The United States and Canada collaborated to calm the situation in order to provide relief to the Haitian people in order to address a severe threat to their well-being. liberalism internationalism multilateralism.
Liberal internationalism has also been compared to multilateral organizations like UNDP, UNICEF, WHO, and the UN General Assembly. Realists think that countries should only intervene when it is in their own best interests, but in this situation, it is more about a country intervening for moral grounds.
According to the democratic peace theory, democracies are averse to starting armed conflicts with other recognized democracies. The democratic peace theory holds that a number of variables encourage peace between democratic states.
Read more about united states at
https://brainly.com/question/858298
#SPJ4
Larry was arrested for not following traffic rules and almost caused some damaged further he could not produce a driver licence when a a police officer asked for it what could be Larrys crime classified as?
A owns Blackacre because true owners cannot be tacked together. Thus, the statute of limitations starts in 1994, and B lost possession in 2004.
Why? We'd rather favor the earning principle, than the sleeping.
In the given case, if A acquired ownership of Blackacre without privity between A and B, then B's period of possession cannot be tacked onto A's period of possession for the purposes of adverse possession.
The principle of adverse possession is based on the notion that a person who uses and maintains property for a certain period of time should be allowed to claim ownership of the property, even if they do not have legal title to it.
This principle is sometimes referred to as the earning principle because adverse possessors are seen to have earned ownership of the property through their use and maintenance of it.
Learn more about adverse possession here:
https://brainly.com/question/29988444
#SPJ4
The Supreme Court Case New Jersey v. TLO questioned the rights students had in public schools. TLO was a New Jersey high school student whose locker was searched after school officials had reason to believe she was distributing drugs and cigarettes. She was found guilty and sentenced to a one-year probation. TLO appealed the decision all the way to the Supreme Court, which initially decided that her 4th Amendment rights (which protect a person’s home, belongings and body from being searched without just cause) had been violated. However, upon re-arguing the case, “the Court held that while the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable warrantless searches of students under their authority notwithstanding the probable cause standard that would normally apply to searches under the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the search of T.L.O.'s purse was reasonable under the circumstances”.
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s final decision or their initial? Why or why not? In your answer, discuss the Fourth Amendment, how it applies to this case, and which verdict you agree with (the initial or final verdict).
Answer:
its c
Explanation:
The role of the judge in the common-law tradition differs from the role of the judge in the civil-law tradition in that ______.
The role of the judge in the common-law tradition differs from the role of the judge in the civil-law tradition in several ways.
In the common-law tradition, judges play a significant role in creating and interpreting laws through the use of judicial precedent. This means that judges have the power to make law based on their interpretation of previous court decisions. This is in contrast to the civil-law tradition where judges are bound by the legal code and are not able to create new laws through judicial precedent. Instead, judges in the civil-law tradition are responsible for applying the law to the facts of the case before them.
Another key difference between the two traditions is the level of discretion that judges have. In the common-law tradition, judges have a great deal of discretion when interpreting laws and applying them to individual cases. This is because the law is often vague and open to interpretation. In contrast, judges in the civil-law tradition have less discretion since the law is typically more prescriptive and detailed.
Overall, the role of the judge in the common-law tradition is more active and creative, while the role of the judge in the civil-law tradition is more passive and focused on applying the law to the specific case at hand.
Learn more about court :
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ11
which of the followings aspects of international law would enable a cyber-criminal operating across borders to evade prosecution? Non-existent extradition agreements between 2 countries
Non-existent extradition agreements between two countries can enable a cyber-criminal operating across borders to evade prosecution.
Extradition is the legal process through which one country surrenders an individual to another country for prosecution or punishment. It allows for the transfer of accused individuals from one jurisdiction to another to face criminal charges. However, in the absence of an extradition agreement between two countries, there is no legal framework to facilitate the extradition process.
For a cyber-criminal operating across borders, the lack of an extradition agreement can provide a safe haven, as they cannot be easily extradited to a country where they committed the crime. This can hinder international cooperation and make it challenging for law enforcement agencies to bring the cyber-criminal to justice.
