Answer:
D. Mountains
Step-by-step explanation:
When two Continental plates crash the land piles upward to forms mountains and hills.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I D KK
Which side is opposite 0
The value of opposite side of angle θ would be,
⇒ EF
Since, A triangle is a three sided polygon, which has three vertices and three angles which has the sum 180 degrees.
We have to given that,
A right triangle EFD is shown in figure.
And, At angle E, right angle is shown.
We know that;
The Opposite side of a angle is called perpendicular side.
Hence, The value of opposite side of angle θ would be,
⇒ EF
Thus, Option A is true.
Learn more about the triangle visit;
brainly.com/question/1058720
#SPJ1
determine whether the sequence converges or diverges. if it converges, find the limit. (if an answer does not exist, enter dne.) an = (−1)n 5 n lim n→[infinity] an =
The sequence an = (-1)ⁿ * 5ⁿ alternates between positive and negative terms and grows without bound as n increases, so it does not converge and the limit does not exist (DNE).
The sequence is defined as an = (-1)ⁿ * 5ⁿ.
When n is odd, (-1)ⁿ is equal to -1, so an = -5ⁿ.
When n is even, (-1)ⁿ is equal to 1, so an = 5ⁿ.
Therefore, the sequence alternates between positive and negative terms, and the absolute value of the terms grows without bound as n increases.
This means that the sequence does not converge.
Hence, the limit of the sequence as n approaches infinity does not exist (DNE).
To learn more about converges and diverges:
https://brainly.com/question/28169281
#SPJ11
Help, Help, Please
\( \sf find \: the \: value \: of \: \theta \: when \: \theta \: is \: acute\: angle\)
\( \sf \cos^{2}(\theta) - \sin^{2}(\theta) =2-5 \cos(\theta) \)
\(\text{note:explanation is a must}\)
Answer:
θ = \(\frac{\pi }{3}\) (60° )
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the identity
sin²x + cos²x = 1 ⇒ sin²x = 1 - cos²x
Given
cos²θ - sin²θ = 2 - 5cosθ
cos²θ - (1 - cos²θ) = 2 - 5cosθ
cos²θ - 1 + cos²θ = 2 - 5cosθ
2cos²θ - 1 = 2 - 5cosθ ( subtract 2 - 5cosθ from both sides )
2cos²θ + 5cosθ - 3 = 0 ← in standard form
(cosθ + 3)(2cosθ - 1) = 0 ← in factored form
Equate each factor to zero and solve for θ
cosθ + 3 = 0
cosθ = - 3 ← not possible as - 1 ≤ cosθ ≤ 1
2cosθ - 1 = 0
cosθ = \(\frac{1}{2}\) , so
θ = \(cos^{-1}\) (\(\frac{1}{2}\) ) = \(\frac{\pi }{3}\) ( or 60° )
Answer:
\( \huge \boxed{ \boxed{\blue{ { \theta = 60}^{ \circ} }}}\)
Step-by-step explanation:
to understand thisyou need to know about:trigonometryPEMDASlet's solve:\( \sf \: rewrite \: \sin ^{2} ( \theta) \: as \: 1 - \cos ^{2} ( \theta) : \\ \sf \implies \: \cos ^{2} ( \theta) - (1 - \cos ^{2} ( \theta)) = 2 - 5 \cos( \theta) \)\( \sf \: remove \: parentheses \: and \: change \: its \: sign : \\ \sf \implies \: \cos ^{2} ( \theta) - 1 + \cos ^{2} ( \theta)) = 2 - 5 \cos( \theta) \)\( \sf \: add : \\ \sf \implies \: 2\cos ^{2} ( \theta) - 1 = 2 - 5 \cos( \theta) \)\( \sf \: move \: left \: hand \: sides \: expression \: to \: right \: hand \: sides \: : \\ \sf \implies \: 2\cos ^{2} ( \theta) + 5 \cos( \theta) - 1 -2 = 0\)\( \sf \: rewrite \: 5\cos( \theta) \: as \: 6 \cos( \theta) - \cos( \theta) : \\ \sf \implies \: 2\cos ^{2} ( \theta) + 6 \cos( \theta) - \cos( \theta) - 3 = 0\)\( \sf \:factor \: out \: 2 \cos( \theta) \: and \: - 1 : \\ \sf \implies \: 2\cos ( \theta)( \cos( \theta) + 3 ) -1( \cos( \theta) + 3) = 0\)\( \sf \: group: \\ \sf \implies \: (2\cos( \theta) - 1) ( \cos( \theta) + 3 ) = 0\)\( \sf \: rewrite \: as \: two \: seperate \: equation: \\ \sf \implies \: \begin{cases}2\cos( \theta) - 1 = 0\\ \cos( \theta) + 3 = 0 \end{cases} \)\(\sf add \: 1 \: to \: the\: first \: equation \: and \: substract \: 3 \: from \: the \: second \: equation: \\ \sf \implies \: \begin{cases}2\cos( \theta) = 1\\ \cos( \theta) = - 3 \end{cases} \)\( \sf the \: second \: eqution \: is \: false \: \\ \sf because \: - 1 \leqslant \cos( \theta) \leqslant 1 \: \\ \sf but \: we \: can \: still \: work \: with \: the \: second \: equation\)
\( \sf substract \: both \: sides \: by \: 2 : \\ \implies\frac{ 2\cos( \theta) }{2} = \frac{1}{2} \\ \implies\cos( \theta) = \frac{1}{2} \\ \therefore \: \theta \: = {60}^{ \circ} \)Anyone help me with this please!!
Find r'(t), r"(t), r'(t) r"(t), and r'(t) x r"(t). r(t) = 3²³i - 3tj + 5t³k (a) r'(t) 3ti - 3j+5/1²k (b) r"(t) 3i+5tk 9t + (d) r'(t) r"(t) . 25 2 2 I r'(t) x r"(t) - -
The vector function r'(t), r"(t), r'(t) r"(t), and r'(t) x r"(t). is
(a) r'(t) = 3ti - 3j + 15t²k
(b) r"(t) = 3i + 15tk
(c) r'(t) · r"(t) = 9t - 45t²
(d) r'(t) x r"(t) = -90t²i - 45tj - 9k
To find the derivatives of the vector function r(t) = 3²³i - 3tj + 5t³k, we differentiate each component of the vector with respect to t.
(a) To find r'(t), we differentiate each component separately:
r'(t) = (d/dt)(3²³i) - (d/dt)(3tj) + (d/dt)(5t³k)
= 0i - 3j + 15t²k
= 3ti - 3j + 15t²k
(b) To find r"(t), we differentiate each component of r'(t) with respect to t:
r"(t) = (d/dt)(3ti) - (d/dt)(3j) + (d/dt)(15t²k)
= 3i + 0j + 15tk
= 3i + 15tk
(c) To find r'(t) · r"(t), we take the dot product of r'(t) and r"(t):
r'(t) · r"(t) = (3ti - 3j + 15t²k) · (3i + 15tk)
= 9t - 45t²
(d) To find r'(t) x r"(t), we take the cross product of r'(t) and r"(t):
r'(t) x r"(t) = (3ti - 3j + 15t²k) x (3i + 15tk)
= -90t²i - 45tj - 9k
In summary, r'(t) = 3ti - 3j + 15t²k, r"(t) = 3i + 15tk, r'(t) · r"(t) = 9t - 45t², and r'(t) x r"(t) = -90t²i - 45tj - 9k.
Learn more about vector function: https://brainly.com/question/28479805
#SPJ11
ads
12
angle
B
A
A
13
hip
12 o=cos
13 -22.00
9
B
COS O
4
11
B
5
0
C
B
4
What is the greatest possible quotient of any two distinct members of the set $\left\{\frac{2}{5}, \frac{1}{2},5,10\right\}$
The greatest possible quotient of two distinct members of the set is 25.
