Answer:
liqiud is a silolid
Explanation:
beacuese as big
Who was the father of policing?
Sir Robert Peel, in 1829, He made 9 Policing Principles, making him famous for his neutral and upbringing laws.
VOTE!!!!!!!!! THIS IS IMPORTANT
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Cathy was incarcerated because she has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren. She has been held in custody for an extended period after her incarceration term ended because she has the possibility of becoming violent, which is also known as:
Answer:
Preventative detention
Explanation:
Preventative detention is a form of incarceration that is given when the detained party is thought of as harmful to the society.
They are detained to prevent further acts of violence or crime in the community.in which they live.
In the given scenario Cathy has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren.
Releasing her will most likely lead to further abuse on the step children.
This was done to prevent further acts of violence from her.
The defendant's neighbor owned an authentic major league baseball signed by Babe Ruth. The defendant asked if he could show it to some friends who were visiting. The neighbor agreed as long as he kept it in the display case, which the defendant promised to do. In fact, the defendant intended to use the ball in a pickup game. During the game, the ball was hit over the fence and into a yard with a guard dog, which had chewed up several other balls that had previously landed in the yard. The dog did the same to that ball. When the neighbor learned what happened to the ball, he pressed charges against the defendant. If the defendant is convicted, he will most likely be found guilty of what crime?
a. Common law larceny.
b. Embezzlement.
c. False pretenses.
d. Larceny by trick.
Answer:
d. Larceny by trick.
Explanation:
Larceny by trick is distinguishable in that a defendant who commits larceny by trick obtains only possession of the personal property of another, not title of that property.
For example if you ask a person to borrow their phone but have no intention of giving it back
Alison, a data analyst and software engineer, worked for Dellis, Inc. When she joined Dellis, she signed an employment contract. In that employment contract, among other provisions, was an arbitration clause, which read:
"any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association."
During her work for Dellis, Alison created a software program that would better track Dellis’ clients. Alison attempted to register for a patent to the program, claiming personal ownership in the rights to the software. Dellis learns Alison is applying for patent protection and claims the program was created as a result of Alison's work for the company and therefore it belongs to the company.
Alison files a lawsuit in Court. She is requesting that the Court enter a Declaratory Judgment--essentially an order that she is the rightful owner of the patent associated with the program.
Dellis immediately files a motion to dismiss Alison’s lawsuit. Should the court hear Alison’s lawsuit. Why or why not?
Any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Was an arbitration clause.
What is employment?In most cases, employment refers to the status of having a paid job—of being employed. Employing someone is paying them to work. Employees are employed by an employer. Employment can also refer to the act of hiring individuals, as in We're trying to hire more women.
The term employment contract may include an employment arbitration clause, which means you agreed not to pursue any legal action against your employer in court. Instead, any disputes that you have with your employer must be settled through a process known as arbitration
Therefore, Thus option (A) is correct.
Learn more about employment here:
https://brainly.com/question/1361941
#SPJ1
Examine the following situations decide whether the search violates the fourth amendment.explain your decisions.
d.Pam is seen shoplifting in a store.police chase Pam into her apartment building and arrest her outside the closed door of her apartment.A search of her apartment reveals a large quantity of stolen goods.
e. Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods. The police go to her house and ask Claire,her roommate,if they can search the house.Claire gives them permission,and they find stolen in Sandis dresser
Pam is seen shoplifting in a store and Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods this suggests that there is a violation in the fourth amendment with respect to the case of Sandi.
What is the fourth amendment?The Bill of Rights is comprised of the Fourth Amendment to the U.s. Constitutional. It outlaws arbitrary warrantless searches.
In this situation where families have been seen shifting or is being seen to be taking the goods from a store. This music that she is a criminal police had the right to search her apartment but if a person is suspected without having any kind of proof which is the case of Sandi and still her house is being investigated without her permission then it is a violation of the 4th amendment right.
Learn more about fourth amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ1
By judicial interpretation, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution __________.
By judicial interpretation, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution restricts the federal government.
The Due process Clause of the Fourteenth change is precisely like a similar provision within the 5th change, which best restricts the federal authorities. It states that no man or woman shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or assets without a due method of regulation.” typically, “due manner” refers to truthful strategies.
Delivered to cope with the racial discrimination continued via Black individuals who were recently emancipated from slavery, the amendment showed the rights and privileges of citizenship and, for the first time, assured all people equal protection beneath the legal guidelines.
Learn more about amendment here brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ4
Which of the following may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law? US District court decision. Temporary Treasury Regulation. Revenue Ruling. Technical advice memorandum. Tax Treaty with Canada. Question 5 Which of the following taxes is NOT paid by wage eamers? FICA tax FUTA Social Security tax Medicare tax Income tax
A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.
A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.
These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.
You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517
#SPJ11
licensing refers to a contractual agreement in which the licensor grants access to its patents, trade secrets, or technology for a fee paid by the licensee. True or False?
A licensing refers to a contractual agreement in which the licensor grants access to its patents, trade secrets, or technology for a fee paid by the licensee. The given statement is "True."
What is licensing, In other words, Licensing is a business model that enables a business to use another firm's intellectual property for commercial purposes. Licenses allow companies to enter new markets, obtain competitive advantages, and add revenue streams to their businesses.
It's a type of revenue-sharing agreement in which the license holder agrees to pay a fee to the licensor in exchange for the right to use the licensor's intellectual property.
therefore the correct statement is "True."
For more such questions on licensing
brainly.com/question/24827828
#SPJ11
If a+6= 8 what does a=?
Why should a matriculant be aiming to achieve a bachelor's pass, regardless of what they plan for 2023 ?
The reason why a matriculant has to achieve a pass in their bachelor's regardless of the plans that they have in 2023 are:
To achieve fulfillment To be able to apply for jobs.What is a Bachelors?This is the degree that students who are able to fulfill all of the university requirements are awarded at the end of their school.
The person who is awarded this degree must be able to fulfill all of the school requirements by passing all of the required courses.
Read more on bachelors here:
https://brainly.com/question/17496239
Laura approached Tyrone, an undercover police officer, and asked him to kill her father.
Laura is guilty of what?
She is guilty of solicitation.
As Mrs. Forrester's attorneys, what ethical obligations do you have regarding any communications you have regarding her potential lawsuit? What ethical obligations does your law firm have with regard to Mrs. Forrester's husband William?
The ethical obligation that the law firm has with regard to Mrs. Forrester's husband William is respect for confidentiality and privacy.
What is ethics?It should be noted that ethics simply means the principle of knowing what is right from what's wrong.
It should be noted that it's important for law firms to keep one's secret and also respect the privacy that the person has.
The requirement that someone performs an action or refrain from performing one because they "owe" it to another person is known as an ethical responsibility. We refer to their obligation or obligation to behave a certain way as an obligation. A legal obligation that is based on an ethical duty can be enforced in court. As a result, someone who violates a legal obligation may face criminal charges or civil litigation.
In this case, the ethical obligation that the law firm has with regard to Mrs. Forrester's husband William is respect for confidentiality and privacy.
Learn more about ethics on:
brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
50 points !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
Consumer protection
Explanation:
Answer:
A.CONSUMER PROTECTIONExplanation:
The NRC licenses and regulates the Nation's civilian use of radioactive materials to provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety and to promote the common defense and security and to protect the environment.
Match the steps to the order in which they take place to describe how a bill becomes a law. 1. Step 1 The bill goes to the president. 2. Step 2 The president signs the bill. 3. Step 3 The full House or Senate debates the bill. 4. Step 4 The House or Senate votes on the bill. 5. Step 5 The bill is referred to a committee for consideration. 6. Step 6 One or more members of Congress introduce the bill. 7. Step 7 The committee votes on the bill.
Answer:
6. Step 1 One or more members of Congress introduce the bill.
5. Step 2 The bill is referred to a committee for consideration.
7. Step 3 The committee votes on the bill.
3. Step 4 The full House or Senate debates the bill.
4. Step 5 The House or Senate votes on the bill.
1. Step 6 The bill goes to the president.
2. Step 7 The president signs the bill.
Explanation:
The process of any bill to become a law involves a number of deliberations and steps before it can become a law. These processes involves not only a single group of people but more of the governing power houses of the government.
The first step is to introduce the bill by the one bringing forward the idea of the bill. Then it goes to the Congress committee to be considered for any further action. If the committee accepts to push forward the bill, it is then sent to the House or Senate, depending on the source of the bill's introduction. If the committee doesn't find it fit to be a bill, then it dies down and doesn't move any further.
In the House or Senate, the members debate and vote on the bill. If they accept it, then it moves forward to the President of the country. If rejected, then the bill goes back to be changed or even completely rejected.
Once it reaches the President, the bill becomes a law once he/ she accepts it.
Many countries struggle with the issue of immigration, illustrating a strongly perceived ______ distinction.
Many countries struggle with the issue of immigration, illustrating a strongly perceived in-group/out-group distinction.
What does in-group and out-group refers to?An in-group is a social group that a person mentally identifies with in sociology and social psychology. An out-group, on the other hand, is a social group with which a person does not identify. People may identify, for instance, with their peer group, family, neighborhood, sports team, political party, gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, or country. Numerous occurrences have been discovered to be correlated with psychological membership in social groups and categories.
Henri Tajfel and associates developed social identity theory in the 1970s, which led to the widespread use of the concept. A technique known as the minimal group paradigm was used to determine the importance of in-group and out-group classification.
To learn more about in-group and out-group from given link
https://brainly.com/question/7548841
#SPJ4
the statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is typically set by individual provinces or territories within their respective legal frameworks.
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges varies depending on the specific charge and the province in which it is being laid. Generally, the limitations range from one to five years, but some charges may have longer limitations or none at all. For example, in Ontario, the limitation period for most provincial offences is one year from the time the offence was committed, while in British Columbia, the limitation period is generally two years. However, some charges, such as sexual assault and murder, have no limitation period and can be laid at any time. It is important to note that the statute of limitations does not apply to all offences, and some charges may be laid even after the limitation period has expired if certain conditions are met.
To know more about provincial visit:
brainly.com/question/31273238
#SPJ11
Which of these would likely be considered an unfair claim settlement practice ?
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
What explanations have been offered for why Latino and African-American people have a disproportionately high representation in arrest and incarceration rates?
Answer:
Many explanations have been offered for why Latino and African-American people have a disproportionately high representation in arrest and incarceration rates. These explanations include racial profiling, socioeconomic disparities, and systemic discrimination. Racial profiling is the practice of law enforcement disproportionately targeting people of color for investigation and arrest. Socioeconomic disparities refer to the fact that people of color are more likely to be living in poverty, which can lead to higher rates of crime and incarceration. Systemic discrimination refers to the way that the criminal justice system has been designed in a way that disadvantages people of color, including through harsher sentencing, higher bail amounts, and more frequent stops and searches.
Explanation:
!!!!I NEED THE ANSWER TO THIS ASAP!!!!AND PLEASE THE RIGHT ANSWER!!!!Why are congressional committees important? *
A)They allow for more debate on a bill
B)They give experts an opportunity to give their opinions on a bill
C) They ensure the best possible bill that can be written
D) All of the above
Answer:
The answer is D, all of the above.
Explanation:
hope this helped! <3
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
"the government should provide health care for all citizens." this statement is an illustration of:
The statement "the government should provide health care for all citizens" is an illustration of a policy proposal advocating for universal health care. Universal health care refers to a system where the government ensures that every citizen has access to essential health services, regardless of their financial circumstances.
This concept is rooted in the idea that health care is a fundamental human right and should be accessible to all citizens. In a universal health care system, the government plays a significant role in funding and regulating the health care industry to ensure equal access for all. This approach contrasts with a more market-based system, where individuals are responsible for obtaining and financing their health care services.
Advocates of universal health care argue that it promotes equity, improves overall public health, and can ultimately lead to cost savings due to economies of scale and a focus on preventative care. Opponents, on the other hand, often raise concerns about the potential for inefficiencies, increased taxes, and the potential erosion of quality care.
