If you convert the phrase "How I wish I could calculate pi" into a number, it spells out the first seven digits of pi.

Answer:

500*2%=10

500+10=510

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

I can't explain.. i don't know it's like a whole paragraph. I'm sorry! I hope I helped tho!

Answer:

The answer is 64, and I’m being for real

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 5 or c

i know im so late but this is for other people who just got the question like me

Answer:

5 or c

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = (x - 5)² + 7

Translations are transformations that change the position of the graph of a function. The general shape of the graph of a function translates up, down, to the right, or to the left.

Vertical translations:

Let k > 0:

To graph y = f (x) + k, shift the graph up k units.

To graph y = f (x) -k, shift the graph of k units down.

Horizontal translations:

Let w>0

To graph y = f (x-w), shift the graph w units to the right.

To graph y = f (x + w), shift the graph w units to the left.

Let:

f(x) = x²

Shift f(x) 7 units up:

f(x) = x² + 7

And shift f(x) 5 units to the right:

f(x) = (x - 5)² + 7

The slope in the context of predicting verbal SAT scores based on math SAT scores indicates the change in the verbal score for each unit increase in the math score.

In this survey of statistics undergraduate students at Prosperity University, the slope represents the rate of change in the verbal SAT score for every one-point increase in the math SAT score. A positive slope suggests that as the math score increases, the verbal score also tends to increase. The magnitude of the slope indicates the strength of the relationship between the two variables. A larger slope indicates a stronger positive association, meaning that a one-point increase in the math score is associated with a larger increase in the verbal score. Conversely, a negative slope would imply an inverse relationship, where an increase in the math score is associated with a decrease in the verbal score.

Learn more about SAT score here

brainly.com/question/32449961

#SPJ11

What is the interpretation of the slope in the context of predicting the verbal SAT score based on the math SAT score, according to the survey conducted among undergraduate students majoring in statistics at Prosperity University?

2 because  iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

Answer:

40 two-digit numbers have one odd digit and one even digit in them.

Answer:

7. m and n = √8

8. a and b = √2

9 x and y = √1/8

10. x and y =5/√2

11. x and y = 3/√2

12. x and y = 9/√2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7. m and n = √8

8. a and b = √3

9 x and y = √1/8

10. x and y =2/√5

11. x and y = 3/√2

12. x and y = 8/√2

Step-by-step explanation:

i dont know i had some help from my older brother i hope this is right!

Answer:

The correct answer is $75,900.

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability that the number of lost-time accidents occurring over a period of 8 days will be no more than 4 is 0.2027, or approximately 20.27%.

To solve this problem, we can use the Poisson distribution formula, which is as follows:

P(X ≤ 4) = ∑(k=0 to 4) [(e^-λ * λ^k) / k!]

where λ is the mean rate of lost-time accidents per day, and X is the number of lost-time accidents occurring over a period of 8 days.

Substituting the given values, we get:

λ = 0.7 * 8 = 5.6

P(X ≤ 4) = ∑(k=0 to 4) [(e^-5.6 * 5.6^k) / k!]

Using a calculator, we can evaluate this probability as:

P(X ≤ 4) = 0.2027 (rounded to four decimal places)

In conclusion, the Poisson distribution can be used to calculate the probability of a certain number of events occurring over a given time period, given the mean rate of occurrence per unit time.

In this case, we used the Poisson distribution to calculate the probability of a certain number of lost-time accidents occurring over an 8-day period, given the mean rate of lost-time accidents per day.

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/22648840

#SPJ4

The size of the sample is 24 and the size of the population is 135.

Sample size is a group of subjects that are selected from the large population and is considered as representative of the real population for that specific research.

In population genetics and population ecology, population size (usually denoted N) is the number of individual organisms in a population

In this particular case, a political scientist surveys 24 of the current 135 representatives in a state's legislature.

The sample is the group of individuals selected from the population,

in this case, the 24 representatives surveyed by the political scientist.

The population is the entire group of individuals that the sample is drawn from, in this case,

the 135 representatives in the state's legislature.

for such more question on size

https://brainly.com/question/29580215

#SPJ11

The option (c)  all patients in a local hospital makes up the population

Surveys are a commonly used method for collecting data in various fields, including healthcare. They can provide valuable insights into patients' experiences, opinions, and preferences, which can help healthcare providers improve their services.

In this case, the survey was conducted among patients in a local hospital, and the results showed that 62.42% of the respondents believed that healthcare providers needed to spend more time with each patient.

The answer is not immediately obvious, but we can make some inferences based on the information given. However, we cannot generalize the results to all patients in the area or the entire population.

Third, surveys cannot account for all the factors that may influence the results, such as demographic characteristics, health status, or cultural background.

Therefore, we can conclude that the population under study is "patients in a local hospital" who participated in the survey.

