Answer: Classical conditioning involves associating an involuntary response and a stimulus, while operant conditioning is about associating a voluntary behavior and a consequence. In respondent conditioning, the US could be an appetitive or aversive stimulus. For instance, in appetitive conditioning, the US would be something desirable such as candy which makes us happy. Other examples could include water, food, sex, or drugs. For example, when lab rats press a lever when a green light is on, they receive a food pellet as a reward. When they press the lever when a red light is on, they receive a mild electric shock. As a result, they learn to press the lever when the green light is on and avoid the red light.
Explanation:
Which of the following are examples of compassion?
Choose 3 correct answers.
A. Concern for the workload of the people who report to you
B. Covering for your coworker when he or she leaves work early
C. Caring about the safety of your coworkers
D. Making sure that you don’t cause extra work for someone else
E. Expecting the same wages as someone who does the same job as you do
Donald is a very wealthy man. One day, Randy, the owner of a local gas station, compliments Donald on his new luxury car. Donald says: “Because you have given me such great service over the years, I will give you ownership of the car at the end of the week. Just fill up the gas tank.” Randy accepts and gives Donald the gas without charging for it. At the end of the day, Donald has second thoughts. Which of the following is the best answer?
Question 5 options:
A contract has been formed, because Randy’s service over the years is sufficient consideration for Donald’s promise to give the car.
A contract has been formed, because Randy accepted Donald’s offer.
No contract has been formed, because consideration is lacking since the gas was not bargained for in exchange for the car
No contract has been formed, because gas is not sufficient consideration for a car
Answer:
i think "no contract has been formed because consideration is lacking since the gas was not bargained for in exchange for the car"
Explanation:
thats a really weird question to be asked-
What does “unanimous” mean? Why do you think jury verdicts must be unanimous?
One technique to guarantee that a defendant won't be found guilty unless the prosecution has proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt is to have.
What is court?A court is any person or institution with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disputes between parties and administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative affairs in conformity with the rule of law. A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the legal jurisdiction to hear and settle disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
A unanimous jury verdict. To successfully convict a criminal defendant, prosecutors must persuade the jury that there is no possibility of reasonable doubt in their minds.
Therefore, By, “unanimous” means being of one thought; receiving the assent and agreement of all. indisputably.
Learn more about the court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
currently, the concept of white-collar crime focuses on the
The concept of white-collar crime currently focuses on the illegal activities committed by individuals in professional or business settings.
What is the primary emphasis on the concept of white-collar crime?White-collar crime primarily refers to non-violent offenses that are typically committed by individuals in positions of power, authority, or trust within corporate or professional settings.
It encompasses a range of illegal activities such as fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, money laundering, and tax evasion, among others.
Unlike traditional street crimes, white-collar crimes are characterized by their financial nature and their impact on businesses, organizations, and society as a whole.
White-collar crime investigations and prosecutions often involve complex financial transactions, corporate misconduct, regulatory violations, and breaches of professional ethics.
The focus is on the intentional or negligent actions of individuals who misuse their positions for personal gain or to deceive others for financial benefit.
The concept of white-collar crime recognizes the importance of holding individuals accountable for their actions in the business world and ensuring that justice is served.
Learn more about white-collar crime
brainly.com/question/1573032
#SPJ11
Which of these is true about a restraining order?
A. Restraining orders often require a great deal of evidence before
they are given.
B. It prevents a defendant from doing something that the defendant
has threatened to do.
C. There is a lengthy process involved in getting a restraining order.
D. Restraining orders are solely used in domestic violence situations.
Answer:
It prevents a defendant from doing something that the defendant has threatened to doExplanation:
Which of the following statements is true about foster homes?
A.The effectiveness of many foster home placements is inhibited by problems such as frequent movement of youths from home to home.
B.Unlike group homes, foster homes are closed, secure, community-based facilities excluded from both halfway-in and halfway-out programs.
C. Although foster homes are rarely used by juvenile courts in any jurisdiction, there are many sound evaluations of their effectiveness.
D. Foster homes are somewhat larger and frequently less family-like than group homes
The statement which is true about foster homes is Unlike group homes, foster homes are closed, secure, community-based facilities excluded from both halfway-in and halfway-out programs. Thus, option B is correct.
What is Foster homes?Foster homes are a home where an orphaned, neglected, or delinquent youngster is cared for. Prior to 1945, "fostering" refers to a variety of situations in which children were cared for in households other than their own. The concept was intended to contrast institutional care with family placements.
Foster homes give children who have been abused, neglected, or abandoned with protection, stability, and refuge. Fostering is a temporary care arrangement, with the ultimate objective of reuniting foster children with their natural relatives after they have been judged as capable of caring for them. Hence, option B is correct.
Learn more about Foster homes here:
https://brainly.com/question/29603747
#SPJ1
Under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if a lease does not state a clear expiration date, the lease is regarded as
Answer:
Hello. Under Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if the lease does not specify or make clear an expiration date, the lease will be regarded as: A tenancy from period-to-period.
Explanation:
Question does not ask for an explanation, so one will not be given. Have a nice day user.
can I have purple team rolve
Answer:
sure
Explanation:
dm him
Answer:
i also want purple team nah i want black team
What do you think of the court decision in the Hustler Magazine v. Moral Majority
case?
Do you agree with the court's decision that the Moral Majority's
use of the Hustler parody ad was fair use?
In the Hustler Magazine v. Moral Majority case, the court's decision was in favor of the defendant, ruling that the Moral Majority's use of the Hustler parody ad was fair use. The court determined that the ad was transformative in nature, using the original work to criticize and comment on the political views of Hustler's publisher, Larry Flynt. As a result, the use of the parody ad did not infringe on Hustler's copyright.The court's decision in this case is generally seen as a victory for the fair use doctrine and free speech. It reaffirmed that parody is a legitimate form of expression and that the use of copyrighted material for the purpose of parody does not necessarily constitute infringement. While some may have disagreed with the moral or political message conveyed by the parody ad, the court recognized that such criticism and commentary is an important part of the public discourse.In conclusion, I agree with the court's decision in this case. The parody ad was clearly transformative in nature and did not compete with the original work. Instead, it used the original work to comment on a matter of public concern. As such, it was a legitimate exercise of free speech and did not infringe on Hustler's copyright.
For more question like Court Decision visit the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28038485
#SPJ11
what is element if community policing?
Answer:
In general it is agreed that community policing involves problem-solving and community engagement with an emphasis on police-community partnerships to solve the underlying problems of crime, the fear of crime, physical and social disorder, and neighbourhood decay
Explanation:
I hope this helps you
Opening statements are just statements, and cannot be considered as evidence by the jury
True or False
Answer:
I say false
Explanation:
formal rules like minimum wage laws, insurance requirements, and worker safety requirements are examples of institutions that influence the aggregate .
Formal rules such as minimum wage laws, insurance requirements, and worker safety requirements are examples of institutions that influence the aggregate, or overall, functioning of an economy.
These rules are typically put in place by governments or regulatory bodies to establish standards and promote certain outcomes in areas such as labor markets, social welfare, and business practices.
Minimum wage laws, for instance, set a floor on the wages that employers must pay to their workers, ensuring a minimum level of income and potentially reducing income inequality. Insurance requirements mandate that individuals or businesses obtain specific types of insurance coverage to protect against potential risks and liabilities. Worker safety requirements aim to protect employees from hazards in the workplace, ensuring their well-being and reducing the incidence of workplace accidents or injuries.
These formal rules and institutions can have significant effects on various aspects of the economy. Minimum wage laws, for example, can impact labor market dynamics, wage levels, and income distribution. Insurance requirements can provide financial security and stability for individuals and businesses, while worker safety requirements can improve workplace conditions and productivity.
By establishing these formal rules, governments and regulatory bodies seek to create a framework that promotes fairness, social welfare, economic stability, and sustainable development. However, the effectiveness and impact of these institutions can vary depending on factors such as enforcement mechanisms, compliance rates, economic conditions, and societal factors.
To know more about Insurance visit
https://brainly.com/question/33622959
#SPJ11
Laws of conservation of mass
Answer:
mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations.
Explanation:
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer:According to "https://courses.lumenlearning.com/" "The law of conservation of mass states that mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations"
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>
- Zack Slocum
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
The owner of the property has the right to establish
certain rules on their property that may or may not be
part of the criminal code.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
owner of the land has the right to make rules and kick people off the land if they dont listen to the rules
True, the owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Thus option (a) is correct.
What is criminal code?The criminal code or criminal law is a system of laws that is concerned with crimes and the punishment for the persons who commit crimes.
The criminal prosecution involves the government to decide whether to punish an individual for either an act or an omission.
