Changing your negative self-talk to positive will normally relieve stress.
True
False

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: True

Explanation: If you mainly think positively about yourself, you will feel good and optimistic most of the time. Research shows that positive self-talk can: improve self-esteem, stress management and wellbeing. reduce any symptoms of depression, anxiety and personality disorders.


Related Questions

About blank people injured or killed in an alcohol related crash have consumed no alcohol

Answers

Answer:

Every day 29 people in America die from drunk driving.

(Courts & Civil Liberties 04.01 MC) A federal case in Texas would began in a

Answers

Answer:

d. US Court of Appeals for Circuit Five.

Explanation:

According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:

a. Texas trial court.

b. Texas court of last resort.

c. U.S. District Court for Circuit Five.

d. U.S. Court of Appeals for Circuit Five.

A federal case in Texas would most likely begin in a U.S. Court of Appeals for Circuit Five. This would be a federal appellate court, which would mean that the court would have appellate jurisdiction. The rulings that such a court makes may be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Fifth Circuit hears cases in the states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

Identify a true statement about federal courts. A. Federal courts can hear all manner of cases related to crime and law. B. Federal courts can hear cases that the U.S. Constitution has expressly put within their jurisdiction. C. Federal courts can only hear appeals of verdicts passed by state courts and lower courts. D. Federal courts have unlimited jurisdiction.

Answers

The correct option that identifies a true statement about federal courts is B. Federal courts can hear cases that the U.S. Constitution has expressly put within their jurisdiction.

Federal courts, in general, possess the power to adjudicate cases and controversies relating to federal law, including constitutional interpretation, federal statutes and regulations, interstate and international commerce, and federal crimes.

However, it is critical to note that the federal courts have limited jurisdiction and can only hear specific types of cases that have been expressly put within their jurisdiction by the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Therefore, option B is correct.

Federal courts, in general, have jurisdiction over cases involving: Federal law and Constitutional interpretation Federal crimes Interstate and international commerce Bankruptcy Patent, copyright, and trademark law Federal tax law Public lands and natural resources Labor relations Federal civil rights The law of the sea Environmental law Alienage and citizenship issues Admiralty law International trade Law governing the Federal Government and its employees.

Learn more about federal courts here:

https://brainly.com/question/32017401

#SPJ11

In the planning function, public management's main focus is on the executing the assigned tasks

Answers

In the planning function, public management's main focus is on executing the assigned tasks. - False

When organizational management is in the planning phase, this is when it defines its aims, goals, and action plans to accomplish them. One of a firm's most crucial steps is strategic planning because it addresses the organisation's long-term needs. It must be well-structured, contain the organisation's mission, vision, and values, and aid in the achievement of the firm's goals and objectives.

Setting goals, objectives, and priorities as well as creating strategies and action plans to accomplish them are the primary areas of emphasis for public management when performing the planning function. Despite being a crucial component of the implementation stage, carrying out given duties is not the primary concern of the planning function.

Complete Question:

In the planning function, public management's main focus is on executing the assigned tasks. True/False

Read more about planning function on:

https://brainly.com/question/3504046

#SPJ4

You are a parole officer who has a single mother with three hyperactive, attention deficit-disorder young children on your caseload. She receives no support from her ex-husband. Her mother wants nothing to do with her or the children because she believes “God is punishing” the young mother. She works as a topless dancer but hates it. She continues dancing because it pays the bills so well. You know she regularly smokes marijuana in an attempt to deal with stress. Obviously, this is a violation of probation. However, if you file a violation report on her, she will go back to prison. You know she is doing the best she can with her kids, is very involved with their school, and they are strongly bonded to her. You worry about what will happen to the kids.

1.What would you do?

Things to consider as you prepare



Ethical judgment: Defer filing a violation report while you work with her to find a better means to support herself and kids. Moral Rules: One should treat each person as an end and not as a means.

One should act in such a way that you will it to be a universal law.

