I SWEAR THE BOTS ARE TARGETING MY POSTS

We can utilise the MRF and/or CRF numbers to identify which brand may have issues with quality control when it comes to selling the specified number of chips in its 24-ounce bag.

First, we must locate and analyse the MRF and CRF values for each brand. We can determine the overall percentage of samples from each brand by comparing the MRF values.

If a brand routinely has a lower MRF than other brands, it may indicate a problem with quality control.

Brands with lower CRF scores for this category can have label accuracy problems.

We must compute the CRF values for each brand in that category in order to discover which one has the highest CRF for less than the advertised weight of chips.

The frequency of samples that weigh less than what is stated is compared to the overall frequency of samples within that particular brand to determine the CRF.

When compared to the other brands, the brand with the highest CRF regularly has a higher percentage of samples that fall below the declared weight.

Thus, this implies that the label's accuracy may be in doubt because it consistently deviates further from the declared weight than competing brands.

For more details regarding CRF value, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31725029

#SPJ1

Verifying that this function satisfies the three hypotheses of Rolle's Theorem on the inverval f(x) is f(x) is and f(0) on [0, 4] on (0, 4) f(4) Then by Rolle's theorem, there exists at least one value c = 2  such that f'(c) = 0.

Given:

Consider the function f(x) = x2 - 4x + 8 on the interval 0, 4. Verify that this function satisfies the three hypotheses of Rolle's Theorem on the inverval f(x) is f(x) is and f(0) on [0, 4] on (0, 4) f(4) Then by Rolle's theorem, there exists at least one value c such that f'(c) = 0.

f(x)=x^2−4x+8, [0,4]

when, x = 0

f(x) = x^2 -4x +8

f(0) = y = 0 - 0 + 8 = 8

when, x=4

f(5) = y = 16 - 16+8 =

thus, we have 2 points (0, 8) ; (4, 8)

slope,m = {8-(8)} / {4-0} = 0

hence, we have to calculate all the points,x where 0<x<8 and slope=0

f '(x) = 2x - 4 = 0

or, f '(c) = 2c - 4 = 0

c = 4/2 =2 ( 0<x<4)

hence, the there is only one solution c=2 which satisfies Rolle's theorem.

Learn more about the rolle's theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/13972986

#SPJ4

Answer:

,,,

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Scientifically proven that there is a 60% chance you will get an odd number and a 40% chance you will get an even number.

I hope this helps!!

Answer:

a) 2.5 km

b) 1836 m ≈ 1.8 km (rounded)

Step-by-step explanation:

a) just add the two distances of the vertical and horizontal road. 900m + 1600m = 2500m = 2.5 km

b) Apply Pythagoras (a²+b²=c², where a and b are the vertical and horizontal roads, and c is the diagonal road).

c = √(1600²+900²) ≈ 1836m (rounded)

Answer:

Composite number

Step-by-step explanation:

Factors of 38:

1 * 38

2 * 19

1, 2, 19, 38

Therefore, 38 is not a prime, but rather a composite number.

Hope this helps!

Answer: The statement is false.

The given differential equation is x²y' - xy = 1

We have to determine whether the given function f(x)

= ln x ,x is a solution of the above differential equation or not.

For that, we have to find the derivative of the given function f(x) and substitute it into the differential equation.

Let y = f(x)

= ln(x)/x,

then we have to find y'. y = ln(x)/x

Let's use the quotient rule for finding the derivative of y.=> y'

= [(x)(d/dx)ln(x) - ln(x)(d/dx)x] / x²(apply quotient rule)

= [1 - ln(x)] / x²Substituting the value of y' and y in the given differential equation:

x²y' - xy

= 1x²[(1 - ln(x)) / x²] - x[ln(x) / x]

= 1(1 - ln(x)) - ln(x)

= 1-ln(x) - ln(x)

= 1-2ln(x)

We see that the left-hand side of the differential equation is not equal to the right-hand side (which is 1).

Therefore, the given function is not a solution of the differential equation. Hence, the given statement is false.

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

A 1-point closing fee assessed on a $200,000 mortgage is equal to $2,000.

Points are a percentage of a mortgage loan amount. One point equals one percent of the loan amount. Points may be paid up front by a borrower to obtain a lower interest rate. Lenders can refer to this as an origination fee, a discount fee, or simply points.

So, one point of $200,000 is $2,000. Hence, a 1-point closing fee assessed on a $200,000 mortgage is equal to $2,000. Therefore, the correct option is $2,000.

Learn more about mortgage here: https://brainly.com/question/29518435

#SPJ11

Answer: k = 13

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

At x intercept, x = 0

2.8(0)+5.7y+5.8=0

y=-5.8/5.7

=-1.02

At y intercept, y=0

2.8x+5.7(0)+5.8=0

x=-5.8/2.8

=-2.07

Answer:

X ans y intercepts are

xintercept (s) : (-2.0,0) you can roud if necessary

y intercept(s) : (0,-1.01754385) you can round if nessecary

Step-by-step explanation:

to find the \(x\) and \(y\) intercepts simply plug in \(o\) to replace \(x\) then when you solve for \(x\) plug in \(x\)to solve for \(y\)

Answer: I’m really sorry if you get this wrong and I will feel so bad so please don’t take it from me because I’m only 15 and also doing summer school lol, but if I had to take a quick, random guess i’d say 4. Please wait until someone else responds or look it up! I don’t want to be the reason you get it wrong.

Total buttons = 18 + 9 + 3 = 30 buttons

Total number of white buttons = 18

Total number of blue buttons = 3

Therefore, the formula to calculate the probability is,

Hence,

Hence, the answer is 0.06 (OPTION D).

The distance of the trap from the hunter's home is approximately 600 meters, and the bearing of the trap from the hunter's home is approximately 22.15°.

To find the distance of the trap from the hunter's home and the bearing of the trap from his home, we can use the given bearings and distances. By applying trigonometry and vector addition, we can calculate these values.

To determine the distance of the trap from the hunter's home, we can break down the problem into two components: the north-south (N-S) and east-west (E-W) directions.

i. Distance of the trap from the hunter's home:

Using trigonometry, we can find the N-S and E-W distances separately.

The N-S distance is given by the formula: NS = distance * sin(bearing).

NS = 600 * sin(115°) ≈ 600 * 0.925 = 555 meters (rounded to the nearest whole number).

The E-W distance is given by the formula: EW = distance * cos(bearing).

EW = 600 * cos(115°) ≈ 600 * 0.380 = 228 meters (rounded to the nearest whole number).

Using these N-S and E-W distances, we can apply vector addition to find the total distance from the hunter's home to the trap.

Total distance = sqrt(N\(S^2\) + E\(W^2\)) ≈ \(\sqrt{(555^2 + 228^2)}\) ≈ \(\sqrt{(308025 + 51984) }\)≈ \(\sqrt{(360009)}\) ≈ 600 meters (rounded to the nearest whole number).

ii. Bearing of the trap from the hunter's home:

The bearing of the trap from the hunter's home is the angle measured clockwise from the north direction.

To find this bearing, we can use the formula: bearing = arctan(EW / NS).

Bearing = arctan(228 / 555) ≈ 22.15° (rounded to two decimal places).

Therefore, the distance of the trap from the hunter's home is approximately 600 meters, and the bearing of the trap from the hunter's home is approximately 22.15°.

Learn more about trigonometry here:

https://brainly.com/question/13971311

#SPJ11

Answer:

Point C

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

See attachment for grid

Required

Which point is x and y = negative

From the attached grid, we have the following points

\(A = (6,4)\)

\(B = (-4,2)\)

\(C =(-7,-2)\)

\(D = (5,-4)\)

From the above points, only point C has negative x and y

Another way to go about it is:

Quadrant 3 has negative x and y values and point C is located in quadrant C.

Answer:

  swap the middle two steps to put them in order

Step-by-step explanation:

The steps in order would be ...

Slope is  $0.15 of the equation of cost  C=$0.15t+$35.00.

The slope of the line is the ratio of the rise to the run, or rise divided by the run. It describes the steepness of line in the coordinate plane.

The slope intercept form of a line is y=mx+b, where m is slope and b is the y intercept.

The slope of line passing through two points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) is

m=y₂-y₁/x₂-x₁

Given that A cell phone company uses the equation C=$0.15t+$35.00

C is the total cost for a month of service.

t is the number of text messages.

We have to find the slope of the equation.

slope is 0.15 and 35.00 is the y intercept of the equation given.

Hence, slope is  $0.15 of the equation of cost  C=$0.15t+$35.00.

To learn more on slope of line click:

https://brainly.com/question/14511992

#SPJ1

Answer:

the fiorst plan

Step-by-step explanation:

The multiplicative inverse of 'a' is assure by a-1 or 1/a. on other side, the multiplicative inverse of a number is present as 1 divided by the number.

The multiplication inverse of 3/7 is 7/3.

hence, the multiplicative inverse of -3/7 is -7/3 power 9.

The multiplicative inverse is defined as the reciprocal of a given number. It is used to define mathematical expressions.

The word 'inverse' concludes something contrary/opposite in effect, order, position. or direction. A number when multiplied by its multiplicative inverse results in 1.

The multiplicative inverse approach is called that the multiply of a number and its reciprocal is 1.

To know more about Multiplicative inverse:

brainly.com/question/13715269

#SPJ4

Option a) t= 4 years. The effective interest rate for the specified account is 9.31%. This is because the effective interest rate is the rate that actually applies to the balance in the account, taking into account the compounding frequency. The formula for the effective interest rate is:

Effective interest rate = (1 + nominal yield / compounding frequency) ^ compounding frequency - 1

In this case, the nominal yield is 9% and the compounding frequency is 2 (since it is compounded twice a year). Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

Effective interest rate = (1 + 0.09 / 2) ^ 2 - 1
Effective interest rate = (1.045) ^ 2 - 1
Effective interest rate = 1.092025 - 1
Effective interest rate = 0.092025

Converting this to a percentage, we get:

Effective interest rate = 9.31%

Therefore, the correct answer is 9.31%.

For the second part of the question, we can use the formula for future value to find the missing quantity. The formula is:

A = P(1 + rt)

Plugging in the given values, we get:

5580 = 4500(1 + 0.06t)

Solving for t, we get:

5580 = 4500 + 270t
1080 = 270t
t = 4

Therefore, the correct answer is t = 4 years, or choice A.

Know more about effective interest rate here:

https://brainly.com/question/13735414

#SPJ11

Answer:

1 1/2%

Step-by-step explanation:

1 square is shaded and half the other square is shaded

Here's the answer in C programming language to evaluate the given polynomial:

c

Copy code

#include <stdio.h>

#include <math.h>

double evaluatePolynomial(double x) {

   double term = (x - 1.0) / x; // Calculate the first term of the polynomial

   double result = term; // Initialize the result with the first term

   int i;

   for (i = 2; i <= 4; i++) {

       term = pow(term, i) * i; // Calculate the next term

       result += term; // Add the term to the result

   }

   return result;

}

int main() {

   double x;

   printf("Enter the value of x: ");

   scanf("%lf", &x);

   double y = evaluatePolynomial(x);

   printf("Y = %lf\n", y);

   return 0;

}

In this code, the evaluatePolynomial function takes a value x as input and calculates the polynomial expression. It uses a for loop to calculate each term of the polynomial and adds it to the result. Finally, the main function prompts the user to enter the value of x, calls the evaluatePolynomial function, and prints the result Y.

To know more about C programming language, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28795101

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

Two angles are called complementary when their measures add to 90 degrees.

\(42 + 12x = 90 \\ 12x = 48 \\ x = 4\)

The charge per cubic foot is $0.05. The equation for the total cost of a resident's water is C(x) = 0.05x + 40. The number of cubic feet of water used that would lead to a bill of $130 is 2200.

We will use the given data to calculate the charge per cubic foot:Let x be the number of cubic feet of water used by a household and let y be the corresponding bill amount.

Case 1: When a household using 1000 cubic feet was billed $90.

Case 2: When one using 1600 cubic feet was billed $105.Subtracting case 1 from case 2, we get:$$105 - 90 = 15$$$$1600 - 1000 = 600$$So, the charge per cubic foot is:$$\frac{15}{600} = 0.025$$$$\implies 0.05 \text{ (for two decimal place)}$$ Hence, the charge per cubic foot is $0.05.

To write an equation for the total cost of a resident's water as a function of cubic feet of water used, we will use the given data:

$$\text{Fixed amount = } $40$$\text{Charge per cubic foot of water used = } $0.05$$\text{Number of cubic feet used = } x$$

Therefore, the equation for the total cost of a resident's water as a function of cubic feet of water used is:

$$C(x) = \text{(Charge per cubic foot of water used)}\times\text{(Number of cubic feet used)}+\text{(Fixed amount)}$$$$C(x) = 0.05x + 40$$

To find out how many cubic feet of water used would lead to a bill of $130, we will use the equation obtained above:

$$C(x) = 0.05x + 40

= $130$$$$\implies 0.05x

= $90$$$$\implies x

= \frac{90}{0.05}

= 1800$$

Therefore, the number of cubic feet of water used that would lead to a bill of $130 is 1800.

To know more about resident's water, visit

https://brainly.com/question/30332520

#SPJ11

The statement that is false is: Correlation is used to define the variables of only non-linearly related data sets.

Correlation is a measure of the relationship between two variables of a data set and can be positive, negative, or 0. It is used to measure the degree to which the two variables of a data set resemble each other, regardless of whether the data set is linear or non-linear. The correlation between any two variables can be easily measured and compared, allowing for more detailed analysis of the data set.

Learn more about Correlation: https://brainly.com/question/4219149

#SPJ4

b. To divide a, we need the specific expression for a. Without the expression, we cannot perform the division.

c. The simplified form of (8x^-3 y^10 / 20xy^-2)^-3 is (5y^12) / (2x^6).

b. Without the specific expression for a, we cannot perform the division as requested. Please provide the expression for a so that we can assist you further.

c. To simplify (8x^-3 y^10 / 20xy^-2)^-3, we can simplify each term separately. First, let's simplify the numerator: 8x^-3 y^10 divided by 20xy^-2.

For the numerator, we can simplify the coefficient by dividing both terms by 4: 8/4 = 2.

For the variables, when dividing like terms with exponents, we subtract the exponents: x^-3 / x^1 = x^-4 and y^10 / y^-2 = y^12.

Now, we simplify the denominator: 20xy^-2.

Again, dividing the coefficient by 4, we get 20/4 = 5. The variable x remains the same, and y^-2 becomes y^0 since any number raised to the power of 0 is equal to 1.

Combining the simplified numerator (2x^-4 y^12) with the simplified denominator (5xy^0), we get (2x^-4 y^12) / (5xy^0).

Now, when we raise the entire fraction to the power of -3, we can apply the power to each term within the fraction: (2^-3 x^-4 * y^12 * 5^-3 * x^3 * y^0).

Simplifying, we get (5y^12) / (2x^6).

In summary, the simplified form of (8x^-3 y^10 / 20xy^-2)^-3 is (5y^12) / (2x^6).

learn more about denominator click here;

https://brainly.com/question/15007690

#SPJ11

Based on proportions and using mathematical operations, if 4 tickets cost $48, the cost of 11 tickets will be $132.

Mathematical operations involve the use of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, including other operations.

In this situation, we find the unit rate of tickets using division operation.

Secondly, we determine the cost of 11 tickets by multiplication.

The quotient of the division operation is multiplied by 11.

The cost of 4 tickets = $48

The cost of 1 ticket = $12 ($48/4)

The cost of 11 tickets = $132 (12 x 11)

Thus, we can conclude that 11 tickets cost $132 given that 4 tickets cost $48.

Learn more about mathematical operations at https://brainly.com/question/20628271

#SPJ1

Answer:

  the rule for repeated denominator factors applies

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know why is there not a separate rule in the partial fraction decomposition key idea for what to do if you have a cubic function in the denominator of a rational function.

The rule for repeated denominator factors is that there is a fraction in the partial fraction sum for each power of the denominator factor up to its greatest power.

  A(x)/B(x)^n = a1(x)/B(x) + a2(x)/B(x)^2 + a3(x)/B(x)^3 + ... +an(x)/B(x)^n

This rule applies to cubic factors as well as factors of any other power.

__

Additional comment

The attached calculator display shows an example of a repeated factor.

<95141404393>

There is no separate rule in the partial fraction decomposition key idea for what to do if you have a cubic function in the denominator of a rational function because the general method can be applied to any rational function regardless of the degree of the denominator.

Partial fraction decomposition is the process of decomposing a rational function to a sum of simpler fractions. It is a technique used in the integration and simplification of algebraic expressions. The partial fraction decomposition key idea is a method for separating a rational function into its parts so that it can be more easily manipulated.

1: Factorize the denominator of the rational function into linear factors.

2: Write the partial fraction decomposition of the function as a sum of simpler fractions, with each term having a denominator that matches the factors.

3: Determine the unknown coefficients by equating the coefficients of like terms in the original function and its partial fraction decomposition.

The degree of the denominator does not affect the general method of partial fraction decomposition.

You can learn more about Partial fractions at: brainly.com/question/30763571

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

what do you need to do ?

the only thing we can do here without any further information is simplification if the expression:

-23x² + x² - 6x + 10 + 2x²

now we group ask the terms of the same variable exponents :

-23x² + x² + 2x² - 6x + 10

-20x² -6x + 10

we could do

2×(-10x² - 3x + 5)

but I personally don't find this more simplified that the previous form.

do not know sorry : (

Answer:

right option is A:- they are adjacent angles

hope it helps

Step-by-step explanation:

please mark me brainliest

The first error that Holden made in his proof is option (B) Holden only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion.

Congruence of triangles is a relationship between two triangles where they have exactly the same shape and size. When two triangles are congruent, all their corresponding sides and angles are equal in measure.

Holden's proof contains an error because he only established the congruence of one pair of corresponding sides in the two triangles. However, to prove the congruence of two triangles, all corresponding sides and angles must be shown to be congruent using a congruence criterion such as SSS or SAS. Therefore, Holden's proof is incomplete and does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the two triangles are congruent.

Therefore, the correct option is (B) Holden only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion.

Learn more about congruence here

brainly.com/question/20521780

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

Holden tried to prove that △FGH≅△FIH

1 IH≅GH

Given

2 FH≅FH

Line segments are congruent to themselves.

3 △FGH≅△FIH

Side-side congruence

What is the first error Holden made in his proof?

(A) Holden used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.

(B) Holden only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion.

(C) Holden established all necessary conditions, but then used an inappropriate congruence criterion.

(D) Holden used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.