Describe what happened at the Hartford Convention

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

The Federalist Party of New England meets to talk about the War of 1812.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

Related Questions

Describe the government of Sudan and the challenges it is currently facing,

Easy answer

Will report any answers not related to this question

Answers

The problems in sudan are: Conflict, abuse, protestors, torture, arbitrary detentions, malicious prosecutions, harassment, restrictions on the media, sexual violence, discrimination, limited freedom of religion, refugees and migrants, and much more

The type of government sudan is: authoritarianism, one-party state. it takes place in the framework of a federal provisional government under a socialist military dictatorship.

What makes a nation, a nation? How do we define "nation"?

Answers

A countryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

A nation is a stable community of humans formed on the basis of a common language, territory, history, ethnicity

Is it important to remember things that have happened in the past why or why not

Answers

Answer:

Yes, it is

Explanation:

It is, so we can learn from out mistakes. And it is fun to learn about what other people did back then to survive, and what laws they had, or if they had any.

Yes, in order to grow we must learn from our mistakes. Ours as in us personally, as well as us as in humanity

What were the similarities and differences between the federalists and democratic republicans?

Answers

Answer:

The Federalists believed that American foreign policy should favor British interests, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to strengthen ties with the French. The Democratic-Republicans supported the government that had taken over France after the revolution of 1789.

Explanation:

why is it difficult to grow quinoa (disincentives) and the incentives for growing other crops list three for each.

Answers

Pests found in quinoa farming include the tarnished plant bug, stem borer, flea beetles, aphids, leafhoppers, and beet armyworm.

What are the disadvantages of this plant?

Even in this case, however, there is a disadvantage. Quinoa, in fact, contains a number of irritant toxic compounds for the intestines that can cause inflammation, digestive issues, and nutrient absorption problems. Too much quinoa on your plate can cause stomach pain, diarrhoea, bloating, and discomfort. This occurs because your body cannot handle an excessive amount of fibre. It also contains saponins, a naturally occurring chemical that can cause stomach problems if quinoa is not thoroughly washed.

To know about Quinoa visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30440857

#SPJ1

points)
The American, French and Latin American revolutions all stemmed from ideas of the
Enlightenment.
Which answer below describes the ideas these revolutions adhered to?

Answers

As the American, French and Latin American revolutions all stemmed from ideas of the Enlightenment, the answer that describes the ideas these revolutions adhered to includes the limited government, natural rights, self-determination and social contract.

What was the Enlightenment ideas?

The idea stemmed from enlightenment era which was a social movement in which ideas concerning God, reason, nature and humanity were synthesized into a worldview that gained assent and that instigated the revolutionary developments in art, philosophy, and politics.

In an overview, this enlightenment included series of ideas centered on the value of human happiness, the pursuit of knowledge obtained by means of reason, ideals such as liberty, progress, toleration, fraternity, constitutional government as well as the separation of church and state.

Therefore, the answer that describes the ideas these revolutions adhered to includes the limited government, natural rights, self-determination and social contract. Therefore, the Option D is correct.

Answers

The statement that correctly indicates the order of events in evolutionary history, from earliest to most recent are: roots, vascular tissue, pollen, flowers.

What is the order of events in evolutionary history, from earliest to most recent?

Roots, vascular tissue, pollen, and flowers are all key features of modern plants, and have played an important role in the evolutionary success of the plant kingdom.

Roots:

Roots are underground structures that anchor plants in the soil and absorb water and nutrients from the surrounding environment.

Vascular tissue:

Vascular tissue is a specialized type of tissue that transports water, nutrients, and other substances throughout the plant.

Pollen:

Pollen is a structure produced by male plants that contains the sperm cells needed for reproduction.

Flowers:

Flowers are the reproductive structures of modern plants, and are involved in the production of both male and female reproductive cells.

Learn more about Vascular tissue here:https://brainly.com/question/1133040

#SPJ1

The purpose of randomization or random assignment is to
A: eliminate participants who are too indecisive.
B: make the experiment impressively complicated.
C: prevent psychics from distorting the results through paranormal influences.
D: control confounding variables by equalizing the experimental conditions.

Answers

The correct option is (D). The purpose of randomization or random assignment is to control confounding variables by equalizing the experimental conditions.

Randomization or random assignment:

A randomization method, such as a chance procedure or a random number generator, is used to randomly assign human or animal subjects to different groups in an experiment. This method is also known as random assignment or random placement.

Imagine a study seeking to determine whether consuming caffeinated beverages before an exam can enhance test performance. Each participant is randomly allocated to either the control group or the experimental group after a pool of participants is drawn at random assignment.

By assigning participants at random, it is possible to prevent systematic differences between and within groups from existing at the commencement of the experiment. As a result, it is safer to attribute any differences between groups that are noted at the end of the trial to the methods or treatments used.

Learn more about random assignment here:

https://brainly.com/question/9423006

#SPJ1

According to Corwin, what is the major issue that a victory in a war with Mexico will cause?

European nations will attack the US in order to defend Mexico

Many Americans will turn against the war and oppose the government

The Whig party will lose votes if they support the war

Once the US wins, slave owners will want to expand slavery into the new territories causing friction between the North and South

Answers

According to Corwin, the major issue that a victory in a war with Mexico will cause is that once the US wins, slave owners will want to expand slavery into the new territories.

How does victory in war with Mexico contribute to friction?

Corwin's analysis highlights that a victory in the war with Mexico would lead to a issue concerning the expansion of slavery into the newly acquired territories. The conflict arises from the fact that Southern slave owners would seek to extend their institution into these region.

But Northern states who were driven by abolitionist sentiments would vehemently oppose such expansion. This potential clash between the North and South over the issue of slavery would exacerbate existing tensions and could further strain the unity of the nation.

Answers

Steven is most likely an Anti-Federalist, opposing a powerful central government and Alexander Hamilton's financial plan.

Based on the information provided, Steven, as a politically active planter from North Carolina who opposes a powerful central government and the financial plan of Alexander Hamilton, is most likely an Anti-Federalist.The Anti-Federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and advocated for strong state governments with limited federal power. They believed that a powerful central government would undermine individual liberties and the rights of the states. Steven's opposition to a powerful central government aligns with the core principles of Anti-Federalism.Furthermore, Steven's opposition to Alexander Hamilton's financial plan suggests a stance against a strong federal government's intervention in economic affairs. Hamilton's financial plan aimed to consolidate and strengthen federal authority over fiscal matters, including the assumption of state debts and the establishment of a national bank. Steven's disagreement with Hamilton's financial plan further aligns with the Anti-Federalist position of limited federal control.In conclusion, based on his opposition to a powerful central government and Alexander Hamilton's financial plan, Steven is most likely an Anti-Federalist.

For more questions on government

https://brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ8

What role did the British navy play in causing the War of 1812?

Answers

Answer:

The Royal Navy also outraged Americans by its practice of impressment, or removing seamen from U.S. merchant vessels and forcing them to serve on behalf of the British. Hope that helps!!

Explanation:

Answer:

The Royal Navy also outraged Americans by its practice of impressment, or removing seamen from U.S. merchant vessels and forcing them to serve on behalf of the British

Britain relied on a maritime economic blockade to defeat France. When American merchants tried to exploit their neutral status to breach this blockade, the British introduced new laws, the 'Orders in Council', to block this trading. ... Britain was in a total war with France.

The immediate causes of the War of 1812 were a series of economic sanctions taken by the British and French against the US as part of the Napoleonic Wars and American outrage at the British practice of impressment, especially after the Chesapeake incident of 1807.

MATCH ASAP

Philosophe

[ Choose ]

John Locke

[ Choose ]

Thomas Hobbes

[ Choose ]

Newtonian World View

[ Choose ]

Voltaire

[ Choose ]

Toleration

[ Choose ]

Montesquieu

[ Choose ]

Checks and Balances

[ Choose ]

Cesare Beccaria

[ Choose ]

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

[ Choose ]

Mary Wollstonecraft

[ Choose ]

17th and 18th century thinkers who often wrote and critiqued human nature and natural laws that forged new attitudes favorable to change

an early political philosopher from England who believed people were generally good natured and capable of governing themselves through direct democracy, established the natural rights: life, liberty, and property

an early political philosopher from England who believed people were generally selfish, mean spirited, and prone to violence – requiring that a strong absolute ruler maintain law and order as people could not maintain it on their own

a system of scientific and philosophical beliefs commonly accepted in the 1600s and 1700s, based in determinism, materialism, and reductionism – encouraged political and commercial stability particularly in England during the 18th century

The most influential French philosopher who believed in freedom of speech, religious toleration, and separation of church and state but also believed in the necessity of a strong central ruler who allowed Enlightenment ideals to flourish

the enlightenment ideal that suggests people of varying views should more or less be allowed to hold those views free from persecution – it was later criticized by Kant

a French enlightenment thinker who admired the British form of constitutional government, he suggested the best governments have provisions in place that limit the power of the king and alluded to the separation of branches, as well as checks and balances

the notion that no one person or branch in government should hold more power than the other, so provisions and powers should be put in place that keep each branch vulnerable to the authority of another

his most famous work, On Crime and Punishment, called for the abolition of capital punishment, equal punishment under the law, and the doing away with torture or cruel, unusual punishments

this Enlightenment philosophe was actually opposed to several enlightenment ideals because he suggested they corrupted mankind who was otherwise a “noble savage,” disliked materialism and the over-importance of land and wealth accumulation

this Englishwoman believed enlightenment ideals should not be confined to the male experience and encouraged women to receive a diverse and enlightened education

Answers

Matching the philosophical personalities with the ideologies that they advocated for is as follows:

Philosophe:

17th and 18th-century thinkers often wrote and critiqued human nature and natural laws that forged new attitudes favorable to change.

John Locke:

an early political philosopher from England who believed people were generally good-natured and capable of governing themselves through direct democracy, established the natural rights of life, liberty, and property.

Thomas Hobbes:

an early political philosopher from England who believed people were generally selfish, mean-spirited, and prone to violence – requiring that a strong absolute ruler maintain law and order as people could not maintain it on their own.

Newtonian World View:

a system of scientific and philosophical beliefs commonly accepted in the 1600s and 1700s, based on determinism, materialism, and reductionism – encouraged political and commercial stability particularly in England during the 18th century.

Voltaire:

The most influential French philosopher believed in freedom of speech, religious toleration, and separation of church and state but also believed in the necessity of a strong central ruler who allowed Enlightenment ideals to flourish.

Toleration:

the enlightenment ideal that suggests people of varying views should more or less be allowed to hold those views free from persecution – it was later criticized by Kant.

Montesquieu:

a French enlightenment thinker who admired the British form of constitutional government, he suggested the best governments have provisions in place that limit the power of the king and alluded to the separation of branches, as well as checks and balances.

Checks and Balances:

the notion that no one person or branch in government should hold more power than the other, so provisions and powers should be put in place that keeps each branch vulnerable to the authority of another.

Cesare Beccaria:

his most famous work, On Crime and Punishment, called for the abolition of capital punishment, equal punishment under the law, and the doing away with torture or cruel, unusual punishments.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau:

this Enlightenment philosophe was opposed to several enlightenment ideals because he suggested they corrupted mankind who was otherwise a “noble savage,” disliked materialism and the over-importance of land and wealth accumulation.

Mary Wollstonecraft:

this Englishwoman believed enlightenment ideals should not be confined to the male experience and encouraged women to receive a diverse and enlightened education.

Thus, the personalities and terms have been matched to the described ideas.

Learn more about the Enlightenment at https://brainly.com/question/12481854

#SPJ1

During the election of 1860, Abraham Lincoln

Answers

Answer:

The 1860 United States presidential election was the 19th quadrennial presidential election. It was held on Tuesday, November 6, 1860. In a four-way contest, the Republican Party ticket of Abraham Lincoln and Hannibal Hamlin emerged triumphant. Lincoln's election served as the primary catalyst of the American Civil War.

Explanation:

Answer:

did not win the support of any Southern states.

Explanation:

What role did taxes play in the French Revolution

Answers

Taxes were a cause of the French Revolution since the commoners were expected to pay more than the aristocrats, the French regime was bias and unfair towards lower classes

What was the result of Korematsu v. United States regarding the imprisonment of Japanese Americans during World War II? Do you agree or disagree with their decision? Answer in 3-5 sentences.

Answers

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the government's decision to intern Japanese Americans during World War II as a necessary measure to protect national security during wartime.

I agree with decision in Korematsu v. US (1944) as its created a separate standard of review for a law utilizing a suspect classification.

What is the Case of Korematsu v. US (1944) about?

Korematsu v. United States, landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, upheld the Japanese Americans' exclusion from the West Coast Military Area during World War II. The decision has been widely criticized with some scholars describing it as "an odious and discredited artifact of popular bigotry and as "a stain on American jurisprudence".

This federal case is cited as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions in history. In his majority opinion in the 2018 case of Trump v. Hawaii, Chief Justice John Roberts explicitly rejected the Korematsu decision.

Answers

Religion played an important role in forming Japanese, was NOT true of Japanese religion. As they believe in Shinto rituals.

What is the major role of Shintoism in the lives of the Japanese?

Shinto is an upbeat religion, based on the belief that individuals are essentially good and that evil is inflicted by malevolent spirits. As a response, most Shinto ceremonies involve cleanliness, prayers, and sacrifices to the kami in order to ward off evil spirits.

Thus, option A is correct.

For further details about major role of Shintoism in the lives of the Japanese, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2065531?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ1

in the late 1800s how many sick days dis workers receive

Answers

Answer:

zero

Explanation:

They were allowed none due to bad labor conditions as many unions had not formed by then.

What was the historic moment that lead to the start of World War 1? Was it the assassination of the Emperor of Austria?

Answers

The historic moment that led to the start of World War 1 was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria.

On June 28, 1914, Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, was assassinated in Sarajevo by a Serbian nationalist named Gavrilo Princip. This event triggered a chain reaction of events that ultimately resulted in the outbreak of the war.

Following the assassination, Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia, demanding compliance with a set of conditions. When Serbia did not fully meet these demands, Austria-Hungary declared war on July 28, 1914. This led to a series of alliances and counter-alliances among European powers, escalating the conflict into a full-scale war.

The assassination of the Archduke can be seen as the spark that ignited the tensions and rivalries among the major powers of Europe. It exposed the deep-rooted political and ethnic tensions in the region and ultimately set the stage for the devastating conflict that became known as World War 1.

For more questions on historic moment

https://brainly.com/question/24513174

#SPJ8

match the terms with their definitions

Answers

Answer:

what are the options?

Explanation:

Answer:there’s no terms...

Explanation:

Which of the following choices correctly matches the Gilded Age philosophy with its beliefs?
Gospel of Wealth: rich people should use their money to build schools, libraries, and hospitals for the poor
Individualism: only the fittest survive
Social Darwinism: sometimes people fail due to circumstances that are out of their control
Naturalism: anyone can succeed in America with enough hard work and determination

Answers

Answer:

Social Darwinism: sometimes people fail due to circumstances that are out of their control

current event related to the Great London smog

Answers

Great Smog of London, lethal smog that covered the city of London for five days (December 5–9) in 1952, caused by a combination of industrial pollution and high-pressure weather conditions. This combination of smoke and fog brought the city to a near standstill and resulted in thousands of deaths.Oct 8, 2022

As the events takes place, lethal smog that covered the city of London for five days (December 5–9) in 1952, was caused by a combination of industrial pollution and high-pressure weather conditions.

What are the events?

The event, incident, episode, and scenario all refer to an occurrence or occurrence. A happening that occurs without intention, choice, or plan is referred to as an occurrence. a fortuitous meeting that happened to occur. the event often denotes a significant occurrence, with a reason before it.

The term is related to the Events that the city has come a long way since the infamous, 'pea-soup' Great Smog of 1952, and air pollution has become less visible in the capital, but it still presents severe health and economic.

Therefore, By the event related to the Great London smog, Was caused by pollution and high-pressure weather

Learn more about events here:

https://brainly.com/question/12961938

#SPJ2

How have African-Americans historically dealt with oppression and self-identity in this country? Offer some reasons why.

Answers

Answer:

Ever sense the African-Americans we're brought over, they struggled with their identity due to the lack of education of later generation and lies that were fed into their minds to hide truths. also delt with oppression due to being "different" and "not equal"

Question 1 of 10
In the Asch experiment, what decreased conformity?
OA. When the group was attractive
OB. When everyone said the same thing
C. When one of the confederates didn't agree
OD. When there were at least three people in the group

Answers

In the Asch experiment, what decreased conformity? Option C, when one of the confederates didn't agree, decreased conformity in the Asch experiment.

In the Asch experiment, the factor that decreased conformity was when one of the confederates didn't agree (option C). The Asch conformity experiment was conducted in the 1950s by Solomon Asch to investigate the extent to which people conform to social pressure. In the experiment, participants were shown a series of lines and were asked to identify which line was the same length as a standard line. However, the majority of the participants were confederates who purposely gave incorrect answers.When one of the confederates didn't agree with the incorrect responses and instead provided the correct answer, it created a discrepancy between the majority and the dissenter. This led to a decrease in conformity among the real participants. The presence of a dissenting voice allowed the participants to feel more confident in their own judgment and resist the influence of the majority.The Asch experiment demonstrated the power of social influence and the tendency of individuals to conform to group norms. However, the presence of a dissenting individual provided a counterbalance and allowed participants to maintain their independence and resist conformity.

For more questions on Asch experiment.

https://brainly.com/question/23670018

#SPJ8

Civics Lesson 5: Extension Activity
Essential Question: Should the Electoral College Be Abolished?
The 2000 election and its aftermath prompted renewed debate over our
system for electing the President and Vice President
By Kay Maxwell, Robert Hardaway
YES
When the Constitution was written, the typical voter had few opportunities to learn about presidential candidates, so
the job of choosing the President was given to the Electoral College: Electors, who were appointed by their states.
were better educated than average citizens, who were not thought capable of making an informed choice.
Today, with universal education, TV, radio, newspapers, and the Internet, voters can learn about candidates for
themselves. And they should be trusted to choose their President.
The Electoral College is unfair in several ways. First, it gives more weight to votes cast in small states. (Each state's
electoral votes are equal to the number of members it has in the House and Senate combined.) Second, because the
Electoral College is "winner take all" in all but two states (Maine and Nebraska), people who disagree with the
majority in their state are not represented. Finally, the system allows the election of a President who does not have
the support of a majority of voters.
Without the Electoral College, candidates would campaign to get as many individual votes as possible in every state,
instead of focusing on states that provide key electoral votes. Each vote would make a difference and voters would
diel they truly had a stake in the elections, which could lead to increasted voting across the country. With a system of
direct election, all votes would be equally important and equally sought after. We need to abolish the Electoral
College and make our presidential elections one person, one vote.
-Kay J. Maxwell
President, League of Women Voters
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: Read the above opinion that provides a “Yes”
answer to the essential question and answer the questions below:
1. What is the author claiming?
2. What evidence does the author use to support their claim?
3. What is the reasoning behind using the evidence to support the claim
(make a connection between the two):

Answers

These are the answers to the question

What the author is claiming in this passage is that the use of the electoral college as the way of picking the president is outdated, unfair as well as disadvantageous to the people of the United States.The evidence that the author used to back up the claim has to do with the use of these two states Nebraska and Maine. These are states that are small but may favor the president who may be elected even tough he is not the choice of the people.The reason I used this evidence to support my claim is that the states mentioned may not even produce the same number of votes like other states if the president was to be picked by the citizens solely. But despite their sizes, they still have the ability to make same picks as the large states.

What is the electoral colleges?

This is the way that the president of the United States has to be chosen. This is different from the methods where the citizens are solely responsible for choosing the president.

Read more on the electoral college here: https://brainly.com/question/13474496

#SPJ1

Which of the following individuals had the greatest impact on the economic policy of the Washington administration?

Answers

Alexander Hamilton had the largest influence on the economic policies of the Weimar period with his concept for the first United States Bank of Commerce.

The Weimar Republic, formally known as the German Reich, was the administration of Germany during 1918 to 1933, during which time it was the first constitutional federal republic in history; as a result, it is also known as, and unofficially declared itself, the German Republic. The state's informal name is taken from the city of Weimar, who held the regional parliament that formed its administration. In English, this republic is mainly referred to as "Germany," with the term "Weimar Republic" not becoming popular until the 1930s. The Economic Crisis of October 1929 had a significant influence on Germany's shaky growth; massive unemployment and ensuing social and political upheaval led to the coalition government's demise.

Learn more about coalition here

https://brainly.com/question/12405194

#SPJ4

Which of these conflicts resulted in a defeat for the U.S. Army?

the Battle of Bear Valley
the Sand Creek Massacre
the Battle of Little Bighorn
the Wounded Knee Massacre

Answers

Answer:

the Battle of Little Bighorn

can i get a brinlest

Explanation:

Options:

☐ the Battle of Bear Valley

☐ the Sand Creek Massacre

☐ the Battle of Little Bighorn

☐ the Wounded Knee Massacre

✔Answer✔:

☐ the Battle of Bear Valley

☐ the Sand Creek Massacre

☑ the Battle of Little Bighorn

☐ the Wounded Knee Massacre

(The answer has a ☑ instead of a ☐)

Despite this opinion, Jefferson Davis decided not to send reinforcements to help the besieged town. Why do you think he made that choice? (Hint: Look at the dates and think of the time period)

Answers

Answer:

Without knowing the specific context and dates referred to in the question, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, assuming that the question is referring to a specific event during the American Civil War, it is possible to speculate on some reasons why Jefferson Davis might have chosen not to send reinforcements to a besieged town.

During the Civil War, the Confederacy faced significant challenges in terms of resources and manpower. The Confederacy was often stretched thin, particularly in the later years of the war, and was forced to make difficult choices about where to allocate its limited resources. As a result, Davis may have decided not to send reinforcements to a besieged town because he believed that the Confederacy simply did not have the resources to spare.

Another factor that may have influenced Davis's decision was the political and military situation at the time. Depending on the specific event in question, Davis may have been facing pressure from other Confederate leaders or from the public to focus on other priorities, such as defending the capital or winning a major battle. Additionally, Davis may have been concerned about the potential consequences of sending reinforcements, such as leaving other areas vulnerable to attack or further depleting the Confederacy's already-limited resources.

Overall, the decision not to send reinforcements to a besieged town during the Civil War likely involved a complex set of factors, including resource constraints, political pressure, and military considerations.

During the American Civil War, Jefferson Davis chose not to send reinforcements to Vicksburg during the siege because the Confederate army was also facing critical battles in other regions, such as Gettysburg in the east. Davis likely prioritized allocating resources to multiple fronts simultaneously, making it difficult to provide immediate assistance to Vicksburg.

Jefferson Davis made the decision not to send reinforcements to the besieged town of Vicksburg for several reasons. Firstly, the timing of the siege coincided with other crucial battles in the American Civil War, such as the Battle of Gettysburg. Davis had to allocate resources and troops to multiple fronts simultaneously, making it challenging to provide immediate aid to Vicksburg. Secondly, the geographical obstacles presented a significant challenge. Vicksburg was located on high bluffs along the Mississippi River, making it difficult to supply and reinforce the town. Additionally, Union forces had effectively cut off the city's access to the river, further limiting the Confederacy's ability to support Vicksburg.

Given these circumstances, Davis likely calculated that diverting resources from other critical fronts would be unwise and opted to concentrate efforts elsewhere.

Note: The complete question is:

Jefferson Davis called Vicksburg the "Nail that holds the Confederacy together" because it linked western Confederate states (LA, TX, AR) to eastern Confederate states. Despite this opinion, Jefferson Davis decided not to send reinforcements to help the besieged town. Why do you think he made that choice? (Hint: Look at the dates and think of the time period)

For more questions on American Civil War:

https://brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ8

Why was communism appealing to Europeans in the 1930’s

Answers

Answer:

See Explanation...

Explanation:

Communism was a new social system that allowed for everyone to have a chance. The workers in society, especially those in Russia, had been ignored, despite being the countries foundation and essential people. They started a revolution so they could be equal to those on top. In these times the working class were starving whilst higher classes had a satisfying life. The same was happening in many countries and they followed in Russia's footsteps (despite the original idea of Communism originating in Germany). Soon much of Asia was Communist, but a lot of the time ruthless dictators who ruled the country bent the rules and changed the original idea of Communism to fit their lifestyle.

European exploration had both positive and negative repercussions. List several of these effects and describe the impact they made on the people of Europe and on the greater world.

Answers

Answer:
Here you go!

Explanation:
Positive:
-Established new trade routes between India and Portugal which help these countries to become wealthier.
-The age of exploration vastly increased Europeans knowledge of the world.
-Made new Alliances.
-New Land.
-Trade.
-Showed that it was possible to sail around the world.

Negative:
-New diseases killed many native people.
-Forced religion
-Civilizations were destroyed

If we accept moral or cultural relativism, would it make sense to talk abc
moral progress? Why? What would be the basis for understanding moral
rogress?

Answers

If we accept moral or cultural relativism, the concept of moral progress becomes problematic.

Is moral progress possible in a relativistic framework?

In moral relativism, there is no objective standard by which to measure moral progress since moral values and norms are determined by individual cultures or personal beliefs. What may be considered morally progressive in one culture may be seen as regressive or even immoral in another.

So, without universal standard for morality, the notion of moral progress loses its foundation. Progress implies a movement towards an objectively better state, but in relativism, what is considered better or worse is subjective.