One should do what is best for everyone.

One should do one’s duty.

Ethical system: A strict duty-based system might support filing a violation report, however, it depends on the definition of duty. It could be argued that a probation officer’s duty is not to automatically file violation reports, but rather to “protect society.” In this expanded view of duty, resolving the situation without filing a violation report might be

Answers

1. As the parole officer for a single mother with three hyperactive, attention-deficit disorder young children, I think that C. One should do what is best for everyone.

2. In the expanded view of duty, especially with respect to protecting society, resolving the situation of this woman without filing a violation report might be more ethical.

What is an ethical duty?

An ethical duty is the responsibility to recognize, interpret, and act upon multiple principles and values based on given standards.

However, being ethical does not imply that ethical guidelines must be followed blindly.  Some circumstances demand different approaches to achieve what is best for everyone involved.

Thus, ethical responsibility demands that the parole officer deals with each case with courage, fairness, and integrity.

Learn more about ethical principles at https://brainly.com/question/14334089 and https://brainly.com/question/18401975

#SPJ1

Suppose you are reading descriptions of job openings and notice one that says the individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement. What job description are you probably reading? abuse and social services manager social, community, and emergency manager disaster and emergency services manager child protective services manager

Answers

Answer:

What methods would you use to collect job analysis data? 2. You work in the human resource department of a large brewery in Atlantic Canada. You are in the process of writing job descriptions for all managerial and supervisory staff. One manager who is in the production division of the brewery refuses to complete a job analysis questionnaire.

Explanation:

The individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement is a description of an abuse and social services manager. Option A. This is further explained below.

What are social services?

Generally, Social services are simply defined as services provided to groups that aid in the development of individuals.

In conclusion, A description of abuse and social services manager includes the ability to examine an organization and adopt strategies for improvement.

Read more about social services

https://brainly.com/question/15059623

#SPJ2

Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.

Answers

Answer:

Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.

yeah i like the death penalty too tbh. i think it’s very reasonable in many cases

Maria believes that through her actions, her voice can be heard in government and that she can effect change in government policies. We would say Maria has high levels of

Answers

Maria has high levels of Pollyannaism.

Pollyannaism refers to the tendency of a person being blindly or excessively optimistic for the occurrence of a certain task in future. Here, in the given situation Maria's behavior is indicative of high levels of Pollyannaism because of the fact that her actions have not been executed and she is merely in day dream that her actions and voice can change the government policies. There is no source of evidence is available which can proof that any of her believes has taken shape in the change of the reality that is the change in the government policy.

Learn more about government policies:

https://brainly.com/question/17492456

20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties

Answers

The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.

Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.

On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.

While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.

To know more about obligations.

https://brainly.com/question/32907342

#SPJ11

Research and compare and contrast both of the following topics:

1. A successful marriage (10+ years) and an unsuccessful marriage (ended in divorce)

2. Child custody situation siding with the mother and one siding with the father

please help find ​

Answers

Explanation:

Juices Company has available two kinds of food Juices: Orange Juice and Juice. The company produces Atwo types of punches: Punch A and Punch B. One bottle of punch A requires 20 liters of Orange Juice and 5 liters of Grape Juice.1 Bottle of punch B requires 10 liters of Orange Juice and 15 liters of Grape Juice.

From each of bottle of Punch A a profit of $4 is made and from each bottle of Punch B a profit of $3 is made .Suppose that the company has 230 liters of Orange Juice and 120 liters of Grape JuiceGrape available.

Required:

Formulate this problem as a LPP

How many bottles of Punch A and Punch B the company should produce in order to maximize profit?

What is this maximum profit? (solve it using both the graphical and Simplex method)

Garage will be collected on Tuesday and must be properly disposed state law, local law, or federal law?

Answers

Answer:

All of the Laws

Explanation:

Was Carly Fiorina treated fairly by the board? Why or why not?

Answers

Oh, come on. You're really asking me a question about Carly Fiorina and the board? You must be really scraping the bottom of the barrel for conversation topics, honey.

But to answer your question, in my oh-so-humble opinion, Carly Fiorina was not treated fairly by the board. She was a strong and capable leader who brought fresh ideas and a new perspective to the table. But of course, the old boys' club couldn't handle having a woman in charge, could they? They just had to find a way to push her out.

But hey, what do I know? Maybe she just wasn't cut out for the job. Or maybe she was too busy being a power-hungry egomaniac to do her actual job. Who knows? All I know is that she got a raw deal, and it's a shame that the board couldn't see her true worth.

Please really need help on this please

Please really need help on this please

Answers

y-6=1/4(x-5) !!!!!!! Dude

what is fiscal spending that is required by the law is known as

Answers

Fiscal spending that is required by the law is referred to as mandatory spending. It encompasses government expenditures mandated by legislation, including entitlement programs.

Mandatory spending refers to government expenditures that are mandated by legislation and must be allocated according to specific legal requirements. These spending obligations are typically established by laws, statutes, or entitlement programs and are considered non-discretionary.

They encompass various programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other entitlements where eligibility and benefit amounts are predetermined by law.

Unlike discretionary spending, which is subject to annual appropriations and can be adjusted based on policy priorities, mandatory spending is essentially set in stone unless the underlying laws are modified.

To learn more about fiscal spending click here :

brainly.com/question/28762118

#SPJ11

How many delegates had signed the Declaration of Independence?

Answers

On August 2, 1776, members of Congress affix their signatures to an enlarged copy of the Declaration of Independence. Fifty-six congressional delegates in total signed the document, including some who were not present at the vote approving the declaration.

Private sector security officers are employed and utilized by a wide variety of of Government. Public and Corporates agencies. In this assianment. vou will review the associated Power Point Presentation RE Private Sector Security, to get An understandina of what agencies utilize private sector securty and now they use them
You will then write a one page report on how Govemment, Private, Cooperate Public and Indian Reservations utilize there services. DO NOT USE any of the agencies mentioned in the Power Point Presentation! Using the information you
have learned from the Power Point and from lecture, research an agency (Gov. Private, Cooperate, Public or Indian Reservation) that utilizes the services of Private Sector Security, in their business.

Answers

Answer:

The Business, Careers, and Challenges of Security and Loss Prevention

Philip P. Purpura, in Security and Loss Prevention (Sixth Edition), 2013

Regulation of the Industry

The security vocation has its share of charlatans who tarnish the industry, and, as with many types of services offered to the public, government intervention has taken the form of licensing and registration. The Task Force Report and Hallcrest Reports recommend regulation of the security industry by all states. To protect consumers, the majority of states have varied laws that regulate, through licensing and registration, contract security officer services, private investigators, polygraph and other detection-of-deception specialists, and security alarm businesses. Security consultants are generally not regulated, but consumers should verify professional memberships and certifications. Although government regulation does not guarantee that all security practitioners will perform in a satisfactory manner, it does prevent people who have criminal records from entering the profession. In the case of applicants who have lived in multiple states, their backgrounds should be checked in each jurisdiction.

Another way the industry is regulated is through local, state, and federal agencies that contract out private security services and mandate various contract requirements (e.g., education, training, and character) to enhance professionalism and competence. Certain industries are regulated by the government and require stringent security standards. For example, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issues rules and standards that must be followed by licensees of nuclear reactors to ensure safety and security. A variety of businesses, institutions, and other organizations also issue requirements. Notably, when a contract is awarded simply to the lowest bidder, professionalism may be sacrificed.

Attempts have been made through Congress to pass a national law to regulate the security industry. In 1995, Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA) introduced H.R. 2092, The Private Security Officers Quality Assurance Act. It languished in Congress in various forms until Rep. Matthew Martinez (D-CA) introduced a similar bill. Known as the Barr-Martinez Bill, if passed, it would have provided state regulators with expedited FBI criminal background checks of prospective and newly hired security officers. The minimal training standards were struck from the bill. These would have required eight hours of training and four hours of on-the-job training for unarmed officers and an additional 15 hours for armed officers. Critics argued that states are against such a national law and state regulations are sufficient.

Finally, Congress passed the Private Security Officer Employment Authorization Act of 2004 (included in the National Intelligence Reform Act of 2004), which enables security service businesses and proprietary security organizations in all 50 states to check whether applicants have a criminal history record with the FBI, which may emanate from one or more states. (National training requirements were not included in the legislation.) This law is significant and adds strength to criminal records checks of security officer applicants. Traditional name-based searches can result in false positives (i.e., an applicant’s name is incorrectly matched to an offender’s name or similar name) and false negatives (i.e., an applicant’s name does not result in a match because the applicant is using a different name or a database was omitted from the investigation). Because applicants may use different names and other bogus identifying information, fingerprints provide increased accuracy in background investigations. Under the act, security firm access to the FBI’s Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) also includes access to the Violent Gangs and Terrorism Organization File. Although not all security organizations are required to check these fingerprint databases for a match with their applicants, the effort and expense of doing so prevent litigation and the possibility that an applicant is a terrorist or other criminal. Cost is one of several factors that influence the extent of background investigations (Friedrick, 2005: 11).

Which government agency (or agencies) in your state regulates the private security industry? What are the requirements for contract security (“guard”) companies, private detectives, and security alarm installers? Are proprietary security organizations regulated in your state?

In 2008, a man was charged with one count of illegally stocking wild animals, a civil offense. State investigators had accused him of bringing 31 wild hogs from Texas to Wisconsin to hunt on his private land, spawning a feral hog population that has caused thousands of dollars in crop damage to hundreds of farms in the region. Can the Coase theorem apply in this example? Why or why not? a. Yes b. No; because all property rights are clearly defined
c. No; because transaction costs are low d. No; because a large number of parties are involved

Answers

b. No; because all property rights are clearly defined. The Coase theorem assumes that property rights are clearly defined, allowing parties to negotiate and reach an efficient outcome. In this case, the man's actions violated property rights, making the Coase theorem inapplicable.

Option b. "No; because all property rights are clearly defined" is not the correct answer because the situation involves illegal activity and potential violations of property rights.

Option c. "No; because transaction costs are low" is also not the correct answer. While transaction costs might be a consideration, the illegal act and associated legal and ethical concerns go beyond mere negotiation.

Option d. "No; because a large number of parties are involved" is not the correct answer as the number of parties involved is not the primary factor in determining the applicability of the Coase theorem.

Therefore, the correct answer is b. . No; because all property rights are clearly defined

Learn more about property rights.

https://brainly.com/question/29613081

#SPJ11

Why should epileptics not be allowed to use the defence of automatism in the case of a car accident? Explain your opinion.

Answers

Epileptics should not be allowed to use the defense of automatism in the case of a car accident because it is generally considered that they have a duty to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others while operating a vehicle.

What does the term "Epileptic automatisms" mean?

Epileptic automatisms refers to 'insane automatisms, which cause a person who commits a crime during the course of a seizure to be declared legally insane and must be committed to a psychiatric hospital. The law of insanity is inappropriate when applied to epileptic automatisms.

As it is considered that they have a duty to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others while operating a vehicle. Then, there are steps to be taken to prevent or manage seizures while driving, such as taking prescribed medication and avoiding triggers that may induce seizures.

Read more about Epileptic

brainly.com/question/28131457

#SPJ1

in the kelo case, the u.s. supreme court majority that decided that case applied this type of constitutional interpretation: _________

Answers

The U.S. Supreme Court majority in the Kelo v. the City of New London case applied the doctrine of "public use" under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which allows for the use of the eminent domain for public purposes.

In the Kelo v. City of New London case, the U.S. Supreme Court majority upheld the use of eminent domain by the City of New London, Connecticut, to take private property for the purpose of economic development. The Court applied the "public use" doctrine under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which provides that private property shall not be taken for public use without compensation.

The Court held that the City's plan to transfer the taken property to private developers for the purpose of economic development constituted a valid public use, as it would benefit the community as a whole by creating jobs, increasing tax revenue, and revitalizing the local economy.

To learn more about economic development, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/19632298

#SPJ4

The President welcomes Pope Francis to the United States on behalf of the American people. Which role is the president carrying out?

Answers

Answer:

He's representing the United States.

Explanation:

When the President greets and welcomes the Pope to America, not only is he representing the American people, but he's also representing the United States as a whole. He is seen as Representing the United States.

What is the law for demand?

Answers

According to the rule of demand, when a product's price increases, fewer people will buy it, and vice versa.

With an example, define the law of demand.

According to the economic principle known as the law of demand, customer demand for a good increases when prices are low and decreases when prices are high. When shoppers rush to purchase goods at steep prices during Black Friday bargains, the law of demand is in effect.

Which two laws of demand are there?

The demand schedule and the demand curve are the two main ways to represent the law of demand. Elastic demand is defined as when the amount purchased significantly changes when the price does.

To Know more about price increases,

https://brainly.com/question/13289011

#SPJ4

Stair and Erskine on the development of law

Answers

Answer:

Stair, Bell, and Erskine are the most well-known of these. In the 1660s, Stair brought together the elements of customary, feudal, and Roman law into one system based on legal principles and philosophy in his leading work The Institutions of the Law in Scotland (1681).

Explanation:

Hope this helps and have a great day!!!

SUBMISSION
Value: 1
Federalism is the separation of powers between the state and national governments.
True
False
# 9/10

Answers

the answer it is true.

it is unlawful to turn water service on or off without approval

Answers

Answer:

It is unlawful to turn water service on or off without approval. Every child between ages 6 and 16 must attend a school or be homeschooled. Temporary structures such as circus tents may not be put up without approval. A person between ages 16 and 18 must have a parent's permission in order to get married.

Answer:

It is unlawful to turn water service on or off without approval.

what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?

Answers

In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.

An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.

If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.

To know more about proceedings:

https://brainly.com/question/29791715


#SPJ11

Explain why is law is an instrument which regulate human conducts?​

Answers

Answer:

Law is an instrument which regulates human conduct/behavior. Law means Justice, Morality, Reason, Order, and Righteous from the view point of the society. Law means Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, and Injunctions from the point of view of Judges.

As far as alalcohol laws are concerned what is a private club

Answers

Guests possess the alcoholic drinks of a Private Club. Guests aren't accredited to pay for any provider of alcoholic drinks. Guests have to pay for any alcoholic drinks they consume.

What is a private club?

A private club can be defined as an affiliation of people for a few, common purposes. The regulation permits a personal membership to serve and provide to serve alcohol to its members, even in a dry area, as lengthy because it holds a legitimate personal membership allowed by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission ("TABC").

Thus, A private club can be defined as an affiliation of people for a few, common purposes.

learn more about a private club:

https://brainly.com/question/4483904

#SPJ1

can someone help me with this question please.

Assuming that each of the following pieces of evidence is admissible, including a reliably documented chain of custody, which would NOT be useful in determining the facts of the case?
A. A photograph of the crime scene
B. Matching DNA test from blood at the scene and a hair sample from a suspect
C. An eye witness who says she thought she recognized that someone at the scene looks like the accused
D. A neighbor who says that the accused was known to have drugs when she was in high school

Answers

Answer: C

Explanation: The women wouldn’t be helpful cause she thought she saw a suspect but she didn’t cause she don’t remember. if she doesn’t remember then she would be useful at all

D. A neighbor who says that the accused was known to have drugs when she was in high school

strategic public relations

Answers

Answer:

At their heart, all public relations campaigns are about planning and strategy. After all, without a good strategy, it would be impossible for a PR expert to ensure that they were having the right impact on an audience with their marketing solutions, or that they were releasing press content at the right time. The “strategic planning” part of public relations is what sets it apart as a critical component of building a business and managing a company reputation.

Strategic planning starts with setting a goal for a PR campaign. Once a vision of success is established, PR companies can then work alongside their clients to carve out an effective route to that end target. Strategic planning ensures that press releases go out just at the right time to cause a social splash, and that reputation management strategies have components in place that allow businesses to respond quickly when disaster strikes.

Explanation:

A pest control company fumigated one of two buildings in an apartment complex with a toxic gas in order to eliminate unwanted insects. Even though the company exercised reasonable care, the gas escaped into the other building, which adjoined the fumigated building, where the gas caused serious illness to a tenant in that building. The tenant had received a written advance notice about the fumigation that advised the tenant of the need to vacate his apartment during the hours the fumigation was conducted. The tenant chose instead to remain there in order to watch a favorite television program. The applicable jurisdiction treats fumigation as an ultrahazardous activity. The injured tenant filed an action against the pest control company. Who will prevail?

Answers

Answer:

sfassfasfasffgdg sfg sg

Explanation:fafaasfasfasfasd

Other Questions
Which of these is not a type of muscle tissue?a smoothb. roughC.skeletalD. cardiac What is the volume of this sphere?Use 3.14 and round your answer to the nearest hundredth. Which elements would best provide evidence for Jorie's reason Elie Wiesel's Night An investor borrows an amount at an annual effective interest rate of 5% and will repay all interest and principal in a lump sum at the end of 10 years. She uses the amount borrowed to purchase a 1000 par value 10-year bond with 8% semiannual coupons bought to yield 6% convertible semiannually. All coupon payments are reinvested at a nominal rate of 4% convertible semiannually. Calculate the net gain to the investor at the end of 10 years after the loan is repaid How does the Coriolis effect impact the Gulf Stream and the Brazil Current?It turns the Gulf Stream southwest and the Brazil Current northeast.It turns the Gulf Stream northwest and the Brazil Current northeast.It turns the Gulf Stream northeast and the Brazil Current southwest.It turns the Gulf Stream northeast and the Brazil Current northwest. PLEASE HELP (CARTOON ANALYSIS) What is the context of this cartoon? (What is the big event the cartoon is referring to? Describe that event.) When palpating the abdomen, you should note whether the liver is enlarged in the:_____. What two formulas can you use to find the circumference?C = n.dC = 2.11.rc=dC = 7.12 Look at the pictures and unscramble the words. Insert the appropriate one in each phrase. Practice Problem 1. Find s' where s= cos(t-1) Reggie can line a football field in 120 minutes. Rosalinda can line a football field in 80 minutes. If they work together, how many minutes does it take them to line a football field? (2 points) 40 minutes 48 minutes 200 minutes 240 minutes If a+b=20 and ab=50Then find the value of a^2+b^2 Consider the curves y = 3x2+6x and y = -2+4.a) Determine their points of intersection (21,91) and (22,32), ordering them such that 1 A prominent part of the reward pathway of the brain is the _______, located at the base of the frontal lobe. a) locus coeruleus b) suprachiasmatic nucleus c) nucleus accumbens d) reticular formation image attached down bellow After 35 game different team has 50 point. 14 games were draw. how many game has this team lost what determines the properties of elements? responses the number of neutrons in an atom the number of neutrons in an atom the outermost shell of electrons the outermost shell of electrons the total number of atomic particles the total number of atomic particles the protons write a two paragraph story about why your imaginary animal went extinct Can someone please help When thermal energy is added to a substance the temperature will increase except during a phase change is occurring.TrueFalse group filtering from fortigate can only be done if the collector agent is in which ad access mode?