For every car you sell, you get a 6% commission. If your total sales for the month are $125, 650 , what is your commission ?

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of n in the global truncation error of the Runge-Kutta method can be determined by taking the number of steps required to reach a certain point.

As the local truncation error is of O(h3), it means that the error in each step is proportional to h3. Therefore, if we take n steps, the total error would be proportional to h3n. Since we are given that the global truncation error is of O(hn), we can conclude that n must be equal to 3.

Based on the information provided, the local truncation error in the Runge-Kutta method is given as O(h^3). The global truncation error is generally one order lower than the local truncation error. Therefore, in this case, the global truncation error in the Runge-Kutta method can be determined as O(h^2), where the value of n is 2.

Visit here to learn more about Runge-Kutta method brainly.com/question/30033468

#SPJ11

The correct answer is option (C). The answer is round function.

Given that,

Instead of just altering what is presented, Excel changes the amount of decimal places it really keeps.

To find : Something alters the real number of decimal places?

Number is rounded using ROUND function to a given number of digits. You can use the following formula, for instance, to round the value 23.7825 in cell A1 to two decimal places: =ROUND(A1,2) (A1,2) is 23.78 is the output of the function

Therefore, option is the right response (C). Round function is the solution.

To learn more about Round function click here :

brainly.com/question/27899163

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

it may help you to understand.

The equation which represents the provided function after it has been translated 5 units up and 9 units to the right is (1.6)ˣ⁻⁹+5.

Transformation of a function is shifting the function from its original place in the graph.

Types of transformation-

The provided function in the problem is,

\(f(x) = (1.6)^x\)

The function has translated 5 units up. Thus, substrate 5 units inside the function.

\(g(x) = (1.6)^{x-5}\)

The function has translated units to the right. Thus, add 9 units outside the function as,

\(g(x) = (1.6)^{x-5}+9\)

Thus, the equation which represents the provided function after it has been translated 5 units up and 9 units to the right is,

\(g(x) = (1.6)^{x-5}+9\)

Learn more about the transformation of a function here;

https://brainly.com/question/10904859

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

ur wlcm

Answer:

28.79 cm.

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of a semicircle is equal to the sum of the diameter (which is twice the radius) and half of the circumference of the circle.

The diameter of the semicircle is 2 × 5.6cm = 11.2cm.

The circumference of a full circle with radius 5.6cm is 2π × 5.6cm = 11.2π cm.

Therefore, the circumference of the semicircle is 1/2 of the circumference of the full circle, which is 1/2 × 11.2π cm = 5.6π cm.

The perimeter of the semicircle is the sum of the diameter and the circumference, which is:

11.2cm + 5.6π cm ≈ 28.79cm (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the perimeter of the semicircle is approximately 28.79 cm.

Answer:

pi ( 5.6 ) + 11.2 or approximately 28.79291 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The outside of the semicircle or the perimeter is 1/2 of the circumference and the length that closes the circle is the diameter.

Perimeter = 1/2 C + d

                 = 1/2 *pi*d + d

The diameter is 2 times the radius.

                 = 1/2 ( pi) * (2r) + 2r

                  = pi r + 2 r

                   = pi ( 5.6 ) + 11.2

Approximating pi, we get approximately 28.79291

To prove that the set of all algebraic numbers is countable, we need to show that there exists a one-to-one correspondence between the set of algebraic numbers and the set of natural numbers (or a subset of natural numbers).

This would imply that the algebraic numbers can be "counted" or enumerated, demonstrating their countability.

To begin, let's define an algebraic number. An algebraic number is a number that is a root of a non-zero polynomial equation with integer coefficients. Let's denote the set of all algebraic numbers as A.

We can start by considering the polynomial equations with integer coefficients of degree 1, also known as linear equations of the form ax + b = 0, where a and b are integers and a ≠ 0. The solutions to these equations are algebraic numbers. Since the coefficients are integers, the solutions can be expressed as fractions, which are rational numbers.

The set of rational numbers (Q) is countable, meaning that its elements can be put into a one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers. We can label the rational numbers as q1, q2, q3, ..., where qi represents the ith rational number.

Next, we can consider polynomial equations of degree 2. These equations have the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, where a, b, and c are integers and a ≠ 0. By the quadratic formula, the solutions to these equations can be expressed as:

x = (-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)) / (2a).

