I NEED HELP PLEASEEEE
The Mystery of Loch Ness
By Kayden Mitchell

Of all the mysteries in the world, none has been as popular as that of the Loch Ness Monster. Perhaps the biggest mystery is whether it is convincing evidence or a simple desire to believe that keeps the myth alive.

Loch Ness is a lake in Scotland. The loch, or lake, is known for sightings of a mysterious monster. Most who see this monster, known as Nessie, describe something with a long neck and several humps above the water. Sometimes the "monster" is moving in these sightings, and sometimes it is still. Many have suggested that Nessie might be a plesiosaur (plea-see-a-soar), an aquatic dinosaur that was trapped in the loch after the last ice age.

The plesiosaur theory presents several problems. First, the plesiosaur is an air breather. Such a creature would need to surface often and, therefore, be seen more frequently. Second, it's unlikely that the same creature has lived in the loch since the last ice age. Today's creature would have to be the offspring of an original plesiosaur trapped long ago. This would suggest multiple creatures in the loch (needed to produce offspring). Again, sightings would be more frequent if this were the case.

So from a purely logical stand point, the existence of such a large and ancient creature is unlikely. But assume for a minute that it is possible. What would a plesiosaur need to live in an enclosed lake?

Tropical waters: Scientists believe plesiosaurs were warm-blooded. Like crocodiles and alligators, plesiosaurs would need to live in warm waters. The loch is very cold with temperatures averaging about 40 degrees Fahrenheit (4.4 Celsius).
Food: Like other warm-blooded creatures, plesiosaurs would need a large quantity of food. If there is a group of Nessies, then even more food would be needed. Because the loch is full of silt (underwater dust) not much light gets into the deepest areas. So the food chain, which would depend on plankton, is very weak at its base. As a result, there is probably not enough food to support such a large creature.
However, the plesiosaur theory is not the only one. Many other ideas attempt to explain the sightings and "photographs." But two separate sonar surveys of the loch have not found any evidence of a creature larger than a salmon. The last survey,1 completed in 2007 by the British Broadcasting Company (BBC), involved 600 different sonar beams. Using satellite navigation systems, the team made sure every inch of the loch was searched. The team found nothing.

With cell phones and digital cameras, one would think that sightings of Nessie would increase. This has not happened. The BBC team believes the legend of Nessie has endured because people see what they want to see. To prove this, the team used a fence post, raising it before groups of tourists. Afterwards several of the tourists asked to draw pictures of what they had seen drew pictures of a monster's head.

In this article, the author suggests the Loch Ness monster may be a product of people's imaginations. Writing in complete sentences, cite two pieces of evidence the author uses to support this claim. Use details from the article to support your answer. (10 points)

Answer:

metaphor because of the comparison

Answer:

I think it's Mysterious( not sure)

since they said where had she disappeared off too makes the text seen very spooky and mysterious and curious.

Again I'm not sure

Answer:

Answer:

c.Carson worked for the u.s fish and wildlife service.

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Answer:

make amends to

Including an appendix in a dissertation can help to improve the clarity, organization, and accessibility of the paper and provide additional support for the author's arguments and conclusions.

The dissertation's organization and clarity can be enhanced by adding an appendix. Satheesh can make it simpler for the reader to follow the primary argument of his dissertation by isolating the links to the studies from the main body of the work.

The main body of the dissertation may appear cluttered and challenging to read if it contains connections to research and other supporting information. Satheesh can prevent the main body of the paper from being cluttered and make it simpler for the reader to concentrate on the main point by including these materials in an appendix.

Learn more about dissertation:

brainly.com/question/30403195

#SPJ1

The twelve prominent Nazis who were put on trial were charged with crimes such as the waging of aggressive war, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

The Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials that took place in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949. These trials were organized by the Allied powers in the aftermath of World War II to prosecute the prominent leaders of Nazi Germany for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. During the course of their trial, the accused offered a number of defenses, the most notable of which was that they were simply following orders.

In the defense of the Nazis, they claimed that they were just obeying the orders of their superiors. They claimed that they were just doing their jobs and that they had no choice but to carry out the orders that were given to them. They argued that they were not guilty of the crimes they were accused of because they were just following orders, and therefore they could not be held responsible for their actions.

The defense of "superior orders" or "obedience to orders" is a well-known legal principle that states that an individual is not responsible for their actions if they are carrying out orders that were given to them by someone in authority.

However, this defense was rejected by the tribunal on the grounds that it was not a legitimate defense for crimes such as those that the Nazis were accused of. The tribunal held that individuals have a duty to disobey illegal orders and that this duty is higher than any duty to obey orders given by a superior.

In conclusion, the defense of "superior orders" or "obedience to orders" was the primary defense that the twelve prominent Nazis used in their trial at the Nuremberg Trials. However, this defense was ultimately rejected by the tribunal on the grounds that individuals have a duty to disobey illegal orders.

For more such questions on humanity

https://brainly.com/question/24067944

#SPJ8

The narrator is a lawyer is an explicit detail in the passage.

What is narrator?

The person who tells a narrative from their point of view is the narrator. A somebody who adds verbal commentary to a movie, TV show, slide show, etc.

The narrator is a lawyer because the passage line is "My client Justin sat in my office" usually  client means a person or organization using the services of a lawyer or other professional person or company.

Narrator as a lawyer suggest to Justin, "I told him that he should lie low. The best way to help me win his upcoming trial was for him to stay out of trouble".

As a result, option (a) The narrator is a lawyer is correct

Learn more about on narrator, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12020368

#SPJ1

Option A is correct. Solar power is clearly the most efficient renewable energy to use because it has a limited.

Why is solar energy the best renewable source of power?

In contrast to fossil fuels, the sun has more than enough energy to supply the entire world's energy needs, and it won't run out anytime soon. The sole constraint on solar energy as a renewable resource is our capacity to efficiently and economically convert it to electricity. Solar electricity is radiantlight and heat from the Sun this is harnessed the usage of a number technology such as sun power to generate electricity, sun thermal electricity (including sun water heating), and sun architecture. It is an important supply of renewable electricity, and its technology are extensively characterised as either passive sun or lively sun relying on how they seize and distribute sun electricity or convert it into sun power.

To learn more about Solar power, use the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/10122139

#SPJ1

When an author attempts to gain the audience's personal trust, he is using ethos as a rhetorical device.

Thus this is the meaning of ethos.

To learn more about ethos, refer: https://brainly.com/question/13889

#SPJ1

Answer:

It's a hexagon. A hexagon has 6 sides.

Answer: because the people that live in it want to move

Explanation: this question honestly makes no sense

Answer:

if you learn some archery lessons, you soon have

Answer:

otoño

Explanation:

The real meaning behind the euphemism "targets are neutralized" is People are killed in a war. Thus the correct option is C.

Inference in a piece of literature is the process of drawing a conclusion about a given topic using the facts and evidence that are specific to that work of literature.

Euphemism is typically defined as the use of a pleasant phrase in place that can insult or imply unfavorable meanings. Targets that are neutralized will signify that something has been destroyed, like a bomb or a military target, which is best exemplified by the casualties caused during battle.

Therefore, option C is appropriate.

Learn more about inference, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29774121

#SPJ1

Answer:

no

Explanation:

Answer:

Generativism is a linguistic theory that regards linguistics as the study of a hypothesised innate grammatical structure. It is a biological or biologistic modification of earlier structuralist theories of linguistics, deriving ultimately from glossematics.

Answer:

cruza tu casa

Explanation:

Answer:

C. Goes

Explanation:

Goes is spelt this way not any other way :)

C. Goes

Explanation:

Since you need to add an s because he goes in the past or he is going to go in the future. We need to eliminate B. and D. For D, that is not how you spell it. You should know how. Goes has a slient E so we need to also eliminate A. Now we are left with C.

Answer:

I believe that technology and media is greatly affecting people's abilities to focus, think, and connect with others. Social media can lead to short attention spans, which is especially seen with the use of platforms such as TikTok. Additionally, social media changes the ways we connect with others. Where a normal conversation would allow for visual cues, as well as tone of voice, text messages do not allow for these types of connection. Overall, I believe that technology and media has both positive and negative effects on society.

Explanation:

Not sure what context this is for so I just typed something up but hope this helps :)

The net benefit of the trade-in over 10 years, taking into account the discount rate of 3%, is -$10,292.79.

The electric car saves you $3,500 per year in gas, maintenance, and insurance.

Using the formula for the present value factor (PVF), which is (1 + discount rate)(number of years), we can calculate the PVF for 10 years with a 3% discount rate:

PVF = (1 + 0.03)¹⁰ = 1.343917

Calculate the present value of the annual savings over 10 years:

Present Value = Annual Savings × PVF

Present Value = $3,500 × 1.343917 = $4,707.21

Net Benefit = Present Value - Out-of-Pocket Cost

Net Benefit = $4,707.21 - $15,000 = -$10,292.79

Therefore, the net benefit of the trade-in over 10 years, taking into account the discount rate of 3%, is -$10,292.79.

Learn more about trade on

https://brainly.com/question/17727564

#SPJ1

The Revised Paragraph will be: Although Jon struggled with reading and math in school, he always had a passion for climbing. As he scaled steep cliffs, he felt a sense of belonging and thrived on the constant challenges presented by the sport. Despite his parents' concerns about the dangers of his hobby, they eventually gave up trying to keep him away from the mountains. Jon's love of climbing provided a sense of purpose and fulfillment that he had never found in any other activity, making it all the more important to him.

A compound-complex sentence is comprised of at least two independent clauses and one or more dependent clauses.

Example: Though Mitchell prefers watching romantic films, he rented the latest spy thriller, and he enjoyed it very much.

Learn more about sentence on:

https://brainly.com/question/552895

#SPJ1

Answer:

The conflict is between the man/the narrator and his own self thoughts.

Explanation:

O Henry's "The Cactus" is a short story that revolves around the protagonist Trysdale's thoughts, about his marriage and how it went awry. This short story  also delves into the protagonist's own character.

Even though there are other characters mentioned and involved, the main conflict is primarily within himself. He did not try to understand the cactus nor did he seem interested in trying to. So, the woman who was supposed to be his wife decided to not marry him, discovering that he is an egoistic man and nothing, and no one can or will be able to change him. This left him wondering how/ why she refused to marry him, never realizing his own mistake.

Thus, the correct answer is that the conflict occurs between the man and his own self.

Answer:

not sure if this is what your looking for but

Explanation:

One thing absolute phrases cannot contain is a finite verb. That is, a verb that has a subject. Essentially, that would turn the phrase into a sentence, completely ruling it out as an absolute phrase.

The Brown case addresses whether facilities separated by race are permissible by law

Answer:

Bro above me is correct.

Explanation:

Answer:

distance

assistance

persistence  

Explanation:

This expert is significant because it is a powerful metaphor for Janie's character development and journey towards self-discovery.

For more questions on Their Eyes Were Watching God

https://brainly.com/question/16037611

#SPJ8

Answer:

B- serious

Explanation:

Brainliest?

Answer:

trees,cars,houses,buildings,ect.

Answer:

I see trees other peoples houses people walking pets and cars also friends

Explanation: