Congress enacted a statute prohibiting discrimination in the rental of residential property anywhere in the United States on the basis of sexual orientation or preference by any person or entity, public or private.
What provision of the Constitution is the strongest basis for Congress's authority to enact this statute?

Answer: The approach to foreign policy that involves sending ambassadors to other countries is Diplomacy

Explanation:

Option a is incorrect,

Option b is also incorrect,

Option c is the correct answer.

Constitutionalism refers to a system of government where there is a constitution that establishes the powers, limits, and rights of the government. It ensures that the government operates within the framework of the constitution, respecting the rule of law and protecting individual rights. In this context, the options provided can be evaluated.

Option a is incorrect as it suggests that the federal government allows states to have some powers. Constitutionalism does not necessarily involve the federal government allowing powers to states.

Option b is also incorrect as it states that the state surrenders most power to the federal government. Constitutionalism is about establishing a balance of power, not necessarily one entity surrendering most power to another.

Option c is the correct answer as it states that state governments allow the federal government to have some powers. This aligns with the principle of constitutionalism, where power is shared between the state and federal government, with each having their own set of powers and limitations.

The phrase "The Federal government is limited to the few powers given to them in Article I section 8" is accurate, as it highlights that the federal government's powers are specifically outlined in the constitution, specifically in Article I section 8.

Know more about Constitutionalism here:

https://brainly.com/question/4932085

#SPJ11

Under civil law, Mark is liable to Don for Don's injury because he acted in a way that caused harm. In this scenario, Mark pushed Don, which caused Don to fall and break his arm.

This is considered a tort, or wrongful act, since Mark acted in a way that resulted in harm to Don. The tort of negligence applies, which means that Mark acted in a careless or negligent way.

Under civil law, Don can bring a lawsuit against Mark to recover damages. He must prove that Mark acted in a negligent way and that Don suffered damages as a result. To do this, Don must show that Mark had a duty to act in a certain way, such as not pushing Don, that Mark breached that duty by pushing Don, and that Don suffered damages as a result.

If Don is successful in his lawsuit, he can recover damages from Mark. This could include medical bills, pain and suffering, and other related costs. He could also be compensated for his lost wages, if any, if he had to miss work due to his injury. Mark is liable for Don's injury under civil law, and Don can seek compensation for his damages in a civil lawsuit.

To know more about civil law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14788507#

#SPJ11

the 3-second road is wet, icy, curvy, or visibility is limited, then you need to increase your following distance

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

The decision ultimately depends on individual circumstances and personal preferences. However, there are some factors to consider that may aid in making a decision.

If the individual is willing to endure the conditions of prison, they may choose the 13 months in state prison with the possibility of early release due to good behavior and overcrowding. This option provides a finite timeline for the sentence and allows for a fresh start once released.

On the other hand, if the individual prefers to maintain their freedom and can commit to the weekly reporting requirement, they may choose the five years on probation option. This choice allows them to stay in their community and potentially maintain employment, but requires consistent compliance with the terms of probation.

It is important to note that probation violations can result in harsher penalties, including imprisonment, so careful consideration and commitment to following the terms of probation is necessary.

The reason for choosing probation is because it allows for more freedom and the opportunity to maintain or rebuild my life, including employment and relationships, while serving the sentence. Reporting to a probation officer once a week, even if it's 15 miles from my house, is more manageable compared to spending time in a state prison, which may have a more negative impact on my life in the long term. Additionally, probation provides an opportunity for rehabilitation and personal growth, whereas prison may not offer the same level of support.

To Know more about personal preferences.

https://brainly.com/question/27417027

#SPJ11

From the following, the one which is not a function of political parties is that, the selection of persons for government.

The primary function of a political party is to contest election, through which they try to form government. So, the political parties are considered to be the essential institutions of democracy. Thus, by competing in elections parties offer the citizens a choice in governance, and while in opposition.

However, the political parties tend to perform an important task in the government. So, they tend to bring the people who are together in order to achieve the control of the government.

To learn more about the political parties here:

https://brainly.com/question/29783542

#SPJ4

No, the act do not went too far in allowing the government to track terrorists because it help to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.

The USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act) is a U.S. law that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001, in response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The Act was designed to provide law enforcement and intelligence agencies with the tools they needed to combat terrorism.

The Act significantly expanded the powers of law enforcement and intelligence agencies in a number of ways. For example, it allowed for the collection of intelligence information without a warrant, expanded the use of National Security Letters, which allow the FBI to obtain information about individuals without a court order, and increased the use of surveillance and wiretapping. It also created the Department of Homeland Security.

Critics of the Act argue that it has resulted in violations of civil liberties, such as the right to privacy, and that it has led to racial profiling and discrimination against Muslim and Arab Americans. Supporters argue that the Act has been effective in preventing terrorist attacks and that the increased surveillance and intelligence-gathering powers are necessary in the fight against terrorism.

The Act has been amended and extended several times since its initial passage, most recently in 2015 when several provisions were set to expire. However, some of the controversial provisions, such as the bulk collection of phone metadata, were not renewed.

Learn more about government at:

https://brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ1

The correct answer is False. Only physically removing another person's property from their possession qualifies as an act of embezzlement.

Mischief Anyone who destroys property, changes it in a way that lessens its worth or utility, or negatively affects it with the intent to cause, or knowing that he is likely to cause, unjust loss or harm to the general public or to any individual, is guilty of a crime.

Criminal damaging or endangerment is a crime that can be committed when you deliberately or carelessly damage someone else's property. The crime could be prosecuted as a felony or a misdemeanour.Vandalism is the intentional destruction or impairment of private or public property. Even if a purposeful act only partially destroys or damages property, it is still considered vandalism if the property is tarnished, defiled, or somehow diminished.

Read more about embezzlement committed at

https://brainly.com/question/29890838

#SPJ4

The information provided is generally accurate. Many states suspend driver's licenses when a driver is convicted of multiple moving violations within a set period, which can vary by state.

The statement given is generally true. Driving laws vary by state, but many states do have regulations that if a driver is convicted of multiple moving violations within a specific time frame, their license can be temporarily suspended. A moving violation is any fracture of the law committed by a driver while the vehicle is in motion. Examples of moving violations include speeding, running a red light, or reckless driving. These laws aim to maintain safety on the road by discouraging repeated reckless behavior.

https://brainly.com/question/37593330

#SPJ2

The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is commonly known as tort law.

Tort law is a branch of law that handles wrongful actions and their consequences. In this situation, the broken window of your home caused by someone else is classified as negligence. Negligence refers to a breach of duty to take reasonable care that causes harm or loss to another person. The person who broke the window of your home was not careful enough to prevent such damage, and as a result, you experienced financial harm or loss due to the cost of repair or replacement of the window.

Therefore, you are entitled to seek financial compensation or restitution from the person who broke the window. In order to claim financial restitution, you must prove that the person who broke your window was negligent, that you experienced harm or loss, and that the harm or loss was a direct result of the other person's negligence. If you can prove all of these elements, then you have a strong case for financial restitution.

In the event that the person who broke your window refuses to pay for the damages or is unable to do so, you can take them to court, where a judge or jury will evaluate the evidence and determine whether you are entitled to financial restitution. In conclusion, the set of laws that allows you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is governed by tort law, specifically the principles of negligence.

Know more about Tort law here:

https://brainly.com/question/33013975

#SPJ8

Option E is true, sole proprietors must follow all laws, including federal, state, and local regulations; securities laws; and employee and consumer protection regulation.

Contracts entered into by a solo proprietor are legally his or her responsibility. The business in a sole proprietorship is regarded as a distinct legal entity. A sole proprietorship can be established without obtaining clearance from the federal or state governments. A business type called a sole proprietorship has just one owner. The business's owner has total control over every part of it. A sole proprietorship is viewed as an extension of the owner rather than a distinct legal organisation. However, you are allowed to use a trade name, such as "Bob Smith Plumbing."

Know more about sole proprietorship at: https://brainly.com/question/24174032

#SPJ4

A) A provision of International law does not apply in the United States unless United States law incorporates the provision such as ratification of a treaty by the United States Congress.

Historically, the prevention and control of communicable diseases had been done by way of sanitation, safe water, meal supply, isolation, and immunization.

EBPH is the improvement, implementation, and assessment of powerful packages and guidelines in public fitness via the application of standards of clinical reasoning, such as systematic makes use of statistics and information structures and appropriate use of software making plans fashions.

Learn more about ratification here https://brainly.com/question/7458577

#SPJ4

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Cabinet department Taft created to help workers is true(because the department was designed to promote the welfare and improve the working conditions of wage earners, including the regulation of child labor, the establishment of minimum wage standards, and the implementation of safety regulations in the workplace).

President William Howard Taft created the Department of Labor in 1913 to address the needs of American workers.

The Department of Labor is responsible for the formulation and implementation of labor policies and programs, including the enforcement of labor laws and the administration of various benefit programs for workers. It also oversees the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which collects and analyzes data on employment, wages, and other economic indicators.

Overall, the creation of the Department of Labor represented a significant step forward in the protection and empowerment of American workers. By focusing on the needs and concerns of employees, the department has helped to promote fair labor practices and improve the quality of life for millions of working people in the United States.

For more questions on: wage

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ11

Answer:

error, mistake, or a symbolic reprisentation for two different angles and lines

Answer:

a law allowing courts to prevent people who show signs of being a danger to themselves or to others from having access to firearms (as by ordering the seizure of weapons)

The statement is false.

Under Florida public records law, an unsolicited proposal can be exempt from disclosure for a limited period, but the specific timeframes mentioned in the statement are not accurate. Here's a breakdown of the correct provisions:

Exemption Period: An unsolicited proposal submitted to a responsible public entity can be exempt from public records disclosure for a period of 30 days after the date of the entity's receipt of the proposal. During this time, the entity evaluates the proposal's feasibility, utility, or potential for the public's interest.

Competitive Solicitation: If the responsible public entity decides not to initiate a competitive solicitation for the project described in the unsolicited proposal, the exemption can be extended for an additional period. The unsolicited proposal remains exempt for 90 days from the initial notice issued by the entity, which must reject all proposals. This additional exemption period allows the entity to explore the potential for competitive solicitation or alternative procurement methods.

It's important to note that after the exemption period expires, the unsolicited proposal becomes subject to public records disclosure unless other exemptions or protections apply.

To ensure accurate information regarding Florida's public records law and its specific provisions, it is advisable to consult the relevant statutes or consult legal professionals familiar with Florida law.

To know more about, unsolicited proposals click here:https://brainly.com/question/30053310

#SPJ11

Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. on June 30, (2022).

The Supreme Court of the United States may grant a petition for certiorari, reverse a lower court's ruling, and remand the matter for additional proceedings in a grant, vacate, and remand order (GVR order) (hence the acronym by which they are known).  Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. on June 30, (2022).

Learn more about grant, vacate, and remand here:

https://brainly.com/question/2033587

#SPJ4

A person can vote in United States federal, state, and local elections only if : He is a U.S. citizen, Meet it's state’s residency requirements, Are 18 years old before Election Day, Are registered to vote by state’s voter ID.

Election laws in the United States go back to Article 1 of the Constitution. State governments now have control over federal election administration. Since then, numerous federal laws and Constitutional amendments have been passed to safeguard voting rights.

Anyone is free to participate in any local, state, or presidential election in the United States without violating the law. Voting is a right as defined by the US Constitution. The ratification of numerous constitutional changes.

To learn more about presidential election here:

https://brainly.com/question/4690264

#SPJ4

Answer:

Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.

Explanation:

Answer:

An employee.

Explanation:

An employee can be defined as an individual who is employed by an employer of labor to perform specific tasks, duties or functions in an organization.

The party who is paid by employer to serve under the employer's direction and control is known as an employee.

Basically, an employee is saddled with the responsibility of providing specific services to the organization or company where he is currently employed while being paid a certain amount of money hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly depending on the contractual agreement between the two parties (employer and employee).

Hence, while an employer may be the owner of a business firm or company, an employee is a subordinate employed to provide unwavering services to the employer while also, being professional and diligent at all times.

Answer:

borrowing money on credit

Explanation:

The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had to take out loans from foreign governments, though they also had no way of raising funds from the states to pay back these loans. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government quickly accumulated a large amount of national debt.

The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.

The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.

To know more about genocide visit:

brainly.com/question/32013150

#SPJ11

The Correct option  (A) (B) ;The justices take a nonbinding vote.

A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the United States' federal judiciary. It has final appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law.

It also has original jurisdiction over a limited number of cases, including "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party."

The court has the power of judicial review, which allows it to invalidate a statute for violating a constitutional provision. It can also overturn presidential directives if they violate the Constitution or statutory law.

Learn more about supreme court

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ4

Full question which of the following is true of the conference that takes place after oral arguments in the supreme court?

The justices take a nonbinding vote.

A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.

the policy concerns of the population at large

the policy preferences of Congress

Answer:

not take anybaction without a warrantis the right answer