Here, we can see that the solutions involve square roots. Since each square root involves two possible values (positive and negative), we can associate each square root with a pair of rational numbers from our countable set Q.

By extending this reasoning to higher degree polynomial equations, we can see that the solutions to these equations involve combinations of rational numbers and square roots (or higher order roots). Since each root can be associated with a finite number of rational numbers, we can create a correspondence between the solutions of these equations and a subset of the natural numbers.

By considering all possible polynomial equations with integer coefficients, we have covered all the algebraic numbers. Each algebraic number is associated with a unique polynomial equation, and therefore with a unique set of rational numbers and square roots (or higher order roots).

Since the rational numbers and the natural numbers are both countable, and each algebraic number is associated with a subset of the natural numbers, we can conclude that the set of algebraic numbers is countable.

Now, let's consider the transcendental numbers. A transcendental number is a number that is not algebraic, meaning it cannot be a root of any non-zero polynomial equation with integer coefficients. The set of transcendental numbers (T) is therefore complementary to the set of algebraic numbers (A).

If the set of algebraic numbers is countable, then its complement, the set of transcendental numbers, must be uncountable. This is because the union of two countable sets is still countable, but the union of a countable set and an uncountable set is uncountable.

Therefore, the set of algebraic numbers is countable, while the set of transcendental numbers is uncountable.

Learn more about algebraic numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/29160654

#SPJ11

Answer:

x≥0

Step-by-step explanation:

The arrow is moving right, to the larger numbers from the starting point at 0. This means that x has to be greater than 0

Because the point at 0 is an empty white dot, it means that it is a 'greater than or equal to' symbol ( looks like this ≤ or ≥, depending on which side you write the x)

So, the final answer is x is greater than or equal to 0, which in maths terms looks like this x≥0, or this 0≤x.

NOTE:

- filled in dot on the number line =  greater than, or less than (>)

- empty dot on number line [like the one on this Q] = greater than or equal to, or less than or equal to (≥)

Applying the scale factor of 1:5, Lisa del Giocondo's face was 1.6 inches long in the sketch.

If the scale factor from the sketch to real life is 1:5, then it means that every inch in the sketch represents 5 inches in real life.

Therefore, to find out how long Lisa del Giocondo's face was in the sketch, we need to multiply the real-life length of her face by the inverse of the scale factor, which is 1/5.

If her face was 8 inches long in real life, then her face in the sketch would be:

8 inches * (1/5) = 1.6 inches

Therefore, based on the scale factor given, Lisa del Giocondo's face was 1.6 inches long in the sketch.

Learn more about scale factor on:

https://brainly.com/question/30943490

#SPJ1

Answer:

9.9\(cm^{3}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula:

1/3(area of the base x height)

1/3 [2.175(2.175)(6.3)]

1/3(4.730625)(6.3)

1/3(29.8029375)

9.9343125

Is the perimeter of the base is 8.7, we need to divide that by 4 (2.175) to find out the side length of the square.  The area of the square, we need to multiply 2.175 by 2.175.

9.9343125 rounded to the nearest tenth is 9.9

Helping in the name of Jesus.

The Taylor series expansion by plugging in the values f(z) = f(z0) + f'(z0)(z - z0) + f''(z0)(z - z0)²/2,f(z) = (ln(sqrt(2)) + i (-π/4)) + (-1/2 - (1/2)i)(z - (-1 + i)) + (i/2)(z - (-1 + i))²/2

The principal value of the logarithm, denoted as Log z, is defined as follows:

Log z = ln |z| + i Arg(z)

The function Log z is analytic in the complex plane except for the branch cut along the negative real axis, which is the set of points of the form x + 0i where x ≤ 0. This branch cut is necessary to define a consistent argument (Arg) for the complex logarithm.

To expand the principal value of the logarithm in a Taylor series with centre z0 = -1 + i, the following formula for a complex function:

f(z) = f(z0) + f'(z0)(z - z0) + f''(z0)(z - z0)²/2! + f'''(z0)(z - z0)³/3! +

Let's start by finding the values of the function and its derivatives at z0 = -1 + i:

f(z0) = Log z0 = ln |-1 + i| + i Arg(-1 + i)

To find the modulus |z0|,use the distance formula in the complex plane:

|-1 + i| = sqrt((-1)² + 1²) = sqrt(2)

To find the argument Arg(-1 + i),use the inverse tangent function:

Arg(-1 + i) = atan(1/-1) = atan(-1) = -π/4

Therefore, f(z0) = ln(sqrt(2)) + i (-π/4).

Now, let's calculate the first derivative:

f'(z) = d/dz (ln |z| + i Arg(z))

= 1/z

At z = z0,

f'(z0) = 1/(-1 + i)

To simplify the expression, multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of -1 + i:

f'(z0) = (1/(-1 + i)) × ((-1 - i)/(-1 - i))

= (-1 - i)/((-1)² - (i)²)

= (-1 - i)/(1 + 1)

= (-1 - i)/2

= -1/2 - (1/2)i

Now, let's calculate the second derivative:

f''(z) = d/dz (1/z)

= -1/z²

At z = z0,:

f''(z0) = -1/(-1 + i)²

To simplify the expression, square the denominator:

f''(z0) = -1/((-1 + i)²)

= -1/((-1 + i)(-1 + i))

= -1/(1 - 2i + i²)

= -1/(1 - 2i - 1)

= -1/(-2i)

= (1/2i)

= (1/2i) × (i/i)

= i/2

To know more about values here

https://brainly.com/question/30145972

#SPJ4

The probability that the first person picks a mango or a june plum or cashew pack is 0.84

From the question, we have the following parameters:

Start by calculating the total number of fruits

This is represented as

Total number of fruits = Mangoes + Cashew packs + June plums + Jamaican apples

Substitute the known values in the above equation

So, we have the following equation

Total number of fruits = 12 + 17 + 13 + 8

Evaluate the like terms

Total number of fruits = 50

The total number of mango,  june plum or cashew pack is

Selected fruit = Mangoes + Cashew packs + June plums

So, we have

Selected fruit = 12 + 17 + 13

Evaluate

Selected fruit = 42

The probability of picking any of these fruits is then calculated as

Probability (P) = Selected Fruit/Total number of fruits

So, we have

P = 42/50

Evaluate

P = 0.84

Hence, the value of the probability is 0.84

Read more about probability at

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ1

The probability that the average weight of the four babies will be more than 7.5 lbs is approximately 0.1271 or 12.71%.

To obtain the probability that the average weight of the four babies will be more than 7.5 lbs, we need to calculate the z-score and use the standard normal distribution.

The z-score formula is given by:

z = (x - μ) / (σ / sqrt(n))

Where:

x = desired value (7.5 lbs)

μ = mean weight (7 lbs)

σ = standard deviation (0.875 lbs)

n = sample size (4)

Substituting the given values into the formula:

z = (7.5 - 7) / (0.875 / sqrt(4))

 = (0.5) / (0.875 / 2)

 = 1.14286

Next, we need to find the probability of the z-score being greater than 1.14286 using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical software.

Assuming a two-tailed test, we want to find the probability in the right tail.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we find that the cumulative probability corresponding to a z-score of 1.14286 ≈ 0.8729.

However, since we want the probability in the right tail, we subtract this value from 1.

P(Z > 1.14286) ≈ 1 - 0.8729

             ≈ 0.1271

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32560116#

#SPJ11

The result of the Fourier Transform (Ω) X ( Ω ) of the signal x() = ((−1)−(+1))cos(200) is

x(t) = 1/(2π) ∫[-j∞, j∞] (s/(s^2 + 4π^2f0^2) + (s + 2/T)/(s^2 + 4π^2f0^2)) e^{st} ds

Given that the signal x()=((−1)−(+1))cos(200)  

The Fourier transform (Ω) X (Ω) is given by;

X (Ω) = ∫[-∞, ∞] x(t) e^{-jΩt} dt

Taking Laplace transform of the signal x(t);

x(t) = (−1)^(t/T)cos(2πf0t)

= cos(2πf0t) - 2cos(2πf0t)u(-t/T)

The Laplace transform of the first term is L(cos(2πf0t)) = s/(s^2 + 4π^2f0^2)

The Laplace transform of the second term is given by

L(cos(2πf0t)u(-t/T)) = (s + 2/T)/(s^2 + 4π^2f0^2)  

which is derived using partial fraction decomposition

Hence, the Laplace transform of the signal is given by

X(s) = L{x(t)}

= s/(s^2 + 4π^2f0^2) + (s + 2/T)/(s^2 + 4π^2f0^2)

