if X is following Normal distribution with parameters and o² and a prior for is a Normal distribution with parameters and b². Then, how can I find the bayes risk for this task? I found the bayes est

Answer:

Zack is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

when we plot out all the points we see that not all sides are the same length, which is techinally defines a square. Because of the different sides lengths we know it is a rhombus.

Josh was correct as the figure is Square.

In a Cartesian plane there are two points P(a, b) and Q(c, d) then the distance between two points

PQ = √(c- a)² + (d- b)²

We have the coordinates F(2, 2) O(5, -2) U(9, 1) and R(6, 5).

Now using Distance Formula

FO = √(-2 - 2)² + (5- 2)² = √16 + 9 = √25 = 5 unit

OU = √(1 + 2)² + (9-5)² = √9 + 16 = √25 =5  unit

UR = 5 unit

RF = 5 unit

and, FU = √(1 -2)² + (9- 2)² = √1 + 49 = √50 = 5√2

OR = √(5+2)² + (6-5)² = √49 +1 = 5√2

So, the given figure is square because the length of Diagonal are equal.

Learn more about Distance formula here:

https://brainly.com/question/25841655

#SPJ3

The smallest possible inside length of the cubical steel tank that can hold 275 liters of water is approximately 0.640 meters.

The side length of the cube is found by converting the volume of water from liters to cubic meters, as the unit of measurement for the side length is meters.

Given that the volume of water is 275 liters, we convert it to cubic meters by dividing it by 1000 (1 cubic meter = 1000 liters):

275 liters / 1000 = 0.275 cubic meters

Since a cube has equal side lengths, we find the side length by taking the cube root of the volume. In this case, we find the cube root of 0.275 cubic meters:

∛(0.275) ≈ 0.640

Rounded to the nearest 0.001 meters, the smallest possible inside length of the tank is approximately 0.640 meters.

To know more about smallest possible inside length, refer to the link :

https://brainly.com/question/17304098#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know how to determine the y-intercepts of a rational function, and their possible number.

A rational function f(x) is the ratio of two polynomial functions p(x) and q(x):

  f(x) = p(x)/q(x)

As such, both numerator and denominator have single function values for any value of the independent variable. The y-intercept of f(x) is ...

  f(0) = p(0)/q(0)

The values of p(0) and q(0) are simply the constant terms in those respective functions.

The simple way to find the y-intercept is to look at the ratio of the constant terms in the polynomial functions making up the rational function. If that is defined, there is one y-intercept. If it is undefined (q(0)=0), then there are no y-intercepts.

<95141404393>

Answer:

Angle PTR and angle PTS are supplementary angles. Lines PQ and RS intersect at an angle less than a right angle. Angle PTR and angle PTS are complementary angles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6

Answer: 6 lol wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Answer:

-24a^10

Step-by-step explanation:

You multiply like terms with like terms. You multiply -4 with 6, and a^5 with a^5.

If you would like more help in math or other subjects for FREE, check out growthinyouth.org.

Answer: -7, -6.5, -6.2, -4.5, 0

I hope this helps, stay safe, and have a great rest of your day. :)

Answer:

-7, -6.5, -6.2, -4.5, 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Answer: x=2 (third option)

Step-by-step explanation:

Equation of a line

Being m is the slope and (h,k) is a point through which the line passes, the point-slope form of the equation of a line is:

y - k = m ( x - h )

We have the function f passes through the point (-1,9) and has a slope of m=-3. The point-slope equation of the line is:

y - 9 = -3 ( x - (-1) )

Operating:

y - 9 = -3 ( x + 1 )

y - 9 = -3x - 3

Adding 9:

y = -3x + 6

To calculate the zero of the function we set y=0 and solve for x:

-3x + 6 = 0

Subtracting 6:

-3x = - 6

Dividing by -3

x = - 6 / ( - 3 )

x = 2

Answer: x=2 (third option)

Answer:

so each chair will cost 205

205 will be our cost C this is our dependent due to the entire cost being base on how many chairs that will get order

the independent variable will be how many chairs that will be ordered and there are 34 chairs being ordered

34*205= 6970

the total cost will be 6970

Answer: \(y=5x-6\)

Step-by-step explanation:

use point-slope form

\((y-y_{1}) =m(x-x_{1})\)

plug in given values where m is slope and y1 and x1 are values

\(y-(-1)=5(x-1)\)

\(y+1=5(x-1)\)

\(y+1=5x-5\)

\(y=5x-6\)

Answer:8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: square root of 76

Step-by-step explanation:

6^(2)+4^(2)-2*6*4*cos120= 76 and then to simplify you square root it

The time taken for the water level in the tank to drop from 3 to 0.5 meters above the bottom cannot be determined without additional information.

To calculate the time taken, we need to know the flow rate or discharge rate of the water from the tank. This information is not provided in the question. The time taken to drain the tank depends on factors such as the diameter of the outlet pipe, the pressure difference, and any restrictions or obstructions in the flow path.

If we assume a known discharge rate, we can use the principles of fluid mechanics to calculate the time. The volume of water that needs to be drained is the difference in the volume of water between 3 meters and 0.5 meters above the bottom of the tank. The flow rate can be determined using the pipe diameter and other relevant factors. Dividing the volume by the flow rate will give us the time taken.

However, since the discharge rate is not given, we cannot perform the calculation and determine the time taken accurately.

Without knowing the discharge rate or additional information about the flow characteristics, it is not possible to calculate the time taken for the water level in the tank to drop from 3 to 0.5 meters above the bottom.

To know more about water level visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30015643

#SPJ11

Answer:

Both expressions equal 5 when substituting 2 for x because the expressions are equivalent.

Step-by-step explanation:

x=2

1/2(x) + 4

1/2(2) +4

1+4 = 5

x + 6 -1/2(x) -2

2+6 -1/2(2) -2

8 - 1 -2 = 5

Hope i helped you out :)

Answer:

If the shipping is for all books then the total cost is 164.95

The length of Hayden shadow is 31.875 inches.

Equation is an expression which is used to show the relationship between two or more variables and numbers.

Let y represent Charlie height and x represent his shadow.

y ∝ x

y = kx

Charlie is 64 inches tall and casts a shadow of 30 inches. Hence:

y = 2.13x

If Hayden is 68 inches tall, hence:

The length of Hayden shadow is 31.875 inches.

Find out more on equation at: https://brainly.com/question/13763238

Answer: Options 2 and 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Option 1: The angles add to \(180^{\circ}\), so the angles can form a triangle. However, because there are no side lengths, the triangle is only defined up to similarity.

Option 2: The angles do not add to \(180^{\circ}\), so a triangle cannot be formed.

Option 3: The side lengths do not satisfy the triangle inequality, so a triangle cannot be formed.

Option 4: It is not specified what side the \(75^{\circ}\) is opposite of, so multiple triangles can be formed.

a. The probability of success (hitting the target) is constant for each trial (88% or 0.88).

b. The probability of hitting the 6th target is:

P(X = 1) = C(1, 1) * 0.88^1 * (1 - 0.88)^(1 - 1) = 0.88

c. Using the binomial probability formula as before, with p = 0.88 and n = 3:

P(X = 1) = C(3, 1) * 0.88^1 * (1 - 0.88)^(3 - 1)

P(X = 2) = C(3, 2) * 0.88^2 * (1 - 0.88)^(3 - 2)

P(X = 3) = C(3, 3) * 0.88^3 * (1 - 0.88)^(3 - 3)

a) The three characteristics of this scenario that indicate we are working with Bernoulli trials are:

The experiment consists of a fixed number of trials (eight shots).

Each trial (shot) has two possible outcomes: hitting the target or missing the target.

The probability of success (hitting the target) is constant for each trial (88% or 0.88).

b) To find the probability of hitting the 6th target (considered as a single trial), we can use the binomial probability formula:

P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)

where:

P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k successes,

C(n, k) is the binomial coefficient or number of ways to choose k successes out of n trials,

p is the probability of success in a single trial, and

n is the total number of trials.

In this case, k = 1 (hitting the target once), p = 0.88, and n = 1. Therefore, the probability of hitting the 6th target is:

P(X = 1) = C(1, 1) * 0.88^1 * (1 - 0.88)^(1 - 1) = 0.88

c) To find the probability that the first time hitting the target is not until the 4th shot, we need to consider the complementary event. The complementary event is hitting the target before the 4th shot.

P(not hitting until the 4th shot) = P(hitting on the 4th shot or later) = 1 - P(hitting on or before the 3rd shot)

The probability of hitting on or before the 3rd shot is the sum of the probabilities of hitting on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd shots:

P(hitting on or before the 3rd shot) = P(X ≤ 3) = P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3)

Using the binomial probability formula as before, with p = 0.88 and n = 3:

P(X = 1) = C(3, 1) * 0.88^1 * (1 - 0.88)^(3 - 1)

P(X = 2) = C(3, 2) * 0.88^2 * (1 - 0.88)^(3 - 2)

P(X = 3) = C(3, 3) * 0.88^3 * (1 - 0.88)^(3 - 3)

Calculate these probabilities and sum them up to find P(hitting on or before the 3rd shot), and then subtract from 1 to find the desired probability.

Learn more about  probability  from

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ11

Hannah's debt-to-equity ratio when her liabilities was $30,000 (excluding her mortgage of $100,000 ) and her net worth is $45,000 is 0.75.

Debt-to-equity ratio is a financial ratio that measures the proportion of total liabilities to shareholders' equity. To calculate the debt-to-equity ratio for Hannah, we need to first calculate her total liabilities and shareholders' equity.

We are given that Hannah has liabilities of $30,000 excluding her mortgage of $100,000. Therefore, her total liabilities are $30,000 + $100,000 = $130,000.

We are also given that her net worth is $45,000. The net worth is calculated by subtracting the total liabilities from the total assets. Therefore, the shareholders' equity is $45,000 + $130,000 = $175,000.

