How did Florida attract New settlers?

Answer:

Feel disrecspected,angry, along with confusion as we are all identically the same.

Explanation:

By portraying the Germans as brutal and inhuman, these posters encouraged Americans to see the conflict as a moral struggle and to support the fight against a dangerous enemy.

During World War I, U.S. propaganda posters often portrayed German soldiers as evil and inhumane, depicting them as barbaric monsters and threatening enemies. These posters aimed to create a sense of nationalism and patriotism among the American people and to rally support for the war effort.

One famous poster from the period, created by artist James Montgomery Flagg, depicts a stern Uncle Sam pointing directly at the viewer and declaring "I Want You for U.S. Army". The image is designed to stir patriotic feelings and to encourage young men to enlist in the army and fight for their country.

Other posters from the period used more graphic and violent imagery to convey their message. One poster shows a bloody hand clutching a dagger with the words "Kultur vs. Humanity" underneath, implying that the Germans were attacking civilization itself and threatening to destroy the world's cultural heritage.  

To know more about propaganda visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31446996

#SPJ11

The facts of Plessy v. Ferguson are that it was constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” propose,and the central issue of Plessy v. Ferguson the case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer sapless refused to sit in a car for blacks. Just like how many colored people did.

The impact of Plessy v. Ferguson on American society was equal rights and almost everyone, every color, and overall every individual person having the same privileges.

After the verdict in Plessy v. Ferguson the civil liberties of people with color had gotten to be treated equal but they were separate with this the was a "quote" that Jim Crow said witch was " Separate but equal".

Answer:

It changed how labor unions fought for change. It strengthened the movement and led to negotiations to wage peace.

Ronny: Social ideology - Ronny's pride in his abolitionist grandfather's work suggests a social ideology focused on equality and freedom.

Jenny: Economic ideology - Jenny's focus on helping her family establish a new business to support themselves indicates an economic ideology centered around financial stability and self-reliance.

Julie: Social and political ideologies - Julie's belief in equal rights and her involvement in voter registration drives demonstrate both social and political ideologies aimed at promoting equality and impacting change through political engagement.

Emily: Social ideology - Emily's advocacy for African American culture suggests a social ideology focused on preserving and promoting the cultural identity and heritage of her community.

Shaun: Economic ideology - Shaun's belief in individual success and starting his own business suggests an economic ideology centered around entrepreneurship and the belief in personal achievement.

Paul: Political ideology - Paul's identification as a Democrat and his engagement in writing a letter to his representative indicate a political ideology aligned with the Democratic party and a desire for legislative change.

for similar questions on American Civil War.

https://brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ8

Answer:

The grievances expressed by the colonists in the late 18th century have significant relevance in contemporary American political culture and society.

The colonists' grievances were centered around the fundamental principles of individual rights and representation. The colonists believed that they should have a say in the laws and ordinances that governed them, and they should not be subject to taxation without representation. These principles are still prevalent in contemporary American society, as citizens expect to have their voices heard and their rights upheld by their elected representatives.

Today, many Americans still take issue with tax policies and government spending decisions. There is a consistent debate about the size and scope of government, with some arguing that government should have a minimal role in society, while others believe that government should be involved in many aspects of citizens' lives.

Additionally, the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution in response to the colonists' grievances, outlines the basic rights and freedoms of American citizens. These freedoms, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, are still fundamental to American society and culture.

In conclusion, the grievances expressed by the colonists hold immense relevance to American political culture and society today. Their fight for individual rights and representation is still present, and the Bill of Rights continues to be an essential part of the American political system. Understanding the colonists' grievances is critical in understanding the foundational principles of American democracy and how they continue to shape the country today.

During the Reign of Terror, Maximilien Robespierre grew to control the Committee of Public Safety. On September 5, 1793, the Reign of Terror began, and it lasted until July 27, 1794.

The committee controlled the French government in an essentially totalitarian manner during the Terror.

One of the most well-known, significant, and divisive individuals of the French Revolution was the French lawyer and statesman Maximilien Francois Marie Isidore de Robespierre. He worked for the abolition of clerical celibacy and French participation in the Atlantic slave trade as a member of the Estates-General, the Constituent Assembly, and the Jacobin Club. He also advocated for universal manhood suffrage, the right to vote for people of colour, Jews, actors, and domestic staff.

To know more about French Revolution, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/27833385

#SPJ4

Answer:

they helped change culture. The trades became more efficient. Socially there were less wars, and fights among the empires.

Explanation:

Answer:

Hyperconjugation is the stabilising interaction that results from the interaction of the electrons in a σ-bond (usually C-H or C-C) with an adjacent empty or partially filled p-orbital or a π-orbital to give an extended molecular orbital that increases the stability of the system.

Answer:

In organic chemistry, hyperconjugation is the interaction of the electrons in a sigma bond (usually C–H or C–C) with an adjacent empty (or partially filled) non-bonding p-orbital, antibonding σ or π orbital, or filled π orbital, to give an extended molecular orbital that increases the stability of the system.