The most of the state has its own criminal code. In a criminal prosecution or proceedings , the burden of proof lies with the government and has to establish every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
The owner of the property has the right to establish certain rules on their property that may or may not be part of the criminal code. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about criminal code here:
https://brainly.com/question/24706076
#SPJ2
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Task With the aid of case law, discuss the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation and Damage, paying particular attention to duty and breach and apply these concepts to construction business. Guidance Note: You will need to cite case law for each principle that makes up the elements you discuss. You should then discuss how the principles apply to the construction workplace. Indicative word limit: 1800 words 40% of the grade
The legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are essential in the construction industry. Duty of Care refers to the responsibility that a person owes to another to ensure that they do not cause harm.
Breach of Duty of Care occurs when a person fails to take reasonable care and this failure causes harm to another. Causation is when the failure to take reasonable care is the cause of the harm. Damage refers to the harm suffered by the injured party.In the construction industry, the duty of care is owed by employers to employees, contractors, and members of the public who may be affected by their actions. The duty of care is also owed by the employees to their employers and co-workers.
A breach of duty of care can occur in many ways. An employer may fail to provide the necessary safety equipment or training to employees, which can cause harm. An employee may fail to follow safety procedures, which can cause harm to themselves or others.The case law that illustrates the concept of Duty of Care is Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). In this case, the claimant bought a bottle of ginger beer from a shop and found a decomposed snail inside the bottle. The claimant suffered from shock and gastroenteritis.
The court held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to the ultimate consumer to ensure that the product was safe.The case law that illustrates the concept of Breach of Duty of Care is Nettleship v Weston (1971). In this case, a learner driver was being taught by her friend and was involved in a car accident. The court held that the learner driver was responsible for the accident, and her friend, the instructor, was held liable for the injuries caused.The case law that illustrates the concept of Causation is Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee (1969).
In this case, the claimant went to the hospital complaining of stomach pains and vomiting. The doctor on duty sent him home, and he died later that night from arsenic poisoning. The court held that the hospital was not liable for the death of the claimant as the failure to diagnose the condition was not the cause of the death.
The case law that illustrates the concept of Damage is Hughes v Lord Advocate (1963). In this case, the defendant left a manhole on the road with no warning signs. The claimant fell into the hole and suffered burns from molten tar. The court held that the defendant was liable for the injuries caused to the claimant as he failed to provide a warning of the danger.
In conclusion, the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are significant in the construction industry. These principles ensure that employers, employees, and members of the public are protected from harm. It is the responsibility of all parties to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others.
To know more about Duty of Care visit-
brainly.com/question/30782971
#SPJ11
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
porhibiting same-sex marriage and the associated government guaranteed spousal rights and benefits: ruled unconstitutional in obergefell v. hodges (2015) prohibiting same-sex marriage and the associated government guaranteed spousal rights and benefits: newly protected from discrimination by a 2020 supreme court ruling; previously illegal in 23 states and washington d.c. prohibiting openly lgtbq from serving in the military: ruled unconstitutional in obergefell v. hodges (2015) landlords; house sellers; and private lenders discriminate against lgbtq persons in access to housing and mortgages: outlawed in many states and municipalities by statute. now illegal nationally under federal law due to 2020 supreme court decision in bostock v. clayton county 590 u.s. (2020) public and private employers deny employment based on sexual orientation or gender identity: ended via an executive order issued by president barack obama in 2011
It is a series of statements about legal developments related to LGBTQ+ rights in the United States.
The statements highlight the following legal developments:
The prohibition of same-sex marriage and associated spousal rights was ruled unconstitutional in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015).
Discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in employment was ended via an executive order issued by President Barack Obama in 2011.
Prohibitions on openly LGBTQ+ individuals serving in the military were ruled unconstitutional in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015).
Discrimination against LGBTQ+ persons in access to housing and mortgages has been outlawed in many states and municipalities by statute and is now illegal nationally under federal law due to the 2020 Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (590 U.S. (2020)).
These legal developments have contributed to greater protections for LGBTQ+ individuals in the United States.
Learn more about rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10710431
#SPJ11
extortion of public officials is called extortion under color of official right. T/F
True. Extortion of public officials is indeed called "extortion under color of official right."
"Extortion under color of official right" refers to the act of public officials unlawfully obtaining property or money from others by exploiting their position and authority. This term is commonly used in legal contexts to describe situations where public officials abuse their power to demand bribes, kickbacks, or other forms of illicit benefits in exchange for performing their official duties or granting favors. It is a form of corruption that involves the misuse of public office for personal gain. Therefore, it is accurate to state that the extortion of public officials is referred to as "extortion under color of official right."
Learn more about extortion here:
https://brainly.com/question/15286343
#SPJ11
although in gitlow v new york, the supreme court established the fourteenth amendment's jurisdiction over the states, when it came to free speech, which of the following was also true
In Gitlow v. New York, the Supreme Court established that the Fourteenth Amendment's jurisdiction applied to the states regarding free speech. This means that the protections of free speech in the First Amendment were incorporated and applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
In Gitlow v. New York, although the Supreme Court established the Fourteenth Amendment's jurisdiction over the states, it also reaffirmed the idea that states could regulate speech that could lead to violence or overthrow of the government.Gitlow v. New York was a US Supreme Court case heard in 1925. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist, for violating the New York Criminal Anarchy Law. The Supreme Court's decision was a significant milestone in the development of American free speech jurisprudence. The Court upheld Gitlow's conviction while also establishing that the Bill of Rights extended to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Learn more about Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/15111973
#SPJ11
The Internal Revenue Service creates the tax laws. a) True b) False Question 2 (4 points) Taxpayers appeal adverse decisions by the U.S. Tax Court to the U.S. Supreme Court. a) True b) False
Taxpayer
"False". The statement "The Internal Revenue Service creates the tax laws" is false. The IRS (Internal Revenue Service) is a government agency responsible for enforcing and administering the tax laws enacted by Congress.
The U.S. Congress is the main entity responsible for creating and passing tax laws in the United States. Tax laws can be found in the Internal Revenue Code, which is a set of federal tax laws that are enforced by the IRS.In addition, the answer to the second question is also "False". The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and has the power to hear cases from lower courts. However, taxpayers do not have the right to appeal adverse decisions by the U.S. Tax Court to the U.S. Supreme Court. Taxpayers can only appeal these decisions to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Learn more about Internal Revenue Code: https://brainly.com/question/32253511
#SPJ11
Order the steps in a lawsuit chronologically
= Voir dire
= The defendant's case
= The discovery process begins
= Jury instructions
= Service of process on the defendant
= The settlement conference
= File the complaint
= The plaintiff's case
= Judgment
= Closing arguments
Answer:
The Trial Process
This webpage presents an overview of the formal processes and proceedings in any civil trial and a link to separate webpage that presents the specific chronology of events in the Woburn Toxic Trial. Links are also available to videoclips of Ohio State University students performing these tasks in a mock trial.
There are four main stages to a trial. In sequence, they are:
Pleading Stage - filing the complaint and the defense's motions.
Pretrial Stage - discovery process, finding of facts.
Trial Stage - seating of the jury, testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs and testimony on behalf of the defendants.
Post Trial - concluding arguments, judge's charge to the jury, jury deliberations, announcement of judgment, motions for new trial or appeal.
Pleading Stage
Filing a Complaint - In civil proceedings the complaint is the official engagement of the plaintiff with the defense regarding the proposed "injustice" caused by the defense. This is a formal document submitted by the plaintiff to the court having jurisdiction over the complaint.
Summons - Notification by the court in which the complaint is filed as an action being brought against the defense. Service of the summons typically requires a response from the defense within a 30-day period. No response from the defense can trigger a default judgment for the plaintiff.
Motions to Dismiss - These are the defense's response or answers to the plaintiffs complaint. The responses are typically filed as motions and are intended to dismiss the claims expressed in the complaint.
Motion for Judgment - Following the defendants response to the plaintiffs claims, the parties can either choose to settle or request a judgment based on the evidence presented, or the court can decide to continue toward resolving conflict at trial. If there is no judgment made, the case proceeds to the pre-trial stage.
Pretrial Stage
Discovery or Finding of Facts - There are generally two aspects of discovery. One consists of a series of questions, known as interrogatory questions, which are posed by the plaintiff's attorney to the defendant's attorney. The other consists of recording a witnesses sworn testimony, known as a deposition. Depositions typically take place outside the courtroom, before a court recorder, with opposing counsel asking questions of the witness.
Motion for Summary Judgment - At the conclusion of discovery, the court will typically review the facts of the case and determine if there is sufficient merit to proceed to trial or to encourage the parties to settle. If the finding of facts determines the case to be frivolous or non-substantiated, the case is dismissed.
Pretrial Order - If a substantial basis for the case is determined, the court will meet with and notify the parties of the trial schedule.
The Trial
Jury Selection - From a pool of potential jurors, individuals are questioned in a process known as voire dire to determine suitability to serve as impartial juror in the specific case. The judge and counsel for both parties are involved in voire dire process, with each party trying to impanel individuals who may be sympathetic to their cause.
Opening Statements - Statements to the jury made first by the plaintiffs' attorney and then by the defense attorneys setting up the circumstances and rationale of the legal complaint (plaintiffs) and the reasons for dismissing the claim (defense).
Click here to see a videoclip of opening statements from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Plaintiff Testimony - The first part of the actual trial proceeding consists of the plaintiffs presenting their witnesses and experts to present the arguments and justifications for the complaint. The defense is permitted to cross-examine each witness in an attempt to dismiss, discredit, or disprove the witnesses statements.
Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Defense Testimony - After the plaintiffs' case is presented, the defendants present their case in much the same way using witnesses and experts that present direct testimony, followed by cross examination by the plaintiffs' counsel.
Click here to see a videoclip of cross examination from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Redirection and Recall - At the discretion of the judge, each witness can be redirected after cross examination by either the counsel. If critical information is not divulged during the initial testimony, counsel can request to recall a witness to the stand for additional questioning and cross examination.
Closing Arguments - Counsel for the plaintiffs and defense summarize their clients positions to remind the jurors of the facts presented in their case and to convince the jurors of veracity of their cause. Closing arguments are typically intended to be dramatic and pointed for effect.
Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Explanation:
what is the maximum fine that can be levied for committing a felony?
A felony is an offense which when is declared and proven beyond reasonable by a jury of their respective peers to be a felony or, if not declared to be a misdemeanor, is punishable, without proof of previous conviction, with death, or with imprisonment for three years or more penalties however vary from states to states.
Penalties for a California Felony Conviction for instance include imprisonment in a state prison or county jail, and a fine up to $10,000. However, the judge has the discretion to sentence a defendant to formal felony probation.
Consider learning more about civil cases here
https://brainly.com/question/12868966
#SPJ4
Liability as an accomplice does not extend to negligent and reckless conduct on the part of a
primary actor that results in a criminal offense.
False
True
Which of the following is most true?
a. Illegal harassment and discrimination can apply to any protected category.
b. Illegal harassment and discrimination only applies to sex and gender.
c. Any type of harassment or discrimination is illegal.
d. Company policies cannot be more restrictive than the law requires.
The most accurate statement is that any type of harassment or discrimination is illegal. (option c)This answer is consistent with U.S. federal and state laws, as well as international conventions, which generally prohibit discrimination and harassment based on race, sex, age, disability, religion, national origin, and other protected categories.
In addition, harassment and discrimination can take many forms, such as unwelcome conduct that creates a hostile or offensive work environment, unfair treatment in employment decisions, and retaliation against employees who complain about discrimination or harassment. Therefore, it is important for employers to have policies and training programs that promote diversity, inclusion, and respect in the workplace.
Company policies can be more restrictive than the law requires, as long as they do not discriminate or retaliate against employees who engage in protected activities. However, it is recommended to ensure that company policies align with the law. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state human rights agencies are responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and employees who believe they have been harassed or discriminated against can file a complaint with these agencies or pursue legal action.
To know more about harassment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32417535
#SPJ11
Which organization is primarily responsible for controlled substance and narcotics enforcement at the
federal level?
How Can We Obtain Divorce Certificate in Pakistan?
Answer:
The Process to get the divorce certificate in Pakistan is very long and difficult. ...
1- Provide the legal documents.
2- Prepare the application for a divorce certificate.
3- File the Application in court for a divorce certificate.
4- After proceeding, you can easily get the divorce certificate.
By age 2, children __________. Select one: a. take turns in face-to-face interaction b. can infer a speaker's indirectly expressed intention c. adjust their speech to fit the age of their listeners d. adjust their speech to fit the social status of their listeners
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because you cant expect a baby to talk to you face-to-face, and they won't do c or d either.
Question 1: Does this new law violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? If it does, what section(s) and why?
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, I provided explanations about the Charter of Rights and Freedoms law.
Explanation:
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms law is a law applied in Canada, which was first signed as law dating back to the year 1982. It basically consists of laws meant to safeguard the rights and freedoms of citizens, such as their:
freedom of expression,right to equality, andright to privacy, etc.When analyzing a Supreme Court ruling, which step answers the question "which
part(s) of the Constitution did the Court use?"
Answer: to overturn unconstitutional legislation
Explanation: