Analyzing Heroes and Villains in Modern History
You have selected one historical hero and one historical villain in the previous tasks. In this task, you will use your
research to compare and contrast these individuals, and then you will share your findings in a presentation. While you
should include some biographical information about each leader, make sure your presentation also compares and
contrasts the leaders. Your presentation should include analysis of each leader's legacy in history.
Here are some points to address as you create your presentation:
. Use any presentation software that you have available.
. Give your presentation an appropriate title.
.Write an introduction to your presentation that will help your audience understand the topic. Your introduction
should include these elements: what makes a person a hero in history, what makes a person a villain in history, the
names of the leaders you selected as a hero and a villain in history.
. Compare and contrast the leaders you selected and their legacies in history. Use information you gained in your
research from the two previous tasks. You can decide how to put together these sections of the presentation.
Follow these steps as you write your presentation:
1. Write about the leaders' backgrounds (where and when they lived, the historical and political climate of the time, and
so on).
2. Describe each person's contribution to his or her country-positive or negative. Include the historical facts you found
in your earlier research.
[
3. Explain each person's legacy in history-positive or negative. Include the historical facts you discovered, along with
your own analysis of these facts.
4. Give your personal opinion about each leader based on your research.
5. Write an appropriate conclusion. It should state your opinion as to why it is important to study both heroes and
villains in history. Use your chosen leaders to explain this concept to your audience.
6. Add relevant and attractive images or media to accompany your presentation.
7. Include a works cited page , listing and crediting the sources you consulted during your research.
Learn how to make an effective presentation e. Your final presentation should be about three to five minutes in length
(about 500-600 words).

I choose Nelson Mandela as a hero and Mao Zedong as a villain

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

A, i got it right on edge

Explanation:

The distinction that Thomas Paine, author of Common Sense, is making between nations and courts is that nations exist to ensure citizen welfare while courts are set up to cater for the nobles' interests and lifestyles.

Thomas Paine was the English-American writer of Common Sense, which galvanized the American Revolution. Thomas Paine urged American colonists to be wary of the allures of courts and royalty in order to develop a modern democratic nation.

Thus, the distinction that Thomas Paine makes between nations and courts is that nations look after the people's welfare while courts are centered on the nobles.

Learn more about Thomas Paine at https://brainly.com/question/141727

It is crucial to remember that North Korea is a very authoritarian state and that open criticism of the government is not accepted. The propaganda apparatus of the nation aims to establish a cult of personality around the ruling Kim family by portraying them as infallible and untouchable.

It is difficult to determine the true feelings of North Korean residents towards their leader, Kim Jong-il, given the country's extreme authoritarianism and the severe limits on press freedom and free speech.

The goal of the regime's propaganda machine is to elevate the Kim family to the status of an invincible cult of personality, and any criticism or dissent is harshly punished. It is also difficult to gather reliable information on the residents' opinions because the nation is essentially cut off from the outside world and its citizens are subject to strict government control and surveillance.

Speaking negatively about one's leader or the government was not acceptable, and North Korean civilians were subject to severe government supervision and censorship.

It is critical to remember that propaganda and the lack of access to fair information may have a significant influence on any opinions or information regarding Kim Jong-il and the North Korean leadership.

learn more about Kim Jong IL here

https://brainly.com/question/31171274

#SPJ1

Answer:

HDEIZVIRFHSJRHSJR CU DIRBD SORRY THIS WAS A DARE

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

No, Individual Mississippians does not have the power to change society because one individual is not enough for bringing change in the society, it needs a large number of people. When a large number of people decides to bring change in the society, it will happens due to the struggle of large number of people. A single person doesn't have the ability to bring change alone, he needs a group of people.

Answer:

is this a real question?

Explanation:

A strong digital leader shares the characteristic of being a strong communicator with Martin Luther King, Jr.

A strong digital leader shares the characteristic of being a strong communicator with Martin Luther King, Jr. However, it is important to note that the other characteristics mentioned in the question are not shared with Martin Luther King, Jr. Let's delve further into the similarities between a strong digital leader and Martin Luther King, Jr. as a strong communicator.

Martin Luther King, Jr. was renowned for his powerful and inspiring speeches during the civil rights movement. He had the ability to effectively convey his message, mobilize people, and bring about social change through his words. A strong digital leader similarly possesses excellent communication skills, utilizing digital platforms to disseminate their message, connect with their audience, and inspire action.

Both Martin Luther King, Jr. and a strong digital leader understand the importance of crafting a compelling narrative, using persuasive language, and engaging with diverse audiences. They have the ability to articulate their vision, values, and goals effectively, motivating others to join their cause and work towards a common objective.

Moreover, they recognize the significance of adapting their communication strategies to the digital landscape. A strong digital leader understands the power of social media, online platforms, and digital technologies in amplifying their message and reaching a wider audience.

While Martin Luther King, Jr. and a strong digital leader share the characteristic of being strong communicators, it is crucial to highlight that the other characteristics mentioned in the question, such as being controlled by political opinion, willingness to wait for progress, or ordering violent protests, are not aligned with Martin Luther King, Jr.'s approach.