What is the Quotient?A quotient is defined as the outcome of dividing an integer by any divisor that can be said to be a quotient. The dividend contains the divisor a specific number of times.
We are given the set of numbers as :
2/5, 1/2, 5, 10
We must choose p as the biggest number from the set and q as the smallest number from the set in order to the greatest possible quotient .
Comparing the fractions we determine :
⇒ 2/5 = 0.4,
⇒ 1/2 = 0.5
So, the smallest number is 2/5
Select p = 10, q = 2/5
To determine the quotient.
So, p/q = 10/(2/5)
⇒ p/q = 10×5/2
⇒ p/q = 50/2
⇒ p/q = 25
Hence, the greatest possible quotient is 25 in the set.
Learn more about the quotient here:
https://brainly.com/question/27796160
#SPJ1
With Alpha set to .05, would we reduce the probability of a Type
I Error by increasing our sample size? Why or why not? How does
increasing sample size affect the probability of Type II Error?
With Alpha set to .05, increasing the sample size would not directly reduce the probability of a Type I error. The probability of a Type I error is determined by the significance level (Alpha) and remains constant regardless of the sample size.
However, increasing the sample size can indirectly affect the probability of a Type I error by increasing the statistical power of the test. With a larger sample size, it becomes easier to detect a statistically significant difference between groups, reducing the likelihood of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis (Type I error).
Increasing the sample size generally decreases the probability of a Type II error, which is failing to reject a false null hypothesis. With a larger sample size, the test becomes more sensitive and has a higher likelihood of detecting a true effect if one exists, reducing the likelihood of a Type II error. However, it's important to note that other factors such as the effect size, variability, and statistical power also play a role in determining the probability of a Type II error.
Learn more about Alpha here:
https://brainly.com/question/30447633
#SPJ11
Circle O has a radius of 12.
Find the area of the shaded region rounded to the nearest whole number.
Answer:
~ 340
Step-by-step explanation:
A = pi * r^2
The big circle is r1 = 12cm so the small r2=6cm
A= A1 - A2 = (pi * r1^2)-( pi*r2^2) = 339,29 ~ 340 square cm
If the radius of the small circle is 12cm then: r1 = 24cm and r2 = 12cm and calculate it the same way
A rhombus has side lengths of 30 inches the longest diagonal is 45inches, what is the measure of the larger angles?
The measure of the larger angles in the rhombus is approximately 101.54 degrees.
The measure of the larger angles in a rhombus can be determined using the properties of rhombi. In a rhombus, opposite angles are congruent. This means that if we can find the measure of one angle, we can determine the measure of the larger angles by using the fact that opposite angles are equal.
To find the measure of one angle, we can use the longest diagonal and the side lengths of the rhombus. We know that the longest diagonal of the rhombus is 45 inches. The longest diagonal of a rhombus bisects the angles it connects. This means that it divides the rhombus into two congruent triangles.
Since the diagonals bisect the angles, we can find the measure of one angle in each triangle. To find the measure of an angle in a triangle, we can use the Law of Cosines. The Law of Cosines states that in a triangle with sides a, b, and c and angle C opposite side c, the following equation holds:
c² = a² + b²- 2ab×cos(C)
In our case, the sides of the triangle are the side length of the rhombus (30 inches) and the longest diagonal (45 inches). Let's denote the measure of one angle in each triangle as A and B.
Using the Law of Cosines, we have:
45² = 30² + 30² - 2×30×30×cos(A)
2025 = 900 + 900 - 1800×cos(A)
2025 = 1800 - 1800×cos(A)
1800cos(A) = 1800 - 2025
1800×cos(A) = -225
cos(A) = -225/1800
cos(A) = -1/8
Since cos(A) is negative, we know that angle A is an obtuse angle. To find the measure of angle A, we can take the inverse cosine of -1/8. Using a calculator, we find that: A ≈ 101.54 degrees Since opposite angles in a rhombus are congruent, the measure of angle B is also approximately 101.54 degrees. Therefore, the measure of the larger angles in the rhombus is approximately 101.54 degrees.
To learn more about Cosines visit:
brainly.com/question/30766161
#SPJ11
I couldn’t type it so I just took a picture. Please help me!! I’ll give you 25 points!
Answer:
It would be D.
Step-by-step explanation:
You have to collect like terms which would involve the 5\(\sqrt{7}\) and -10\(\sqrt{7}\) and do the same for the other 2
Is this correct??????????
The specificheat of a human is approximately 3.47 J/8 ∘
C. Use this information to answer the following questions. (a) If a 1601lb man eats a candy bar containing 287 Cal, how much will his body temperature increase if all of the calories from the candy bar are converted into heat energy? Remember that a food calorie (Cal) is equal to 1kcal, 6
C GOTutorial (b) If a 160lb man eats a roll of candy containing 41.9Cal, how much will his body temperature increase if all of the calories from the candy are converted into heat energy? ∘
C
(a)the body temperature of the 1601 lb man will increase by approximately 3.0 °C.(b)the body temperature of the 160 lb man will increase by approximately 2.4 °C.
The specific heat of a human is given as 3.47 J/°C. Using this information, we can calculate the increase in body temperature when a certain number of calories are converted into heat energy. In the first scenario, a 1601 lb man consumes a candy bar containing 287 Cal. In the second scenario, a 160 lb man consumes a roll of candy containing 41.9 Cal. We will calculate the increase in body temperature for each case.
(a) To calculate the increase in body temperature for a 1601 lb man who consumes a candy bar containing 287 Cal, we need to convert calories to joules. Since 1 Calorie (Cal) is equal to 4184 joules, we have:
Energy = 287 Cal × 4184 J/Cal = 1.2 × \(10^6\) J
Now, using the specific heat formula Q = mcΔT, where Q is the energy, m is the mass, c is the specific heat, and ΔT is the change in temperature, we can rearrange the formula to solve for ΔT:
ΔT = Q / (mc)
Assuming the mass of the man is converted to kilograms, we have:
ΔT = (1.2 × \(10^6\) J) / (1601 lb × 0.4536 kg/lb × 3.47 J/°C) ≈ 3.0 °C
Therefore, the body temperature of the 1601 lb man will increase by approximately 3.0 °C.
(b) For a 160 lb man who consumes a roll of candy containing 41.9 Cal, we repeat the same calculation:
Energy = 41.9 Cal × 4184 J/Cal = 1.75 × \(10^5\) J
ΔT = (1.75 × \(10^5\) J) / (160 lb × 0.4536 kg/lb × 3.47 J/°C) ≈ 2.4 °C
Thus, the body temperature of the 160 lb man will increase by approximately 2.4 °C.
Learn more about kilograms here:
https://brainly.com/question/24901791
#SPJ11
if h hours and 20 minutes is equal to 380 minutes. What is h?
Answer:
3 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
h = 6
Step-by-step explanation:
60*6 = 360
360+20 = 380 BD
Question in photo! (Please help with other questions!)
Answer:
a) \(a_{n}\) = 13.8 + 0.2n
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :-
a = 14
d = 0.2
To Find :
\(a_{n}\)
Solving :-
\(a_{n}\) = a + (n - 1)d
\(a_{n}\) = 14 + 0.2n - 0.2
\(a_{n}\) = 0.2n + 13.8
Solution :-
a) \(a_{n}\) = 13.8 + 0.2n
Helen needs 6 pints of water for her lemonade. How many gallons does she need
Answer:
0.75 gal
Step-by-step explanation:
Example:To convert pints to gallons use the following steps:
Step 1:
Remember that:
1 pint = 0.125 gallons
Step 2:
Let's pretend you want to convert 10 pints to gallons. All you'd have to do is multiply the number of pints you have by 0.125 as follows:
10 pints x 0.125 gallons/pint
Helen needs 0.75 gallons of water for her lemonade and this can be determined by using the unitary method.
Given :
Helen needs 6 pints of water for her lemonade.
The following steps can be used in order to determine the total amount of water in gallons Helen needs for her lemonade:
Step 1 - The unitary method can be used in order to determine the total amount of water in gallons Helen needs for her lemonade.
Step 2 - Remember 1 pint is equal to 0.125 gallons.
Step 3 - If 1 pint is equal to 0.125 gallons then 6 pints is equal to:
\(=\dfrac{0.125}{1}\times 6\)
Step 4 - Simplify the above expression.
= 0.75 gallons
So, Helen needs 0.75 gallons of water for her lemonade.
For more information, refer to the link given below:
https://brainly.com/question/23368125
answer the quesion (i will mark the brainliest if answered correctly)
Answer:
but where is the questions?
A CSI team arrives at a murder scene and immediately measures the temperature of the body and the temperature of the room. The body temperature is 23 °C and the room temperature is 15 °C. Ten minutes later, the temperature of the body has fallen to 18 °C. Assuming the temperature of the body was 37 °C at the time of the murder, how many minutes before the CSI team's arrival did the murder occur? Round your answer to the nearest whole minute.
Answer: ________________ minutes before the team's arrival.
The murder occurred 30 minutes before the CSI team's arrival.
To determine the time of death, we can use Newton's Law of Cooling, which states that the rate of change of temperature of an object is proportional to the difference between its current temperature and the surrounding temperature.
The formula for Newton's Law of Cooling is:
T(t) = T₀ + (T_s - T₀) * \(e^{-kt}\)
where:
T(t) is the temperature of the body at time t,
T₀ is the initial temperature of the body,
T_s is the temperature of the surroundings (room temperature),
k is the cooling constant,
and e is the base of the natural logarithm.
In this case, we have T₀ = 37 °C, T_s = 15 °C, and T(t) = 18 °C after 10 minutes.
We can rearrange the formula to solve for k:
k = -(1/t) * ln((T(t) - T₀)/(T_s - T₀))
Substituting the values into the equation:
k = -(1/10) * ln((18 - 37)/(15 - 37))
k = -(1/10) * ln(-19/-22)
k ≈ 0.03567
Now, we can solve for the time, t, when the body temperature was 37 °C:
37 = 15 + (23 - 15) * \(e^{0.03567t}\)
Simplifying the equation:
22 = 8 * e \(e^{0.03567t}\)
Dividing both sides by 8:
\(e^{0.03567t}\) = 22/8
\(e^{0.03567t}\) ≈ 2.75
Taking the natural logarithm of both sides:
-0.03567 * t ≈ ln(2.75)
Dividing both sides by -0.03567:
t ≈ ln(2.75) / -0.03567
t ≈ 30.197
Rounding to the nearest whole minute, the murder occurred approximately 30 minutes before the CSI team's arrival.
To learn more about murder here:
https://brainly.com/question/32557950
#SPJ4
I would really appreciate your help. Thank you.
Answer:
75
Step-by-step explanation:
trust me bro
test the claim about the population mean μ at the level of significance α. assume the population is normally distributed. claim: μ>29; α=0.05; σ=1.2 sample statistics: x=29.3, n=50
Based on the sample data and the hypothesis test, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the population mean μ is greater than 29 at the significance level of 0.05.
What is the mean and standard deviation?
The standard deviation is a summary measure of the differences of each observation from the mean. If the differences themselves were added up, the positive would exactly balance the negative and so their sum would be zero. Consequently, the squares of the differences are added.
To test the claim about the population mean μ at the level of significance α, we can perform a one-sample t-test.
Given:
Claim: μ > 29 (right-tailed test)
α = 0.05
σ = 1.2 (population standard deviation)
Sample statistics: x = 29.3 (sample mean), n = 50 (sample size)
We can follow these steps to conduct the hypothesis test:
Step 1: Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses.
The null hypothesis (H₀): μ ≤ 29
The alternative hypothesis (Hₐ): μ > 29
Step 2: Determine the significance level.
The significance level α is given as 0.05. This represents the maximum probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.
Step 3: Calculate the test statistic.
For a one-sample t-test, the test statistic is given by:
t = (x - μ) / (σ / √(n))
In this case, x = 29.3, μ = 29, σ = 1.2, and n = 50. Plugging in the values, we get:
t = (29.3 - 29) / (1.2 / √(50))
= 0.3 / (1.2 / 7.07)
= 0.3 / 0.17
≈ 1.76
Step 4: Determine the critical value.
Since it is a right-tailed test, we need to find the critical value that corresponds to the given significance level α and the degrees of freedom (df = n - 1).
Looking up the critical value in a t-table with df = 49 and α = 0.05, we find the critical value to be approximately 1.684.
Step 5: Make a decision and interpret the results.
If the test statistic (t-value) is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
In this case, the calculated t-value is approximately 1.76, which is greater than the critical value of 1.684. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis.
hence, Based on the sample data and the hypothesis test, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the population mean μ is greater than 29 at the significance level of 0.05.
To learn more about the mean and standard deviation visit:
brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ4
marking brainliest and extra points
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
If you Divide 60 by 2 you would get 30 but if you divide by four ill be 15 so for b ill be 2 and a will be 4
assume the variable x has been initialized to an integer value (e.g., x = 3). what does the following statement do?
However, assuming there is a statement that involves the variable x, it would perform some operation or assign a value to x based on the specific syntax of the statement.
Without the statement provided, it is impossible to give a specific answer. Assuming the variable x has been the initialized to an integer value (e.g., x = 3), the following statement will perform an operation or action using the value of x. This could include mathematical operations, comparisons, or use within a loop or conditional statement. Without knowing the specific statement, I cannot provide a more detailed explanation of its function.
To know more about variable visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15078630
#SPJ11
A claim has been made that men in the age group 20-30 average the same height in inches in the U.S. and the Netherland (the land of giants, by the way). I do not believe this claim. I want to be 99% confident and have 90% power. If I think both populations have a population standard deviation of 4, what sample size (total) would I need to reject the claim if the two populations different by 0.5 (inches)?
The required sample size (total) to reject the claim of men in the age group 20-30 averaging the same height in inches in the U.S. and the Netherlands, assuming both populations have a population standard deviation of 4, would be 1456.
To calculate the required sample size, we need to use the formula for sample size calculation in two-sample t-tests, which takes into account the desired level of significance, power, effect size, and population standard deviation. In this case, we want to be 99% confident (i.e., 1% level of significance) and have 90% power, which corresponds to a z-value of 2.33 and a t-value of 1.645. The effect size is 0.5/4 = 0.125, and plugging these values into the formula, we get a required sample size of 1456. This means that if we take a sample of 728 men from each population and find a difference of 0.5 inches or more between their means, we can reject the claim with 99% confidence and 90% power.
Learn more about population here
https://brainly.com/question/29885712
#SPJ11
Calcular la altura, h de un arbol sabiendo que, si nos situamos 8 metros de la base del tronco, vemos la parte superior de su copa en un angulo de 36.87*
Utilizando trigonometría, veremos que la altura del arbol es 6m.
¿Como obtener la altura del arbol?
Podemos visualizar la situación como un triangulo rectangulo.
La altura del arbol será el cateto opuesto al angulo de 36.87°.
La distancia a la base del tronco, que es 8 metros, será el cateto adjacente a dicho angulo.
Entonces, podemos usar la relacion:
tan(θ) = (cateto opuesto)/(cateto adjacente).
Reemplazando lo que conocemos, y definiendo:
altura = cateto opuesto = H.
tendremos:
tan(36.87°) = H/8m
Resolviendo para H:
H = tan(36.87°)*8m = 6m
Así, concluimos que la altura del arbol es 6m.
Sí quieres aprender más sobre triangulos rectangulos:
https://brainly.com/question/2217700
#SPJ1
Nathaniel was out at a restaurant for dinner when the bill came. He wanted to leave a tip of 13%. What number should he multiply the cost of the meal by to find the total plus tip in one step?
Answer:
multiply the total meal cost by .87 to get your answer
Step-by-step explanation:
el cuadro de un numero natural menos nueve es igual a 315. ¿ cual es ese numero ?
Answer:
Espanol? or english?
Step-by-step explanation:
Pleaseeeee helpp :(((
=======================================================
Explanations:
1a. The graph decreases whenever the curve goes downhill as you read from left to right. This is from x = 3 to x = 13. So the decreasing interval is \(3 < x < 13\)See figure 1 below. 1b. The graph increases when the graph goes uphill. This happens two separate times. First from x = 0 to x = 3. Then the second portion is from x = 13 to x = 18. Refer to figure 1.2. The min value is the smallest y value possible. This is y = 0.25 as shown in figure 2. This is where the lowest point on the so called "roller coaster" occurs. The max value is y = 3 which is where the highest point is located.3. The domain is the set of all allowed x values. This is from x = 0 to x = 18, including both endpoints. So we say the domain is \(0 \le x \le 18\). The range is a similar story but for the y values. The range is \(0.75 \le y \le 3\), which has its endpoints match up perfectly with the min and max found earlier.If a mean weight of two groups of children were different with a p level of .03 is the difference statistically significant? What p level identifies statistical significance?
Yes, if the mean weight of two groups of children is different with a p-value of 0.03, the difference is statistically significant. Typically, a p-value of less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant, indicating that the observed difference is unlikely to be due to chance alone.
Yes, if the p level is .03, then the difference in mean weight between the two groups of children is statistically significant. The p level that identifies statistical significance is generally considered to be .05 or less, meaning that there is a 5% or less chance that the difference observed is due to random chance rather than a true difference between the two groups. Therefore, a p level of .03 is below the commonly accepted threshold for statistical significance and suggests that the difference in mean weight is not likely due to chance alone.
Know more about p-value here:
https://brainly.com/question/30078820
#SPJ11
Find the surface area of each figure. Round your answers to the nearest tenth, if necessary
Answer:
268 in ^2
Step-by-step explanation:
SA=2lw+2lh+2hw
width = 4 lenth = 6 height = 11
2(6)(4) + 2(6)(11) + 2 (11)(4)
= 2 (24) + 2(66) + 2 (44)
= 48 + 132 + 88
= 268 in ^2
Answered by G a u t h m a t h
PLEAS HELP ASAP 50 POINTS IF RIGHT: A landscaper is creating a bench for a pool deck. A model of the bench is shown in the image.
A rectangular prism with dimensions of 7 feet by 3 feet by 4.8 feet.
Part A: Find the total surface area of the bench. Show all work. (6 points)
Part B: The landscaper will cover the bench in ceramic tiles except for the bottom that is on the ground. If the tiles cost $0.89 per square foot, how much will it cost to cover the bench? Show all work. (6 points)
Part A: To find the total surface area of the rectangular prism, we need to calculate the areas of all six faces and then add them together.
Given dimensions:
Length = 7 feet
Width = 3 feet
Height = 4.8 feet
Surface Area of each face:
Front and back faces: Length * Height
= 7 feet * 4.8 feet
= 33.6 square feet
Top and bottom faces: Width * Length
= 3 feet * 7 feet
= 21 square feet
Side faces: Width * Height
= 3 feet * 4.8 feet
= 14.4 square feet
Total Surface Area:
2 * (Front and back faces) + 2 * (Top and bottom faces) + 2 * (Side faces)
= 2 * 33.6 square feet + 2 * 21 square feet + 2 * 14.4 square feet
= 67.2 square feet + 42 square feet + 28.8 square feet
= 137 square feet
Therefore, the total surface area of the bench is 137 square feet.
Part B: To calculate the cost of covering the bench with ceramic tiles, we need to multiply the total surface area by the cost per square foot.
Cost per square foot = $0.89
Total Surface Area = 137 square feet
Total cost to cover the bench:
= Cost per square foot * Total Surface Area
= $0.89 * 137 square feet
= $121.93
Therefore, it will cost $121.93 to cover the bench with ceramic tiles.