If a grand jury does not believe enough evidence is present to warrant criminal charges, they issue a:O a. no bill.
What is grand jury?A grand jury can be defined as a panel of ordinary persons which are often called by a court to consider whether there is sufficient proof to press criminal charges against a suspect. If there is reason to think that the accused committed the crime the grand jury will consider the evidence that the prosecution has provided.
The grand jury will return a what is called a no bill if they charges. The case will not go to trial as a result of the grand jury's decision not to indict the defendant.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about grand jury here:https://brainly.com/question/18726345
#SPJ1
Which of the following is an example of incarcerating someone?
1) The judge tells a defendant she must pay for the damages he caused.
2) The judge tells a defendant that he must go to jail.
3) The judge tells a defendant that he must repeat what he said.
4) The judge tells a defendant the she cannot answer a question.
Answer: 2) The judge tells a defendant that he must go to jail.
Explanation:
Incarceration means a suspect is confined to jail or punished to be in a jail or prison. Police officers, officers of the state, federal and local lawmakers, or judge can confine any person suspected for a particular crime. The confinement can occur before or after the conviction. According to the given situation, the judge may tell the defendant that he must go to the jail if all the evidences received for a crime are against that person.
what is the key concept on which representative democracy is based?
The key concept on which representative democracy is based is popular sovereignty.
Popular sovereignty means that the ultimate source of political power resides with the people. In a representative democracy, the citizens exercise their power indirectly by electing individuals to represent their interests and make decisions on their behalf. These elected representatives form the government and are accountable to the people who elected them. Representative democracy operates on the principle that the government's authority is derived from the consent of the governed. The elected representatives are expected to act in the best interests of the people, uphold their rights and liberties, and make decisions that reflect the will of the majority while respecting the rights of minorities.
Learn more about popular sovereignty here
https://brainly.com/question/1087555
#SPJ11
what are things you can do to help your guest keep his or her bac level below the legal limit?
As a host, there are several things you can do to help your guest keep their BAC level below the legal limit.
Firstly, ensure that there is plenty of food available throughout the evening. Eating food helps to slow down the absorption of alcohol in the bloodstream. Secondly, offer non-alcoholic beverage options such as water, juice or soda. This allows your guest to alternate between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, reducing the overall amount of alcohol they consume. Thirdly, monitor the alcohol intake of your guests and encourage them to drink responsibly. If you notice someone becoming too intoxicated, stop serving them alcohol and offer to arrange a ride home for them. Finally, ensure that you have arranged transportation options for your guests, such as designated drivers, ride-sharing services or public transportation. By taking these steps, you can help ensure that your guests enjoy the evening safely and responsibly.
to know about BAC level visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1835332
#SPJ11
Key Terms
Application forms: series of questions regarding suitability for the job
Biodata: application information empirically developed and scored in a way to maximize prediction
Empirically keyed biodata/criterion keyed biodata: biodata items chosen based only on their relationship to an outcome of interest (e.g., job performance)
Rationally keyed biodata: biodata items informed by a job analysis and items chosen based on their relevance for a particular worker characteristic
Reference checks: The collection of information about prospective job applications from people who have had contact with the applicants
Instructions.
Would you advise an organization use biodata? Why or why not? (2-3 sentences)
I provide an example of an empirically keyed biodata measure that is related to job performance throughout this document (Mount et al., 2000). Choose one question from each domain (problem solving and interpersonal) and answer the questions for each one as if you are hiring a barista. Provide your overall evaluation as well. Problem solving (Add item here)
Is this information really needed to judge an applicant’s qualifications for the job?
Would you expect this item be related to the job performance of a barista?
Will answers to this question have an adverse impact in screening out members of a protected group? Does the question conflict with EEOC guidelines, federal or state laws, or statutes?
How would applicants react to this question? Does the question constitute an invasion of privacy?
Would you use this item? Why or why not?
Yes, I would advise an organization to use biodata. This is because the use of biodata will provide an organization with a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of the applicant's skills, and other traits that are relevant to the job.
This, in turn, will help the organization to hire employees who are better suited to the job, and who are more likely to be successful in the job. Answer more than 100 wordsBiodata is a useful tool that can be used by organizations to assess the suitability of job applicants for a particular job. Biodata is a series of questions that are designed to elicit information about an individual's skills, knowledge, abilities, personality, and other traits that are relevant to the job. Biodata can be empirically keyed or rationally keyed. Empirically keyed biodata is based on items that have been shown to be related to an outcome of interest, such as job performance. Rationally keyed biodata is based on items that have been chosen based on their relevance to a particular worker characteristic.Using biodata can be advantageous to an organization as it will help them to hire employees who are better suited to the job and who are more likely to be successful in the job. However, there are also some potential disadvantages to using biodata. For example, some questions on the biodata may be irrelevant to the job or may not be related to job performance. Additionally, some questions may have an adverse impact on members of a protected group or may conflict with EEOC guidelines, federal or state laws, or statutes. As such, it is important for organizations to carefully evaluate the questions on their biodata to ensure that they are relevant, valid, and non-discriminatory.ConclusionIn conclusion, I would advise an organization to use biodata as it is a useful tool for assessing the suitability of job applicants for a particular job. However, it is important for organizations to carefully evaluate the questions on their biodata to ensure that they are relevant, valid, and non-discriminatory. This will help to ensure that the organization hires employees who are better suited to the job and who are more likely to be successful in the job.
to know more about organization visit:
brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ11
Read the article attached.
1. What did you think about the article- for example- was it informative, too much information, not enough information? Explain your answer.
2. List five key pieces of information that you learned from the article and explain each one based on your understanding of what you read.
3. It is important to be able to discuss child abuse in a way that is productive because child abuse tends to bring out a lot of emotions. Many people have different opinions of what discipline/child abuse is unless there are visible injuries to a child. We have to remember as investigators that we are seeking facts. It is up to the courts to determine the punishment (if any) of the offender- and that is based on the facts (not conjecture) of the investigation. The purpose of the following question is to note the different opinions people have concerning discipline vs abuse. Keep in mind that this is opinion based- not everyone is going to think the same way, and we are required to be respectful of other people's opinion. In your opinion (this is not based on personal experiences or law, merely an opinion), at what point does discipline become abuse?
The article informs and guides investigating possible child abuse or homicide.
Five key pieces of information from the article are:
Collecting information about the acute injuryInterviews with medical personnelReviewing medical recordsThorough scene investigation.Interviews with various individualsWhat is crime investigation?
In terms of collecting information about the injury, this info is a starting point for the investigation. Interview medical personnel who treated child. Their expertise can provide valuable insights into injuries.
Discipline turns into abuse by intentionally harming the child. It harms children by causing pain, trauma, or violating their rights. Abuse is excessive force, cruelty, or neglect that ignores the child's welfare and safety. Investigators must collect evidence to assess if disciplinary actions have turned abusive, leaving the courts to decide on next steps.
Learn more about crime investigation from
https://brainly.com/question/28320262
#SPJ1
cộng sản Việt Nam đã vận dụng lí luận chủ nghĩa Mác Lê nin về hình thái kinh tế xã hội vào xây dựng chủ nghĩa xã hội trong thời kì quá độ ở nước ta như thế nào ? rút ra ý nghĩa đối với sinh viên
Disseminating false or misleading advertising is what type of violation of F.S. 475?
A. Second-degree misdemeanor
B. Second-degree felony
C. Third-degree felony
D. First-degree misdemeanor
Disseminating false or misleading advertising is a type of violation of F.S. 475 and it is a Second-degree misdemeanor. Option A.
In the state of Florida, real estate professionals must follow specific rules and regulations when advertising their services, properties, and listings. The Florida Administrative Code, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Real Estate Commission govern advertising rules and regulations. Real estate agents or professionals who violate these advertising rules or regulations may be subject to fines, penalties, or even criminal charges.
Some common advertising violations include: Disseminating false or misleading information Failing to disclose the nature of the relationship between the agent and the buyer or seller Failing to include the name of the brokerage or agent in the advertisement Using a name in the advertisement other than the one registered with the state or the brokerage name. Therefor, option A is correct.
Learn more about misdemeanor
https://brainly.com/question/30175834
#SPJ11
You driving an ambulance 60 mph it start to rain what mph decrease at what speed
If the roads are wet or covered in snow, we should limit our speed by at least half. If the ambulance is at a speed of 60 mph, after it start to rain, the speed is to be decreased to 30 mph.
What is speed?In everyday language and kinematics, an object's speed is defined as the magnitude of its position change over time or the magnitude of its position change per unit of time. It is a scalar quantity.
The average speed of an object in a given time interval is the distance travelled divided by the duration of the interval.
The average highway speed is 60 miles per hour. At 60 mph, you can travel one mile in one minute. The formula for distance and speed with an automobile, as with any other object, is distance time. To get a car's speed at 60 miles per hour, multiply (60 x5280) by (60 x60)= 88 feet per second.
Therefore, the speed must be 30mph when it is raining.
To learn more about speed, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30138602
#SPJ1
What is your idea about the composition of the Supreme Court?
My idea about the composition of the Supreme Court is that, the Supreme Court would be composed of the Chief Justice and also with these seven other judges are included.
The Supreme Court is said to be established under the Article 163 of the Constitution, which is consisting of the Chief Justice, who is known to be the President of the Court. Where, the Deputy Chief Justice, who is the Deputy President of the Court.
However, the number of Associate Justices in the Supreme Court is currently fixed at eight. Whereas, all the Justices here are said to be nominated by the President, confirmed by the Senate. Hence, the Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort.
To learn more about the Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/19532364
#SPJ4
which u.s. supreme court case established that, under the fourth amendment, the police may arrest an individual without a warrant for a minor criminal offense punishable only by a fine?
you are sitting on an jury in which you are the only one that believes that the defendant is not guilty of the charges. what is the most likely outcome of your dissent?
Assuming you are sitting on a jury in which you are the only one that believes that the defendant is not guilty of the charges, the most likely outcome of your dissent is that: C) You eventually agree to vote guilty, but persuade the other jurors to think more critically about the evidence.
What is a grand jury?In Law, a grand jury can be defined as a group of citizens who are saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the evidence in a criminal case.
Who is a defendant?In a criminal case such as drug laundering or trafficking, a defendant can be defined as a legal terminology that is used to describe or refer to an individual who is accused of committing a crime, and brought before the judge and jury by a prosecutor.
In this scenario, the jury who believed that the defendant is innocent (not guilty) of the charges leveled against him or her would eventually agree to vote guilty, while persuading the other jurors to critically ponder and analyze the evidence.
Read more on defendant here: brainly.com/question/10459518
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
You are sitting on a jury in which you are the only one that believes that the defendant is not guilty of the charges. What is the most likely outcome of your dissent?
A) You hang the jury.
B) You cave in and go along with the charges as presented.
C) You eventually agree to vote guilty, but persuade the other jurors to think more critically about the evidence.
D) You eventually agree to vote guilty, but persuade the other jurors that more severe charges are necessary.
the minimum size criminal jury approved by the u.s. supreme court is
The minimum size for a criminal jury approved by the U.S. Supreme Court is six members.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution's Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant in a criminal trial the right to a trial by an impartial jury.
While the Constitution does not specify a minimum jury size, the Supreme Court has held that a jury must have at least six members to satisfy the constitutional requirements.
The Court has recognized that a smaller jury may still be capable of providing a fair and impartial trial.
However, going below six members could potentially compromise the jury's ability to reach a well-rounded and diverse decision, thereby undermining the principles of a fair trial.
Learn ore about criminal here: brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ11
List four (4) exceptions for obtaining a search warrant to search a house, car, or person. For each exception given, provide a brief example.
Answer:
I was personally taught 11 exceptions to obtaining a search warrant. I've chosen the four that I think are the most common.
