Harveer runs a not-for-profit organization to help underprivileged street children who do not have access to
education. His not-for-profit offers a program that provides these children basic education at no cost to their
parents. To run the education program for children, Harveer receives a grant of $5,000 from government to
teach children who are out of school for a few hours a day. The grant money from government is for one year.
Based on the terms and conditions of the grant agreement, Harveer has to return all unspent grant money to
government after the year.
Despite putting a lot of effort, Harveer managed to utilize only $3,500 from the grant after a year. Harveer is
an honest person, but also knows how beneficial and important the education program is. He is facing an
ethical issue and is not sure whether he should return the unused grant money or not.
Imagine you are a Manager at Harveer’s not for profit that oversees Ethics and Social Responsibility. Harveer
asks you to make a recommendation on what to do with the unspent money. Since you have just learned
about ethics in business, you are asked to analyse the situation using an ethical decision making framework
from our class (see next slide for details)
What type of ethical issue is Harveer facing – conflict of interest, conflict of loyalty, bribery, harassment,
other? Briefly explain.
2. Select one of the two ethical decision making frameworks: Sucher Framework or Blanchard Peale
framework (see also next two slides for summary). Then, analyze Harveer’s ethical issue with the
framework you selected. Note, on the next slide, I have given you an example of how you could approach
your analysis using the Sucher framework. You can use this example format for your analysis.
3. As the Ethics Manager, what would you recommend Harveer should do? Please explain briefly using
points from your analysis under #2 for support.

Answer:

Amnesty International

Human Rights Watch

UN human rights council

Human rights first

Explanation:

Answer:

As a caregiver you can't always do that because you are busy with other children but you can tell the parent that you can give them a review at the end of the day when they will pick up their child.

hope this helps!

Group of answer choices.

a. Warning by the human resources department.

b. No consequences.

c. Loss of administrative credential.

d. An angry parent.

Answer:

a. Warning by the human resources department.

Explanation:

Human resources (HR) can be defined as an art of managing, controlling and improving the number of people (employees or workers), functions, activities which are being used effectively and efficiently by an organization.

Hence, human resources managers are saddled with the responsibility of managing and improving the welfare and working conditions of the employees working in an organization.

A possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional conduct by a school employee would be to receive a warning by the human resources department.

If an employee working in an organization such as a school is found to act in an unprofessional manner towards a colleague, pupil or a parent, it is expected that the human resources department calls such a person to order through a query, warning in order to serve as a deterrent to others and to avoid a repeat of such behavior in the future.

We are required to discuss about a role model who embodies the qualities that are vital to being ethical.

Read more:

https://brainly.com/question/11873482

The correct option is not e. The New Deal was a series of programs and reforms enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression, aimed at providing relief and stimulating economic recovery. It did not rewrite the role of government to vastly increase its size and role in private commercial activity.

Out of the given options, the correct option is: e. Was a legislative package that rewrote the role of government, vastly increasing its size and its role in private commercial activity.The New Deal was a legislative package that rewrote the role of government, vastly increasing its size and its role in private commercial activity.The New Deal was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1939. It was a response to the Great Depression, and its programs sought to provide immediate relief to citizens as well as an overhaul of the financial system. The New Deal established a number of welfare state programs and protective regulations, with the goal of providing relief to the unemployed and stimulating economic recovery. The New Deal did not alter the makeup of the Supreme Court, nor was it President Richard Nixon's action plan to alter the relationship between the people and their government.

learn more about Roosevelt here;

https://brainly.com/question/1182184?

#SPJ11

Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:

Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/14620330

#SPJ1

State capture is a political corruption in which private interests significantly influence a state's decision-making processes to their own advantage.

State capture is closely related to South African term for what is elsewhere called kleptocracy.

It is the gate in the corruption allegations against the former president. Two sections of the report by the judicial commission investigating allegations of state capture during the regime of the former President Zuma have now been published. This is a similitude of the true definition of state capture.

This refers to the ministries and parastaters of the government.

The arms of government refer to the divisions of powers of the government. There are three arms of government involving the Legislature, Executive and the Judiciary.

learn more about arms of government from here:https://brainly.com/question/9776664

A taxpayer who would not be considered a material participant of an activity is: one who fails to meet the specific criteria established by the IRS for material participation.

Material participation is a key factor in determining a taxpayer's ability to deduct losses from passive activities against non-passive income.

To be considered a material participant, a taxpayer must meet one of the seven tests outlined in the Internal Revenue Code Section 469. These tests involve the level of involvement and time spent on the activity, such as spending more than 500 hours annually on the activity or being involved substantially more than any other individual.

A non-material participant would typically be a passive investor or someone who has minimal involvement in the day-to-day management or decision-making of the activity.

This type of taxpayer would not be able to deduct passive losses against non-passive income, which can impact their overall tax liability. It is essential for taxpayers to understand their participation status, as it affects their ability to claim deductions and manage their tax obligations effectively.

In summary, a taxpayer who does not meet the criteria for material participation, as defined by the IRS, would not be considered a material participant of an activity. This classification impacts their tax deductions and overall tax liability.

To know more about IRS, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30401300#

#SPJ11

Answer: attention to detail

understanding of government guidelines

knowledge of computers and electronics

aptitude for problem solving

Explanation:

Electrical engineers are the engineers that are responsible for designing, developing, electrical equipment, that are manufactured.

Some qualities that electrical engineers must have include the fact that they must be able to pay attention to details, have knowledge of computers, understand government guidelines and be able to solve problems.

Answer:

b c d e

Explanation:

is correct pros to guy above me

Answer:

Auditor General.

Explanation:

Un auditor es una persona que realiza una auditoría y verifica, mediante cuestionamiento, observación y escucha, cómo se está desarrollando una persona u organización y si se están cumpliendo las especificaciones financieras y legales que le son exigibles.  Así, el Auditor General de Gobierno es el funcionario público que controla el estado financiero de las entidades de la administración pública, así como también lleva a cabo la fiscalización y control de cada acto particular que es realizado por el gobierno.

Allowing guests who smoke to take their drink with them outside of the licensed area, Serving or selling alcohol to an already intoxicated guest and Accepting an out-of-province I.D. are illegal under the liquor license act. Option A, B & D is the correct answer.

In Ontario, the sale, serving, and consumption of alcoholic beverages are all governed under the Liquor License and Control Act, 2019. The legislation defines conditions for getting and keeping a liquor license, specifies policies for serving and consuming alcohol responsibly, and offers instructions for enforcing the law. Option A, B & D is the correct answer.

Additionally, the Act creates the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), which is in charge of overseeing and upholding the legislation. In order to guarantee legal compliance, the AGCO has the authority to issue, revoke, or suspend liquor licenses as well as to carry out inspections and investigations. The Act also has provisions for fines and punishments for breaking the law.

Learn more about Alcoholic Beverage here:

https://brainly.com/question/29791214

#SPJ4

The complete question is, "Select all that apply. Which of the following are illegal under the Liquor License Act?

A. Allowing guests who smoke to take their drink with them outside of the licensed area.

B. Serving or selling alcohol to an already intoxicated guest.

C. Allowing guests to taste each other's drinks.

D. Accepting an out-of-province

If you are either the the driver or the pedestrian, you are less likely to make crashes.

The correct answer is option C.

Some of the safety tips for Pedestrians are:

Some of the safety tips for Drivers are:

To know more about driving safety rules, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29636442

#SPJ4

Answer:

thanks po sa points. God bless po

The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.

The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.

They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.

To know more about employment , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17459074

#SPJ4

Miranda vs . Arizona occurred in 1996. the In this the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects before  police questioning, must be properly informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.

Explain Miranda vs Arizona case.

In this case it was established that the  Police need to make you aware about your  Miranda Rights after an arrest and before questioning. It was established under 5 and 6 amendments of the US constitution.

This was the final result of the Miranda vs Arizona case.