Taking inverse Laplace transform of X(s) we have;

x(t) = 1/(2π) ∫[-j∞, j∞] X(s) e^{st} ds

= 1/(2π) ∫[-j∞, j∞] (s/(s^2 + 4π^2f0^2) + (s + 2/T)/(s^2 + 4π^2f0^2)) e^{st} ds

After solving this integral we will get the result of the Fourier Transform (Ω) X ( Ω ) of the signal x() = ((−1)−(+1))cos(200).

To know more about Fourier Transform, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1542972

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. 35 km

2. 1 cm to 5m

3. 6 cm

4. \(42^\circ\)

5. 16.73 m

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution 1.

Reading of map scale = 1cm:5km

i.e. 1 cm is equivalent to 5 km

Measurement of map  = 7 cm

Actual distance = Measurement of map \(\times 5\)

Actual distance = 7 \(\times 5\) = 35 km

-------------------

Solution 2.

Length of dining hall = 35 m

Measurement of map = 7 cm

Scale = Measurement of map : Length of dining hall (i.e. ratio)

Scale = 7 cm :35 m = 1 cm : 5 m

-------------------

Solution 3.

Length of building = 30 m

Scale = 1 cm to 5m

5 m is equivalent to 1 cm on scale

1 m is equivalent to \(\frac{1}{5}\) cm on scale

30m is equivalent to \(\frac{1}{5} \times 30\) = 6 cm on scale

-------------------

Solution 4.

Angle of elevation of A from B = \(42^\circ\)

Angle of depression of B from A = ?

Please refer to the image attached, we can clearly observe that both the angles (i.e. angle of elevation from A to B and angle of depression from B to A )will be equal.

Angle of depression of B from A = \(42^\circ\)

-------------------

Solution 5.

Given that:

String length, or hypotenuse of triangle BC= 25 m

Angle of string with horizontal, \(\angle B = 42^\circ\)

Please refer to the attached image for the clear understanding of the situation.

To find:

Height, AC = ?

We can use trigonometric identity:

\(sin\theta = \dfrac{Perpendicular}{Hypotenuse}\)

OR

\(sinB = \dfrac{AC}{BC}\\\Rightarrow sin42^\circ = \dfrac{AC}{25}\\\Rightarrow AC = 25 \times 0.67\\\Rightarrow AC = 16.73 m\)

============

So, the answers are:

1. 35 km

2. 1 cm to 5m

3. 6 cm

4. \(42^\circ\)

5. 16.73 m

When a password consists of 2 letters followed by 2 digits. Then, number ,of different passwords can be formed using this combination is 67,600.

Combinations are mathematical operations that count the number of potential configurations for a set of elements when the order of a selection is irrelevant. You can choose the components of combos in any order.

The formula for calculating how many arrangements are feasible when only a few items are chosen from a set of items that are unique is as follows:

ⁿCₓ = n! / {(n-x)!×x!}

n = total elements given in the set.

x = total number of selected elements.

! = factorial

Calculation for the different password combination,

The total alphabets in English is 26 (A-Z)

The single digit number is 10 (0-9)

The combination for selecting first letter is;

²⁶C₁ = 26! / {25!×1!} = 26

Similarly, the combination for selecting second letter is;

²⁶C₁ = 26! / {25!×1!} = 26

The combination for selecting 3rd digit is;

¹⁰C₁ = 10! / {9!×1!} = 10

and, the combination for selecting 4th digit is;

¹⁰C₁ = 10! / {9!×1!} = 10

Thus, the total combination becomes;

= 26×26×10×10

= 67,600

Therefore, the number of total combination formed using 2 letters followed by 2 digits are 67,600.

To know more about combination, here

https://brainly.com/question/11732255

#SPJ4

Answer:

11 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The carbs that are in one glass of milk and

in one snack bar is 27 carbs

Since 4 glasses of milk and 3 snack bars have a total of 80 carbohydrates (carbs), this will be:

4m + 3b = 80

2 glasses of milk and 4 snack bars have a total of 70 carbs. This will be:

2m + 4b = 70

Collect both equations and solve

4m + 3b = 80 ..... i

2m + 4b = 70 ..... ii

m = milk

b = snack bars

Multiply equation i by 2

Multiply equation ii by 4

8m + 6b = 160

8m + 16b = 280

Subtract

10b = 80

Divide

b = 80/10 = 8

Snack bars = 8 carbs

Since 2m + 4b = 70

2m + 4(8) = 70

2m + 32 = 70

2m = 70 - 32

2m = 38

Divide

m = 38/2 = 19

Milk = 19 carbs

The total carbs will be:

= Milk + Snack

= 19 + 8

= 27 carbs

Learn more about equations on:

brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Below, we list what numbers can be divided by 67 and what the answer will be for each number. 67 / 1 = 67. 67 / 67 = 1. What is 68 divisible by? Now you know what 67 is divisible by.

Answer:

67 divided by 8

Step-by-step explanation:

The price per pound for grapefruit is $1.5.

The price per pound for an orange is $1.4.

An equation is a mathematical statement that is made up of two expressions connected by an equal sign.

We have,

2x + 3y = 7.20 ____(1)

4x + 2y = 8.80 ______(2)

From (1) we get,

2x = 7.20 - 3y

x = (7.20 - 3y) / 2 _____(3)

Putting in (2) we get,

4 [(7.20 - 3y) / 2] + 2y = 8.80

2 (7.20 - 3y) + 2y = 8.80

14.4 - 6y + 2y = 8.80

14.4 - 4y = 8.80

14.4 - 8.80 = 4y

5.6 = 4y

y = 5.6/4

y = 1.4

Putting y = 1.4 in (3) we get,

x = (7.20 - 3 x 1.4) / 2

x = (7.20 - 4.2) / 2

x = 3/2

x = 1.5

Thus,

The price per pound for grapefruit is $1.5.

The price per pound for an orange is $1.4.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/17194269

#SPJ1

Answer:

Natalie.....

....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The sum of 25 and 4 is the result promised by the mean value theorem for numerical methods for the function over the specified interval.

G prime(c) = g(b) - g(a) b-a is the formula for the mean value hypothesis for numerical methods for the functional f(c) across the range [a, b]. The assumption is that for the given function, there is a value c between [a, b].

Given the interval [4,9] and the function g(x) = 5x

g prime (c) = g(9) - g(4) ÷ 9-4

g(9) = 5√9

g(9) = 5 × 3 = 15

g(4) = 5√4

g(4) = 5 × 2 = 10

g prime c) = 15-10 ÷ 9-4

g prime (c) = 5 ÷ 5

g prime(c) = 1

So find the numeral for which g prime (x) = g prime(c)

If g(x) = 5√x =

g prime (x) =

g prime (x) = 5 ÷ 2√x

Since g prime (c) = 1 then;

5/2√x = 1

5 = 2√x

√x = 5 ÷ 2

x = (5 ÷ 2)²

x = 25 ÷ 4

The mid-value theorem guarantees a value of c of 25 ÷ 4.

Learn more about mid-value theorem at

https://brainly.com/question/20734406?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The question is -

Find the value(s) of c guaranteed by the Mean Value Theorem for Integrals for the function over the given interval. (Round your answer to four decimal places. Enter your answers as a comma-separated list.)

f(x)=5√x,[4,9]

Answer: look it up-

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

An outlier is something that is out of place compared to the rest of the group. For example, If you had the numbers 3,4,5,4,3,4, and 19, 19 would be the outlier.

Step-by-step explanation:

An outlier is a number that's far away from the rest of your data.

For example, if we look at the numbers 3, 2, 4, 5, 27, and 1, you can likely consider 27 to be an outlier because it's so far away from the rest of the data.

The specific definition of how far something has to be from the rest of the data to be an outlier depends entirely on the situation, but in general: if a number obviously sticks out from the rest, it's probably an outlier.