Without an extradition agreement, the country where the cyber-criminal is residing may not be obligated to hand them over for prosecution, effectively allowing them to evade prosecution and continue their illegal activities.
The absence of extradition agreements between two countries can create loopholes that enable cyber-criminals operating across borders to evade prosecution. International cooperation and the establishment of extradition agreements are crucial in addressing cybercrime and ensuring that offenders are held accountable.
Learn more about law at:
brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ11
If you wanted to obtain eoples of inspection reports of a state-owned building, what guarantees that you would get the coplea?
A. The Freedom of Information Act
B.Writing a request letter
C.Going to the county
governing body
D. Going to the county building in person
Answer:
B.Writing a request letter
C.Going to the county
governing body
D. Going to the county building in person
Explanation:
If you wanted to obtain eoples of inspection reports of a state-owned building, what guarantees that you would get the coplea?
mentally infirmed sasha contracts to purchase a piano for $2,500 in 60 monthly installment payments. six months later she tries to void the contract on grounds of mental impairment. a court will ____________
It depends on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. In general, if the court determines that Sasha was not mentally competent at the time she entered into the contract, the contract may be voidable.
It depends on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. In general, if the court determines that Sasha was not mentally competent at the time she entered into the contract, the contract may be voidable. However, if she continued to make payments after the six-month mark, she may be considered to have ratified the contract, meaning that she accepted the terms of the agreement and cannot later void it on the basis of her mental impairment. Additionally, if the court finds that the seller was aware of Sasha's mental impairment and took advantage of her, it may be more likely to void the contract.
Learn more about contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ11
describe the the political culture of morocco
Answer:
The political culture of Morocco is shaped by a number of factors, including its history, geography, and demographics. Some key characteristics of the political culture of Morocco include:
Authoritarianism: Morocco has a long history of authoritarian rule, with a monarchy that holds significant power and has traditionally played a central role in the country's political system.
Limited democracy: Morocco has a multi-party system, but the monarchy and other powerful institutions limit the scope of political activity and decision-making.
Political Islam: Islam has played a significant role in Moroccan politics, with many political parties and movements seeking to incorporate Islamic principles into the country's political system.
Political stability: Morocco has generally been a stable country, with relatively low levels of political violence and unrest.
Political pluralism: While the monarchy and other powerful institutions dominate the political landscape, there is a degree of political pluralism in Morocco, with a range of political parties and movements representing different interests and viewpoints.
Limited civil society: Civil society in Morocco is relatively weak, with many organizations facing government repression and restrictions on their activities.
Human rights concerns: Morocco has faced criticism for its treatment of political dissidents, minorities, and other vulnerable groups, with concerns about freedom of expression, due process, and other human rights issues. Overall, the political culture of Morocco is characterized by a mix of authoritarianism, political Islam, and limited democracy, with a history of stability and a range of political actors seeking to influence the country's direction.
how can discussions, projects, campaigns,and events support victims of human trafficking
Answer:
By informing the community. Human trafficking victims benefit from discussions, projects, campaigns, and events such as support camps because they learn about their rights, the laws that apply to them, and the organizations that can help them get justice. People can help victims of human trafficking by increasing awareness through discussions, projects, campaigns, and events. People have knowledge or comprehension of human rights violations when they are aware of the problem. They can form an opinion and, eventually, an initiative or a proposal to help fix the situation based on this knowledge.
Hope this helped! Have a great day or night wherever you are, stay safe!
a reflection on the key values of the social work profession
Answer:
service, social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence.
Explanation:
tama po to..
Can a prisoner sue me
Which amendment provides a broad definition of citizenship and guarantees all citizens due process and equal protection of the laws?.
The 14th Amendment guarantees all citizens due process and equal protection under the law and offers a broad definition of citizenship.
What is an Amendment?The term amendment is a change or addition to the terms of a contract or document. An amendment is often a component or correction that leaves the original document considerably intact. In government and law, an addition or alteration is made to a constitution, statute, assembly bill, or resolution. The amendment for human rights is also for it.
When the U.S. Constitution was enacted in 1868, it guaranteed all citizens—including former slaves—the right to citizenship regardless of where they were born or how they obtained it.
