. Many people today consider Magna Carta to be Europe's first written constitution.
Read more about Magna Carta
brainly.com/question/30191949
#SPJ1
Answer: B
Explanation:
It called for limiting the power of the monarch.
Labeling laws require that ingredients in food products be listed on the container in descending order of their.
Most state court systems include all of the following EXCEPT?
A. limited-jurisdiction trial courts
B. intermediate appellate courts
C. special-jurisdiction federal district courts
D. general-jurisdiction trial courts
E. highest state court
"Special-jurisdiction federal district courts" as they are not part of the state court system, but rather the federal court system. The answer to the question is option C.
The court system of a state is responsible for interpreting and applying the law within the jurisdiction of the state. A court system typically includes several types of courts, each with its own distinct responsibilities.
"limited-jurisdiction trial courts" handle specific types of cases, such as small claims or traffic violations, while "general-jurisdiction trial courts" handle a broader range of civil and criminal cases.
"Intermediate appellate courts" are responsible for reviewing the decisions made by lower courts and deciding if there were any errors made in the interpretation or application of the law. Finally, the "highest state court" is the final court of appeal for decisions made in the state court system.
For more about federal district courts:
https://brainly.com/question/12129086
#SPJ11
Una persona por su condición que es migrante en busca de trabajo en una fábrica de procesamiento de pescado es sometida a desprecio e irrespeta su condición de mujer; ¿Qué derecho de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, la ampara para garantizar su condición humana?
Answer:
El derecho a la igualdad.
Explanation:
La declaración universal de derechos humanos establece que todas las personas son iguales y tienen los mismos derechos en los campos político, social y económico. Así, es incorrecto que una persona sufra discriminación, desprecio, prejuicio y cualquier otro tipo de injusticia por razón de su género, religión, opción sexual, edad, color, entre otros.
En este caso, podemos decir que si a alguien se le falta el respeto en el trabajo por ser mujer, se está vulnerando el derecho a la igualdad y esto podría tener consecuencias reales.
Which situation best illustrates an effect of the law of supply
A. A car company increase sales when incomes rise in a city
B. A food truck shuts down after a better food truck opens nearby
C. A theme park gains customers after it lowers its ticket prices
D. A factory stops making a brand of phone after the phones price decreases
Answer: D. A factory stops making a brand of phone after the phones price decreases
Explanation:
The situation best illustrates an effect of the law of supply “A factory stops making a brand of the phone after the phone's price decreases”. Therefore, option D is the correct option.
What is the “law of supply”?The law of supply states that when the price of a commodity or service increases their availability in the market because the manufacturers and the service providers get better prices for them therefore, they generate more.
The concept of the law of supply was proposed in the year 1890 by Alfred Marshall. The law of demand and supply drives the whole market. The needs and manufacturing of goods and services are determined by market sentiments.
The case "A manufacturer stops creating a brand of phone once the phone's price lowers" best exemplifies how the law of supply operates. As a result, choice D is the best one.
Learn more about the law of supply here:
https://brainly.com/question/17805586
#SPJ5
Your car must have two red taillights mounted on the rear visible from ______ feet
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
From your own perspective explain to the construction employers the term health and safety
Implementing comprehensive health and safety measures in construction is crucial to protect employees, visitors, and the environment, minimizing risks and promoting a safe working environment.
Health and Safety refers to the measures taken to ensure the well-being of employees, construction site visitors, and the environment during construction operations. Construction companies must ensure that their operations do not pose a danger to employees, passersby, or the environment.
Therefore, employers must put in place various safety measures and programs. They should perform thorough risk assessments to identify potential risks and hazards at construction sites. Additionally, employees should be trained on health and safety protocols to minimize accidents and injuries.
Therefore, it is important to follow best practices in construction safety to prevent accidents and injuries. This may include the use of protective equipment, ensuring safe work conditions, and training personnel on safe work practices.
To learn more about safety
https://brainly.com/question/29618609
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is true of the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
A. They are only imposed on foreign officials.
B. They are only imposed on foreign companies.
C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
D. Fines imposed on individuals do not exceed $10,000.
E. If corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, only the intermediaries are fined.
The correct statement regarding the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is: C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
The criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are not solely limited to foreign officials (Option A) or foreign companies (Option B). While foreign officials and companies can be held accountable under the FCPA, the scope of enforcement extends to any individual or entity, regardless of nationality, involved in corrupt practices.
Under the FCPA, fines imposed on individuals cannot be paid by their employer (Option C). This means that an individual found guilty of violating the FCPA cannot rely on their employer to cover the financial penalties. Each individual is personally responsible for paying the fines imposed as a result of their misconduct.
Furthermore, fines imposed on individuals for FCPA violations can exceed $10,000 (Option D). The actual fines can vary depending on the severity of the violation, the benefits obtained from the corrupt practices, and other factors considered during sentencing. The fines can be substantial, often reaching into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Lastly, if corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, both the intermediaries and the individuals involved can be fined (Option E). The FCPA does not shield intermediaries from penalties; rather, it holds all parties involved accountable for their role in the corrupt activities.
Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ11
Do you affirm or deny rizal's retraction?
Answer:
I didn't like his react (Deny)
Explanation:
He disavowed Masonry and religious thoughts that opposed Catholic belief. Which isn't really that good once you truly think about. People should have there own beliefs no one should be disavowed for it.
Which crime is BEST represented by the following situation? Dagan sneaks into an event center through an unlocked window to steal valuable items on display for an event the next day.
Answer:
Theft
Explanation:
which of these beliefs describe individuals with a high level of political efficacy, and which describe those with low levels of political efficacy?
Political efficacy is defined as "the conviction that individual citizens can contribute to the realization of political and social change" (Campbell, Guerin and Miller, 1954, p. 187).