To know more about survey here.

https://brainly.com/question/13532910

#SPJ4

ANS: 2 (12e^2inx^3prs^3 o + 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer........

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

5x = 35 divide both sides of the equation by 5

5x / 5 = 35 / 5

x=7

The given condition can be modeled by the compound inequality:

x < -3 or x > 3.

We want to find an inequality that describes the next condition:

"All real numbers X with an absolute value of greater than three"

So our variable will be X, and the absolute value of X is written as:

|X|

We want to have an absolute value larger than 3, so we can write the inequality:

|X| > 3.

The absolute value part can be separated into two, such that we will get two inequalities:

x > 3

x < -3

So the inequality that illustrates the given condition is the compound inequality:

x < -3 or x > 3.

Learn more about inequalities by reading:

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ1

Answer: In 1858 twelve pairs of the European rabbit were released on a ranch in of mosquitoes only 90 per cent of the remaining population was killed

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of z in the triangle using trigonometric ratio is; z = 10.90

The three basic trigonometric ratios from which others are derived are;

sin x = opposite/hypotenuse

cos x = adjacent/hypotenuse

tan x = opposite/adjacent

From the diagram, we can easily see that z is the opposite side of the given angle and 13 is the hypotenuse. Thus;

z/13 = sin 57

z = 13 * sin 57

z = 13 * 0.83867

z = 10.90

Read more about Trigonometric Ratios at; https://brainly.com/question/13276558

#SPJ1

Answer:

a: 00:45

b: 7:30 PM

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this is right

Their hourly wage in 3 more years (after a total of 13 years) will be 17.43 per hour.

We can solve this problem using the formula for exponential growth, which is:

\(A = P(1 + r)^t\)

Where:

A = the amount after t years

P = the initial amount

r = the annual growth rate (expressed as a decimal)

t = the number of years

Let's use this formula to solve the problem:

Find the initial amount

The initial hourly wage is 7.40, so P = 7.40

Find the annual growth rate

The wages grew from 7.40 to 14.56 in 10 years, so we can use this information to find the annual growth rate:

\(14.56 = 7.40(1 + r)^{10}\\(1 + r)^{10} = 14.56/7.40\\(1 + r)^{10} = 1.97297\\1 + r = (1.97297)^{(1/10)\)

1 + r = 1.076

r = 0.076 or 7.6%

So the annual growth rate is 7.6% (expressed as a decimal).

Find the amount after 13 years

We want to find the hourly wage in 3 more years, which is a total of 13 years (10 years of past growth + 3 more years). So t = 13.

\(A = P(1 + r)^t\\A = 7.40(1 + 0.076)^{13}\\A = 7.40(1.076)^{13}\\A = 7.40(2.355)\)

A = 17.43 (rounded to two decimal places)

for such more question on exponential growth

https://brainly.com/question/19961531

#SPJ11

Answer:

1/237.12.

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of winning the minimum award can be calculated by multiplying the probability of picking 4 numbers correctly from 1 to 51 and then multiplying by the probability of picking 1 number correctly from 1 to 42.

The probability of picking 4 numbers correctly from 1 to 51 is given by the formula:

(number of combinations of 4 numbers from 51) / (number of combinations of 5 numbers from 51)

= (51 choose 4) / (51 choose 5)

= 51! / (4! * 47!) / (51! / (5! * 46!))

= (51 * 50 * 49 * 48) / (5 * 4 * 47 * 46)

= 19600 / 10,946

= 1/5.6 approximately

The probability of picking 1 number correctly from 1 to 42 is given by the formula:

1/42

The final probability of winning the minimum award is given by multiplying the above two probabilities:

1/5.6 * 1/42 = 1/237.12

So, the probability of winning the minimum award is approximately 1/237.12.

As per the concept of unitary method, the another way to express 8 feet is 2 ²/₃ yards.

In math, unitary method is known as a way of finding out the solution of a problem by initially finding out the value of a single unit, and then finding out the essential value by multiplying the single unit value.

Here we have given that a clothesline rope is 8 feet long.

Now we need to find another way to express 8 feet.

We know that the formula to convert the measurement it to divide the length by the conversion ratio.

As we know that one yard is equal to 3 feet, then we can use this simple formula to convert is written as

=> yards = feet ÷ 3

Here the equivalent yard measurement is written as,

=> yards = 8 ÷ 3

Then we have to convert the improper fraction into mixed fraction form, then we get,

=> 2 ²/₃ yards.

To know more about Unitary method here.

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ4

Derivative of z, dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt) = (3/2)(-2) + (0)(-3) = -3

We need to use the chain rule:

dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt)

We can find ∂z/∂x and ∂z/∂y by differentiating the given equation with respect to x and y, respectively:

2z(dz/dx) = 3x² + 2y(dy/dx)

2z(dz/dy) = 2y

Solving for dz/dx and dz/dy, we get:

dz/dx = (3x² + 2y(dy/dx))/(2z)

dz/dy = y/z

Plugging in the given values, we get:

dz/dx = (3(4)²)/(2(2sqrt(4³))) + 0 = 3/2

dz/dy = 0/sqrt(4³) = 0

So, dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt) = (3/2)(-2) + (0)(-3) = -3

Learn more about Derivative.

brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

Derivative of z, dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt) = (3/2)(-2) + (0)(-3) = -3

We need to use the chain rule:

dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt)

We can find ∂z/∂x and ∂z/∂y by differentiating the given equation with respect to x and y, respectively:

2z(dz/dx) = 3x² + 2y(dy/dx)

2z(dz/dy) = 2y

Solving for dz/dx and dz/dy, we get:

dz/dx = (3x² + 2y(dy/dx))/(2z)

dz/dy = y/z

Plugging in the given values, we get:

dz/dx = (3(4)²)/(2(2sqrt(4³))) + 0 = 3/2

dz/dy = 0/sqrt(4³) = 0

So, dz/dt = (∂z/∂x)(dx/dt) + (∂z/∂y)(dy/dt) = (3/2)(-2) + (0)(-3) = -3

Learn more about Derivative.

brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

The long-run proportion of time Marvin spends in room 5 is 0.214.

We can approach this problem using the concept of Markov chains, where Marvin's movements between the rooms can be represented as a sequence of states. In this case, the states are the rooms, and the probabilities of moving from one room to another are given by the fact that Marvin is equally likely to choose any available door.

We can represent this as a transition probability matrix P, where P(i,j) is the probability of moving from room i to room j. Since Marvin is equally likely to choose any available door, the probability of moving from room i to room j is 1/n(i), where n(i) is the number of doors available in room i. For example, n(5) = 2, since room 5 has two doors.

The transition probability matrix P is:

   1       2       3     4     5     6

1   0     1/2   1/2     0     0     0

2   1/3   0     1/3   1/3    0     0

3   1/2   1/2   0       0     0     0

4   0     1/3    0       0     1/3   1/3

5   0      0      0     1/2    0     1/2

6   0      0      0     1/2   1/2    0

To find the long-run proportion of time Marvin spends in room 5, we need to find the stationary distribution of the Markov chain. This is a probability distribution over the states that remains unchanged as the chain evolves over time.

The stationary distribution can be found by solving the equation πP = π, where π is the stationary distribution. This can be rewritten as (P^T - I)x = 0, where x = (π1, π2, ..., π6) and I is the identity matrix. We also need the constraint that the sum of the elements of x is 1, since x is a probability distribution.

Solving this system of equations gives us:

π1 = 9/56

π2 = 5/28

π3 = 3/28

π4 = 1/8

π5 = 3/14

π6 = 1/56

Therefore, the long-run proportion of time Marvin spends in room 5 is π5 = 3/14, or approximately 0.214.

Correct Question :

Suppose that Marvin the rat travels through a maze of 6 rooms. Doors between the rooms are depicted as breaks in the walls. At each time step, Marvin will move to a neighboring room. He is equally likely to choose from any of the available doors. What is the long-run proportion of time Marvin spends in room 5?

To learn more about long-run proportion here:

https://brainly.com/question/16548769

#SPJ4

The sum of all these probabilities is equal to 1, which is the total probability of all possible outcomes.

To solve this problem, we need to consider all the possible outcomes that result in at most four successes. These outcomes are:

0 successes

1 success

2 successes

3 successes

4 successes

The probability of each of these outcomes can be calculated using the binomial distribution formula:

P(k) = (n choose k) \(* p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)\)

where n is the number of trials, k is the number of successes, and (n choose k) is the binomial coefficient, which is equal to n!/(k!*(n-k)!).

To find the probability of at most four successes, we need to add up the probabilities of all these outcomes. So the expression that would provide the answer is:

P(0 successes) + P(1 success) + P(2 successes) + P(3 successes) + P(4 successes)

This expression includes all the possible outcomes that correspond to having at most four successes in five trials. Note that it does not include the probability of having five successes, since we are only interested in the probability of at most four successes.

For example, if the probability of success in each trial is 0.3, then the probability of having zero successes is:

P(0 successes) = (5 choose 0)\(* 0.3^0 * 0.7^5 = 0.168\)

Similarly, the probability of having one success is:

P(1 success) = (5 choose 1) \(* 0.3^1 * 0.7^4 = 0.360\)

We can calculate the probabilities of having two, three, and four successes in a similar way. Then, we can add up all these probabilities to get the probability of at most four successes:

P(at most 4 successes) = P(0 successes) + P(1 success) + P(2 successes) + P(3 successes) + P(4 successes)

In this example, we get:

P(at most 4 successes) = 0.168 + 0.360 + 0.308 + 0.132 + 0.032 = 1.000

Note that the sum of all these probabilities is equal to 1, which is the total probability of all possible outcomes.

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11