In conclusion, the statement in question reflects a policy position in favor of universal health care, which is grounded in the belief that the government has a responsibility to ensure equal access to essential health services for all citizens. This perspective emphasizes the importance of equity, public health, and the role of government in addressing societal needs.
To learn more about Universal health care here:
https://brainly.com/question/29705792#
#SPJ11
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take place at a local restaurant. the officer obtained a search warrant for the restaurant and arrived with other uniformed officers to search the premises. while conducting the search, the officer searched several of the customers. while searching one of the restaurant's regular customers, the officer felt an object in the customer's pocket and pulled out a container filled with heroin. the customer was arrested and later convicted of possession of heroin. a state statute permits officers executing a search warrant to search persons on the premises if the officers reasonably expect danger to themselves or a risk of disposal or concealment of anything described in the warrant. if the customer challenges his conviction on the ground that his fourth amendment rights were violated, will he be successful?
Answer:
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take pla
Explanation:
Which would be an example of a State Authority Occupational Crime?
Answer: Hope this helps.
Explanation:
State Authority Occupational Crime refers to illegal activities committed by individuals in positions of authority in government or state organizations, using their power for personal gain or to benefit the organization they work for. An example of a State Authority Occupational Crime would be an elected official embezzling public funds for personal use, a police officer accepting bribes to overlook criminal activities, or a public official awarding contracts to companies in exchange for personal favors or kickbacks. Another example would be a public official using their influence to influence government policies or regulations to benefit a particular business or industry in which they have a financial interest.
Money laundering is an example of State Authority Occupational crime.
State authority occupational crimes are crimes that happen when someone uses the power that has been legitimately granted to them by someone with the ability to execute the law or to order others to commit the crime. These crimes are often referred to as white-collar crimes.
Money laundering is the practice of fraudulently disguising the source of funds earned via unlawful activities such as the sale of illegal drugs, corruption, embezzlement, or gambling by rerouting them through a legitimate source.
Hence, Money laundering is an example of State Authority Occupational Crime.
To learn more about Occupational crimes, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3187325
#SPJ4
Part I: Explore a correctional agency in your state. explain how ancillary entities support the legal system in carrying out justice. (comp. 2.5)
An agent has listed the property of a korean immigrant. she advertises the property in general circulation media only and not in a korean publication. the agent is guilty of
This agent most likely engaged in Blockbusting.
What exactly does "blockbusting" in real estate mean?Blockbusting is the practice of placing African American residents in historically all-white communities in an effort to precipitate a quick exodus of white people and a decrease in house prices. This method has long been employed by real estate speculators to take advantage of market instability brought on by prejudice.
What is a blockbuster?The most frequent instances of blockbusting encompass: When real estate brokers inform neighborhood residents that their community is "changing" and that they need to take their property; Making house-to-house calls to neighborhood residents to urge them to sell before their property prices decline; and.
To know more about Blockbusting visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17063288
#SPJ4
___________ prints occur when a finger touches or presses against plastic material and creates a negative impression of its friction ridge pattern.
the rule of law is when a society enforces property rights, contracts, and other rules according to an established and uniform set of laws instead of arbitrary decisions. (true or false)
The rule of law refers to the principle that all individuals and institutions are subject to and accountable to the law, which is fairly and consistently applied and enforced. given statement is true.
It means that a society enforces property rights, contracts, and other rules according to an established and uniform set of laws instead of arbitrary decisions. This concept is central to the functioning of a democratic society and is essential for protecting individual rights and promoting social and economic stability.
For such more question on federal law
https://brainly.com/question/30710747
#SPJ4
system in which government owns and controls some factors of production
Command economies is the system in which government owns and controls some factors of production.
three economic problems of "what to create," "how to produce it," and "for whom to produce it" are all addressed by the government in command economies. Command economies are frequently linked to authoritarianism, socialism, and communism.
A command economy is one in which the production and distribution of products and services are centrally planned and managed by the government. Typically, this sort of economy is linked to socialist or communist political ideologies. All economic choices are made by the government, and there is little to no private property ownership.
To know more about command economy click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13719381#
#SPJ4