He advocated for nonviolent resistance, emphasized justice and equality, and sought to create positive change through peaceful means.

For more question on communicator visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2499229

#SPJ8

Answer:

strong communicator

Explanation:

bc u need communication and communication is key

Answer:

The correct answer is A. The dual functions of members of Congress most frequently lead to conflicts between the interests of voters in a particular state and the interests of all Americans.

Explanation:

Members of Congress, whether Representatives or Senators, have the function of representing the citizens of the states in which they were elected, within the legislative structure of the federal government. Therefore, they must primarily channel the interests of the citizens of their states in Congress, with the objective of meeting their needs and achieving the greatest benefits for them.

Now, on the other hand, they are members of the very structure of the federal government and as such they must consider the interests not only of the citizens of their states, but of the entire nation, with which they must have the common good for the entire country as their objective, regardless of the interests of its states.

Thus, a duality is generated, since many times the interests of the citizens of the state they represent are contrary to the interests of the other states or the federal government itself, with which congressmen have to have the ability to balance both interests seeking achieve the best possible result.

Answer:

The committee together provide and make a donation charity for society to raise money and get water,food,solve problems etc.

pls mark me as brainlest

The Committees of Safety were a network of committees established in late 1774 and early 1775 to enforce the Continental Association prohibiting all trade with Britain.

They were authorized by the Continental Congress and received support from the Second Provincial Congress of North Carolina and the North Carolina Assembly. The committees of safety were formed to control the colonial powers; they were powers of transition to control what the colonial powers could not control in the colonies; ultimately, they came to control everything when no formal government had been established and when there was no longer any authority.

The committees of correspondence later evolved into the committees of safety. During the American Revolution, the Committees of Correspondence were established to serve as de facto governments. They were to serve as legitimate governments in the colonies, assisting the colonists in their efforts to find a new nation and create institutions independent of those formerly under the supervision of the British government.

Know more about the Committee of Safety at:-

https://brainly.com/question/886764

The Peace of Westphalia, which was signed in 1648, had a number of significant consequences. Some are:

Answer:

the money he pays back the store is injected back into the economy through the employees wages

Explanation:

Answer:

Injected back into

and

employee wages

Explanation:

I literally just took the final in economics and this was on it

Answer: The Hawaiian Islands were formed by a volcanic hot spot,

Explanation:When the vocano explodes the vocano's magma melts out and over days, weeks,or years the magma hardens and creats new islands!!

If we accept moral or cultural relativism, the concept of moral progress becomes problematic.

In moral relativism, there is no objective standard by which to measure moral progress since moral values and norms are determined by individual cultures or personal beliefs. What may be considered morally progressive in one culture may be seen as regressive or even immoral in another.

So, without universal standard for morality, the notion of moral progress loses its foundation. Progress implies a movement towards an objectively better state, but in relativism, what is considered better or worse is subjective.

Read more about relativism

brainly.com/question/10627704

#SPJ1

The reasons why the Maya culture is considered arguably the most advanced of the early American civilizations was thanks to their Math advancements and way of life.

The Maya civilization is considered the be the most advanced of the American civilizations that existed before the arrival of Europeans and this was because of their advancements in Math and writing.

They developed the concept of zero, had a written language and carried out complex calculations. For their way of life, the Maya had well-planned cities as well as huge temples which were wonders of architecture.

Find out more on the Maya civilization at https://brainly.com/question/225736

#SPJ1

Answer: But the American Revolution continued long after the Revolutionary War was over. Ideas about liberty and equality helped inspire the French Revolution and independence movements in French colonies, such as Haiti, for generations after 1783.

Explanation:

The effect that the Rowe v Wade bill would have on the your life today is that it would have to reduce the options that you have towards having a child or not.

In the decision of Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (7-2) on January 22, 1973, that overly strong state restrictions on abortion are unconstitutional.

The Court found that a set of Texas laws that criminalized abortion in most cases violated a woman's constitutional right to privacy, which it found to be implicit in the liberty guarantee of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ("...nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law").

The majority opinion was written by Justice Harry A. Blackmun. The Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade in 2022.

The Supreme Court made an effort to strike a balance between a woman's right to privacy and a state's interest in restricting abortion after rejecting Roe's statement of an unrestricted right to end a pregnancy in any form and at any time.

Read more on Roe V Wade here: https://brainly.com/question/3870089

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Constitution names the vice president of the United States as the president of the Senate. In addition to serving as presiding officer, the vice president has the sole power to break a tie vote in the Senate and formally presides over the receiving and counting of electoral ballots cast in presidential elections.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Constitution names the vice president of the United States as the president of the Senate. In addition to serving as presiding officer, the vice president has the sole power to break a tie vote in the Senate and formally presides over the receiving and counting of electoral ballots cast on presidential elections.

Answer:

People make choices about what to buy.

Explanation:

Opportunity cost also known as the alternative forgone, can be defined as the value, profit or benefits given up by an individual or organization in order to choose or acquire something deemed significant at the time.

Simply stated, it is the cost of not enjoying the benefits, profits or value associated with the alternative forgone or best alternative choice available.

Hence, the opportunity cost of buying a product is the utility (satisfaction) that could be derived in another product using the same amount of money.

For example, if you decide to use your money to buy a Playstation 5, your opportunity cost would be the satisfaction you could have derived if you had invested the same amount of money in buying a bike for easy transportation.

Hence, opportunity costs exist when people make choices about what to buy.

In their article "Theories and the good: Toward child-centered gifted education," Grant and Piechoswski (1999) argue for the importance of integrating theoretical perspectives in the field of gifted education and emphasize the need for a child-centered approach.

Grant and Piechoswski (1999) explore the significance of theories in the context of gifted education. They advocate for the integration of various theoretical perspectives to enhance understanding and practice in this field. The authors emphasize the importance of considering children's individual needs and characteristics, advocating for a child-centered approach that takes into account the unique strengths, interests, and developmental aspects of gifted learners.

According to Grant and Piechoswski, theories serve three functions: they provide a framework for understanding and explaining phenomena, they guide practice and decision-making, and they facilitate research and knowledge development.

Read more about education theory

brainly.com/question/29795414

#SPJ1

The Scott v. Sandford decision, regarded by many legal experts as the worst ever made by the Supreme Court.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Scott v. Sandford that as slaves were not citizens of the country, they could not be expected to receive any protection from the federal government or the legal system.  The ruling added that Congress lacked the power to outlaw slavery on federal property.

The 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution, that outlawed slavery and proclaimed all people born in the United States to be individuals, reversed Scott v. Sandford, a ruling that many legal scholars believe to be the worst ever made by the Supreme Court.

Learn more about Scott v. Sandford, from:

brainly.com/question/12359809

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. pluralist theories:Interest groups compete among themselves to have power over decision making, providing a balance of power within democracies.

2.  conduct not fitting for the Christian

3.Equality before the law is such an essential part of the American system of government that, when a majority, whether acting intentionally or unintentionally.

4.o defend her position, the Wife refers to King Solomon, who had many wives, and to St. Paul's admonishment that it is better to marry than to burn.

5.In the early nineteenth century, married women in the US were legally subordinate to their husbands. Wives could not own their own property.

6.Passed by Congress June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920, the 19th amendment granted women the right to vote. The 19th amendment granted woman to vote. I mean the woman the right to vote.

Explanation:

Answer: Daisy Bates Legacy

Daisy Lee Gatson Bates was an activist who broke racial and gender barriers to spearhead one of the most pivotal moments in the Civil Rights Movement. Bates is best known as the leading force behind the desegregation of Little Rock's Central High School. Bates was born Daisy Gatson in Huttig, Arkansas, in 1914.

Explanation:

sry im late hope this help UwU

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

This is true. The ninety-five theses called for many reforms

Martin Luther, a German theologian and priest renowned for his influential 1517 Protestant Reformation manifest, The Ninety-Five Theses, fiercely contended for profound reforms within the Roman Catholic Church. This document of ninety-five points combatted against what he perceived as predatory practices being partaken in by the Church - especially with respect to the sale of indulgences; Luther was determined to improve it.

These 94 points encompassed various objections to both the notion that salvation is attainable through good deeds, as well as the papal authority. Furthermore, notably among protests were numerous conundrums opposing the sale of indulgences.

Read more on ninety-five theses here:https://brainly.com/question/8123071

#SPJ1

Answer:

The correct answer is B - the annexation of Guam by the United States - but I can see why this question can be tricky!

Explanation:

Let's go through all the options:

A:The annexation of Spain by the United States - this is not correct. The war was waged in Spanish colonies. It did not directly affect Spain's territory in Europe, and Spain survived as an independent country. That being said - the war made it clear that they are no longer an empire.

B:The annexation of Guam by the United States - This is the one! Guam was one of Spanish colonial territories that was surrendered following the war, and United States took it over as their unincorporated territory. Unincorporated here means that the people living on Guam did not get the same rights that US citizens normally do.

C:A Cuba free of direct influence by the United States - not correct. While the treaties ending and following the war made Cuba an independent country on paper - their consitution reserved the rights for the US to oversee their finances and foreign politics.

D:The independence of Philippines - not correct; while Spain had to surrender Philippines - it became dependent of the United States. There were effort to make Philippines an independent country at that time, but they did not succeed.

Answer: B. report the measure favorably.

Explanation: When a committee reports a measure favorably, it means they are recommending the bill to be approved and passed by the larger body, such as the full House of Representatives or Senate.  This indicates that the committee believes the bill is well-written and should be enacted into law without any amendments or changes.

By reporting the measure favorably, the committee is essentially saying that the bill is in its best form and does not require any modifications or alterations.  This implies that the committee agrees with the content and language of the bill as it was originally submitted.

Learn more about congressional committee here: https://brainly.com/question/1968528.