What does a person's political efficacy score—high, low, or none—mean?It was discovered that political efficacy polarized policy preferences. People with low efficacy tend to express more moderate policy views, whereas those with relatively high efficacy tend to express choices that are more radical and in accordance with their ideological orientation.
What does the notion that the people themselves should exercise political authority entail?Popular sovereignty is the idea that a state's and its government's authority is established and upheld by the consent of its citizens, who are the source of all political power.
To Know more about Political efficacy
https://brainly.com/question/28460389
#SPJ4
Which Federal court system is separated into 11 different circuits throughout the United States?
A. US Court of Appeals
B. O US District Courts
C.
U S Juvenile and Domestic Courts
D.
U.S Supreme Courts
listing broker randy tells his seller client that he'll reduce her commission by 1.5% if an agent in his firm procures the buyer. randy .
In real estate, it's common for a listing broker to offer a reduced commission rate to their seller if an agent within their own firm procures the buyer. This is known as an in-house transaction. However, it's important to note that the listing broker must disclose this arrangement to the seller and receive their consent before moving forward.
In this case, listing broker Randy has offered to reduce his seller's commission by 1.5% if an agent in his firm procures the buyer. While this may seem like a good deal for the seller, it's important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks. On one hand, the reduced commission rate may make the property more attractive to buyers and lead to a quicker sale. On the other hand, it may limit the exposure of the property to outside agents and potentially limit the pool of potential buyers.
Ultimately, it's up to the seller to decide whether the reduced commission rate is worth the potential tradeoffs. However, it's important for the listing broker to be transparent and upfront about the arrangement and obtain the seller's consent before moving forward.
To know more about buyer visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31593651
#SPJ11
what cases fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction and therefore must be heard in a federal district court?
Cases related to Federal crimes, Bankruptcy, Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, Securities and Banking, Suits between States, suits between foreign ambassadors and high-ranking public officials, falls under the exclusive federal jurisdiction.
In addition to the above-mentioned types of cases the federal courts also have the power or jurisdiction to those cases which arise from the act of congress such as environmental cases, labor and civil rights cases.
All the above-mentioned cases fall under the exclusive federal jurisdiction and therefore must be heard in a federal district court. The federal district court derives its powers from Article III of the US Constitution.
To know more about Trademarks, click here: brainly.com/question/19534317
#SPJ4
Which is not true of STRs?
a. STRs are found in all parts of DNA.
b.STRs are often about 2-5 base pairs long.
c. DNA contains hundreds of STRs.
d.CODIS uses STRs.
Timothy is facing trial for a violation of civil law. As such, what is a potential punishment Timothy may face if the court rules against him?
А Timothy may be given a sentence of probation
B
Timothy may be subject to capital punishment.
Timothy may be imprisoned for a specified period of time.
o o
Timothy may be required to compensate the plaintiff,
2021 Illuminate Education.inc
Type here to search
O
Ri
Answer:
Timothy may be required to compensate the Plaintiff.
This is because a civil litigation usually involves some type of compensation for injuries or damages as well as disposition of property and other disputes.
However, if a guilty defendant is punished by incarceration and/or fines, or in exceptional cases, the death penalty.
what is constitutionalism means?
Answer:
a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed
What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses?
Answer:
Answer Expert Verified The statement that best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses is “Under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.”
What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. ... He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.
WAS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL?
MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST
They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.
What is the meaning of the Constitution?A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organization, or another sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.
A state's constitution serves as its rulebook. It lays out the guiding ideals that the state is governed by. It provides an overview of the state's primary institutions and outlines their interrelationships (for example, between the executive, legislature, and judiciary).
The members of the provincial assemblies chosen by the Indian populace formed the Constituent Assembly of India, which drafted the Constitution. The first president of the Constituent Assembly was Dr. Sachidanand Sinha. Eventually, it elected Dr. Rajendra Prasad as president.
Learn more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ2
Which term is used to describe the official judgement stating the guilt or liability of the defendant concerning the issue in question?
Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the decision of either a jury or a judge, that a person accused is not guilty of the crime for which he has been tried
I hope this is what your kind of looking for!
sorry if it isn't!
Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial; the accused is also referred to as the defendant. A person is declared innocent of the offence for which they have been convicted in court upon being found not guilty by a jury or a judge.
What is judgment?A court's official decision establishing the relative rights and claims of the parties to a lawsuit. The court's constitutional right to hear a case and make a decision.
Moral judgements about what is right or wrong in character traits, such as virtues or vices. Moral judgments about what is right or wrong in action. Moral judgments about what is good or evil in people.
A judgment is the ultimate determination of a court or tribunal. Following the judges' review of all relevant evidence from the legal trial as well as of all rights and obligations, the plaintiff and defendant will get the final verdict.
Thus, Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial.
For more information about judgment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2890222
#SPJ6
The primary goals of the juvenile justice system, in addition to maintaining public safety, are _____
The primary goals of the juvenile justice system, in addition to maintaining public safety, are rehabilitation and reintegration.
Unlike the adult criminal justice system, the juvenile justice system operates with a different set of goals and principles. While public safety remains a paramount concern, the focus of the juvenile justice system is on the rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders.
The juvenile justice system recognizes that many juvenile offenders are still in the process of physical, emotional, and cognitive development. As such, it aims to provide interventions and support that address the underlying causes of delinquent behavior and promote positive changes in juveniles' lives.
Rehabilitation programs within the juvenile justice system often involve a range of services, such as counseling, education, vocational training, substance abuse treatment, and mental health support. The goal is to address the individual needs of young offenders, facilitate their personal growth, and reduce the likelihood of future delinquent behavior.
learn more about juvenile here
https://brainly.com/question/21931423
#SPJ11