In the “Little Albert” experiment, psychologist John Watson conditioned a(n) ____________.
A.
lab rat to fear an infant
B.
infant to fear Santa Claus
C.
infant to fear a lab rat
D.
lab rat to fear loud noises

Answer:

It is important that insurance contracts explicitly state that they benefit third parties because it clarifies the rights and obligations of all parties involved. Specifically, it ensures that the beneficiaries designated by the insured have a legal claim to the proceeds of the contract, even if they are not a party to the original agreement between the insured and the insurer.

Without an explicit statement that the insurance contract benefits third parties, there could be confusion or dispute over who has a rightful claim to the proceeds. For example, if an insured person were to pass away and had not clearly designated beneficiaries in the insurance contract, there could be disagreement among family members or other potential claimants over who should receive the benefits. This could lead to costly and time-consuming legal battles, adding to the emotional distress and financial burden already faced by the family.

Answer:

best answer ever

Explanation:

So, if I am Prime minister of ..... l,  I may do the following things, and again, just because a PM says or does something doesn’t mean it happens automatically, you have to deal with individual ministries and civil servants, media, the opposition party, judiciary, and others, It’s not a dictatorship where things get done just by speaking. Anyway, here are a few things.

Rule of law: Yes, that’s my priority to ensure that Constitution and laws are applied to everybody, rich and poor, politically connected, and others. This will be very difficult in the case of a coalition Govt but it can be done in a majority Govt with strong will and good ministers in various places. What can be done?? Well, we can first start by prosecuting previous cases of violation of rule of law by powerful politicians and others, media can help in that. Giving resources to public prosecutors and hiring good people so that accused are punished. Increasing punishment for things like corruption (It’s just 2 years in Nepal for big corruption) can also help. it must be assured that nobody is above the law and that way, their faith in Govt and democracy will be restored a bit.

Expedite construction projects: We have too many problems in Nepal with slow approval process or red tape regulation and also with procurement and contractors, among others which delays vital projects like building roads, airports, bridges, pipelines for water among others and even if they are built, it’s of less quality because a lot of money is being wasted on commission and there is corruption. I will create a task force of expert people from all relevant backgrounds to suggest ways to expedite construction projects including Hydropower projects, try to find out root problems and how to address them, see if the problems are politicians bureaucrats or private sector, and give me ways. A PM cannot know everything and we need to rely on experts for a solution. One of the biggest problems in Nepal is that politicians here including PM believe only they are real experts and don’t need help from anybody. We need to change that approach.

Electricity generation: This is a must for economic development in Nepal because without electricity there can be no industrialization. As everyone knows, Nepal has a huge potential in hydroelectricity which is renewable but big projects have been delayed for a long time. We need to expedite such big projects but also help the private sector build small hydropower projects in small communities to make them itself-sufficientient. Nepal’s total hydropower generation many says is around 80,000 MW (I am not sure, need to look at that as well) and many in Nepal say, we must build hydropower projects to then immediately sell to India. I think, first, we should make Nepal self-sufficient and then only think about other Countries. Electricity can be used not just for regular stuff but also for industries, we can give thousands of MW to industries in Nepal that will employ millions of good-paying jobs in Nepal, we can use electricity to make Nepal a leader in electric vehicles, and using renewables. We import billions of petroleum from India, if we can only try to reduce it by using electric vehicles, esp in Kathmandu, it will make a difference. Again, these are long-term projects and only a PM cannot do anything, huge amount of cooperation is needed on all sides, from Nepali people to the private sector. Nepal govt can always give incentives like custom-free electric vehicles that are cheap to tax credits for companies among others.

Most cases reach the Supreme Court in the United States through a petition for writ of certiorari.

In the United States, most cases reach the Supreme Court through a process called a "petition for writ of certiorari." This means that parties involved in a case submit a formal request asking the Supreme Court to review and hear their case. The Supreme Court has discretionary power over which cases it chooses to accept, and it generally grants certiorari in cases that present significant legal questions, conflicts between lower courts, or cases of national importance. Once the Supreme Court grants certiorari, it agrees to review the case and make a final decision that will have precedential value.

Learn more about petition for writ of certiorari

brainly.com/question/32367931

#SPJ11

The question of whether democratic political culture in the United States is under threat is a matter of ongoing debate and subjective interpretation.

There are varying perspectives on the health and resilience of democratic values, institutions, and norms within the country. Some argue that there are indeed challenges and threats that pose risks to democratic political culture, while others maintain that the system is robust and adaptable.

Those who express concerns about the state of democratic political culture in the US often point to various factors. These may include the rise of political polarization and divisiveness, the erosion of trust in institutions and elected officials, the influence of money in politics, efforts to restrict voting rights, disinformation and fake news, and the potential for foreign interference in elections.

On the other hand, proponents of the resilience of democratic political culture in the US argue that the system has faced challenges throughout its history and has demonstrated the ability to adapt and self-correct.

Learn more about proponents

https://brainly.com/question/988904

#SPJ11

The other factors that made an employee succeed in the artic are as follows

1) Stay hydrated

2) Consume lots of calories and food high in fat.

3) Protect yourself from the wind.

4) Insulate yourself from the cold.

5) Protect extremities.

6) Stay dry.

7) Don’t get lost.

8) Avoid weak ice.

The extreme Arctic climate makes the region a forbidding place to travel and even so, people have found ways to explore and live in the Arctic. And heating a home can be challenging and expensive without trees to cut for firewood in the Arctic to pass on traditional knowledge and skills, such as hunting, fishing

The weather of the Arctic is characterized by long, bloodless winters and short, cool summers. There's a massive amount of variability in climate across the Arctic, but all regions experience extremes of solar radiation each summer and winter.

Learn more about Arctic here https://brainly.com/question/4038569

#SPJ9

The elements that do not represent corpus delicti are:

This refers to the legal term that has to do with the facts and circumstances that make up a crime.

Hence, we can see that The elements that do not represent corpus delicti are:

This is because causation and concurrence are not valid proof that a crime was committed and guilt being established and thus is not a representation of corpus delicti.

In criminal law, the facts and circumstances are determined by several factors...

Read more about corpus delicti here:

https://brainly.com/question/17636247

#SPJ1

Answer: I'm not sure if I understand your question, or if you misunderstood the workings of this platform but this is how you ask question where other people answer your question(s).

If you have any questions let me know.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

U.S. has most incarcerated people

True. The federal government has issued an executive order to advance racial fairness and support for underserved communities.

Executive Order 13985, titled "Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government," was signed by President Biden on January 20, 2021. It calls for a comprehensive strategy for the Federal Government to transform itself so that fairness and equity are not just ideals.

According to Executive Order 13985, the director of the Office of Management and Budget and the assistant to the president for domestic policy must meet to develop a strategy for dealing with the following issues: any obstacles preventing underprivileged communities and individuals from enrolling in or using federal benefits, services, or programs; and any obstacles preventing full and equal participation.

Learn more about executive Visit: brainly.com/question/26909217

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

The statement "all income must be reported, and all deductions are allowed unless specifically disallowed in the code" is a fundamental principle of tax law in many countries, including the United States. It means that taxpayers are required to report all of their income to the government, and they are allowed to deduct certain expenses from their income to arrive at their taxable income.

The first part of the statement, "all income must be reported," means that taxpayers are required to report all of their income, regardless of the source. This includes income from wages, self-employment, investments, and any other source of income. Failure to report all income can result in penalties and legal consequences, such as fines or even imprisonment.

The second part of the statement, "all deductions are allowed unless specifically disallowed in the code," means that taxpayers are allowed to deduct certain expenses from their income to arrive at their taxable income, unless those deductions are specifically disallowed by the tax code. These deductions are meant to help offset the costs of earning income and to encourage certain behaviors, such as charitable giving and investing in retirement savings.

Examples of deductions that are allowed under the tax code include charitable contributions, certain medical expenses, and certain business expenses. Deductions that are specifically disallowed under the tax code include personal expenses, such as clothing and personal grooming expenses, and certain types of investment losses.

It is important for taxpayers to understand and follow these principles of tax law to ensure that they are in compliance with the tax code and to minimize their tax liability. Taxpayers should consult with a tax professional or utilize tax software to help ensure they are reporting all income and taking advantage of all allowable deductions.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

Explanation:

The statement "all income must be reported, and all deductions are allowed unless specifically disallowed in the code" is a fundamental principle of tax law in many countries, including the United States. It means that taxpayers are required to report all of their income to the government, and they are allowed to deduct certain expenses from their income to arrive at their taxable income.

The first part of the statement, "all income must be reported," means that taxpayers are required to report all of their income, regardless of the source. This includes income from wages, self-employment, investments, and any other source of income. Failure to report all income can result in penalties and legal consequences, such as fines or even imprisonment.

The second part of the statement, "all deductions are allowed unless specifically disallowed in the code," means that taxpayers are allowed to deduct certain expenses from their income to arrive at their taxable income, unless those deductions are specifically disallowed by the tax code. These deductions are meant to help offset the costs of earning income and to encourage certain behaviors, such as charitable giving and investing in retirement savings.

Examples of deductions that are allowed under the tax code include charitable contributions, certain medical expenses, and certain business expenses. Deductions that are specifically disallowed under the tax code include personal expenses, such as clothing and personal grooming expenses, and certain types of investment losses.

It is important for taxpayers to understand and follow these principles of tax law to ensure that they are in compliance with the tax code and to minimize their tax liability. Taxpayers should consult with a tax professional or utilize tax software to help ensure they are reporting all income and taking advantage of all allowable deductions.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

Answers Below.

Explanation:

1. True

2. False

3. True

4. True

5. True

6. False

7. True

8. True

9. True

10. True

Most of these are true lol XD

Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.

- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.

- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.

- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.

These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.

For more such questions on colonization, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/27868020

#SPJ8

The legal threshold in a criminal court needed in order for the prosecution to secure a conviction is to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt.

Reasonable doubt is a legal standard which a prosecution team must attain in order to secure the conviction of a person on trial.

  Reasonable doubt means that the prosecution must present to the court all admissible evidence to prove that a person on trial actually committed that crime and that all the evidence provided must have been obtained through an admissible means.

Conviction is the formal verdict which is issued by the jury in a competent court of jurisdiction that the accused of a crime is found guilty of that crime.

This means that the jury must have taken in to consideration the evidence set before it by both the defense and the prosecution team and that they have voted amongst themself and the number of votes for conviction outweighs the other.

Learn more about Reasonable Doubt at https://brainly.com/question/27077531

#SPJ1

The purpose of the statute of frauds is that it requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the parties bound by the contract.

The purpose of this statute is to prevent fraud and other injury by ensuring that important agreements are documented and verified by all parties involved. Other measures, such as community service for those convicted of fraud or warning labels on products or services prone to fraud, may also be used to deter fraudulent behavior. In the case of Bernie Madoff, a statue erected on Wall Street serves as a reminder that crime doesn't pay and may deter others from committing similar acts of fraud . The Statute of Frauds exists to protect both parties involved in a contract by establishing a clear and concrete record of the agreement. This makes it more difficult for either party to later deny the existence or terms of the contract, ultimately minimizing the risk of fraud and other injury in contractual relationships.

To know more about Statue of Frauds visit :

https://brainly.com/question/12285524

#SPJ11

When it comes to Muslims being allowed to build a mosque near a playground, this depends on the people of the city or town and some things they can consider include:

Muslims hold the right to religion and worshipping as desired. Hence, building a mosque near a playground should not be deemed inappropriate merely based on location.

However, it is integral to consider various factors such as potential noise level disruptions, traffic congestion caused by increased footfall and any danger posed for children frequenting the area. Through careful planning and adherence to local regulations, these issues can be addressed adequately.

Find out more on Muslims at https://brainly.com/question/18213891

#SPJ1

Answer:

the 3 types if voting is plurality, majority, and proportiona representations

Explanation:

Answer:

The Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the states and the federal government from using age as a reason for denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States who are at least twenty years old. It was proposed by Congress on March 23, 1971, and three-fourths of the states ratified it by July 1, 1971, the quickest adoption of an amendment.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Vietnam War

Explanation:

Hope this Helped! ;)

False.

The statement is false. The Department of Justice (DOJ) does not mandate that all law enforcement agencies utilize the same selection process.

While the DOJ provides guidance and sets certain standards for law enforcement agencies, including those related to hiring practices, each agency generally has the autonomy to establish its own selection process based on their specific needs and requirements.

Different agencies may have variations in their selection methods, criteria, and procedures, reflecting the unique context and priorities of the respective jurisdiction. Therefore, there is no blanket requirement for all law enforcement agencies to follow the exact same selection process as mandated by the Department of Justice.

Learn more about Department of Justice

brainly.com/question/2704562

#SPJ11

Answer:

So the prices will not get too high. The higher the minimum wage, the higher the price is for the product the company is selling.

Explanation:

So if Wendy's minumun wage is $7.50 an hour, and a burger is 4.00. If you raise the wage to $15, the burger price will go up

The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.

Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.

To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521

#SPJ11

1. In order to be convicted of a crime, Hanousek must have had the required mental state (mens rea).

2. The theory of strict liability, discussed in the chapter, would enable a court to hold Hanousek criminally liable for violating the statute regardless of his knowledge or participation in the specific violation.

3. The backhoe operator who punctured the pipeline could also potentially be charged with a crime in this situation.

4. Hanousek's defense that he was not aware of the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA) would likely not be successful.

1. The chapter does not provide specific information regarding Hanousek's mental state or intent in relation to the oil discharge. It would depend on the evidence presented in the case to determine whether he had the necessary mental state, such as whether he acted knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence.

2. Strict liability offenses impose liability without requiring proof of intent or knowledge. If the statute under the Clean Water Act imposes strict liability for the discharge of oil into navigable waters, Hanousek could be held criminally liable even if he was not directly involved or aware of the pipeline puncture.

3. If the operator acted negligently or recklessly, causing the oil discharge into the river, they could be held responsible for violating the criminal provisions of the Clean Water Act. However, it would depend on the specific circumstances and evidence of the operator's actions and mental state.

4. Ignorance of the law is generally not a valid defense in criminal cases. The CWA is a federal statute with established regulations, and individuals are expected to be aware of their legal obligations. Hanousek's lack of awareness of the CWA's requirements would not absolve him of potential liability unless there were specific circumstances or legal arguments that could support a defense based on lack of knowledge or mistake of law, which would require further analysis of the case specifics.

Learn more about Negligence

https://brainly.com/question/32769351

#SPJ11

The federal government relies most heavily on Income tax. The correct option is option A.

2. All the statements are true when it comes to when a beekeeper's bees pollinate the crops of the farmer next door. Option C is the correct option.

3. The type of tax explained is regressive tax. The correct option is option A.

4. The United States most closely resembles a mixed economic system. The correct option is B.

5. The category in which the government spend the most is healthcare. Option C is the correct option.

6. The option which is not considered as public good provided by the government is healthcare. Option E is the correct option.

7. The contracts do all of the listed options. The correct option is option C.

8. The government is NOT likely to address a positive externality using law. The correct option is option E.

9. Pollution is not a public goods provided by the government. The correct option is option D.

10. The fishes in the ocean are rival and nonexcludable. The correct option is option B.

Income tax is a kind of tax that is imposed on people or organizations based on their earnings or income. It is often imposed by the government and is used to pay for public programs and services. The amount of income tax payable is typically calculated by applying a tax rate to the taxpayer's taxable income. Depending on the income threshold and tax regulations of the particular nation or jurisdiction, the tax rate may change. Regularly throughout the year, income tax is normally paid by withholding from paychecks or projected tax payments.

Learn more about Income Tax here

https://brainly.com/question/30157668

#SPJ4

About a century of reform initiatives led to the adoption of the amendment. Early supporters of temperance sought to lessen alcohol use and guard against alcoholism, intoxication, and the mayhem and violence that could follow. These early initiatives encouraged moderate consumption in the goal of enacting prohibition later in  Congress.

The 18th Amendment, popularly known as the Prohibition Amendment, was adopted after a protracted fight for temperance. The temperance movement promoted "moderation in or abstention from the drinking of alcoholic beverages." Supporters actually wanted alcohol to be prohibited. The 18th Amendment to the Constitution, which outlawed the "production, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors," was ratified by the states on January 16, 1919. There was a drive in the United States to abolish alcohol at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Congress enacted the 18th Amendment, also known as the Prohibition Amendment, in December 1917 and sent it to the states for ratification. President Woodrow Wilson's veto of the Volstead Act, also known as the National Prohibition Act, was overridden nine months later by Congress.

Learn more about Congress from

brainly.com/question/491441

#SPJ4

Answer: The form of U.S. tax-free organizing under section 527 of the US Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 527) is a 527 association or 527 community. A 527 party is formed with the primary goal of influencing candidate selection, candidacy, voting, appointment, or loss for federal, state, or local public office.