Answer:

Louisiana Purchase was the acquisition of the territory of Louisiana by the United States from France in 1803. In return for fifteen million dollars, or approximately eighteen dollars per square mile, the United States nominally acquired a total of 828,000 sq mi. However, France only controlled a small fraction of this area, most of it inhabited by American Indians; for the majority of the area, what the United States bought was the "preemptive" right to obtain Indian lands by treaty or by conquest, to the exclusion of other colonial powers. The total cost of all subsequent treaties and financial settlements over the land has been estimated to be around 2.6 billion dollars.  

By its terms the Louisiana Territory, in the form France had received it from Spain, was sold to the United States. For this vast domain the United States agreed to pay $11,250,000 outright and assumed claims of its citizens against France in the amount of $3,750,000.

I hope this helps!

(I answerd quick because i copy and pasted of my original work)

P5-6 addresses the question of whether a person of color can be "racist" against another person of color.

In summary, while a person of color can hold biased views or engage in discriminatory behavior towards another person of color, the term "racism" is typically reserved for systemic oppression based on race.

For more such question on racist

https://brainly.in/question/30652324

#SPJ8

The altar symbolizes the table of the last supper of Christ.

Any altar is a building where sacrifices are offered by definition. 11 Sacrosanctum Concilium frequently refers to the Mass as a sacrifice, recalling that Christ established "the Eucharistic sacrifice of His Body and Blood" at the Last Supper in order to "perpetuate the sacrifice of the cross through the generations" (47). The "form of a sacrificial supper" was established as the exact same sacrifice that Christ offered to the Father on the cross. 12 Therefore, the Christian altar differs fundamentally from previous altars throughout history because it is more than just a table set apart for presenting presents to a deity. Christ is physically present among his followers, who thereafter accept the atonement he offers "on" his very person.

To learn more about Sacrosanctum Concilium click here,

https://brainly.com/question/29613312

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. English is A. new England, Virginia and the Carolinas

2. Spanish is C. Florida, the Caribbean, southern Texas and Central America

3. French is B. the north, mainly in Canada

Answer:

"The 13th, 14th, or 15th Amendment together, but above all the 14th Amendment is the fruit of the civil war, it is what all those brave men fought for and died for."

Explanation:

Remember, a metaphor refers to a type of expression involving a comparison between something of one kind with another of a different kind in other to make a vivid explanation.

We can note from the video that historian Louise Weinberg used a metaphorical expression, "the 14th Amendment is the fruit of the civil war", to describe the reconstruction amendments.

By comparing "the 14th amendment" to a fruit Weinberg was using a metaphor in her description of what happened during the reconstruction amendments.

Answer:

The metaphor she uses is ''The 14th amendment is the fruit of the civil war." She was using this metaphor to show that all of those brave men had to sacrifice or work for it.

Explanation:

Answer:

There were many significant changes brought about by World War II that have had a lasting impact on the world, but perhaps the biggest impact was the emergence of the United States and the Soviet Union as the two dominant superpowers in the world. This marked a major shift in the balance of global power, and it set the stage for the Cold War, which lasted for several decades and shaped many aspects of global politics and international relations.

The United States emerged from World War II as the world's leading economic and military power, and it played a major role in the rebuilding of Europe and the establishment of a new global order through institutions like the United Nations. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union became a major superpower in its own right, with a large and powerful military, and it played a leading role in the spread of communism around the world.

The rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union shaped many of the major events of the post-war period, including the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the arms race, among others. This rivalry also had major implications for the developing world, as the two superpowers competed for influence and control in various regions.

Overall, the emergence of the United States and the Soviet Union as the two dominant superpowers of the post-war world had a profound and lasting impact on global politics and international relations, and it continues to shape many aspects of our world today.

Explanation:

America increased the tariff of Cuban sugar, destroying the Cuban economy. This gave them momentum to gain independence from Spain, and gave the U.S. and easy chance to take good land for exports from Spain.

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Based on historical perspective and the description given, as part of the compromise with Democrats, Republicans promised to withdraw "all federal troops from South."

Generally, the compromise of 1877 has always been described as the gentleman agreement among the United States Congress between Republicans and the Democrats following the controversial Presidential 1876 election won by Republican Rutherford B. Hayes.

The Compromise ensured the United States federal government withdrew the remaining troops out of the South, particularly South Carolina, Florida, and Louisiana, ending the Reconstruction Era.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded the correct answer is "all federal troops from South."

Learn more about the Compromise of 1877 here: https://brainly.com/question/7346995

Q:   Complete the following paragraph about the Compromise of 1877.

Explanation:

A:

President Johnson proposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 partially in response to the "Bloody Sunday" event that took place in Selma, Alabama.