Therefore, Amendment guarantees all citizens due process
Learn more about the amendment here:
brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ1
The state tax incentive is an example of":
Answer:
mortgage interest deduction
Which of the following initial written agreements is NOT legally
binding?
A) Memorandum of understanding
B) Letter of intent
C) Mixed document
D) Impossible to determine
Answer: A) Memorandum of understanding
Explanation:
A student is working on a weather project. They want to be able to predict the weather by using tools that will measure the air temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity. Which tools will they use? *
Answer:
I. Air temperature: thermometer.
II. Wind speed: wind vane.
III. Relative humidity: hygrometer.
Explanation:
Weather can be defined as the atmospheric conditions of a particular area over a short period of time.
The elements of weather include precipitation, wind, temperature, atmospheric pressure, relative humidity, cloud, and wind speed.
In this project, a student want to be able to predict the weather by using tools that will measure the following elements of weather;
I. Air temperature: a thermometer is the meteorological tool that should be used to measure it. Temperature can be defined as a measure of the degree of coldness or hotness of a physical object. It is measured with a thermometer and its units are Celsius (°C), Kelvin (K) and Fahrenheit (°F).
II. Wind speed: a wind vane is a device designed for the measurements of wind speed. Wind speed can be defined as a measure of the rate at which the wind moves at a particular point in time.
III. Relative humidity: the students should use a hygrometer to measure it. Relative humidity can be defined as an amount of water vapor present in the air, expressed as a percentage with respect to the maximum it can hold at the same temperature.
Statistics show how twice the number of people are employed in private security than in
public law enforcement in the United States. Discuss why the disparity is likely and what
the implications are for public security.
The reasons there are more private security than police are:
It is expensive to fund more police. Need to fill in gap left by police. Getting into police is relatively difficult. Why are there more private security than Police?As the police are funded by taxes, it would be a huge drain on the economy if more police officers were hired. There are many businesses and people in need of protection and because the police cannot be there all the time, private security is turned to. Police training and accreditation in a lot of cities in also quite cumbersome and intensive. A lot of people who apply don't make it.In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.
Find out more about private security at https://brainly.com/question/7203143.
Which of the following statements best summarizes Hamilton's argument?
A. The 13 States should retain their courts and have independence from national law.
B. The proposed Federal Courts and the Supreme Court will provide national consistency in the law.
C. Because the national court system will have multiple judges, differing decisions will cause confusion.
D. The Judicial Branch should be the superior branch of Government.
B. The proposed Federal Courts and the Supreme Court will provide national consistency in the law.
Alexander Hamilton, in his Federalist Paper No. 22, argued in favor of establishing a federal court system in the United States. He believed that a national court system was necessary to ensure uniformity and consistency in the interpretation and application of federal laws across all the states. He also argued that state courts would be inadequate to handle disputes that arose under federal law or involved parties from different states. Hamilton believed that a national court system, with a Supreme Court at its head, would provide a stronger and more effective means of enforcing the laws of the United States. Thus, the statement that best summarizes Hamilton's argument is that the proposed Federal Courts and the Supreme Court will provide national consistency in the law.
Learn more about federal court :
https://brainly.com/question/1384353
#SPJ4
what was the purpose of the indian education act of 1972?
Answer:
The Indian Education Act of 1972 (also known as Title IV) was enacted to improve educational opportunities for Native American children. It provided financial assistance to local school districts to support the education of Native American students and established policies for the operation of schools on Indian reservations. The act recognized the unique cultural and linguistic needs of Native American students and required schools to work with local tribes to develop culturally appropriate curricula and programs. The goal of the act was to provide Native American students with an education that both respected their cultural heritage and prepared them for success in the modern world.:
Is it illegal to murder someone
Answer:
No it depends on how you do it self defense its legal just to do it its illegal
Explanation:
If the paint on your house was eaten away by the fumes from a factory nearby and you hired a lawyer to sue the polluting firm, your legal fees would be considered
a) external costs.
b) transaction costs.
c) marginal benefits.
d) social costs of the pollution.
Option D, If the paint on your house was eaten away by the fumes from a factory nearby and you hired a lawyer to sue the polluting firm, your legal fees would be considered social costs of the pollution.
The societal costs comprise all of these individual expenses (gas, oil, upkeep, insurance, depreciation, and operator's driving time), as well as the costs incurred by those who are not the driver but are subjected to traffic congestion and air pollution as a result of driving. A harmful externality is pollution. A demand and supply diagram is the tool economists use to depict the social costs of production. The company's internal production expenses as well as the exterior costs of pollution that are borne by society are included in the social costs.
Know more about the social costs of the pollution at: https://brainly.com/question/29945320
#SPJ4
What is the protection of the environment Administration Act 1991?
The Americans with Disabilities Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1991 have an impact on hiring practices because they forbid public discrimination based on race, color, gender, religion, and national origin.
To improve state civil rights laws against workplace discrimination, congress approved the Civil Rights Act of 1991. Additionally, it offered means to deal with covert types of workplace discrimination as well as protection for minorities who are legally protected. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 had a void that the 1991 Act was created to fill. What is the Disability Act? In accordance with the 2016 Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. A person is considered a "disabled person" if they have a long-term physical, a mental, intellectual, or sensory impairment that interacts with a disability to limit their capacity to participate fully and effectively in society and other activities.
Learn more about Civil Rights Act of 1991 here:
https://brainly.com/question/29462345
#SPJ4
Robert is about to graduate college, and his parents tell him that because he is the first member of the family to graduate college, they want to buy him a new, but inexpensive, car. They have the money to buy the car, and Robert is excited about getting his gift. Robert owns a used car but has never owned a new car, so this will be his first. He decides to keep his used-car because he had been promised a new car by his parents for his high school graduation and never got it. On graduation day, his parents tell him that they have decided to use the car money for a vacation and there will be no new car. Legal recourse?
Answer:
Robert cannot successfully sue because he did not rely to his detriment on the promise
Explanation:
Racecourse is a person's resort, soliciting or soliciting the courts, another person, manufacturer of a product, assistance or protectionLegal intercourse, on the other hand, is a deliberate act (action) performed by an individual, group or corporation for a permanent solution to legal difficulties. It comes in a suit, petition or other way. Promissory estoppel can be defined as rules, principles, or laws that prohibit a party from acting differently, even if the first party does not promise, and the other party relies on the promise made and worked for it, but in Robert's case, he does not believe in the promise but his own used car.Oscar owns a bulldog. Another dog owner filed a lawsuit against Oscar alleging that his bulldog injured her pet poodle in a dog park fight. Despite evidence that his bulldog was not present at the dog park when a dog fight broke out, the jury found Oscar liable for injuries caused to the poodle. Based on these facts, Oscar has the legal option to do __________
Answer:
File a motion for a judgment not withstanding the verdict.
preponderance of the evidence standard of proof applies to the competency to stand trial, just as it does in many types of court cases. in the case of competency to stand trial, the defense must prove that
Preponderance of the evidence standard of proof applies to the competency to stand the trial : the defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.
What do you mean by Preponderance?
It can be defined as one type of evidentiary standard which is majorly used in a burden of proof analysis. In this the whole process revolves around around to prove that something is most likely than not. It is a very strong and important component in proving cases based on law.
is majorly based upon two factors
burden of productionburden of persuasionHence ,the defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.
To learn more about Preponderance from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/26765712
#SPJ4
Nick is writing an article for his school’s website about the increasing interest in school plays. Which of the following elements would help readers visually understand the rise in the number of students who have participated in the school's plays in the last five years?
A.
formatting: headings to separate parts of the article
B.
multimedia: video clip of student actors rehearsing
C.
graphics: graph showing student involvement in the plays
D.
graphics: table listing the plays from the last five years
i give brainlest answer rigth fro brainlest
Answer:
C.) Graphics: graph showing students involvement in the plays.
Should there be an obligation to recognize same sex marriage entered into in another state which that is lawful even if the state itself constitutionally does not recognize Sam sex marriage
first,it's forbidden by religions
Where would you find the liquor licensing rules for each state and territory
Answer:
I would find the liquor licensing rules for each state and territory mainly in Australia.
Explanation:
Legal drinking age – you must be 18 or older to buy alcohol or to drink alcohol in a licensed venue. Selling alcohol – it's illegal to sell alcohol to anyone under 18 or to someone who is already drunk. Labelling – all packaged alcohol must show how many standard drinks it contains.
Which item is an example of a primary source?
O A. A website discussing the history of the United Nations
O B. A photograph of a civil rights march
O c. A letter from an academic about her research
O D. A biography of the president
An example of primary source is a photograph of a civil rights march. Thus, the correct answer is Option B.
What is a primary source?A primary source is a first-person or current account of an event or topic. They are the most direct representation of a time or event because they were created by people or things present at the time or event. These sources have not been interpreted and provide original thought or new information.
Primary sources include theses, dissertations, scholarly journal articles (research-based), government reports, symposia and conference proceedings, original artwork, poems, photographs, speeches, letters, memos, personal narratives, diaries, interviews, and correspondence
Therefore, a photograph of a civil rights march is an example of a primary source.
To learn more about primary source, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29771183
#SPJ2
(0)
Which of the following is not administrative authority?
Treasury regulations
Revenue procedures
The Internal Revenue Code
Revenue rulings
The Internal Revenue Code is not administrative authority. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is a federal statutory law of the United States, passed by the United States Congress.
It provides the legal basis for the establishment of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).IRS authority comes from four sources: statutory law (such as the Internal Revenue Code), regulatory law (such as Treasury Regulations), administrative pronouncements (such as Revenue Rulings), and judicial decisions (such as tax court cases).However, the Internal Revenue Code is not considered an administrative authority. The IRS is not authorized to make changes or exceptions to the provisions in the Code. Instead, the Code outlines the fundamental principles that the IRS must follow when administering tax law.Administrative authority is the power granted to administrative agencies by legislation to carry out the purposes of the law. The Internal Revenue Service is an administrative agency of the federal government, responsible for enforcing tax law. To fulfill its duties, the IRS relies on four sources of authority: statutory law, regulatory law, administrative pronouncements, and judicial decisions. Treasury Regulations, Revenue Procedures, and Revenue Rulings are all examples of administrative pronouncements.Treasury Regulations are rules and guidelines established by the Secretary of the Treasury under the authority of the Internal Revenue Code. They interpret the provisions of the IRC and provide guidance to taxpayers on how to comply with tax law. Revenue Procedures provide guidance to IRS personnel and taxpayers on how to handle specific situations, such as how to request a private letter ruling from the IRS. Revenue Rulings provide official IRS interpretations of the IRC and explain how tax law applies to specific situations. In contrast, the Internal Revenue Code is not considered administrative authority. It is a federal statutory law passed by Congress, and it provides the legal basis for the establishment of the IRS. However, it does not authorize the IRS to make changes or exceptions to its provisions.In conclusion, the Internal Revenue Code is not administrative authority. It is a federal statutory law passed by Congress, and it provides the legal basis for the establishment of the IRS. The IRS relies on four sources of authority to fulfill its duties: statutory law, regulatory law, administrative pronouncements, and judicial decisions. Treasury Regulations, Revenue Procedures, and Revenue Rulings are all examples of administrative pronouncements.
To Know More about authorize visit:
brainly.com/question/1255536
#SPJ11
7
You are watching a movie about ancient Rome when a scene of a court case appears. You see that the court hearing is being held outside around
the town square or market. What can you reasonably infer about this case?
O A
O B.
OC.
O D.
The court case was about a minor offense.
The accused was a part of the elite class.
A corporeal punishment was about to be given.
The case involved a violent crime.
If the court hearing is being held outside around the town square or market then the court case was about a minor offense.
Roman legal procedure was a long-evolving system utilised in Roman courts that eventually served as the foundation for contemporary procedure in nations with civil law. There were three major, overlapping phases of development: the legis actiones, which lasted from the late 2nd century BCE until the end of the 5th century BCE law code known as the Twelve Tables; the formulary system; and the cognitio extraordinaria, which was in use during the post-Classical period. The legis actiones procedure was broken down into multiple phases.
To know more about Civil Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1