is this table linear or non -linear?

A 95% confidence interval for percent of american adults who believe in aliens:  (0.6578, 0.7822)

In this question we have been given that in a survey conducted on an srs of 200 american adults, 72% of them said they believed in aliens

We need to find the 95% confidence interval for percent of american adults who believe in aliens.

95% confidence interval = (p ± z√[p(1 - p)/n])

Here, n = 200

p = 72%

p = 0.72

And the z-score for 95% confidence interval is 1.960

The upper limit of interval would be,

(p + z√[p(1 - p)/n])

= 0.72 + 1.960 √[0.72(1 - 0.72)/200]

= 0.72 + 1.960 √[(0.72 * 0.28)/200]

= 0.72 + 1.960 √0.001008

= 0.72 + 0.0622

= 0.7822

The lower limit of interval would be,

(p - z√[p(1 - p)/n])

= 0.72 - 1.960 √[0.72(1 - 0.72)/200]

= 0.72 - 1.960 √[(0.72 * 0.28)/200]

= 0.72 - 1.960 √0.001008

= 0.72 - 0.0622

= 0.6578

Therefore, a 95% confidence interval = (0.6578, 0.7822)

Learn more about 95% confidence interval here:

https://brainly.com/question/15683202

#SPJ4

Bob would write 68 as 2 to the power of 1 * 2 * s, where s = 17, in order to use the Miller-Rabin test to check the primality of 69.

To check if 69 is prime using the Miller-Rabin test, Bob would first write 68 as 2 to the power of u * r, where u is an odd number and r is an integer.

Since 69 is odd, we can set u = 1.

Now, we need to find the value of r. To do this, we need to find the largest integer r such that 2 to the power of u * r divides evenly into 68.

Starting with r = 1, we calculate 2 to the power of u * r: 2^1 * 1 = 2. However, 2 does not divide evenly into 68.

Next, we try r = 2. 2^1 * 2 = 4, and 4 divides evenly into 68. So, we have found the largest value of r.

Now, we can write 68 as 2 to the power of 1 * 2 * s, where s is the quotient of 68 divided by 4. This gives us 68 = 2^1 * 2 * s, or 68 = 2^2 * s.

Since 68 = 2^2 * s, we can simplify this to 17 = s. Now, we have expressed 68 as 2^1 * 2 * 17.

Using the Miller-Rabin test, Bob would then perform multiple iterations to test the primality of 69. However, since this question only asked about the initial steps of the process, we can conclude that 69 is not prime based on the factors we found.

Learn more about Miller-Rabin test from the given link!

https://brainly.com/question/31382973

#SPJ11

Answer:

x+7/x+6

Step-by-step explanation:

A differential equation with some initial conditions is used to solve an initial value problem.

The required particular solution is given by the relation:

\($4y^{(3/2)} = 9e^{(-2x/3)} + 23\)

An initial value problem in multivariable calculus is an ordinary differential equation with an initial condition that specifies the value of the unknown function at a given point in the domain. In physics or other sciences, modeling a system frequently entails solving an initial value problem.

Let the given equation be \($y^{1/2} dy\ dx y^{3/2} = 1\), y(0) = 9

\($(\sqrt{y } ) y^{\prime}+\sqrt{(y^3\right\left) }=1\) …..(1)

Divide the given equation (1)  by \($\sqrt{ y} $\)  giving

\($y^{\prime}+y=y^{(-1 / 2)} \ldots(2)$\), which is in Bernoulli's form.

Put \($u=y^{(1+1 / 2)}=y^{(3 / 2)}$\)

Then \($(3 / 2) y^{(1 / 2)} \cdot y^{\prime}=u^{\prime}$\).

Multiply (2) by \($\sqrt{ } y$\) and we get

\(y^{(1 / 2)} y^{\prime}+y^{(3 / 2)}=1\)

(2/3) \(u^{\prime}+u=1$\) or \($u^{\prime}+(3 / 2) y=3 / 2$\),

which is a first order linear equation with an integrating factor

exp[Int{(2/3)dx}] = exp(2x/3) and a general solution is

\(u. $e^{(2 x / 3)}=(3 / 2) \ln \[\left[e^{(2 x / 3)} d x\right]+c\right.$\)  or

\(\mathrm{y}^{(3 / 2)} \cdot \mathrm{e}^{(2x / 3)}=(9 / 4) \mathrm{e}^{(2x / 3)}+{c}\)

To obtain the particular solution satisfying y(0) = 4,

put x = 0, y = 4, then

8 = (9/4) + c

c = (23/4)

Hence, the required particular solution is given by the relation:

\($4y^{(3/2)} = 9e^{(-2x/3)} + 23\)

To learn more about initial-value problem, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14744043

#SPJ4

In summary, the correct options for the probability are "Pr(EF) = 0.2", "Pr(E' UF') = 0.8", and "Pr(FE) = 4/7", while the incorrect options are "Pr(EIF) = 2/5", "Pr(E n F) = 0.3", and "Pr(E|F) = 3/5".

Given that event E and F form the whole sample space, S, and Pr(E)=0.7, and Pr(F)=0.5, we can use the following formulas to calculate the probabilities:

Pr(EF) = Pr(E) + Pr(F) - Pr(EuF) (the inclusion-exclusion principle)

Pr(E'F') = 1 - Pr(EuF) (the complement rule)

Pr(E|F) = Pr(EF) / Pr(F) (Bayes' theorem)

Using these formulas, we can evaluate the options provided:

Pr(EF) = Pr(E) + Pr(F) - Pr(EuF) = 0.7 + 0.5 - 1 = 0.2. Therefore, the option "Pr(EF) = 0.2" is correct.

Pr(EIF) = Pr(E' n F') = 1 - Pr(EuF) = 1 - 0.2 = 0.8. Therefore, the option "Pr(EIF) = 2/5" is incorrect.

Pr(E n F) = Pr(EF) = 0.2. Therefore, the option "Pr(E n F) = 0.3" is incorrect.

Pr(E|F) = Pr(EF) / Pr(F) = 0.2 / 0.5 = 2/5. Therefore, the option "Pr(E|F) = 3/5" is incorrect.

Pr(E' U F') = 1 - Pr(EuF) = 0.8. Therefore, the option "Pr(E' UF') = 0.8" is correct.

Pr(FE) = Pr(EF) / Pr(E) = 0.2 / 0.7 = 4/7. Therefore, the option "Pr(FE) = 4/7" is correct.

To know more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

(i) 2^6

(ii) 3^5

(iii) -1^14

(iv) 0.3^4

Different arrangements of candidates are possible is 210.

Given:

There are 7 students on a team. if they must elect a president, a vice president, and a treasurer.

Number of arrangements = \(7_p_{3}\)

= 7!/(7-3)!

= 7!/4!

= 7*6*5*4! / 4!

= 7*6*5*1

= 42*5*1

= 42*5

= 210

Therefore Different arrangements of candidates are possible is 210.

Learn more about the arrangements here:

https://brainly.com/question/28406752

#SPJ4

The 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of all auto accidents involving teenage drivers is approximately (0.1205, 0.1927).

To find the 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of all auto accidents involving teenage drivers, we can use the formula for the confidence interval for a proportion.

The formula for the confidence interval is:

CI = p1 ± Z * √((p1 * (1 - p1)) / n)

Where:

CI is the confidence interval,

p1 is the sample proportion (proportion of accidents involving teenage drivers),

Z is the Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (95% confidence level corresponds to Z ≈ 1.96),

n is the sample size (number of accidents checked).

Given:

Number of accidents checked (sample size), n = 582

Number of accidents involving teenage drivers, x = 91

First, we calculate the sample proportion:

p1 = x / n = 91 / 582 ≈ 0.1566

Now we can calculate the confidence interval:

CI = 0.1566 ± 1.96 * √((0.1566 * (1 - 0.1566)) / 582)

Calculating the standard error of the proportion:

SE = √((p1 * (1 - p1)) / n) = √((0.1566 * (1 - 0.1566)) / 582) ≈ 0.0184

Substituting the values into the formula:

CI = 0.1566 ± 1.96 * 0.0184

Calculating the values:

CI = 0.1566 ± 0.0361

Finally, we can simplify the confidence interval:

CI = (0.1205, 0.1927)

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of all auto accidents involving teenage drivers is approximately (0.1205, 0.1927).

To know more about confidence interval refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32278466#

#SPJ11

An advantage of a weighted moving average (WMA) is that recent actual results can be given more importance than what occurred a while ago is a "true" statement because "Weighted moving averages could be adjusted to emphasize more recent data in forecasting."

Moving averages are popular tools for measuring momentum among active traders. The formula used to calculate the average is the primary distinction between a simple moving average, a weighted moving average, and an exponential moving average.

Some key features regarding the weighted moving average are-

To know more about moving average, here

https://brainly.com/question/15188858

#SPJ4

Answer:

\(1 \frac{2}{5}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

= \(5\frac{3}{5} / 2 \frac{2}{3}\)

= \(\frac{28}{5} / \frac{8}{2}\)

= \(\frac{28}{5} * \frac{2}{8}\)

= \(\frac{7}{5}\)

= \(1 \frac{2}{5}\)

The expected activity time for the given statement is = 5.33

The average amount of time required for an activity when it is repeatedly performed is known as the expected time. The weighted average of the three estimated times, i.e., the optimistic time, the most probable time, and the pessimistic time, is used in project management analysis to determine the expected time of activity.

A network model called the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) allows for randomness in the timing of activity completion. PERT was created in the late 1950s again for a massively labor-intensive Polaris project for the US Navy. It might shorten a lot of time and cost needed to finish a project.

optimistic = 2

most likely = 5

pessimistic = 10.

We will use the following formula to calculate the anticipated time for each activity in order to solve this problem:

Expected Time = (Optimistic Time + (4 x Most likely) + Pessimistic Time) / 6

Putting the values into formula:

= (2 + (4 x 5) + 10)/ 6

= (2 + 20 + 10) / 6

= 5.33

To know more about PERT network visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17464130

#SPJ4

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$850.79

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming "$ 796-99" meant $796.99

796.99 increase 6.75% =

796.99 × (1 + 6.75%) = 796.99 × (1 + 0.0675) = 850.786825

The coordinates of X that partitions XY in the ratio 5 to 4 include the following: X (-1.6, -7).

In this scenario, line ratio would be used to determine the coordinates of the point X on the directed line segment AB that partitions the segment into a ratio of 5 to 4.

In Mathematics and Geometry, line ratio can be used to determine the coordinates of X and this is modeled by this mathematical equation:

M(x, y) = [(mx₂ + nx₁)/(m + n)],  [(my₂ + ny₁)/(m + n)]

By substituting the given parameters into the formula for line ratio, we have;

M(x, y) = [(5(2) + 4(-6))/(5 + 4)],  [(5(-11) + 4(-2))/(5 + 4)]

M(x, y) = [(10 - 24)/(9)],  [(-55 - 8)/9]

M(x, y) = [-14/9],  [(-63)/9]

M(x, y) = (-1.6, -7)

Read more on line ratio here: brainly.com/question/14457392

#SPJ1

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

Answer:

It would be -5 + -6 = 65

Step-by-step explanation:

Add it up to together by removing the -

The centroid of the solid is located at (0, 0, 32/15). The integral for the volume is 64/15π.

To find the volume and centroid of the given solid, we will use cylindrical coordinates. The volume of the solid is V = 64/15π and the centroid is located at (0, 0, 32/15).

First, we need to determine the limits of integration for cylindrical coordinates. The cone and sphere intersect when x² y² = 4, so the limits of integration for ρ are 0 to 2. For φ, the limits are 0 to 2π. For z, the cone extends from z = ρ² cos² φρ² sin² φ to z = 4ρ² cos² φρ² sin² φ. Therefore, the integral for the volume is:

V = ∫∫∫ρ dz dρ dφ

= ∫0²π ∫0² ∫ρ² cos² φρ² sin² φ to 4ρ² cos² φρ² sin² φ dz dρ dφ

= ∫0²π ∫0² ρ³ cos² φ sin² φ (4 - ρ²) dρ dφ

= 64/15π

To find the centroid, we need to evaluate the triple integral for the moments about the x, y, and z axes. Using the symmetry of the solid, we can see that the x and y coordinates of the centroid will be 0. The z coordinate of the centroid is given by:

z_c = (1/V) ∫∫∫z ρ dz dρ dφ

= (1/64/15π) ∫0²π ∫0² ∫ρ³ cos² φ sin² φ (4 - ρ²) ρ dz dρ dφ

= 32/15

Therefore, the centroid of the solid is located at (0, 0, 32/15).

To learn more about centroid here:

brainly.com/question/20305516#

#SPJ11

(i) The number of different divisions possible when 15 children divide themselves into teams of 5 each (Team A, B, and C) is 756.

(ii) If the teams are not distinguishable, the number of different divisions possible is 756 divided by 3!, which equals 126.

(i) To determine the number of different divisions when 15 children divide themselves into three teams of 5 each, we can calculate the number of combinations.

Since the order of the teams does not matter, we use the combination formula.

The formula is nCr = n! / (r! * (n - r)!), where n is the total number of children and r is the number of children per team.

Plugging in the values, we have 15C5 * 10C5 = (15! / (5! * 10!)) * (10! / (5! * 5!)) = 756.

(ii) If the teams are not distinguishable, we need to account for the fact that the order of the teams doesn't matter.

Each division would be counted multiple times if we considered the teams distinguishable. Since there are 3! (3 factorial) ways to arrange the teams, we divide the previous result by 3!, which gives us 756 / 3! = 126.

This accounts for the different arrangements of the same teams and gives us the number of distinct divisions.

To know more about divisions, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2273245#

#SPJ4

To calculate the annual payment required to pay off a five-year, $25,000 loan at an interest rate of 3.50 percent EAR, we can use the formula for calculating the equal annual payment for an amortizing loan.

The formula is: A = (P * r) / (1 - (1 + r)^(-n))

Where: A is the annual payment,

P is the loan principal ($25,000 in this case),

r is the annual interest rate in decimal form (0.035),

n is the number of years (5 in this case).

Substituting the given values into the formula, we have:

A = (25,000 * 0.035) / (1 - (1 + 0.035)^(-5))

Simplifying the equation, we can calculate the annual payment:

A = 6,208.61

Therefore, the annual payment required to pay off the five-year, $25,000 loan at an interest rate of 3.50 percent EAR is $6,208.61.

Learn more about loan here: brainly.com/question/32625768

#SPJ11

After 2.94 Hr. or approximately 3 Hr. both cars will be 250 miles apart.

We have,

The value of the speed of the car moving in the north direction =35 mph

The value of the speed of the car moving in the south direction=50 mph

From above, we can conclude that both are going in the opposite direction

So, the value of the net speed/ relative speed of both the car will be =35+50=85 mph

As we know,

The value of distance can be determined by using the relationship:

Distance = speed * time

So, for determining the value of time, we will put the value of total distance covered and the value of relative speed in the above expression.

Thus, we will get it as:

250=85*t

So, the value of the time taken = t=250/85=2.94 hours approx 3 hours

For more questions on Speed, Time, Distance

https://brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ4

The complete question should be like:

Two cars leave the origin; one goes north at 35mph and the other goes south at 50 mph. After how many hours will they be 250 miles apart?

Answer:

3 + y = 18

y = 18 - 3

y = 15

Step-by-step explanation:

brainliest plz

15 is the answer.

3+15=18

Using the center-of-gravity technique, the best site location for the new distribution center in Charlotte is determined to be at coordinates (X, Y) = (27.92, 19.08).

The center-of-gravity technique is used to find the optimal location for a facility based on the distribution of demand. In this case, we will calculate the weighted average of the coordinates (X, Y) of the three sites, with the weights being the number of weekly packages flowing to each site.

To calculate the X-coordinate of the center of gravity, we use the formula:

Xc = (X1 * W1 + X2 * W2 + X3 * W3) / (W1 + W2 + W3)

Similarly, for the Y-coordinate:

Yc = (Y1 * W1 + Y2 * W2 + Y3 * W3) / (W1 + W2 + W3)

Substituting the given values:

Xc = (16 * 26000 + 35 * 12000 + 40 * 10000) / (26000 + 12000 + 10000) ≈ 27.92

Yc = (28 * 26000 + 10 * 12000 + 18 * 10000) / (26000 + 12000 + 10000) ≈ 19.08

Therefore, the best site location for the new distribution center in Charlotte is approximately at coordinates (X, Y) = (27.92, 19.08) based on the center-of-gravity technique.

Learn more about coordinates here:

https://brainly.com/question/22261383

#SPJ11

Using the information, we can find the probability of various outcomes for the number of cameras sold (X) and the number of extended warranties sold (Y). We can also calculate the joint pmf of X and Y and the marginal pmf of Y.

Explanation:

a. To find P(X = 4, Y = 2), we can use the fact that P(Y = 2 | X = 4) = P(Y = 2 and X = 4) / P(X = 4). Since the purchases of cameras and warranties are independent, we can treat them as four trials of a binomial experiment with probability of success p = 0.6. Therefore, P(X = 4) = (0.6)^4 and P(Y = 2 and X = 4) = (4 choose 2) * (0.6)^2 * (0.4)^2. Putting it all together, we get P(X = 4, Y = 2) = (4 choose 2) * (0.6)^3 * (0.4)^2.

b. P(X = Y) can be calculated by summing the probabilities of all outcomes where X = Y. Since X and Y can only take integer values, we can sum over all possible values of X and Y where X = Y. Using the pmf of X and Y, we get P(X = Y) = P(X = 0, Y = 0) + P(X = 1, Y = 1) + P(X = 2, Y = 2) + P(X = 3, Y = 3) + P(X = 4, Y = 4).

c. To determine the joint pmf of X and Y, we can use the fact that the purchases of cameras and warranties are independent. Therefore, P(X = x, Y = y) = (x choose y) * (0.6)^y * (0.4)^(x-y) for 0 <= y <= x <= 4. To find the marginal pmf of Y, we can sum the joint pmf over all possible values of X for each fixed value of Y. This gives us P(Y = y) = sum from x=y to 4 of P(X = x, Y = y) for 0 <= y <= 4.

To learn more about joint pmf click here, brainly.com/question/18688445

#SPJ11

Diversity encompasses multiple dimensions such as life experiences, educational background, geographic origin, and age that is option E.

Diversity encompasses a range of factors including life experiences, educational background, geographic origin, and age. It goes beyond a single dimension and encompasses various aspects that contribute to differences among individuals. By embracing diversity in all its forms, organizations and communities can benefit from a wider range of perspectives, ideas, and talents.

To know more about Diversity,

https://brainly.com/question/31522598

#SPJ11

The matrix A' for the linear transformation T with respect to the basis B' is:

[ 0  2 -1]

[ 1 -2 -2]

[-3 -3  3]

To find the matrix A' for the linear transformation T with respect to the basis B', we need to apply T to each vector in B' and express the result as a linear combination of vectors in B'. We can then use these coefficients to construct the matrix A'.

Let's apply T to the first vector in B':

T(0,-1,2) = (0, 1, -3) = 0*(0,-1,2) + 1*(-2,0,3) - 3*(1,3,0)

So the first column of A' is:

[0]

[1]

[-3]

Similarly, applying T to the second and third vectors in B', we get:

T(-2,0,3) = (2, -2, -3) = 2*(0,-1,2) - 2*(-2,0,3) - 3*(1,3,0)

T(1,3,0) = (-1,-2,3) = -1*(0,-1,2) - 2*(-2,0,3) + 3*(1,3,0)

So the second and third columns of A' are:

[ 2  -1]

[-2  -2]

[-3   3]

Therefore, the matrix A' for the linear transformation T with respect to the basis B' is:

[ 0  2 -1]

[ 1 -2 -2]

[-3 -3  3]

Learn more about matrix here:

https://brainly.com/question/28180105

#SPJ11

The volume of the given silo is 79,546.67 ft³.

Given, a silo of the radius 20 ft and height of the cylinder is 50 ft.

We have to find the volume of the silo,

Volume = Volume of hemisphere + Volume of Cylinder

Volume = 2/3πr³ + πr²h

Volume = πr²(2/3r + h)

Volume = 79,546.67 ft³

Hence, the volume of the given silo is 79,546.67 ft³.

Learn more about Volumes here https://brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ4

The probability of randomly selecting a doctor who is either a General Practitioner or under the age of 40 from a small hospital is 9/19, given 6 out of 19 are General Practitioners, 5 out of 19 are under 40, and 2 are both.

To find the probability of randomly selecting a doctor who is either a General Practitioner or under the age of 40, we need to add the probabilities of these two events and subtract the probability of selecting a doctor who is both a General Practitioner and under the age of 40, since we don't want to count that case twice:

P(General Practitioner or under 40) = P(General Practitioner) + P(Under 40) - P(General Practitioner and under 40)

we know 6 out of 19 doctors are General Practitioners, 5 out of 19 doctors are under the age of 40, 2 doctors are both General Practitioners and under the age of 40.

Therefore:

P(General Practitioner) = 6/19

P(Under 40) = 5/19

P(General Practitioner and under 40) = 2/19

Substituting these values into the formula:

P(General Practitioner or under 40) = 6/19 + 5/19 - 2/19

= 9/19

Therefore, the probability of randomly selecting a doctor who is either a General Practitioner or under the age of 40 is 9/19.

To know more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

x=37

Step-by-step explanation:

a triangle is equal to 180°. so if you already have 50+56 then you have 74° left for 2x. and 74/2=37

Answer:

x=37 because 56+50=106 180-106=74 74÷2=37