To know more about Miranda vs Arizona from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/13483624

#SPJ4

Hearing is a session that takes place without a jury before a judge in which evidence and/or arguments are presented to determine some factual or legal issue. The correct answer is A.

A hearing is a legal proceeding where evidence and arguments are presented to a judge to determine a factual or legal issue. Hearings are typically conducted in courtrooms or other official settings and may involve witnesses, testimony, and cross-examination.

Hearings can cover a variety of legal issues, such as motions to dismiss a case, bail hearings, or preliminary hearings to determine if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial. The purpose of a hearing is to allow both sides to present evidence and arguments to a judge, who will then make a decision based on the facts presented.

Unlike a trial, a hearing is typically held without a jury, and the judge is responsible for determining the outcome of the case.

To know more about legal issue, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30178117#
#SPJ11

Answer:

1.=The creation of jaywalking laws would be an example of the interactionist view in lawmaking .The interactionist view states that the definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power in a particular legal jurisdiction ,such as the auto industry .

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Choices B-D are either criminal charges, or a misdemeanor. Someone with no previous record is likely to receive a warning (not even a citation/infraction).

Answer:

A. A parking violation by a driver with a previously perfect record

The Supreme Court concluded in the case of New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) that the government could not prevent the New York Times and Washington Post from publishing classified information contained in the Pentagon Papers.

The Pentagon Papers were a classified study of the Vietnam War that was commissioned by the Department of Defense. Daniel Ellsberg, a former military analyst who had worked on the study.

He leaked the papers to the New York Times and Washington Post in 1971. The government sought an injunction to prevent the newspapers from publishing the papers on national security grounds.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment's protection of the freedom of the press overrode the government's interest in protecting national security.

The Court reasoned that prior restraints on publication, such as the injunction sought by the government, are presumptively unconstitutional and can only be justified in the most extraordinary circumstances.

The Court found that the government had not met its burden of showing that publication of the Pentagon Papers would cause an immediate and direct harm to the nation's security.

The Court's decision in New York Times Co. v. United States reaffirmed the importance of the First Amendment's protection of the freedom of the press.

Learn more about pentagon papers

brainly.com/question/29792246

#SPJ11

There are a lot of databases that can be used to investigate a particular case, but the four that are most commonly used are the Criminal Justice Abstracts, National Criminal Justice Reference Service, JSTOR, and ProQuest.

These databases are useful for a variety of reasons. Let us take a look at each of these databases and what they offer:

1. Criminal Justice Abstracts

The Criminal Justice Abstracts is a database that is designed to help researchers find scholarly articles, reports, books, and more on topics related to criminal justice.

2. National Criminal Justice Reference Service

The National Criminal Justice Reference Service is a comprehensive database that provides access to resources related to criminal justice.

3. JSTOR

JSTOR is a database that provides access to academic articles, books, and other resources on a variety of topics.

4. ProQuest

ProQuest is a database that provides access to a variety of scholarly resources, including academic articles, books, and more.

In conclusion, these databases are all useful resources for those who are investigating a particular case. They provide access to a wide range of materials that can be used to support research and analysis.

To know more about databases visit :

https://brainly.com/question/6447559

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. Provide Revenue

2. Income and payroll

3. Sales and Property

Explanation:

Took the test this is correct :)

Federal, state, and local governments tax their citizens to collect Provide Revenue for various programs and services. The federal government’s main income sources include  Income and payroll taxes, while state and local governments rely heavily on Sales and Property taxes.

The county, sometimes known as a borough in Alaska and a parish in Louisiana, and municipalities, frequently referred to as cities or towns, are the two main layers of local administration. Towns are created from counties in a number of states.

The objective is to raise money to assist both community services and local infrastructure expansion and improvements. To expand the breadth of their official community plan, their role in guiding community growth, and their control over land use, local governments may start a community's economic planning operations.

State Government: The United States is made up of the District of Columbia, a few territories, and 50 states. The federal government is referred to as the "United States Government" or "Federal Government." County governments exist in each state.

Thus, Provide Revenue, Income and payroll taxes, and Sales and Property.

For more information about local governments, click here

https://brainly.com/question/11688631

#SPJ5

Answer:

No, I do not believe that Homeland Security is doing a good job in protecting America. The agency has been criticized for its lack of transparency and accountability, its failure to adequately address the threat of domestic terrorism, and its inability to effectively coordinate with other federal agencies. Additionally, the agency has been accused of overstepping its authority and infringing on civil liberties.

Answer: I completely agree with iov4jen. If Homeland Security can't even do their job's correctly, then how are they able to protect their citizens? It seems like Homeland Security needs someone to put them in their place and make them do their job's right.

The statement which is not true relating to put a child in the least restrictive environment which contains general education in itself.

First option is correct.

Placement is the action taken to indulge the child in any school, college or university where he/she can learn and develop their skills.

According to the provided options, the least restrictive environment , that is,  a kind of scenario where the child is not being scolded more on their mistakes and providing general education to child in school will not always be a least restrictive environment. It totally depends the culture and values of the school.

Question's missing part:

The options are as follows:

1) The general education environment is always the least restrictive environment.

2) There is a presumption in favor of inclusion.

3) A continuum of placement options should be considered.

4) It includes extracurricular activities.

Therefore, the explanation written in first option is correct.

Learn more about the placement in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/19670400

#SPJ2

Answer: It relates to the D.C. v. Heller case.

Explanation: This case has to do with the second amendment that allows an individual to bear arms.

The statement that the Warren Court "took the handcuffs off the criminals and put them on the police" is a criticism often attributed to critics of the Warren Court's decisions.

It reflects a perspective that the court, under the leadership of Chief Justice Earl Warren, placed more emphasis on protecting the rights of criminal defendants while potentially limiting the power and discretion of law enforcement agencies. However, it is important to note that this statement represents a specific viewpoint and may not capture the full complexity of the Warren Court's decisions and their impact.

The Warren Court, which served from 1953 to 1969, is known for its significant rulings that expanded constitutional protections for individual rights, especially in the realm of criminal justice. The court issued landmark decisions that aimed to safeguard civil liberties and ensure fair treatment of defendants within the criminal justice system. Some of these decisions included Gideon v. Wainwright (right to counsel for indigent defendants), Miranda v. Arizona (Miranda warnings), and Mapp v. Ohio (exclusionary rule).

Critics argue that these decisions created additional procedural hurdles for law enforcement and limited their ability to effectively investigate and prosecute crimes. They argue that the court's emphasis on protecting the rights of individuals, such as requiring police to obtain search warrants or informing suspects of their rights, could potentially hinder law enforcement efforts.

However, it is essential to recognize that the Warren Court's decisions were grounded in the interpretation and application of constitutional principles, including the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The court aimed to ensure that individuals accused of crimes were afforded fundamental rights and protections during criminal proceedings. The decisions sought to prevent abuses of power, uphold due process, and promote fairness within the justice system.

The phrase "took the handcuffs off the criminals and put them on the police" reflects a particular perspective that focuses on the potential challenges faced by law enforcement as a result of the Warren Court's decisions. However, it is crucial to balance the interests of protecting individual rights and liberties with the need for effective law enforcement to maintain public safety and order.

In conclusion, the statement that the Warren Court "took the handcuffs off the criminals and put them on the police" represents a critical viewpoint of the court's decisions, suggesting that the emphasis on protecting defendants' rights potentially impeded law enforcement efforts. However, it is important to consider the broader context of the court's rulings, which aimed to safeguard constitutional rights and ensure fairness within the criminal justice system.

Learn more about criminals here

https://brainly.com/question/30770801

#SPJ11

An act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino

Edward Teach was one of the most fear sea pirates and Carlo Gambino was the head of a crime organization in U.S.

An organized crime means a continuing criminal enterprise that works by profiting from an illicit activities.

In conclusion, the act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino.

Read more about organized crime

brainly.com/question/8451608