On March 7, 1965, peaceful civil rights activists attempted to march from Selma to Montgomery to demand their right to vote, but they were met with violence from state troopers who brutally beat and tear-gassed the protesters. This event was televised across the nation, and the brutality that was shown on live television shocked and outraged many Americans.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was proposed by President Johnson in response to this event to ensure that all citizens, regardless of race or ethnicity, had the right to vote. The act prohibited racial discrimination in voting and was aimed at eliminating the barriers that prevented African Americans from voting. It also provided federal oversight of state and local elections, requiring certain states with a history of discrimination to obtain federal approval before making any changes to their voting laws.

To know more about voting rights act click here

brainly.com/question/30973464

#SPJ11

Always be wary of monocausal (single-cause) explanations for anything complex. Ever since WW2 and earlier, self-flagellation has been very fashionable in connection with this in Britain and America; and in pop history it is often given as the main or even sole reason for WW2. This is sometimes carried so far that Hitler’s role is not even mentioned, as in this question, for example.

Certainly, the Treaty of Versailles was harsh, but by the mid 1920s some of the most onerous terms had been mitigated. Germany had been admitted to the League of Nations, which ended its international ‘pariah’ status, reparations had been rescheduled and put on a more manageable footing in the Dawes Plan (1924) and Young Plan (1929). The occupation of the Rhineland ended early. These renegotiations were led by Gustav Stresemann, who died in October 1929. However, further negotiations could have been undertaken and would almost certainly have addressed the grievances that affected most ordinary Germans. Such negotiations would of course have presupposed good will on both sides. What was not on the cards was any significant change to Germany’s borders, let alone a wholesale overturning of the post WW1 settlement.

By the late 1920s Germany was enjoying modest prosperity following the stabilization of the currency in 1923–24 and there was apparent political stability. Except for political extremists, most parties were reconciled to living with the Weimar Republic, even if they were not enthusiastic about it. However, this was rapidly destroyed by the Great Crash and the mass unemployment that soon followed. The political extremists flourished, President Hindenburg began meddling in day to day politics, and by dismissing Chancellor Brüning in 1932 he (probably unintentionally) made parliamentary democracy unworkable in Germany, given the level of unemployment and the determination of the Nazis to destroy the republic. (There were over 100 political murders during the general election campaign of July 1932).

With the appointment of Hitler as Chancellor, Germany embarked on a policy of massive rearmament and boundless expansion. It was this policy, which went way beyond redressing the wrongs of Versailles, that led to WW2.

Answer:

coz people were not as religious in the South

Explanation:

The south didn't believe them

Answer: B, The diary of a Muslim defender of Jerusalem who witnessed the siege.

Explanation: A primary source is when the source was written by someone who experienced the events or saw them. This means it is not C. A is a good option, but B is a better (primary source) because it is a diary of someone who witnessed that one siege.

According to the popular and infamous beliefs of Karl Marx, he states that a society that follows communism would overcome the conditions of social separation.

A communist society can be referred to or considered as a society that believes in the ideologies of communism as an ideal form of governance. Karl Marx had given his philosophy on the existence of such societies.

A communist society would mostly be able to overcome the capitalist systems wherein there is an existence of social separation for the producers who are involved in production for the society.

Therefore, the significance regarding a communist society has been aforementioned.

Learn more about a communist society here:

https://brainly.com/question/25301035

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The main reason is that most factories that came as a result of the Industrial revolution were centered in the cities and thus people moved to the city to get work. The more people there were to develop the city meant that that the city received more benefits of the industrial revolution

Hope that helps!

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Siam, which is currently known as Thailand, was never colonized. Therefore, it was one of the only states in Southeast Asia to maintain its independence.

Siam, on the other hand, was still under pressure from the colonial powers of Great Britain, France, and the United States. To preserve its independence, Siam took the following steps:1. Modernizing the legal system: King Chulalongkorn (Rama V) of Siam revised and improved the legal system by introducing new laws to govern the country.

Siam's legal structure became more advanced, and it could compete with other states on an equal footing.2. Balancing Power: Siam maintained favorable relations with powerful states, such as Britain and France, in order to protect itself against their aggression.3.

Negotiating: When France attempted to annex Laos and Cambodia, Siam worked with Britain to negotiate a treaty that established boundaries between the three countries, effectively preserving Siam's borders.4. Creating a bureaucracy: Siam established a new bureaucracy, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which improved its administrative efficiency.5. Modernizing the military: Siam modernized its military to defend itself against the aggression of the colonial powers.

King Chulalongkorn established military schools, reorganized the army, and purchased modern weapons to improve its effectiveness.6. Creating a Diplomatic Corps: Siam established a Diplomatic Corps that was responsible for protecting Siam's interests abroad and ensuring that the country was well represented.7.

Strengthening economic ties with other countries: Siam actively sought to strengthen its economic ties with other countries, particularly Britain and the United States. This allowed Siam to become a major trading partner and reduced its dependence on France.The above steps were implemented to preserve Siam's independence.

To know more about Thailand visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12066415

#SPJ11

Answer:

d

Explanation:

napoleon introduced nationalism to europe

Answer:

the answer is D (:

Explanation: