how did the global movement Black Lives Matter begin

it is because law is made by people to fulfill their needs

.

Some general factors that would influence sentencing recommendations include:

• The specifics of the charges (e.g. reckless murder vs. 1st degree murder) and the number of charges. More/lesser charges would impact sentencing.

• Alabama sentencing guidelines which provide ranges for different types of felonies based on offense levels. Reckless murder would likely fall into a higher offense level.

• The criminal history of the offenders. Prior criminal records could increase recommended sentences.

• Circumstances of the crime. Especially aggravating factors could warrant longer sentences.

• Discretion of the judge. Sentencing ultimately comes down to the judge's discretion within the applicable laws and guidelines.

Without knowing the details of the Dadeville shooting case, charges, criminal histories of the offenders, and judge's sentencing philosophy, I cannot determine precise recommended sentences for the 4 reckless murder charges. The sentences could range from many years to potentially life imprisonment, depending on the factors.

The best approach is to review the specific laws on reckless murder sentencing in Alabama, the guidelines, details of the charges and offenders in this case, and decisions in similar previous cases to help determine an appropriate recommendation range for each charge. But there are too many unknowns based on the information provided for me to give more precise recommendations. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Answer:

I believe the answer is B. The man made a plea bargain with the prosecutor.

Explanation:

It can't be A or C. I don't believe it can be D, because there is evidence against him.

After analyzing the scenario, the situation which is most likely to happen is that the man made a plea bargain with the prosecutor and as a result, the court set bail for the man and ordered a trial date. Thus, option 'B' is the correct option.

In criminal court proceedings, a plea deal is an arrangement whereby the prosecution makes a concession to the defendant in return for a guilty or no-contest plea. A plea agreement saves time for all parties involved and may help criminal defendants avoid being found guilty of a more severe crime.

For instance, in the American legal system, a defendant facing felony theft charges that might result in state prison time may be given the option to plead guilty to a lesser charge of misdemeanour theft instead, which may not result in jail time. In the 1970s, plea bargaining was thought to be primarily an American practice.

Learn more about the plea bargain, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9877538

#SPJ2

To solve this murder, you would have to secure the scene and go on to carry out forensics and other forms of investigation.

As a detective, my first step in solving this murder would be to secure the crime scene and gather as much evidence as possible. This would include interviewing any witnesses, taking photographs and collecting any physical evidence that may be present. I would also need to examine the note left by the killer and try to gain any insight from it.

Next, I would interview the neighbors next door to try and find out any information about the killer's associate. I would also check the mailbox for any papers left by the killer as per the note. Even though the killer stated that the papers should not be checked for fingerprints, I would still do so, as well as check for other forms of physical evidence that could lead to the killer.

I would also check any security cameras in the area to see if they captured anything that could be useful in the investigation.

Read more on murder cases here: https://brainly.com/question/30054429

#SPJ1

Avidar's values and approaches to human resources management play a significant role in supporting Lob's business success. Here's how our Employee Engagement and Satisfaction, Talent Acquisition and Development, Diversity, and Inclusion, and Performance Management

1. Employee Engagement and Satisfaction: Avidar focuses on creating a positive work environment where employees feel engaged, valued, and satisfied. By promoting a culture of employee well-being and work-life balance, Avidar enhances employee morale, productivity, and retention. Engaged and satisfied employees are more likely to contribute their best efforts to the company's success, leading to improved business outcomes for Lob.

2. Talent Acquisition and Development: Avidar recognizes the importance of attracting and retaining top talent. They employ effective recruitment strategies to bring in skilled individuals who align with Lob's goals and values. Avidar also prioritizes employee development through training programs, mentorship, and career progression opportunities. By investing in their employees' growth and professional advancement, Avidar ensures a highly skilled and motivated workforce that contributes to Lob's success.

3. Diversity and Inclusion: Avidar embraces diversity and inclusion as integral components of its human resources approach. They foster an inclusive workplace where individuals from diverse backgrounds feel respected, valued, and empowered. This approach cultivates a rich pool of perspectives, ideas, and experiences within Lob, driving innovation, creativity, and adaptability, which are crucial for business success in a rapidly changing market.

4. Performance Management: Avidar implements effective performance management practices to align individual goals with Lob's objectives. They provide regular feedback, set clear expectations, and recognize and reward employees' achievements. This approach promotes accountability, encourages high performance, and helps drive the overall success of Lob.

By upholding these values and employing these approaches, Avidar creates a strong foundation for Lob's human resources management. It leads to a motivated, skilled, and diverse workforce that is engaged, productive, and aligned with the company's vision and goals, ultimately contributing to Lob's business success.

Know more about Human resources management here:

https://brainly.com/question/14419086

#SPJ8

Answer:

A- jury selection

Explanation:

Answer:

Sorry, but I don't know which position you are talking about. Please say it first. But which subject is this about in law?

Answer:

List your assets (what you own)

List your liabilities (what you owe)

Judicial processes can vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system, but in general, they include the following stages: Pretrial,Trial,Verdict,Sentencing,Appeals,Post-appeal

1. Pretrial: This is the stage before a trial begins and includes activities such as investigation, arrest, booking, and bail hearings. During this stage, the prosecution and defense gather evidence and build their cases.

2. Trial: This is the stage where the case is presented to a judge or jury. Witnesses are called, evidence is presented, and arguments are made by the prosecution and defense.

3. Verdict: Once the trial is over, the judge or jury delivers a verdict of guilty or not guilty. If the defendant is found guilty, the judge will typically schedule a sentencing hearing.

4. Sentencing: During this stage, the judge determines the appropriate punishment for the defendant based on the severity of the crime and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances.

5. Appeals: If the defendant is found guilty, they may have the right to appeal the verdict to a higher court. The appeals court will review the case to determine if any legal errors were made during the trial that may have affected the outcome.

6. Post-appeal: If the defendant is unsuccessful in their appeal, they may have limited options to challenge the ruling, such as filing a habeas corpus petition or seeking executive clemency.

These stages of the judicial process can involve numerous legal procedures, rules, and requirements that are designed to ensure that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner.

For more such questions on jurisdiction

https://brainly.com/question/10377896

#SPJ11

Answer:

B. To limit the power of the federal government

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Extensive planning and research is included in every aspect of making and establishing laws, so your statement is definitely false. To establish traffic laws, lawmakers need to carefully examine how traffic behaves, which may flucuate from region to region. They also need to vote on it, and the proposed law must go through a large ratificattion process to become official and accepted. A large amount of planning is needed to establish a traffic law. Thwerfore, your statement is false.

~~~Harsha~~~

Answer: a act took place in

Explanation:

Answer:

It will take place in White House.

This is a question that relates to an investigation at a crime scene. The questions that are immediately apparent are: "Where did the blood come from"? "Who could have done this? "What was their motive?" "Did she have a quarrel with anyone?"

A crime scene is any site that may be related to a crime that has been committed. Physical evidence from crime scenes is relevant to a criminal inquiry. Crime scene investigators and law enforcement collect this evidence.

Physical evidence recognition, recording, correct collection, packing, preservation, and, lastly, scene reconstruction are the essential crime scene processes.

Learn more about Crime Scenes:
https://brainly.com/question/10702774
#SPJ1

Full Question:

The Crime + Crime Scene:

You walk into the home of Sue Ellen Miller, the victim. Sue Ellen is a middle-aged, unmarried woman who lives alone. She has very long, black hair and is short and petite. She has no pets, children, or roommates. She worked as a museum curator at the local museum.You notice a pool of blood next to her body on the pink rug. The blood looks almost dry, as if it had beensitting there for several hours. You cannot identify any wounds where the blood may be coming from without moving the body. Her body is splayed out in the middle of the living room floor. She is lying on her back, with her arms andlegs bent at awkward angles.All the lights are off in the room; the TV is still on, however the screen is simply black, no picture or menu is showing.As you carefully walk around her body, you notice a thin trail of dirt leading from the back door to her body.You make a mental note to check the yard for soil. You also notice broken glass near her left leg and freshflowers laying on the floor. There is a note on the table indicating that the flowers were a gift. The card is signed, “Your Loving male acquaintance, Ben.”You get closer to the body and notice several short, brown hairs stuck to her pants.On the coffee table, there is a pile of museum comment cards that appear to be only partially read through.The card on the top of the pile catches your eye, as it has large, angry doodles decorating the page. Writtenat the bottom of the page, in big letters is, “I TOLD YOU TO LEAVE ME ALONE!”. You note that the card wasfilled out by a Michael Wilcox. You write down his name and wonder if it was his real name.Next to the cards on the table is a pizza delivery box, slightly open, but with an untouched pizza inside. Thereceipt next to the box shows that the pizza was delivered yesterday evening at 5:15pm. Sue Ellen’ssignature is on the receipt.On the sharp corner of the table, there is a bloodstain. It looks dry and is the only apparent bloodstain asidefrom the puddle next to the body.You move away from the body and begin to look around the room. You notice a bloody fingerprint near theback door on the doorframe. You also notice that the lock on the door appears to have been tampered with.

You head outside and examine the backyard. There is a tall wooden fence, a well-tended rose garden with awater fountain in the center, and freshly cut grass.You examine the garden and spot another bloody fingerprint on the water fountain and a footprint in thegarden soil near the fence. Upon closer inspection of the fence, you find one medium length blonde haircaught between the wooden planks.You return to the house and notice a man has arrived on the scene. He identifies himself as Ben, the male friend. He explains that he was on a flight back from a business trip in DC and just arrived home thismorning. He claims to have the plane ticket stub at home to prove it.Moments later, a female neighbor arrives on the scene and claims to have seen a tall, blonde man or teen loitering in the garden yesterday evening when she was walking her dog. She did not speak to the man, buthe was wearing a black jacket and black jeans.You get your Investigative Journal out and start taking notes to make a plan for your investigation.

What questions do you have based on what you observe?

A quarrel may be formulated by a landowner directing the dispute at the local government if they impose a zoning decree, namely if it restrains the use of his property.

For instance, when the district decides to use it exclusively for residential purposes, the owner may feel he is being shortchanged on its value and actual utilization.

Conversely, an affirmatory case from the "public benefit" viewpoint could maintain that such regulation is essential for maintaining the safety, health, and welfare of everyone in the area.

These rules seek to reconcile the rights of personal ownership with general communal benefit through organized and productive land use, countering overcrowding, and impeding any types of nuisance or potentially perilous pursuits.

Read more about property rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/9052855

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

Every human is bound by the rules of society. We are expected to follow the rules, be it family, school, college, office, etc. On an individual level, rules help us in conducting our lives in a meaningful way. They put limits on our actions. Rules guide our behavior and actions. On a societal level, rules facilitate the better organization of every stakeholder. Rules are like codes of conduct for society. They promote harmony, cooperation, equality, etc. No society can sustain without rules. Hence, ensuring that rules are properly followed is important. Punishment is one of the means to achieve the goal of a rules led society. Punishment acts as a deterrence against violation of rules. For example, fines are imposed on people violating traffic rules. The imposition of fines is a tool of punishment and it motivates the public in obeying traffic rules. Obeying rules led to discipline in one's life. They guide every action and avoid dilemmas. In a work, coordination is very crucial and having specific guidelines promotes coordination. A proper rule based work culture diminishes chaos, encourages discipline, and boosts efficiency.

Electoral college has long been criticized for its unfairness and tendency to be biased.

The author's position about three common arguments for Preserving the Electoral College that is wrong are-

1. Voters' passions are filtered by electors-

When initially learning about the Electoral College, college students frequently defend the system by pointing out that it was designed to act as a check on the electorate in case it made a bad presidential choice.

Nevertheless, voters no longer serve as either autonomous agents or representatives of the state legislature. They are chosen based on their fidelity to the party by party leaders or conventions.

2. Rural areas would get ignored-

Since 2000, a common justification for the electoral college on conservative blogs and talk radio has been that without it, politicians would spend all of their time campaigning in large cities and would disregard low-population areas.

The argument is untrue aside from this peculiar perspective on democracy that favors spending as much effort on campaigns in communities with few residents as it does in communities where the majority of Americans reside.

3. It creates a mandate to lead-

Because of the winner-take-all character of the Electoral College at the state level, some have argued that it should be kept in place.

This is because many close elections are perceived by the public and media as landslides, providing the victorious candidate a stronger mandate to rule.

Ronald Reagan received 51 percent of the national popular vote but 91 percent of the electoral votes in 1980, providing the appearance of a landslide victory and enabling him to persuade Congress to support some of his policies.

To know more about Electoral College visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25375266

#SPJ1

Answer:

Appellate court

Explanation:

trust

The next step for the defendant to appeal the verdict would be to an appellate court. The appellate court reviews the lower court's decision. The correct option is B.

An appellate court is a higher court that has the authority to review and reconsider decisions made by lower courts. The purpose of the appellate court is to ensure that lower courts have applied the law correctly and that the decision was made based on proper legal procedures.

The appellate court does not retry the case or review the evidence presented at the lower court; instead, it reviews the record of the lower court to determine whether the trial court made an error in applying the law or procedure.

An appellate court would be the next step for the defendant to make their case. Thus, the ideal selection is option B.

Learn more about an appellate court here:

https://brainly.com/question/29766399

#SPJ3

Answer:

If you aren't confident it can make you/your client look suspicious

Explanation:

Better Call Saul is an American crime and legal drama television series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould. Part of the Breaking Bad franchise, it is a spin-off, prequel and sequel to Gilligan's previous series, Breaking Bad. Set primarily in the early-mid 2000s in Albuquerque, New Mexico, the series develops Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk), an earnest lawyer and former con artist, into an egocentric criminal defense attorney known as Saul Goodman. Also shown is the moral decline of former police officer Mike Ehrmantraut (Jonathan Banks), who becomes a violent fixer for drug traffickers to support his granddaughter and her widowed mother. The show premiered on AMC on February 8, 2015, and concluded on August 15, 2022, after six seasons consisting of 63 episodes.

At the start of the series, Jimmy struggles financially while he mostly works on court-appointed cases as a public defender. His romantic interest and former colleague, Kim Wexler (Rhea Seehorn), is an attorney at Hamlin, Hamlin & McGill (HHM), a law firm co-owned by Jimmy's brilliant but unwell brother, Chuck McGill (Michael McKean) and Chuck's law partner, Howard Hamlin (Patrick Fabian). After hiring Jimmy as legal representation, Mike provides advice and security for Nacho Varga (Michael Mando), an intelligent drug dealer who later becomes a mole for Gus Fring (Giancarlo Esposito), a drug lord and legitimate businessman as owner of the Los Pollos Hermanos fast food establishment. Their operations are disrupted by members of the murderous Salamanca family, including Lalo Salamanca (Tony Dalton). Odenkirk, Banks, and Esposito reprise their roles from Breaking Bad, as do many others who make guest appearances.

Better Call Saul has received critical acclaim, with particular praise for its acting, characters, writing, direction, and cinematography; many critics have called it a worthy successor to Breaking Bad and one of the greatest television series of all time, with some deeming it superior to its predecessor.[5][6][7] It has garnered many nominations, including a Peabody Award, 46 Primetime Emmy Awards, 15 Writers Guild of America Awards, 14 Critics' Choice Television Awards, six Screen Actors Guild Awards, and four Golden Globe Awards. At the time of its airing, the series premiere held the record for the highest-rated scripted series premiere in basic cable history.

The statement that best completes the diagram is option   A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces Enlightenment ideas to its readers.

The Pennsylvania Gazette, established by the esteemed Benjamin Franklin, was highly circulated throughout the colonies and effectively promoted the tenets of the Enlightenment, such as personal freedoms, reason, and inherent entitlements, to the general populace.

Therefore,  The colonial leaders were significantly influenced by Enlightenment principles, leading to their ratification of the Declaration of Independence during the Second Continental Congress.

Learn more about Enlightenment  from

https://brainly.com/question/1688832

#SPJ1

See text below

Question 1 of 10

Which statement best completes the diagram?

Diagram is:

The Second Continental Congressratifies the Declaration of Independence.

__

Enlightenment ideas are introduced in Europe.

Options

A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces

Enlightenment ideas to its readers.

B. British military forces are told to withdraw from the colonies as

punishment for their disloyalty.

C. Colonial leaders reject the concept of natural rights because of its

association with Great Britain.

D. British leaders conclude that the only way to control the colonies.

is by enforcing a strict social contract

Phyllis files a case in federal court after exhausting all administrative options, and the court will respect the agency's judgment on both legal and factual issues by upholding it unless it is clearly arbitrary.

Arbitrariness-or-capriciousness and substantial evidence are the two standards of review that the APA established for courts evaluating the conduct of administrative agencies.

The process through which courts assess the decisions made by the three branches of the government—the legislative, executive, and administrative branches—is known as judicial review. It also establishes if such activities are compliant with the nation's constitution.

In all areas of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, compensation, and other employment perks, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) forbids discrimination on the basis of pregnancy. Policies that restrict or forbid women from working just because they are expecting or of childbearing age are forbidden under this law.

Learn more about Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA): https://brainly.com/question/10692857

#SPJ4

Whether it is a republic, a business, a college, or a fan club, the president is the official leader. This term refers to a leader, such as the U.S. president or the head of the National Football League Players' Union.

In most republics, the head of state is referred to as president. In general, the president of a country serves as the formal head of state, head of the executive branch, and essential leader of the country.

Such a president is frequently referred to as the head of state. The president must actively participate in all aspects of government as the main executive.

Learn more about the President here:

https://brainly.com/question/497462

#SPJ1

C. No, because in the medical field, the standard of expected care is defined by the standards of the profession, not an average person.

Answer: false

Explanation: we have freedom of speech. Also it goes against the constitution.

(False) that is my answer...

Amendments in the Bill of Rights address specific elements of due process, most importantly the Sixth Amendment, which affords criminal defendants seven specific rights, all of which are essential to protecting our rights and our freedom: The right to a speedy trial. Right to an unbiased tribunal or impartial jury.

Brainliest?

Answer:

Prosecutorial Waiver

Explanation:

A prosecutorial waiver is a type of waiver to adult court that occurs when there is concurrent jurisdiction between juvenile and adult courts and the prosecutor has the option of filing charges against the juvenile offender in either court.

Prosecutorial waiver would have been needed to try Tombs in adult court. Hence, option A is correct.

The benefit of a waiver is that more serious criminals who are charged with violent offenses are excused and subject to harsher punishments. The drawback is that juveniles may serve reduced sentences for their first offenses and are required to be freed once they reach a specific age.

A juvenile who is being tried as an adult in criminal court may request to have the case moved to juvenile court for adjudication or disposition under the legislation of 23 States.

When a judge waives the safeguards that juvenile court offers, some juvenile cases are transferred to adult criminal court through a procedure known as a "waiver."

Thus, option A is correct.

For more information about Prosecutorial waiver, click here

https://brainly.com/question/6831848

#SPJ6