(1) Consent – A warrant is not needed if the person gives the officer their permission to search their things without one. If an officer asks "may I search your car" and the driver says "yes", a warrant isn't needed.
(2) Plain View – If the objects are in "plain view", a warrant isn't required to conduct a search. An officer doesn't need a warrant to observe that which can clearly be seen in a place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
(3) Evanescent Evidence – If the officer has reason to believe that a person will destroy the evidence in the time it will take to get a warrant, places may be searched without one.
(4) Hot Pursuit – Any attempt a person makes to physically escape before the officer is done with them is grounds for arrest without a warrant, and anything the officer comes across, sees, or walks by in their pursuit of them, is automatically searchable without a warrant.
One country has a comparative advantage over another country in the production of a good if it.
A country has a comparative advantage over another country as regards production of goods when that country is able to produce the goods at lower cost.
What is comparative advantage?
In economic , comparative advantage can be regarded as an advantage that a country get over the other when that country can produce at lower cost.
In the law of demand and supply, it is established that consumer will definitely go for product with lower price.
Countries that usually specialize as regards comparative advantage usually have a gain from trade.We can conclude that at lower cost of production , a country will have comparative advantage.
Learn more about comparative advantage at;
https://brainly.com/question/14846093
In your own word and drawing from your experience as teacher, explain why a person such as darling-Hammond(2006) perceives teaching as more complex than law,medicine, or engineering
Answer:
well teaching is more complex because it has to do with being equipped and trained to do the job of passing on knowledge in a way that is best understood by the students.
It is more complex to be a teacher than having any of those jobs because it is more stressful to get a whole class to understand and it is also more complex because as a doctor you don't need to wait on your patient HOPE THIS HELPS
What do you mean by tutoring?
Tutoring can be defined as engagement with learners to enable their understanding and operation of knowledge, generalities and processes.
Why tutoring is complex?
Tutoring is a complex exertion that is challenging both intellectually and emotionally. It requires knowledge about the subject being tutored, the class ,applicable tutoring and literacy strategies and about the capacities, interests and personalities of the learners. Preceptors practice is informed by the numerous and varied events that they will have endured.
Then you can learn more about tutoring also-
https://brainly.com/question/15247111
#SPJ2
What are the Essential Parts of a Written Constitution? Briefly explain each
Answer:
The constitution is the central legal document of a state. It regulates the basic organizational structure of the state, the territorial structure of the state, the relationship with its constituent states and with other states, as well as the relationship with those subject to norms and their most important rights and obligations. The state powers constituted in this way are bound by the constitution as the supreme norm and their power over the norm is limited. The constitution-making power in democratic states comes from the people of the state. Constitutions usually also contain state tasks and objectives, these are often found in a preamble.
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Brian, a bean farmer, and Crystal, a rice farmer. Brian and Crystal both
always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2019 the price of beans was $5, and the price of rice was $3.
Suppose that in 2020 the price of beans was $10 and the price of rice was $6.
Inflation was
Keep the Highest 5/7
Indicate whether Brian and Crystal were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off Worse Off Unaffected
O
Brian
Crystal
Now suppose that in 2020 the price of beans was $7.50 and the price of rice was $6.
The inflation in 2017 existed at 100% and both Charles and Dina exist unaffected.
What is inflation?
In economics, inflation exists as a general accumulation in the prices of goods and services in an economy. When the general price level rises, each unit of money buys fewer goods and services; therefore, inflation corresponds to a decrease in the purchasing power of money.
1. In 2016 the price of beans existed at $1, and the price of rice was $4 but in 2017, the price of beans existed at $2 and the price of rice existed at $8.
This indicates that the market basket has increased from $5 to $10. The inflation will be: = (10 - 5) / 5 × 100 = 100%
Therefore, both of them exist unaffected by the increase in price.
2. If the price of beans existed at $2 and the price of rice was $4.80, then the market basket stands at $6.80. Therefore, the inflation will be:
= (6.80 - 5) / 5 × 100
= 36%
Inflation is 36%. In this case, Charles exists better off because the price of beans contains doubled.
3. The Inflation established on the information provided will be:
= (3.60 - 5) / 5 × 100
= -28%
In this case, Charles stands still better off and there's a fall in inflation by 28%.
4. It should be remarked that the relative price of rice and beans matters additional to Charles and Dina.
To learn more about inflation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/850547
#SPJ9
The complete question is,
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Charles, a bean farmer, and Dina, a rice farmer. Charles and Dina both always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2016 the price of beans was $1, and the price of rice was $4.
1. Suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $8.
(a) Inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
2. Now suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $4.80.
(a) In this case, inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
3. Now suppose that in 2017, the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $1.60.
(a) In this case, inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
4. What matters more to Charles and Dina?
The overall inflation rate
or
The relative price of rice and beans
Jack is age 45 and owns a self-only high deductible health policy with a $7,000 deductible under his HSA. What is his maximum permitted HSA contribution in 2021?
Based on the latest information from IRS on Health Savings Account (HSA), the maximum permitted HSA contribution in 2021 for Jack in his situation is "$3,600."
The Health Savings AccountThe IRS made the latest information for 2021 by stating that individuals aged 55 and below without family coverage under qualifying high-deductible health plans not less than $1,400 can contribute up to $3,600.
Therefore, given that Jack is not specified to have family coverage, it is assumed he is operating individual HSA. Also, since he is 45 years old, therefore, the maximum permitted HSA contribution in 2021 for Jack in his situation is "$3,600."
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "$3,600."
Learn more about Health Savings Account here: https://brainly.com/question/3626279
pls help
If a business has not made a profit,
a. it doesn't have to pay income tax.
b. it cannot pay its employees.
c. it has no capital to put back into the business.
d. both a and c
the decision was rendered by the u.s. district court of utah. the taxpayer lives in utah. can the taxpayer expect the court to follow its earlier holding?
Yes, the taxpayer can expect the court to follow its earlier holding.The district courts in the United States are the federal trial courts.
The federal court system comprises of district courts, circuit courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court.
As the main trial court, the district court hears civil and criminal cases. It may be helpful to consult the earlier holding to better understand the court's decision in the current case.
In Utah, the district court rendered a decision. As a result, the taxpayer, who lives in Utah, can anticipate the court to adhere to its previous holding.
The legal holding is a binding decision made by a court in the process of resolving a legal dispute. The holding is a conclusion or decision reached by the judge or court after analyzing the legal issues raised in a case. It provides a precedent that must be followed in similar future cases.
to know more about taxpayer refer here
https://brainly.com/question/29664276#
#SPJ11
in texas, voters get to select the individuals who serve on the court of criminal appeals. true or false
Differentiate an accessory from an accomplice.
Answer:
The difference between an accomplice and an accessory is crucial. An accomplice is responsible for the offense the principal commits. An accessory, on the other hand, is guilty of a separate crime that is almost always a misdemeanor
if a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, then firms with valuable technologies will be reluctant to bring them into that country. t/f
Answer:
True
Explanation:
If a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, firms with valuable technologies may be reluctant to bring them into that country. Without strong intellectual property protections, the firms' technologies and innovations may be vulnerable to theft or copying, which could undermine the firms' ability to profit from their investments in research and development. This could discourage the firms from investing in the country, or lead them to invest less in research and development. Strong intellectual property rights protections are therefore an important factor in encouraging innovation and economic growth.
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
In bench trial the judge makes the decisions on A)both law and the facts of the case B)just the facts of the case c) just the law of the case
Answer:
A
Explanation:
hope it helps
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Describe the negative impact of failing to acknowledge unity diversity
Answer:
Explanation:
Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:
Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.
Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.
Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.
Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.
Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.
Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.
Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answer:
This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.
The defendant, Union Pacific RR (UPRR), was sued, under the authority of the Federal Employees Labor Act (FELA), by one of its own employees who was afflicted by West Nile virus after being bitten by a mosquito while on the job. After coming down with the virus, William Nami, the plaintiff, could not walk without a cane, could not drive, and had experienced memory loss. He argued that he was bitten by an infected mosquito while working for UPRR outside Galveston, Texas, and next to an area on UPRR’s right of way, that was infested by the virus-carrying mosquitoes. He noted that the infestation had been exacerbated by UPRR’s negligence in never mowing the grass and allowing the standing water to accumulate. Nami also argued that UPRR did not warn employees about the mosquitoes, did not provide insect repellent, and did not equip employees with long-sleeved shirts. UPRR replied that under the doctrine of ferae naturae, the company was not liable for Nami’s illness because he was injured by a wild animal that was not in UPRR’s possession. UPRR also claimed that because the danger was commonly understood to exist (Galveston is known by local inhabitants as the "mosquito capital of the world"), the company had neither a duty to warn nor a duty to supply employees with repellent or long-sleeved shirts. UPRR also disputed the claim that it did not mow the grass and that it let the standing water accumulate. Nami argued that UPRR was relying on common law principles, like ferae naturae and proximate cause, that had been deliberately superseded by FELA, which states that a railroad will be liable for on-the-job injuries to a worker if the railroad "caused or contributed to" a worker’s injury just so long as the railroad’s "negligence played a part—no matter how small—in bringing about the injury." The trial court held for the railroad, but the court of appeals reversed. The case then went to the Texas Supreme Court. Does FELA supersede the Roman law principle of ferae naturae, and if not, does the doctrine of ferae naturae protect UPRR from liability? Explain. [See: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Nami, 498 S.W. 3d 890 (Texas 2016).]
We found that the idea still holds true in the contemporary environment and that the catastrophe was not the fault of the Railways.
A railway worker who was bitten by a mosquito and later found to have West Nile virus is suing his employer for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (often known as "FELA," which mandates railway companies to provide their workers with a sufficiently safe place of working).
The majority of the time, FELA culpability is determined in accordance with the norms of common law negligence. The well-established "ferret hypothesis" of the nature doctrine releases landowners from responsibility for damage caused by wild animals that wander into their property without human action.
Learn more about Liability Act here
https://brainly.com/question/31190764
#SPJ4
Congress did not have the power to collect state debts owed to the national government article of confediration
The Articles of Confederation was that Congress did not have the power to collect state debts to the federal government. The delegates to the Continental Congress wanted to ensure that the federal government could not force states to pay for things that states did not want.
The legislative branch of the federal government of the United States is known as the United States Congress. It is bicameral, with the House of Representatives as the lower body and the Senate as the higher body. It meets in Washington, DC, in the Capitol building.
Direct elections are used to select senators and representatives, but the governor can appoint someone to fill a vacancy in the Senate. There are 435 members of Congress and 100 senators out of the 535 members of Congress. Only in the event of a tie in the Senate does the Vice President of the United States have the right to vote. Six members of the House of Representatives did not vote.
To know more about Congress here-
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ4
Match the police ranks to the appropriate description
Answer:
What do you mean by that?
Explanation:
Wdym..
The HIPAA Security Rule contains what provision about encryption?
a. It is required for all ePHI.
b. It is required based on CMS guidance.
c. It is required based on organizational policy.
d. It is not required for small providers.
The HIPAA Security Rule contains what provision about encryption, It is required based on organizational policy. correct answer is c.
The HIPAA Security Rule requires that covered entities and business associates implement appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic protected health information (ePHI). One such technical safeguard is encryption, which is the process of converting information into a secure code that can only be deciphered with a specific key or password. The Security Rule does not explicitly require encryption for all ePHI, but it does state that covered entities and business associates must assess the risks to ePHI and implement measures to reduce those risks to a reasonable and appropriate level. This means that if a covered entity determines that encryption is necessary to adequately safeguard ePHI, then it must be implemented. Ultimately, the decision to use encryption should be based on organizational policy and risk management considerations. Therefore, option C is the correct answer. It is important to note that while small providers may not be explicitly exempt from the Security Rule, they may be able to use alternate and less costly measures to safeguard ePHI.
To know more about HIPAA visit:
brainly.com/question/28224288
#SPJ11