Legally speaking, if there is no blood relationship between the two people, then it would not be considered incest in most jurisdictions. However, there may be social or cultural taboos surrounding the situation that could make it a controversial or sensitive topic.
Why it would be legal by law?From a biological perspective, there is no genetic relationship between the two individuals since they do not share any blood ties. Therefore, there would not be any biological reason to consider their relationship as incestuous.
From a legal perspective, the legality of their marriage would depend on the laws of the country or state where they reside. In most places, the law prohibits marriage between close blood relatives, but the definition of "close blood relatives" may vary. In some places, the law considers adoptive siblings as close relatives, while in others, they are not.
However, it is important to note that there may still be social or cultural taboos associated with such a relationship, and some people may still view it as inappropriate or morally wrong.
Learn more about law here:https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
The Building and Ordinance endorsement to a homeowners policy is especially important for which type of building?
If your own home is broken via a blanket and it needs to be repaired or revamped to comply with constructing codes, ordinances, or laws insurance kicks in to pay for the additional production costs required to satisfy these necessities. This insurance covers building ordinances or law enforcement in 3 approaches:
It covers the fee of any authorities-required demolition, reconstruction, transforming, maintenance, or upkeep to the section of your private home that was broken by using a protected loss.In the event your own home is needed to be totally demolished due to covered damages to any other part of the house, it covers the price of demolition or reconstruction of the part of your home that wasn't damaged.It covers the fee of transforming, casting off, or replacing a part of the undamaged part of your own home so as to finish the creation or maintenance of the broken portion of your house.Learn more about insurance here https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ9
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.
Some oppose the “ticking time bomb" argument as a justification for torture because _____.
Answer: In the post 9/11 environment society has been consumed by the question of whether torture is acceptable under extreme circumstances. The “ticking bomb” metaphor was regularly employed by various figures in the US as an argument to justify the use of torture in interrogations during the term of the Bush Administration. It is an argument that has been used to justify torture in a set of very extreme and detailed circumstances. This paper will argue that the “ticking bomb” metaphor does not provide a convincing argument to justify the use of torture under extreme circumstances. First, definitions of torture and the “ticking bomb” metaphor will be provided. Second, this essay will discuss the use of torture by the US in the War on Terror. Third, the arguments for the use of torture under extreme circumstances, and the flaws of allowing torture under extreme circumstances will be addressed.
Explanation:
any act by which severe pain suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity (United Nations 1997).
Torture is prohibited in any circumstance under a variety of international laws, conventions, and norms. It is spelt out in not only the UN Convention against Torture, but also the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the law of armed conflicts, and the Geneva Conventions (Ip 2009: 36). The prohibition of torture is further enshrined in domestic laws of many of the countries who have ratified these treaties. However, the “ticking bomb” metaphor is used to justify torture in certain extreme situations. The concept of the “ticking bomb” was first conceptualised in a fiction novel written by Jean Larteguy in 1960 (Kovarovic 2010: 254). It describes a scenario whereby the torture of a suspect is considered necessary to obtain information to prevent a future catastrophic event from occurring (Kovarovic 2010: 254). The scenario is usually described as one where terrorists have planned an attack that is going to occur very soon and a large number of people will be killed unless the authorities obtain critical information from the source they have captured (Ip 2009: 40). It is essentially torture that has been sanctioned by the state in exceptional circumstances (Bufacchi and Arrigo 2006: 354). Torture is still considered to be wrong in these circumstances, but it is viewed as a necessary or lesser evil (Ip 2009: 40). Proponents of the “ticking bomb” scenario argue that “torture may be wrong…but mass murder is worse, so the lesser evil must be tolerated to prevent the greater one” (Roth 2005: 197).
Which of the following are local issues that escalated into national issues? how much time working parents need to have to care for their children not having anyone to take care of a new child in the family
how often trash pick-up should occur
not having rules or regulations set for using dog parks
how many people should be elected to the city council
Answer:
no idea. b
Explanation:
sorry i dont no
The PMC industry performs a service that cannot be provided by any other source
A PMC (private military company) is a private company that provides security services in exchange for money. Technically speaking, armies are able to preform the same service. So the PMC industry DOES preform a service that CAN be provided by another source. Also mercenaries, pirates, and rent-a-cop companies do the same thing.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
A private military company (PMC) is a private company providing armed combat or security services for financial gain. PMCs refer to their operationally deployed personnel as "security contractors" or "private military contractors".
Explanation:
PMCs specialize in providing combat and protection forces. Their work ranges from running small-scale training missions to providing combat units composed of up to several hundred highly trained soldiers equipped with powerful weapons platforms, including tanks and attack helicopters.
What do you think would happen if one group of people got to make laws, enforce them, decide what the laws mean, AND judge whether someone had broken a law?
Answer:
The rich would be powerful,
Explanation:
There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent
Answer: It could lead to very unfair things, and one group might try taking advantage of their power.
-The amount of alcohol in a person's body is measured by
You are the health information manager at General Hospital. Your in-house counsel has been contacted by an attorney for a former patient of the hospital whose inpatient hospitalization resulted in some harm to the patient. That harm was documented in an incident report prepared by hospital staff. Internal legal review of the incident report indicates that the harm described by the patient’s attorney is consistent with the harm described in the incident report. Based on the conversations between General Hospital counsel and the patient’s attorney, the counsel believes a lawsuit is imminent.
There are three parts of the discussion to be addressed in your initial response.
First, discuss which source(s) of law might govern this scenario and give an example of one source of law that would be applicable.
Secondly, discuss which part of the legal process of a lawsuit you would be involved with as the health information manager.
Lastly, what content can and/or cannot be released to the patient’s attorney and what legislation may govern this process and content release?
It should be noted that as the health information manager, one will be involved in the incident report which was to identify harm on the patient.
The legal uses of the health record are that they form the backbone of the professional liability action and can establish whether the standard of care was met. Also, they are required for civil actions.
Lastly, the incident reports that were filed is highly confidential and cannot be released to the patient’s attorney or be used against the nurse practitioner in a lawsuit
Learn more about health manager on:
https://brainly.com/question/10643509
"When you create acronyms, songs, or visual images to help you remember course material, you are using"
Explain the four reasons for introducing a community policing style.
Four reasons why a state my introduce a community policing style are;
Creating a more positive image of the local police agency.Increasing trust between the police and the general public.Improvement of reliable information from residents about illegal activities in their locality.The development of a better knowledge of people's aspirations and their chances of being policed.Community policing is an organizational concept that supports the methodical use of partnerships and problem-solving tactics to proactively address the present conditions that give birth to public safety concerns such as crime, social dysfunction, and fear of crime.
Learn more about Community Policing:
https://brainly.com/question/3177078
#SPJ1
why are the supreme court cases of brown v. board of education and mendez v. westminster important to education in the united states?
The case Mendez v. Westminster was a case that challenged racial segregation in the education systems in the United States of America. The petitioners had challenged that the children of Mexican ancestry were being forced into attending a different school based on their race.
Brown V. Board of Education was a case similar to the Mendez case, and here the Supreme Court cited Mendez v. Westminster by saying that any kind of discrimination amongst students is unconstitutional and will not come under the the legal doctrine 'separate education facilities are inherently unequal'.
These two landmark cases are important in the United States of America because they put an end to the racial segregation in the education system by calling it unconstitutional.
To know more about racial segregation
https://brainly.com/question/10466242?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
How have voting requirements changed over the years?
Answer: Over time, voting rights have been extended to more Americans. Voting qualifications based on property ownership, religion, race, and sex have all been eliminated through federal laws and constitutional amendments. The Constitution originally gave the power to decide voter qualifications to the States.
Explanation:
Answer:
Voting requirements have changed over the years in response to social, political, and legal developments. Some of the them could be about age requirements: The minimum age to vote has also changed over time. In the United States, the minimum voting age was originally 21, but it was lowered to 18 by the 26th Amendment in 1971.
the ascertion that non formal institutions have no role to play at the processing stage of the systems. comment on it
Explanation:
The assertion that non-formal institutions have no role to play at the Processing Stage of the Systems Theory is an empty rhetoric.
in states with _______________ divorce laws, the court recognizes the right of either the wife or husband to terminate a marriage.
In states with "no-fault" divorce laws, either the wife or husband has the right to terminate a marriage without proving fault.
