Four individuals form a rock band. There are the two guitarists who also sing (Jay on rhythm and Sally on lead), a bass player (Bradley) and a drummer (Rayshon). They practice and want to play at bars, fairs and weddings. After they have practiced their songs, they set up their website for the band named Mojo Riders with information on the band and a contact for the band through the rhythm guitarist, Jay. The band buys group gear makes several bookings (including playing at bars and several weddings a year later). The band equally splits the proceeds from playing their gigs. Just before the first wedding gig they are supposed to play at, the band breaks up with Sally leaving. The band is unable to get another female lead guitarist/singer and cancels the weddings and bar gigs booked. Three of the weddings try to get alternative bands. One can get another band at an increased cost of $20,000. The other two weddings must cancel and reschedule the weddings losing all their wedding deposits totalling $40,000 each. The brides and grooms of the weddings sue the band and its individual members for their losses. Please discuss the liability of band and the four band members and whether there was anything they could have done to avoid or limit that liability.

Companies can ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for breaches of customary international law by adhering to international legal standards and conducting thorough due diligence.

To mitigate the risk of lawsuits related to breaches of customary international law, companies should first familiarize themselves with the relevant international legal frameworks and norms. They should identify the specific customary international laws that apply to their operations, such as human rights, labor rights, and environmental protection. Once identified, companies should implement robust compliance programs that align with these standards.

A crucial step is conducting thorough due diligence throughout their supply chains and business operations. This includes assessing and monitoring potential risks, such as human rights abuses, environmental harm, or unethical practices. By identifying and addressing these risks proactively, companies can prevent or mitigate potential breaches of customary international law.

To know more about lawsuits

brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ11

it is possible that the court may recognize the neighbor's right to hunt on the ranch through a prescriptive easement.

A prescriptive easement is a legal right to use someone else's property in a certain way, established through open, continuous, and uninterrupted use for a period of time that is set by state law. In this case, the neighbor has been hunting on the ranch for 16 years with the rancher's permission, and the rancher also permitted others to hunt on the ranch during that time. This may be considered open, continuous, and uninterrupted use of the property for hunting purposes, which could establish a prescriptive easement.

However, the applicable statute of limitations for bringing an action against a prescriptive easement in the jurisdiction is 15 years. This means that if the neighbor did not bring an action to establish the prescriptive easement within the 15-year period, the neighbor may have lost the right to do so. Therefore, whether or not the court recognizes the neighbor's right to hunt on the ranch will depend on whether the court determines that the neighbor established a prescriptive easement within the applicable time period.

It's also worth noting that the rancher's permission to hunt on the property may be considered a license rather than a prescriptive easement. A license is a personal privilege to use someone else's property for a specific purpose, which can be revoked at any time by the property owner. If the court determines that the neighbor had a license rather than a prescriptive easement, the neighbor may not have a legal right to continue hunting on the ranch after the rancher's death, especially if the sister now opposes hunting on the property.

Ultimately, the outcome of this case will depend on the specific details of the situation and the applicable law in the jurisdiction where it is being heard.

To know more about prescriptive easement, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30401536

#SPJ11

Answer: C.The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people. California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.

Explanation:

The Daughters of Bilitis (DOB) was founded in San Francisco in 1955, as a lesbian organization aimed to help lesbians that suffered discrimination.

On November 22, 2008, Proposition 8 banned same-sex marriage in California.

In 2020, the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission defined discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in violation of Title VII and transgender people as a protected class.

C.

1. The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people.

2. California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state.

3. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.

True. In 2020, former Nissan Motor Co. Chairman Carlos Ghosn was sentenced to more than four years in prison and ordered to pay a $6.5 million fine for financial misconduct during his time leading the company.

Ghosn was accused of underreporting his compensation and misusing company funds for personal gain.

The case against Ghosn was a high-profile example of corporate leaders being held accountable for their actions, and it drew attention to the growing trend of increased enforcement of corporate governance laws around the world. The case also highlighted the importance of transparency and accountability in corporate leadership, and the need for companies to have strong systems in place to detect and prevent financial misconduct.

Overall, the case against Ghosn is a powerful reminder that corporate directors and officers can face serious consequences for their actions, including jail time, fines, and damage to their reputations. This underscores the importance of strong corporate governance practices and a culture of ethical behavior throughout organizations at all levels.

To learn more about corporate directors visit;

https://brainly.com/question/14479663

#SPJ4

Answer:

believe in the hypodermic needle theory.

Explanation:

The hypodermic needle theory may be defined as the method of communication which suggest that intended messages and communication are directly received by the people and they are fully accepted.

It means that media messages are directly given to the passive audiences and inserted into their brains.

In the context, Theodor and Max Horkheimer believes that by advertising, the customers are compelled to buy the products. They believed in the hypodermic needle theory.

Answer:

FIRST DEGREE MURDER

Explanation:

The French police structure is characterized as "multiple coordinated." However, there are some areas of friction between the Police Nationale and the Gendarmerie Nationale that put stress on the coordination of French police. The two forces work together in the fight against crime and threats to national security, but their areas of jurisdiction have long been blurred.

The French police structure consists of three main entities: the police nationale, the gendarmerie, and the municipal police.The police nationale are responsible for crime prevention, police investigations, and maintaining public order in towns and cities.

The gendarmerie is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense, while the police are under the authority of the Ministry of the Interior.Some of the factors that put stress on coordination between the two entities include a lack of coordination between the two forces in sharing information and intelligence.

To know more about French police visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/17357629

#SPJ11

In a case whereby Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial and say it is a question of competence means that A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.

A trial  can be described a the formal examination of evidence  which is been done in the court by the judge that is in charge and this been performed when the  jury is available so that the  guilt in a case of criminal  can be known.

It should be note that in the case above the question came out to know how fit is Kendall might be .

Therefore, option A is correct.

Read more about Detectives at:

https://brainly.com/question/26059088

#SPJ1

The theft of millions of US dollars from President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala-Phala farm is a serious criminal offense, and the authorities will likely investigate the matter thoroughly to determine who is responsible and hold them accountable.

Grounded on the information  handed, it appears that there are allegations of theft and  fiscal impropriety involving President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala- Phala  ranch. The  chairman has stated that he's not  shamefaced and has  contended that the  ranch  director failed to report the matter to the applicable authorities.

 still, the  execution would need to present  substantiation to support their case that the  chairman and/ or the  ranch  director committed a crime, If the matter were to  do to felonious court. The defense would have the  occasion to present their own  substantiation and arguments to refute the  execution's case.   The ultimate  outgrowth of a felonious trial would depend on  numerous factors, including the strength of the  substantiation presented, the skill of the attorneys representing each side, and the decision of the judge or jury.

Learn more about Ramaphosa at

https://brainly.com/question/31891368

#SPJ1

Answer:

Are you just trying to get free points?

Explanation:

Answer:

Lower Government Spending

Raise Taxes

It is possible that the federal court could hear this case. The union's action in filing for an injunction and declaratory judgment suggests that they believe there may be a legal basis for their position.

A federal court would need to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the case, which would depend on the specific legal issues raised by the union's claims.

In general, federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal law or disputes between parties from different states. While the union's claims likely involve state law and parties within the same state, there may be federal questions at issue. For example, if the union argues that the proposed abolition of tenured positions violates the teachers' constitutional rights, a federal court may have jurisdiction to hear the case.

Ultimately, whether or not the federal court hears the case will depend on a number of factors, including the specific legal claims made by the union, the relevant state and federal laws, and the court's analysis of its own jurisdiction. If the court does hear the case, it will need to consider the arguments and evidence presented by both sides before reaching a decision on the injunction and declaratory judgment requested by the union.

learn more about federal court here

https://brainly.com/question/31037815

#SPJ11

Wrongful birth refers to a scenario whereby medical professionals do not adequately advise a parent about potential abnormalities in their unborn child during prenatal testing.

The parent may have decided against having the baby if they had known of the issues beforehand. Such parents can sue the healthcare provider for wrongful birth. There is no one right answer to whether a cause of action should be allowed in a wrongful birth. However, let's advocate against it.

It is not ethical to allow for wrongful birth lawsuits. Firstly, the responsibility of such lawsuits falls squarely on medical professionals. Medical professionals already carry an immense burden of dealing with human life. Doctors should not have to carry additional weight in cases where the issue was not caused by the medical personnel. As a result, wrongful birth cases may be detrimental to medical professionals' careers. Doctors may stop taking on high-risk cases to avoid potential litigation, resulting in the loss of innocent lives.Secondly, wrongful birth cases are a blatant disregard of human life. The child is a living and breathing individual that should not be subject to lawsuits. A child is a gift and a blessing regardless of their physical or mental condition. The laws surrounding wrongful birth should not devalue human life.Finally, wrongful birth lawsuits promote eugenics, which is a practice of selectively choosing traits in offspring. If wrongful birth lawsuits were to be allowed, it would lead to the promotion of aborting children with any perceived abnormality. It is ethically wrong to promote selective abortion based on perceived genetic defects.

In conclusion, wrongful birth lawsuits are not ethical. They promote selective abortions and disregard human life. Medical professionals are already under a great burden, and wrongful birth lawsuits would increase their workload and cause them unnecessary stress. A child's life is precious, and their physical or mental conditions do not determine their worth. Therefore, a cause of action for wrongful birth should not be allowed.

To know more about ethical visit:

brainly.com/question/30590798

#SPJ11

Option A (encouraging the child to work out answers to these questions on his own) would not be the most helpful approach for a young bereaved child who is repeatedly asking questions about when the person who died will come home. Young children may not have the emotional capacity or understanding to work through these questions on their own.

Option B (giving the child a toy to play with) may provide temporary distraction but does not address the child's emotional needs.

Option C (explaining that questions like this make you feel bad) is not helpful as it dismisses the child's concerns and emotions.

Therefore, none of these options would be most helpful. Instead, it is important to provide the child with age-appropriate and honest answers, and offer comfort and support in their grief process. It is also helpful to provide a safe space for the child to express their feelings and memories.

To know more about emotional capacity:

https://brainly.com/question/28098333

#SPJ11

After a funeral, the most helpful approach for a young bereaved child who is repeatedly asking questions about when the person who died will come home would be to provide them with d) none of these and give age-appropriate and honest answers.

Encouraging the child to work out answers on their own may leave them feeling unsupported and confused, while giving them a toy to play with may provide temporary distraction but fail to address their underlying feelings of loss and confusion.

Similarly, dismissing their questions by explaining that it makes you feel bad may cause the child to feel guilty or ashamed for expressing their emotions.

Instead, responding to their questions in a compassionate and truthful manner can help the child understand the reality of the situation and find comfort in knowing that their feelings are valid and understood.

Additionally, providing them with opportunities to express their grief through activities such as drawing, writing or talking about their loved one can help them process their emotions in a healthy way.

To know more about funeral visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31097097

#SPJ11

A city or other governmental entity must show that its restrictions are justified by proving that they are "reasonable" and "narrowly tailored" to serve a "significant governmental interest." This is known as the "intermediate scrutiny" standard, and it is applied to restrictions on speech or expression in public forums.

Under this standard, the governmental entity must demonstrate that its restrictions are necessary to achieve a legitimate governmental interest, such as protecting public safety or preventing disruption.

Additionally, the restrictions must be narrowly tailored, meaning that they must be the least restrictive means of achieving the governmental interest.

In the case of Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery, the governmental entity would have to prove that its restrictions on speech or expression are necessary to protect the dignity and solemnity of the cemetery, and that they are the least restrictive means of achieving this goal.

Overall, the governmental entity must show that its restrictions are reasonable, narrowly tailored, and serve a significant governmental interest in order to be justified under the intermediate scrutiny standard.

For more similar questions on scrutiny:

brainly.com/question/24309787

#SPJ11

Answer:

very True, with an increasing severity of punishment depending on the state laws. It could be fineable up to hundreds of dollars, because the motorist is putting pedestrian lives in danger when they don't.

Answer:

They learn from their mistakes and depending on how severe the punishment is, this prevents other people from breaking the law which will essentially make the world a safer place to live in, without people being constantly in fear that something could happen to them.

Explanation:

Punishing individuals who break the law serves several purposes, including:

Deterrence: Punishment serves as a deterrent to others who may be considering breaking the law. The fear of punishment can discourage people from committing crimes.

Rehabilitation: Punishment can also serve as a means of rehabilitating offenders, helping them to understand the impact of their actions and encouraging them to change their behavior.

Retribution: Punishment can also be seen as a way of holding offenders accountable for their actions and providing a sense of justice for victims and society as a whole.

Protection: Punishment can also serve to protect society by removing dangerous offenders from the community, either through imprisonment or other forms of punishment.

Public safety: Punishing individuals who break the law can also help maintain public safety by removing individuals who pose a threat to society.

Restitution: Punishment can also include restitution, which would be a form of compensation to the victims of the crime.

It is important to note that punishment should be proportionate to the crime committed and should aim to achieve a balance between punishment, rehabilitation, and reintegration of the offender into society.

They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)

True, Joint education can be broadly parsed into three categories: Joint Professional Military Education (JPME), Enlisted Joint Professional Military Education (EJPME), and other Joint Education.

Joint education must be grounded in shared doctrine and reflect the purposeful, iterative, and ongoing nature of joint force development.

Joint Doctrine comprises the basic rules by which the U.S. military is guided in conducting coordinated actions against common goals.

Including tactics, techniques, methods and terms when included in joint publications. It has supreme authority, but it requires rationality to apply.

Joint Professional Military Education (JPME) is a form of Professional Military Education (PME) in the United States and emphasizes a multi-service approach.

Joint Professional Military Education was formed after a growing awareness of the need for effective cooperation between branches of the United States Armed Forces during World War II.

To learn more about 'Joint education', here:

https://brainly.com/question/13176395

#SPJ4

It can be inferred that it took so long for the Sixth Amendment right to become standard practice in America because: "

Most people are not aware of all the amendments and what they guarantee." (Option B)

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial before a completely unbiased jury of the State and district wherein the crime was committed, which district shall have been previously determined by law, and to be notified of the character and cause of the accusation;

to be challenged with the witnesses against him; to have a mandatory procedure for gathering evidence in his favor; and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

In governance and law, an amendment is an addition or change made to a constitution, legislation, or legislative bill or resolution.

Modifications can be made to existing constitutions and statutes, as well as to legislation during their transit through a legislature.

Learn more about the Sixth Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ1

In Dahan v. Weiss, the court held that the purchase of a house was insufficient to establish a complete agreement in this case.What is Dahan v. Weiss case.Dahan v. Weiss is a case that was heard in the Court of Appeals of New York in 2002.

The case involved a situation where a man and his son had purchased a house together. According to their agreement, the father and son were to share the house. However, after the father passed away, the son claimed that he was the sole owner of the house, while the father's estate argued that they were entitled to half of the property.A Complete agreement refers to a contract that includes all the terms and conditions required to make the contract legally binding. The court held that the purchase of the house was insufficient to establish a complete agreement because it did not contain all the necessary terms to create a legally binding contract. As a result, the court ruled in favor of the father's estate, stating that they were entitled to half of the property.

To know more about agreement  , visit;

https://brainly.com/question/27899951

#SPJ11

Answer:

1 True

2 False

3 True

4 True

5 False

6 False

7 True

8 False

9 True

10 True

11 True

12 True

13 False

9

The impact of digitalization on operations management has been profound, with significant advancements in quality management, waste and lean management, project management, and inventory management and capacity planning.

Digital tools and technologies have revolutionized the way organizations approach these areas. In quality management, digitalization allows for real-time data collection and analysis, enabling proactive quality control and continuous improvement. With digital tools, organizations can monitor and control quality throughout the production process, identify defects or deviations, and take immediate corrective actions.

Digitalization has also transformed waste and lean management practices. By leveraging digital technologies, organizations can optimize processes, identify areas of waste, and implement lean practices to minimize non-value-added activities. Real-time monitoring and data analysis enable organizations to make data-driven decisions and continuously improve operational efficiency.

In project management, digitalization has improved coordination, communication, and efficiency. Collaborative project management software, digital planning tools, and communication platforms facilitate seamless collaboration among team members, ensuring efficient resource allocation, tracking progress, and timely project completion.

Digitalization has also revolutionized inventory management and capacity planning. Real-time inventory tracking, demand forecasting, and digital supply chain management tools enable organizations to optimize inventory levels, improve demand planning, and ensure efficient utilization of production capacities.

To learn more about project management, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32990426

#SPJ11

Calculating salary rise rates is simple. All you need is a calculator, the present salary of your employee, and the percentage raise you intend to make.

Ready? Start by determining the employee's current salary. Let's use $52,000 a year, or $1,000 per week, for the purposes of this example. Decide on the rise % now. Assuming they are one of your finest workers, you choose to give them a raise of 5%.

We now wish to use a decimal to represent the raise for your employee. This will assist us in determining the rise. The decimal equivalent of an increase of 5% is.05. A 20% increase would be expressed as.20 in decimal form. Basically, you can describe any increase in decimal form between 1 percent and 99 percent.

To learn more about salary rise visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13582204

#SPJ1

Answer:

emergency ambulance service

Explanation:

In the 1970s and early 1980s, emergency ambulance service was almost entirely provided either by career municipal services, usually associated with fire departments, or by volunteer units that were also frequently fire department based.