if you identify a possible surveillance attempt you should try to handle the situation yourself. (antiterrorism scenario training, page 2) : T/F

Answer:

state

Explanation:

The state government is primarily responsible for establishing general rules for electoral registration. This is because the number of registered voters must be issued by each state government, which is also responsible for counting votes and establishing polling places, as well as regulating voting in local elections.

In civil cases, a/an complaint is filed against the person who is accused of causing harm. That person can then file a/an lawsuit challenging those claims.

A lawsuit is an action in civil court brought by one or more parties against another. A lawsuit can be used to resolve private law disputes between individuals, businesses, or non-profit organizations.

Thus, complaint and lawsuit are correct

For more details lawsuit, about click here

https://brainly.com/question/8205151

#SPJ1

Answer:

Punitive damages

Explanation:

Based on the information given the monetary damages that was awarded in these two cases are described as PUNITIVE DAMAGES reason been that we were told that the juries has the intention to sanction the defendants who is the person that was found guilty after been accused of committing a crime by sending a clearer message to the defendants that individual’s or people's privacy have to be respected regardless of who they are in order to serve as a lesson to the defendants and to others who may have the intention of committing the same crime and as well to punish the defendants for the crime that was committed by him or her just as in the case of both Erin Andrews and Hulk Hogan who were awarded monetary damages after winning their cases that involve the invasion of privacy.

Therefore The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as: PUNITIVE DAMAGES

Established in 1968, the LEAA was set up within the U.S Department of Justice to allocate money to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the criminal justice system. Between 1968 and 1977, the LEAA spent more than $6 billion on crime control programs and college education for police officers

Correct question: In 1968, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration was created and was responsible for administering higher education opportunities for law enforcement professionals.

To know more about LEAA visit: https://brainly.in/question/32686119

#SPJ9

Answer:

yes,this is constitutional

Some of the possible punishments which can be given to a person for Medicare fraud and abuse includes:

This refers to the use of fraudulent means to obtain federal healthcare benefits for a person who is not entitled to it and this is considered fraud and can carry between 10-20 years jail time.

With this in mind, we can see that a person can get 10 years of jail time depending on the severity of the crime and this could go up to 20 years depending on the judge presiding over the case.

Read more about medicare fraud here:
https://brainly.com/question/14308945

Answer:i dont know really

Explanation:

Answer: Some kids are a bad influence

Explanation: According to my studies, many teenagers build up a ball of rage inside their head. As a result, they peer pressure poor innocent children to feel happy. This is called a pyschopath.

The goal of this activity is to match legal requirements with the associated pay policy.

Non exempt                              Justification

Hourly basis                              Since all of the aforementioned

Full-time janitors                       examples are limited in scope,

Time                                           they are not considered to be exempt.

Off the clock

Exempt                                      Justification

Supervisors                               The designations mentioned

Computer professionals           in the list are considerably

Salary basis                                the tax-payers and are

Corporate executives                provided with few special privileges

Minimum wage                          Justification

Trainee wage                             These are the basic level

Living wage                                 jobs and hence are

Higher rates of pay                    ensured and guaranteed to

Fast-food employees                  receive the minimum wage

A minimum wage is the lowest compensation that businesses are permitted by law to give their workers. It is the price floor below which workers are not permitted to sell their labor. By the turn of the century, the majority of nations had passed minimum wage laws. Because minimum wages raise the cost of labor, businesses frequently try to get around minimum wage legislation by hiring gig workers, shifting employment to places with lower or no minimum wages, or automating job duties.

To learn more about minimum wage from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/4894733

#SPJ4

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The option that is not used in secondary data analysis is B) Surveys conducted by the investigator.

Data analysis, can be described as the process for obtaining raw data, and subsequently converting it into information useful for decision-making by users.

It should be noted that when dealing with secondary Data,  data is been and analyzed to answer questions, test hypotheses,  and Official recordsas well as  Historical documents and Media reportscan be used.

Hence , Data Analytics  involves the collecting, cleaning, sorting, and processing raw data to extract relevant .

Therefore, option B is correct.

Learn more about analysis of data at:

https://brainly.com/question/14724376

#SPJ1

Answer:

What is the difference between marginal cost and marginal revenue?

Marginal cost is the money paid for producing one more unit of a good. Marginal revenue is the money earned from selling one more unit of a good.

Explanation:

Marginal cost is the money paid for producing one more unit of a good. Marginal revenue is the money earned from selling one more unit of a good.

The statement is false because there is no legal basis for denying custody to a parent solely based on their lifestyle choices.

As long as a parent is able to provide a safe and stable environment for their child, their personal choices and behavior are not relevant to the custody decision. However, if a parent's lifestyle choices put the child in danger or negatively impact their well-being, such as substance abuse or criminal behavior, it may be considered in the custody decision.

Ultimately, the best interests of the child are the top priority in custody cases, and factors such as the ability to provide for the child's physical and emotional needs, and the parent-child relationship, are given more weight than lifestyle choices.

Learn more about lifestyle https://brainly.com/question/31234440

#SPJ11

The ways that the rule of law supports democracy include:

The Rule of Law is based on set rules than arbitrary decisions.  As a democratic principle, it recognizes that no person operates above the laws of the land.

This democratic rule follows from the universal idea that law (truth) is based upon discoverable but unimaginable fundamental principles necessary for the protection of undeniable divine rights.

Thus, the ways that the rule of law supports democracy are numerous.

Learn more about the rule of law at https://brainly.com/question/820417

In the case of Kennedy v. Shave Barbor Co, the "legitimate business interests" that could justify the enforcement of a non-compete provision include protecting trade secrets, confidential information, customer relationships, and goodwill.

Noncompete provisions are intended to protect employers' legitimate business interests. These interests can include safeguarding trade secrets and confidential information, maintaining customer relationships, and preserving the goodwill of the business.

In Kennedy's case, if enforcing the noncompete provision would unduly restrict his ability to find employment or pursue his chosen profession, it could result in a court refusing to enforce the provision. The harm to Kennedy would be in the form of a significant limitation on his employment opportunities and potentially depriving him of his livelihood.

Therefore, a court may consider the balance between the employer's legitimate interests and the harm caused to the employee in deciding whether to enforce the noncompete provision.

To know more about non-compete here https://brainly.com/question/30508349

#SPJ4

Answer:

King Jul ian lll

Mort who am I talking too?

Explanation:

Answer: You are Mental Sico

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is A. No frills policy.

Explanation:

A no-frills policy is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates. This policy typically includes restrictions on amenities and privileges, such as cable television, weightlifting equipment, and in-cell coffee pots. The goal of a no-frills policy is to create a harsh and unpleasant environment that will deter crime and make inmates less likely to re-offend.

Answer:

the now be signing 10 years

Explanation:

Answer: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW!!!

Explanation:

Answer: the law

Explanation:

Answer:

Public Law 86-272, enacted in 1959, established limitations on states' ability to tax out-of-state businesses based solely on their solicitation of sales activities within the state. However, changes in the U.S. economy over time have made this law partially obsolete. Two significant factors that have contributed to this obsolescence are the rise of e-commerce and the shift towards a service-based economy.

With the advent of e-commerce, companies can conduct business across state lines without a physical presence in a particular state. This has made it more challenging to determine the extent of a company's activities within a state and has blurred the lines of physical nexus that Public Law 86-272 sought to protect. As a result, states have sought ways to update their tax laws to capture revenue from online sales, leading to limitations in the applicability of Public Law 86-272.

Additionally, the shift towards a service-based economy has seen a decrease in the significance of physical product sales as a primary revenue stream for many companies. Public Law 86-272 primarily applies to companies engaged in the solicitation of sales for tangible personal property. However, service-based companies often have different revenue models, making the law less relevant for them.

An example of a company for which Public Law 86-272 works well is a traditional brick-and-mortar retail store that operates exclusively within one state. Such a company engages in physical product sales and solicits sales activities within its state of operation. Public Law 86-272 provides protection against being subjected to additional taxation from other states solely based on these activities.

On the other hand, an example of a company for which Public Law 86-272 does not work well is an e-commerce platform that sells products nationwide. Since the company conducts business across state lines without a physical presence in each state, it becomes more challenging for states to apply the limitations of Public Law 86-272 effectively. As a result, states may seek alternative ways to tax the company's online sales activities.

In summary, changes in the U.S. economy, such as the rise of e-commerce and the shift towards a service-based economy, have made Public Law 86-272 partially obsolete. While the law may still be relevant for traditional brick-and-mortar retail companies, it becomes less applicable to e-commerce platforms and service-based companies operating in multiple states.

Explanation:

TWO examples or situations that prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing country are  Tax Avoidance, Environmental Regulations.

Tax Avoidance: One example is when a multinational corporation (MNC) from a developed country takes advantage of the less stringent tax laws and regulations in a developing country. They may establish subsidiaries or offshore entities in the developing country to shift profits and reduce their tax liability. By exploiting tax loopholes or lower tax rates in the developing country, the MNC can potentially minimize their overall tax burden and increase their profits.

Environmental Regulations: Another example is when an MNC relocates or outsources its production to a developing country with less stringent environmental regulations. By doing so, the MNC can avoid the costs and compliance requirements associated with stricter environmental standards in their home country. This allows them to potentially operate with fewer restrictions, lower production costs, and potentially contribute to environmental degradation in the developing country.

It is important to note that these examples illustrate situations where MNCs may exploit differences in laws and regulations between developed and developing countries. However, it is crucial to promote responsible business practices that prioritize sustainability, ethical behavior, and adherence to global standards to ensure equitable and sustainable development for all parties involved.

Learn more about  tax loopholes

https://brainly.com/question/7227568

#SPJ11

The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.

The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.

They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.

To know more about employment , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17459074

#SPJ4

Answer:

Dogmatic goes back to the Greek words dogma, which means basically “what one thinks is true” and dogmatikos, “pertaining to doctrine.” To be dogmatic is to follow a doctrine relating to morals and faith, a set of beliefs that is passed down and never questioned. ... Dogmatic people are usually not very popular.

Dogmatic is also a Greek word that's dogma, which suggests that “what one thinks is true” and also dogmatics, “about doctrine.” To be dogmatic is to follow a doctrine pertaining to morals and also faith, a set of beliefs that's passed down and never questioned.

The Three Dogmatic Principles Of Fingerprints are:

The First principle of constancy: A fingerprint will remain unchanged during somebody's lifetime.

The Second principle of variation: No two fingerprints of various persons or the neighboring finger of the identical person have ever been found to be identical altogether respects.

Then The third principle of infallibility: Forged fingerprints are often distinguished from genuine fingerprints.

Find out more information about Dogmatic Fingerprints here:

https://brainly.com/question/22558775

Answer:

There are three basic modes of constitutional interpretation: strict construction, aspirationalism, and textualism. The strict construction approach seeks to apply the Constitution according to what it says explicitly rather than based on desirable social consequences; the aspirational approach applies the Constitution based on societal standards regardless of whether it contradicts what it says, and the textualist approach looks only at the text of laws regardless of their effect on society.

The literal interpretation assumes that the US Constitution was set in stone by an all-knowing entity. If this is true, then what use are the amendments if one had already decided the outcome of every single dispute ever framed under them? The idea of being open to interpretation is so that new issues can be solved using old principles. Yes, some people may choose to "go rogue" with these principles come up, but I side with keeping my own freedoms limited for greater freedoms for others. And finally, aspirationalism takes into account that America's founding fathers wanted aspirations, not just laws. They would have understood that sometimes even they couldn't agree on moral solutions, and they knew times change over time.

I prefer strict aspirational because it takes into account social progress. The Constitution is meant to be a living document that isn't static, and the Constitution was written in a time when slavery, women's suffrage and segregation were still acceptable. The Constitution needs to evolve with society and make sense in modern times - interpretations.

The Constitution was written at a time when slavery was legal in America - aspirationalism would have been impossible back then. The Constitution works on interpretation - if it didn't, we wouldn't need it. Over time, we've developed aspirationalism to be able to interpret the Constitution more fairly. It's not what the Constitution says, it's how well society can agree to interpret that.

Explanation:

The modes of constitutional interpretation are two of the most popular ways in which constitutional law is interpreted. An aspirationalist judge would favor arguments that all legislation should follow the “original intent” of the constitution while strict constructionists follows the literal text of the constitution.

The job of U.S. attorneys is that B. They are the chief federal law enforcement officers for their judicial districts.

U.S. attorneys in America are tasked with being the federal officials that prosecute federal crimes in their districts.

This means that they are condisered to be federal law enforcement officers in their judicial districts.

Find out more on U.S. Attorneys at https://brainly.com/question/1597501.

#SPJ1

Answer:

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is an international body responsible for maintaining global peace and security. The legal and political questions regarding the competence of the UNSC have been debated for several years, with different actors holding divergent opinions.

One legal question pertains to the authority of the UNSC to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. The Charter of the United Nations permits the UNSC to authorize the use of force against a state that poses a threat to international peace and security. However, some legal scholars argue that this provision could be interpreted broadly, allowing the UNSC to intervene in the internal affairs of states without proper justification, thereby violating the principles of sovereignty and non-intervention in domestic affairs.

Another legal question relates to the criteria for the use of force. According to the UN Charter, the use of force is only authorized in self-defense or when authorized by the UNSC. However, the UNSC has been accused of using force for political purposes, with some actors arguing that its decisions have been motivated by political interests rather than by a genuine concern for international peace and security.

From a political standpoint, there are questions regarding the representation and legitimacy of the UNSC. The UNSC comprises five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year terms. The five permanent members hold veto power, which has been criticized for giving them undue influence and limiting the decision-making power of other member states. Furthermore, the representation of the UNSC does not reflect the diversity of the international community, with some regions, such as Africa and Latin America, underrepresented.

In conclusion, the competence of the UNSC is a complex legal and political issue. While the UNSC has been instrumental in maintaining global peace and security, its decisions have been subject to scrutiny, with questions raised regarding its authority to intervene in the internal affairs of states, the criteria for the use of force, and its legitimacy and representation.

Explanation:

Voters View budget deficits as a effect on the economy of the nation and increasing debt.

When expenditure by the government surpasses income from taxes and other sources, a budget deficit results. Although any organization with operating revenues and expenses can experience a budget deficit, the term is most frequently used to refer to government budgets. Budget surplus is another name for public savings.

As budget deficits and government debt can have long-term effects on the economy and future generations, many voters are typically concerned about them. Deficits may be perceived by some voters as evidence of excessive government spending or fiscal irresponsibility, and they may be more inclined to support measures to reduce the deficit, such as spending reductions or tax increases.

Learn more about budget deficits at:

brainly.com/question/29602763

#SPJ4