Answer:

area=66

perimeter=42

Step-by-step explanation:

area = (12 x 3) + (5 x 6)

=36 + 30

=66

perimeter = 12 +9 +5 +6 +7 +5

=42

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

56.1,12.1,23.6

Answer:

x = 125°, y = 55°, z = 70°

Step-by-step explanation:

x and 55 are adjacent angles and are supplementary, sum to 180°, that is

x + 55° = 180° ( subtract 55° from both sides )

x = 125°

∠ ABD and ∠ BDC are alternate angles and congruent , so

y = 55°

Since BD and BC are congruent, then Δ BCD is isosceles, so

∠ BDC = ∠ BCD = 55° and

z = 180° - (55 + 55)° ← angle sum of triangle

   = 180° - 110°

   = 70°

The table should be completed by writing each part of the exponential function as follows;

Geometric sequence        Exponential function      Mathematical meaning

gₙ                                             f(x)                                  dependent variable

g₁/r                                            a                                    coefficient of power

r                                                b                                    base of power

n                                               x                 independent variable (exponent)

In Mathematics, the nth term of a geometric sequence can be calculated by using this mathematical expression:

aₙ = a₁rⁿ⁻¹

Where:

In Mathematics, an exponential function can be represented or modeled by using the following mathematical equation:

\(f(x) = a(b)^x\)

Where:

By comparison, we have:

gₙ  = f(x) (dependent variable)

g₁/r = a (coefficient of power)

r = b (base of power).

n = x (independent variable or exponent).

Read more on exponential functions here: https://brainly.com/question/30241796

#SPJ1

The general solution to the given exact differential equation is Φ(x, y) = cos y ln|x+3| - ln|y| + C, where C is an arbitrary constant.

We have the equation

(x+3)⁻¹ cos y dx - (ln(5x+15)sin y - y⁻¹) dy = 0

Let's check if the equation is exact by verifying the equality of the mixed partial derivatives

∂/∂y [(x+3)⁻¹ cos y] = - (x+3)⁻¹ sin y

∂/∂x [-(ln(5x+15)sin y - y⁻¹)] = - (ln(5x+15) cos y)

Since the mixed partial derivatives are not equal, the equation is not exact. However, we can check if it becomes exact by using an integrating factor.

The integrating factor (IF) can be calculated as the exponential of the integral of the coefficient of the term that multiplies dx. In this case, the coefficient is (x+3)⁻¹ cos y.

IF = e^(∫(x+3)⁻¹ cos y dx)

Calculating the integral

∫(x+3)⁻¹ cos y dx = ∫cos y / (x+3) dx = cos y ln|x+3| + C(y)

Therefore, the integrating factor (IF) is

IF = e^(cos y ln|x+3| + C(y))

Multiplying both sides of the equation by the integrating factor (IF), we get

e^(cos y ln|x+3| + C(y)) × [(x+3)⁻¹ cos y dx - (ln(5x+15)sin y - y⁻¹)dy] = 0

Expanding and simplifying

(e^(cos y ln|x+3| + C(y))) × [(x+3)⁻¹ cos y dx - (ln(5x+15)sin y - y⁻¹)dy] = 0

Now, we can determine the exact differential equation by comparing the differential form with the total derivative of a function Φ(x, y)

dΦ = (∂Φ/∂x)dx + (∂Φ/∂y)dy

Comparing the terms, we have

(∂Φ/∂x) = (x+3)⁻¹ cos y

(∂Φ/∂y) = -(ln(5x+15)sin y - y⁻¹)

Now, integrate (∂Φ/∂x) with respect to x to find Φ(x, y)

Φ(x, y) = ∫(x+3)⁻¹ cos y dx

= ∫cos y / (x+3) dx

= cos y ln|x+3| + h(y)

Where h(y) is an arbitrary function of y.

Now, differentiate Φ(x, y) with respect to y and equate it to (∂Φ/∂y)

∂Φ/∂y = -sin y ln|x+3| + h'(y) = -(ln(5x+15)sin y - y⁻¹)

Comparing the terms, we can see that h'(y) = -y⁻¹.

Integrating h'(y) = -y⁻¹, we find

h(y) = -ln|y| + C

To know more about differential equation here

https://brainly.com/question/32538700

#SPJ4

d)An error because d cannot be negative.

According to the data, effect sizes such as Cohen's d typically range from 0 to positive values, and negative values do not make sense in this context. Therefore, an effect size of d = -63 is likely an error or a typo.

Assuming that the correct effect size is a positive value, the magnitude of the effect size can be described as follows based on Cohen's convention:

However, it's important to note that the interpretation of effect sizes also depends on the context and the specific field of study.

Learn more about effect sizes;

https://brainly.com/question/31364497

#SPJ4