The burden of proof during pretrial evidence suppression hearings lies with the prosecution.
Who has the burden of proof during pretrial evidence suppression hearings?During pretrial evidence suppression hearings, it is the prosecution's responsibility to establish that the evidence in question should be admissible in court. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution to demonstrate that the evidence was obtained lawfully and in accordance with constitutional rights. The defense may argue for the exclusion of evidence by challenging its legality or arguing violations of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Ultimately, the court decides whether the evidence should be suppressed based on the arguments and evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense.
Learn more about suppression hearings
brainly.com/question/32331686
#SPJ11
the texas access to justice commission was formed to provide legal services to which group?
The Texas Access to Justice Commission was formed to provide legal services to low-income individuals.
The Texas Access to Justice Commission is a state agency established to address the legal needs of low-income individuals in Texas. Its primary objective is to ensure that all Texans have access to legal representation and services, regardless of their financial situation. The commission collaborates with various stakeholders, including legal aid organizations, pro bono attorneys, and the judiciary, to develop and implement strategies that improve access to justice.
One of the key groups targeted by the Texas Access to Justice Commission is low-income individuals who cannot afford legal representation. Many individuals facing legal issues, such as eviction, domestic violence, or immigration matters, may not have the financial resources to hire an attorney. The commission works to bridge this gap by supporting legal aid organizations, which provide free or low-cost legal services to eligible individuals. These services may include legal advice, representation in court, and assistance with navigating the legal system.
By focusing on low-income individuals, the Texas Access to Justice Commission aims to address the disparities in access to justice and ensure that vulnerable populations receive the legal support they need. This helps to promote fairness, protect individuals' rights, and prevent injustices that may arise from the inability to access legal assistance.
Learn more about access to justice.
brainly.com/question/23712752
#SPJ11
Legislation that requires businesses to prove that they are securing their data ____.a.HIPPAc.USA Patriot Actb.Sarbanes-Oxleyd.all of the above
"Legislation that requires businesses to prove that they are securing their data includes the following:
a. HIPAA: The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requires all covered entities to maintain the privacy and security of patients' protected health information (PHI). HIPAA ensures that patients' data is kept private and secure. This legislation outlines the specific requirements for data security and HIPAA compliance.
b. USA Patriot Act: The Patriot Act contains provisions that require businesses to maintain secure records and prevent the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. It requires businesses to implement strict security measures to safeguard data from unauthorized access, modification, or destruction. It also enables the government to access electronic communication and data to prevent terrorism.
c. Sarbanes-Oxley: Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) is a federal law that was passed in 2002 to improve corporate accountability. The legislation establishes requirements for financial reporting and mandates that companies implement internal controls to protect against fraud.
d. All of the above: HIPAA, the Patriot Act, and SOX all require businesses to prove that they are securing their data. They establish strict standards for data security and mandate that companies take measures to prevent unauthorized access, modification, or destruction of sensitive information.
To Know more about Accountability Act
https://brainly.com/question/31874902
#SPJ11
Which of the following are consistent with Contractionary Fiscal Policy
Deficit
Lower Taxes
Lower Government Spending
Raise Taxes
Increase the Federal Debt
Surplus
Increase Government Spending
Decrease the Federal Debt
Answer:
Lower Government Spending
Raise Taxes
Upon the death of a President, the Vice President assumes the powers and duties of the presidency, but technically does not become President.A. TrueB. False
The assertion is accurate that the death of a President, the Vice President assumes the powers and duties of the presidency, but technically does not become President.
What transpires if the president and vice president pass away while he is in office?Order of Presidential Succession If the President of the United States becomes incapable of holding office due to illness, death, resignation, or any other reason, or is removed from office, the following individuals shall succeed him or her in office: Deputy President.
In the president's absence, who assumes control of the government?The Chief Justice of India or, in his absence, the seniormost Supreme Court of India judge available will fill the positions if there are vacancies in either the President's or Vice-posts President's due to death, resignation, removal, or other reasons.
To know more about Justice visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/978006
#SPJ4
What is another name for the national government?
Answer:
Explanation:
National Government is just the government of a single country
Answer:
federal government is the answer
Bill and his family are visiting Sydney for the weekend. They live in Victoria and decide to have a week away during the summer holidays. They stay at the Shangri-La Hotel and as part of their package, receive a buffet lunch each day. On their second day at the hotel, Bill slipped on some grapes that were on the floor near the lunch buffet. As a result of the slip, Bill broke his ankle and was required to undergo surgery. He was off work for a period of 2 months and was unable to earn an income. Bill is suing for the total sum of $150,000. At the time of the fall, Bill reported the incident to the banquet manager who indicated they were not sure how long the grapes had been on the floor before the slip occurred. The incident report also noted Bill had consumed a number of glasses of wine before the slip.
Representing Bill as the plaintiff and the Shangri-La Hotel as the defendant, you are to make arguments to the Court as to who is liable in negligence for Bill’s injuries. You should argue the case referring to the relevant legislation and any case law. You should also identify the relevant jurisdiction in which the claim is brought.
Answer:
if that is shangri la hotel it's sure that there will be web cam for security and find the exact time that incident happen.also check where his family went. if he really drank wine then it must be someone from his family or it maybe someone waiter or other first understand what happen and try to combine it together you will know the result best of luck
methods of identifying an inmate who is to receive medication.
Answer:
Effective classification is now regarded as critical to the
operation of a safe, secure facility. As a management tool,
classification is considered essential for assessing and
meeting the needs, risks, and constitutional rights of each
offender through appropriate housing, work, programs,
and activities, while at the same time maintaining the
security and safety of the facility and community.
Explanation:
yee
in a criminal trial the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? group of answer choices
Yes, as the witness is now accustomed to the voice of the defendant.
In a trial, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice?
The witness can accurately confirm it because she is familiar with the defendant's voice at this point. Anybody who is familiar with the voice of the purported speaker may verify a voice recording by identifying the speaker. As a result, the witness can comment on whether the voice on the video is actually that of the defendant because she is now accustomed to hearing it.
As circumstantial evidence, the accused's actions either before or after the crime are extremely important. The circumstantial evidence in front of the court allows it to deduce facts and draw a conclusion.
Expert testimony is only appropriate in cases where the trier of fact would benefit from the expert's knowledge in order to appreciate the evidence or determine the fact at issue.
To know more about circumstantial evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ4
After the cherokee won their court case against removal, how did president andrew jackson respond?.
Andrew Jackson chose not to carry out the Supreme Court's ruling, allowing states to pass further laws that were detrimental to the tribes. In 1838, the American authorities started evicting the Cherokee from their territory.
President Andrew Jackson disregarded the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, but later said that the Court had the final say on constitutional issues and emphasized that its rulings had to be followed. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States, reached the conclusion that Georgia had no authority to impose state laws within its borders. President Andrew Jackson ordered the expulsion of the Cherokee nation after refusing to maintain the court's decision in this case.In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Jackson allegedly disobeyed the Supreme Court by declaring, "John Marshall has made his judgement now let him implement it." Georgia's attempt to impose state laws on Cherokee lands was the central issue in the lawsuit.Thus this is how president Andrew Jackson responded after the Cherokee won their court case.
Refer here to learn more about Andrew Jackson: https://brainly.com/question/340840
#SPJ4
which kind of damage does a plaintiff sue for to compensate for a broken leg？
-special damages
-aggravated damages
-punitive damages
-general damages
The Statement of Claim starts a lawsuit in court.
-True
-False
A plaintiff would typically sue for general damages to compensate for a broken leg.
True. The Statement of Claim is indeed the document that initiates a lawsuit in court.
When a plaintiff sues for compensation due to a broken leg, they generally seek general damages. General damages are non-monetary losses that are not easily quantifiable, such as pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. These damages aim to provide compensation for the physical and emotional harm caused by the injury.
Special damages, on the other hand, cover the specific economic losses resulting from the broken leg, such as medical expenses and loss of income. Aggravated damages may be awarded if the defendant's conduct caused additional distress, while punitive damages are rarely awarded and are meant to punish the defendant for extreme wrongdoing.
The plaintiff, or the party bringing the lawsuit, must file the statement of claim with the court in order to begin a civil action. It describes the case's facts, the claim's legal foundation, and the relief the plaintiff is requesting.
The statement of claim gives the defendant official notice that they are being sued and gives them a chance to refute the claims. Following the filing and service of the statement of claim on the defendant, the court process gets under way, with the goal of either litigating or settling the case.
To know more about plaintiff here https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ4
what did the judge revoke or deny derek chauvin?
Answer:
The judge revoked Derek Chauvin's bail and said he would be sentenced in eight weeks. ... Chauvin was convicted on all three charges he faced at trial — second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Detective Sanders knows the hole in the windshield was caused by a bullet being shot from inside the car. How is he MOST likely to make this
conclusion?
ОА
The bullet hole is wider on the outside of the windshield.
ОВ.
The bullet hole is wider on the inside of the windshield.
Ос.
The bullet hole made radial fractures and a few concentric fractures.
OD.
There is glass everywhere surrounding the car.
Answer:
The rounded shape of the bullet because as it goes through the glass it stops spinning and this make the hole wider
Explanation:
Answer:
The bullet is wider on the outside of the windshield.
Explanation:
Being in charge of the Executive Branch falls under the presidential role of___.
A. Commander - in - Chief
B. Chief Diplomat
C. Chief Legislator
D. Head of Government
You are the surety for you nephew's study loan .the bank that gave the loan to your nephew has brought a claim against you. write out a set of valid legal defence for yourself by the commercial law
What type of claim is it? For now I can tell you this. Ask them what is the claim and tell that it's your nephew and you have a relationship with them and that you want a study loan for them for school/college.
Explanation:
(Please explain what type of claim is it.)
A buyer entered into a written contract with a seller to purchase his commercial property for $100,000. The contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed, and made no mention of easements or reservations. The closing was set for November 25, three months from the signing of the contract. Shortly thereafter, the buyer obtained a survey of the property, which revealed that the city had an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Because this actually enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not mention it to the seller. Subsequently, the buyer found a better location for her business. On November 1, the buyer notified the seller that she no longer intended to purchase the property. The seller told her that he intended to hold her to her contract. At closing, the buyer refused to tender the purchase price, claiming that the seller's title is unmarketable and citing the sidewalk easement as proof of that fact. In a suit for specific performance, will the seller likely prevail? A: Yes, because the contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed. B: Yes, because the buyer was aware of the visible easement and it enhanced the value of the property. C: No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders title unmarketable. D: No, because the buyer gave the seller sufficient notice of her change in plans and yet he made no effort to try to find another purchaser.
No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.
The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.
Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.
The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.
Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:
https://brainly.com/question/32959753
#SPJ11
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Driving Under the Influence: Do Strict DUI Laws Really Work?
Yes, Strict DUI Laws Really Work in controlling the public in order to attain public safety.
About Driving Under the Influence
Driving under the influence (DUI) is indeed the act of driving, operating, or being in charge of a vehicle when affected by al-cohol or other dr-ugs (includes recreational dr-ugs and those related to prescription), to a degree that makes the driver incapable of driving a motor vehicle safely.
Also known as dri-nk-driving (UK/Ireland), driving while into-xicated (DWI), drun-ken driving, operating a vehicle while into-xicated (OWI), operating a vehicle while under the influence of dr-ugs or al-cohol (OVI) in Ohio, or impaired driving (Canada).
The phrase for the offence changes from legal to informal terms and from one jurisdiction to another.
To know more about Driving Under the Influence:
brainly.com/question/1586954
#SPJ4
With respect to prayer in public schools, the united states supreme court has ruled that.
With respect to prayer in public schools, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that school-sponsored prayer violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
What does the the Supreme Court say ?The United States Supreme Court, on many occasions, has made a declaration stating that participation in any school-related prayer or activity with religious association ensuing from public education institutions infringes upon the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
This law bars governing forces from having allegiance to a particular religion and/or endorsing its beliefs. One of the most acclaimed rulings was made in Engel v. Vitale (1962), whereby the apex court declared that sustained instruction for learners to chant a prayer preceding each academic session contravened the nation's law.
Find out more on the Supreme Court at https://brainly.com/question/28917468
#SPJ1
A disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is...
a) group politics
b) void of expert opinion
c) an increase in programmed costs
d) faster decision making
e) too much brainstorming
The disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is a) group politics.
When a decision-making process involves interacting groups, group politics is likely to come into play. Group politics refers to the dynamics, power struggles, and personal interests that can influence decision-making within a group. Individuals may engage in behaviors such as lobbying, forming alliances, or pursuing personal agendas, which can hinder the overall effectiveness and objectivity of the decision-making process. This can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions that may not necessarily align with the organisation's best interests or the problem being addressed.
Learn more about group politics: https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ11
separation of power
Answer:
The separation of powers is an approach to governing a state. Under it, a state's government is divided into branches, each with separate, independent powers and responsibilities so that the powers of one branch are not in conflict with those of the other branches.
Explanation:
not clear
Answer:
seperation of power is when each branch of government is kept spread and are allowed checks and balances for when they need it.
What are the different types of probation condition violations? Select all that apply.
General
Legal
Technical
Specific
Answer: Common probation violations include: Missing appointment with a probation officer. If you are on supervised probation, you will be required to meet with your probation officer on a regular schedule set by him. If you miss an appointment, this is considered a probation violation, and your probation officer could report this to the court.
Explanation:
in what way can victims of crime be better assisted and empowered in the criminal justice system?
Answer:
By having strong evidences mostly regarding his case or/and witnesses of course
Explanation:
A married couple who materially participates in the operation of a jointly owned business may elect for each spouse to file their own schedule c, with each reporting their respective amounts of income, loss, and deductions. This is known as what?.
A married couple who materially participates in the operation of a jointly owned business may elect for each spouse to file their own schedule c, with each reporting their respective amounts of income, loss, and deductions. This is known as what joint venture.
Unless a commercial enterprise meets the requirements listed underneath to be a certified joint challenge, a sole proprietorship needs to be completely owned with the aid of one spouse, and the alternative partner can paint in the enterprise as a worker.
The IRC generally lets in a certified joint undertaking whose best contributors are a married couple filing a joint go-back not to be dealt with as a partnership for Federal tax functions.
Learn more about joint ventures here https://brainly.com/question/9389546
#SPJ4
WHAT CRIMES ARE COMMITTED BY BOTH MEN AND WOMEN (give 5 crimes)
, murder, robbery, assault, kidnapping.
Answer:
1. Embezzlement
2. Domestic Violence
3. Murder
4. Car Theft
5. Extortion
Explanation:
Which of the following represents a potential problem for Kantian
deontology?
a.) People can sometimes be treated as objects.
b.) The same rules don't apply to everyone.
c.) Unintended effects have no impact on a person's moral
character.
d.) No weight is given to a person's intentions.
The reason why the Kantian deontology may be a potential problem is the fact that People can sometimes be treated as objects.
What is Kantian Deontology?This Deontology was by the philosopher that is known as Immanuel Kant. The Deontology principle uses rules in order to establish what is right and what is wrong.
The potential problem is that humans may be treated as the means to an end here.
Read more on the deontology principle here:
https://brainly.com/question/26038204
Answer: Unintended effects have no impact on person’s moral character.
Explanation:
Mike Reed, a partner in Post Co., received the following distribution from Post:
Post's basis Fair market value
Cash $11,000 $11,000
Land 5,000 12,500
Before this distribution, Reed's basis in Post was $25,000. If this distribution were nonliquidating, Reed's recognized gain or loss on the distribution would be
a. $11,000 gain.
b. $ 9,000 loss.
c. $ 1,500 loss.
d. $0.
Reed's recognized loss on the distribution would be $ 1,500. The correct option for the given question is "option C."
In this scenario, Mike Reed received a distribution from Post Co. consisting of cash and land. To determine the recognized gain or loss on the distribution, we need to compare the fair market value of the assets received to Reed's basis in Post before the distribution. The fair market value of the cash received is equal to the basis, so there is no gain or loss on the cash portion.
However, the fair market value of the land received is $12,500, which exceeds its basis of $5,000. Therefore, there is a recognized gain of $7,500 ($12,500 - $5,000) on the land distribution. As a result, the correct answer is option C, which states a $1,500 loss (since the recognized gain is positive, the answer would be a loss).
You can learn more about market value at
https://brainly.com/question/27993050
#SPJ11
Part 1 – Theory Summary
Choose one of the criminological theories we have covered this semester that you feel is depicted in your chosen song and summarize its: 1) major components, 2) assumptions, and 3) its basic description of the cause of crime. 250-word limit (1 page, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman 12-point font)
Part II – Application
Apply your chosen theory to describe how the song's lyrics embody or capture the theory you have chosen. Describe how the theory’s main propositions are demonstrated through the song's lyrics. 250-word limit (1 page, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman 12-point font)
According to social control theory, anyone can perceive the benefits of crime and be creative enough to devise and carry out any number of illegal acts spontaneously, without any extra drive or preparation.
The underlying premise is that the desire to engage in criminal activity is resisted due to the costs involved. Additionally, it is presumptuous to believe that the rejection of the people a potential offender cares about is one of crime's greatest costs.
What are criminological theories?Criminological theories concentrate on outlining why crimes occur. They highlight risk factors for committing a crime, explain why some people commit crimes and can concentrate on the methods and justifications used to enact and uphold particular laws.
The psychodynamic theory, the behavioral theory, and the cognitive theory are the three main psychological theories of time that have evolved after three decades of research.
Learn more about criminological theories, from:
brainly.com/question/5137629
#SPJ1
Which of the President's nine roles calls for him to set the nation's foreign policy?
Answer: The answer is Chief Diplomat
Explanation: Its him because the role of the President as Chief Diplomat is the one that calls him to set the nation's foreign policy, in fact, it makes him its main designer. His power is so large that his rulings are followed both by the US and foreign parties.
HAVE A GOOD DAY Y’ALL
Why did people protesting the stay-at-home order cite the 2nd amendment? Isn't that the right to bear arms?
Answer:
the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms.
Explanation:
they might have cited the right to bear arms because when the government is seen as out of control the people can take over. so I'm guessing that because they see the stay at home order as unfair they want to protest and have guns. but I'm not 100% sure this is right. I just hope this helps