No-fault divorce laws are implemented in various states, allowing couples to dissolve their marriage without placing blame on either spouse. These laws recognize that marriages can break down due to a variety of reasons and do not require proof of misconduct or wrongdoing. Instead, the spouse seeking a divorce can cite irreconcilable differences or the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as grounds for divorce. No-fault divorce laws aim to simplify and streamline the divorce process, promoting a more amicable and less adversarial approach. By eliminating the need to assign blame, these laws facilitate the termination of a marriage in a more straightforward and efficient manner, focusing on the fundamental decision to end the relationship rather than fault-finding.
Learn more about divorce laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/31927143
#SPJ11
What has research into the success of probation and parole concluded?
Answer:
parole is so a prisoner can enjpy some freedom but probation is like being free but you can do anything
Explanation:
Terrorism is among the main concerns of any modern public security organization. Research some recent foiled acts of domestic terrorism and discuss the critical-thinking skills that the public security personnel displayed as they countered the attempts. Discuss what public security personnel can do to address the problem of terrorism while keeping in mind the Bill of Rights. Write your response in two or three paragraphs.
PLEASE HELP IN A HURRY!!!! 50 POINTS FOR WHO EVER GETS IT RIGHT!!!
Define personal characteristics
Answer:
it is how you characterize your self
Task With the aid of case law, discuss the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation and Damage, paying particular attention to duty and breach and apply these concepts to construction business. Guidance Note: You will need to cite case law for each principle that makes up the elements you discuss. You should then discuss how the principles apply to the construction workplace. Indicative word limit: 1800 words 40% of the grade
The legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are essential in the construction industry. Duty of Care refers to the responsibility that a person owes to another to ensure that they do not cause harm.
Breach of Duty of Care occurs when a person fails to take reasonable care and this failure causes harm to another. Causation is when the failure to take reasonable care is the cause of the harm. Damage refers to the harm suffered by the injured party.In the construction industry, the duty of care is owed by employers to employees, contractors, and members of the public who may be affected by their actions. The duty of care is also owed by the employees to their employers and co-workers.
A breach of duty of care can occur in many ways. An employer may fail to provide the necessary safety equipment or training to employees, which can cause harm. An employee may fail to follow safety procedures, which can cause harm to themselves or others.The case law that illustrates the concept of Duty of Care is Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). In this case, the claimant bought a bottle of ginger beer from a shop and found a decomposed snail inside the bottle. The claimant suffered from shock and gastroenteritis.
The court held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to the ultimate consumer to ensure that the product was safe.The case law that illustrates the concept of Breach of Duty of Care is Nettleship v Weston (1971). In this case, a learner driver was being taught by her friend and was involved in a car accident. The court held that the learner driver was responsible for the accident, and her friend, the instructor, was held liable for the injuries caused.The case law that illustrates the concept of Causation is Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee (1969).
In this case, the claimant went to the hospital complaining of stomach pains and vomiting. The doctor on duty sent him home, and he died later that night from arsenic poisoning. The court held that the hospital was not liable for the death of the claimant as the failure to diagnose the condition was not the cause of the death.
The case law that illustrates the concept of Damage is Hughes v Lord Advocate (1963). In this case, the defendant left a manhole on the road with no warning signs. The claimant fell into the hole and suffered burns from molten tar. The court held that the defendant was liable for the injuries caused to the claimant as he failed to provide a warning of the danger.
In conclusion, the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are significant in the construction industry. These principles ensure that employers, employees, and members of the public are protected from harm. It is the responsibility of all parties to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others.
To know more about Duty of Care visit-
brainly.com/question/30782971
#SPJ11
finn and glenda are shareholders in hobby crafts corporation, a mexican corporation doing business in texas. in texas this corporation is considered
In Texas Hobby Crafts corporation will be considered as an Alien corporation.
A company that was founded abroad yet conducts business in the United States is known as an alien corporation. Other nations do not refer to American firms operating abroad as "foreign corporations," hence the phrase is typically only used in the U.S. Registration with the U.S. government and/or the state the activities will be in is required in order to operate as an alien corporation. Aliens must also file Form 20-F with the Securities and Exchange Commission if their firms have shares that are traded on US exchanges. Several well-known brands, like Nestle, Ikea, H&M, Toyota, Samsung, Royal Dutch Shell, and Aldi, are conducting business in the United States as foreign firms.
To know more about Alien Corporation:
https://brainly.com/question/3464699
#SPJ4
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
The Crimes that are not reported to police are called the....
Answer:
Dark Figure of crime.
Explanation:
The dark (or hidden) figure of crime is a term employed by criminologists and sociologists to describe the amount of unreported or undiscovered crime.
A(n) ________ is a document for a person's detainment, based on a showing of probablecause that the person committed a crime.A) no-knock warrantB) possessory warrantC) execution warrantD) arrest warrant
Heidi has brought a civil lawsuit against Linda. Linda's lawyer tells her precedent supports her defense. The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous. , Not Selected does not guarantee that Linda will win the case. , Not Selected Incorrect answer: means Linda will win the case. means Heidi's lawsuit is based on statutory law.
Answer:
The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous.
Explanation:
Precedents in the courts of law are previously established cases whose judgements can be referenced in successive case. In the case above, Linda is the defendant because the burden of proof lies on her. She needs to put up a defense to contest the accuracy of her lawsuit.
When the lawyer tells her that precedent supports her defense, it means that previously established cases on that matter support Linda's case. Therefore, Heidi's lawsuit against Linda was frivolous and lacked merit. Linda has a high chance of winning the case.
What is the final step in the naturalization process? A) Passing a citizenship exam B) Demonstrating good character C) Pledging an oath of allegiance D) Filing a Declaration of Intention
Answer:
C) Pledging an oath of allegiance
Explanation:
Answer:
C) Pledging an oath of allegiance
Explanation:
What is the schedule for the California border patrol tomorrow what time they start and leave please help it would mean a lot my grandmother is sick and need to visit her with any of the mean men
Answer:I think the start at 9 AM and leave At 7 PM
Explanation:
How can the principles of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims? ( 200 words, 5 marks)
Answer:
The officials should research the crime area and they should also get the statements from the person who killed. Until all the investigation is completed, they should treat the person as neither criminal nor victim. ... In principles of Ubuntu, a victim should be treated with broad humanity and ethics.
Explanation:
which insurance protects you if you are injured by a hit- and-run driver or a driver who has no way to pay costs?
a zone where no state exercises complete political control.
A zone where no state exercises complete political control is called a frontier.
A put that is on the edge of a state's political or actual boundaries and over which the state has practically no viable control is regularly alluded to as a wilderness. A boundary fills in as an obstruction between states even while it brings neighbors into prompt contact, improving the probability of brutality.
This can be credited to various variables, including landscape, social contrasts, or an absence of assets. Outskirts can go about as focuses of correspondence and exchange between different individuals and human advancements expand to being destinations of contention.
Learn more about frontier:
https://brainly.com/question/25071524
#SPJ4
If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000 television in New Hampshire? O $6 O $16 O $60 O $600
Answer:
$60
Explanation:
6 percent of 1,000 is 60
Based on the tax in both states, the amount that you would save is $60.
Purchase price of television in Massachusetts= Purchase price x ( 1 + sales tax)
= 1,000 x ( 1 + 6%)
= $1,060
Difference between price in both states.= Price in Massachusetts - Price in New Hampshire
= 1,060 - 1,000
= $60
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on sales tax at https://brainly.com/question/9437038.
assume sally suffers from mental illness. she is declared mentally incompetent as part of a competency hearing. three months later she enters into a contract for the purchase of bedroom furniture. it appears she understood the consequences of her actions. based upon these facts alone, her contract for the purchase of bedroom furniture is\\
Based upon these facts alone, Sally's contract for the purchase of bedroom furniture is voidable.
What is a voidable contract?A voidable contract is a contract that is enforceable until one of the parties to the contract has the option of voiding it. A voidable contract is one that can be cancelled at the option of one of the parties, while an unenforceable contract is one that cannot be enforced by law.
A voidable contract is enforceable until one of the parties decides to void it.
A contract is voidable if one of the parties is incompetent to enter into the agreement at the time it is made. Sally was declared mentally incompetent as part of a competency hearing, which means she was not legally able to enter into a contract at the time. As a result, the contract is voidable.
Sally may choose to void the contract or ratify it by retaining the goods and continuing with the purchase. Sally's mental illness, on the other hand, does not automatically invalidate the agreement.
To learn more about contract, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219#
#SPJ11