Now we can calculate the debt-to-equity ratio by dividing the total liabilities by the shareholders' equity.

Debt-to-equity ratio = Total liabilities / Shareholders' equity = $130,000 / $175,000 = 0.74 (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, Hannah's debt-to-equity ratio is 0.74, which is closest to option 0.75.

Learn more about Debt-to-equity ratio here: https://brainly.com/question/27993089

#SPJ11

The value of the expression (8 1/5 + 4 1/5) - (6 6/8 - 6 2/4) is 243/20.

Let's simplify the addition within the parentheses:

8 1/5 + 4 1/5 = (8 + 4) + (1/5 + 1/5) = 12 + 2/5 = 12 2/5

Next, let's simplify the subtraction within the parentheses:

6 6/8 - 6 2/4 = (6 - 6) + (6/8 - 2/4) = 0 + (3/4 - 1/2) = 0 + 1/4 = 1/4

Now, we can substitute the simplified terms back into the original expression:

(8 1/5 + 4 1/5) - (6 6/8 - 6 2/4) = 12 2/5 - 1/4

To subtract mixed numbers, we need to find a common denominator. The common denominator for 5 and 4 is 20. Converting both terms:

12 2/5 = 12 * 5/5 + 2/5 = 60/5 + 2/5 = 62/5

1/4 = 1 * 5/5 * 5/20 = 5/20

Now we can subtract:

62/5 - 5/20 = (62 * 4)/(5 * 4) - 5/20 = 248/20 - 5/20 = (248 - 5)/20 = 243/20

Therefore, the value of the expression (8 1/5 + 4 1/5) - (6 6/8 - 6 2/4) is 243/20.

Learn more about expression at https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ1

Answer:

the answeis c

Step-by-step explanation:

hoped that helped

Answer:

=

4

-

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

\(a_{n-1}=12\\\\

Plug\: n = n + 1\\\\

a_{n+1-1}=12\\\\

\huge \red {\boxed {a_{n}=12}} \\\\\)

A 3.0 magnitude earthquake is ten times stronger than a 2.0 magnitude earthquake, and a hundred times stronger than a 1.0 magnitude earthquake.


To do this, we first need to determine how many times stronger earthquake A is than earthquake B. Since each whole number increase on the Richter scale represents a tenfold increase in strength, we can use the formula:

Strength = 10^(magnitude)
Using this formula, we can calculate the strength of earthquake A as:
Strength A = 10^(3.0) = 1,000
Similarly, we can calculate the strength of earthquake B as:
Strength B = 10^(1.5) = 31.62To find the difference in strength between the two earthquakes, we can divide the strength of earthquake A by the strength of earthquake B:
Difference in strength = Strength A / Strength B
Difference in strength = 1,000 / 31.62
Difference in strength = 31.6

To know more about magnitude  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14452091

#SPJ11

Answer:

67 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

the shape is a tryangle so it will have the same angle measurements, just make sure you look if it has the slash next to the letter or not in the future

Hope this helps girly!!

Answer:

\(\angle{C}=54\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's first start by establishing that when it comes to a reflection, side lengths and angle measurements remain the same. With that being said, let's identify our angle measurements:

\(\angle{A=}\\\angle{B}= 67\\\angle{C}=\\\angle{A'}=59\\\angle{B'}=\\\angle{C'}=\\\)

As mentioned earlier, angle measurements will remain the same, so we can go ahead and identify the values of \(\angle{A}\) & \(\angle{B'}\)

\(\angle{A=59}\\\angle{B}= 67\\\angle{C}=\\\angle{A'}=59\\\angle{B'}=67\\\angle{C'}=\\\)

The sum of the angles in a triangle will always be equal to 180°.

Add the two identified angles of the original figure.

\(59+67=126\)

Subtract the sum from 180:

\(180-126=54\)

Therefore:

\(\angle{C}=54\)

_

Check your work by adding the three identified angle measurements to see if they measure to 180°:

\(59+67+54\)

\(=180\)

The answer is correct!

The value of f[g(x)] is - 64x³ - 336x² - 588x - 340 and the value of g[f(x)] is -4x³ + 19

The functions are as follows; f(x) = -x³ +3 and g(x) = 4x+7

The value of f[g(x)] is obtained by replacing every x in f(x) with the value of g(x) as given below

f[g(x)] = f(4x + 7) = - (4x + 7)³ + 3

When we expand (4x + 7)³, it gives us 64x³ + 336x² + 588x + 343

Then

f[g(x)] = - 64x³ - 336x² - 588x - 340

Similarly, g[f(x)] is obtained by replacing every x in g(x) with the value of f(x) as shown below;

g[f(x)] = g(-x³ + 3) = 4(-x³ + 3) + 7g

[f(x)] = -4x³ + 19

Therefore,

f[g(x)] = - 64x³ - 336x² - 588x - 340

g[f(x)] = -4x³ + 19

Learn more about the function at

https://brainly.com/question/32520165

#SPJ11