A square rug has an area 38 ft2. Write the side length as a square root. Then decide if the side length is a rational number.
Then the rug has side length
Is the side length a rational number?

Answer:

  -4 28/81 cm/min ≈ -4.346 cm/min

Step-by-step explanation:

Differentiating the formula for the area of a triangle gives the relationship between the various rates of change.

  A = 1/2bh

  A' = 1/2(b'h +bh') . . . . . relation of rates of change

__

When the area is 83 cm², and the height is 9 cm, the base length is ...

  83 cm² = 1/2b(9 cm)

  b = 166/9 cm

Filling in the given values and rates of change, we have ...

  3.5 cm²/min = 1/2(b'·(9 cm) +(166/9 cm)(2.5 cm/min))

  7 cm²/min -46 1/9 cm²/min = (b')(9 cm)

  b' = (-39 1/9 cm²/min)/(9 cm) = -4 28/81 cm/min

The base of the triangle is changing at the rate of -4 28/81 cm/min, about -4.346 cm/min.

_____

The attachment shows a calculator solution to the problem.

Answer:

12- 4 = 8

Give me a brainylest:)

Thank you-!

Answer:

number of chairs painted

Step-by-step explanation:

A)  The 95% confidence interval is:

     0.58 ± 0.062

B) At the 0.01 probability value, there is neither substantial evidence of a home-field  advantage in professional football (they won and over half of the games).

Now, According to the question:

A) Confidence interval is written as

Sample proportion ± margin of error

Margin of error = z × \(\frac{\sqrt{pq} }{n}\)

Where:

z = The z score corresponds to the amount of confidence.

p = sample proportion.

q = probability of failure

q = 1 - p

p = x/n

Where

n = the number of samples

x = the number of success

From the information given,

n = 240

x = 138

p = 138/240 = 0.58

q = 1 - 0.58 = 0.42

To determine the z score,  The confidence level from 100% to get α

α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05

α/2 = 0.05/2 = 0.025

Thus,

1 - 0.025 = 0.975

The z -score associated with the area just on z table approximately 1.96. Therefore, the z score with a 95% confidence level is 1.96.

As a result, the 95% confidence interval becomes

0.58 ± 1.96√(0.58)(0.42)/240

Confidence interval is

0.58 ± 0.062

B) Earning more than half of the games equates to winning 120 games or more.

p = 120/240 = 0.5

The hypothesis test will be

For the null hypothesis,

P ≥ 0.5

For the alternative hypothesis,

P < 0.5

Probability of success, p = 0.5

q = probability of failure = 1 - p

q = 1 - 0.5 = 0.5

Considering the sample,

Sample proportion, P = x/n

Where

x = number of success = 138

n = number of samples = 240

P = 138/240 = 0.58

We need to find the values of  the test statistic which will be the z score

z = (P - p)/√pq/n

z = (0.58 - 0.5)/√(0.5 × 0.5)/240 = 2.48

Remember that this is a two-tailed test. We would use the normal distribution table to calculate the probability potential of the property to the right of both the z score.

P value will be = 1 - 0.9934 = 0.0066

Since alpha, 0.01 > the p value, 0.0066, then we would reject the null hypothesis.

The given question is incomplete, The complete question is this:

__"During the 2000 season, the home team won 138 out of 240 regular season National Football League games. (15 points) a) Construct a 95% confidence interval for the winning proportion of the home team during this season. b) At the 0.01 significance level, is there strong evidence of a home field advantage (they win more than half of the games) in professional football? State hypotheses, calculate the test statistic and p-value, and make a conclusion in context"__

Learn more about Confidence Interval at:

https://brainly.com/question/29680703

#SPJ4

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

5 steps

Answer:

t answer is 2

Answer:

41/35

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplify the following:

4/7 + 3/5

Put 4/7 + 3/5 over the common denominator 35. 4/7 + 3/5 = (5×4)/35 + (7×3)/35:

(5×4)/35 + (7×3)/35

5×4 = 20:

20/35 + (7×3)/35

7×3 = 21:

20/35 + 21/35

20/35 + 21/35 = (20 + 21)/35:

(20 + 21)/35

| 2 | 1

+ | 2 | 0

| 4 | 1:

Answer: 41/35

The exponential smoothing forecast for period 5, assuming an alpha (α) value of 0.4, is determined by applying the exponential smoothing formula.

The exponential smoothing formula is given by:

Forecast for period t = α * Actual value for period t + (1 - α) * Forecast for period t-1

In this case, we need the forecast for period 5, so we will use the formula to calculate it based on the available data.

To calculate the exponential smoothing forecast for period 5, we use the given alpha (α) value of 0.4 and the available data for previous periods. The formula considers the actual value for period t and the forecast for the previous period (t-1).

Since we are calculating the forecast for period 5, we need the actual value for period 5 and the forecast for period 4. However, these values are not provided in the given information. Without the actual value for period 5 or the forecast for period 4, it is not possible to provide a specific numerical answer for the exponential smoothing forecast for period 5.

The exponential smoothing technique is commonly used for forecasting, where the alpha (α) value determines the weight given to the most recent observations. A higher alpha value places more weight on recent data, while a lower alpha value gives more weight to historical data. By adjusting the alpha value, the forecast can be adjusted to respond more quickly or more slowly to changes in the data.

To calculate the exponential smoothing forecast for period 5, it is essential to have the necessary data points. With the provided alpha (α) value of 0.4, the formula can be applied once the required data is available.

Learn more about exponential smoothing formula here:

brainly.com/question/33567988

#SPJ11

Answer:

Y = 4/3 - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

(3, 3)    (0, -1)

m = 3+1/ 3-0

4/3 is the slope

The financial disadvantage that Premium Paper Corporation would recognize per year if they eliminate the Recipe Cards Division is $30,500.

To determine the financial advantage or disadvantage of eliminating the Recipe Cards Division, we need to compare the contribution margin of the division with the portion of fixed costs that can be avoided.

The annual contribution margin of the Recipe Cards Division is $25,000. However, out of the $75,000 in fixed costs, $19,500 cannot be avoided. This means that if the division is eliminated, only $75,000 - $19,500 = $55,500 of fixed costs can be avoided.

If the division is eliminated, the financial advantage or disadvantage can be calculated as follows:

Financial advantage/disadvantage = Contribution margin - Avoidable fixed costs

Financial advantage/disadvantage = $25,000 - $55,500 = -$30,500

To know more about financial disadvantage refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/33446387

#SPJ11

The statement that must be true since the average rate of change T(d) for the interval d = 4 and d = 10 is 0 is this:

C: The same number of tickets was sold on the fourth day and tenth day.

The average rate of change is a measurement that shows how much the function of a unit changes over a given interval. In the above question, we can see that the average rate of change given the two intervals is zero and this means that there was no change among the variables.

Thus, we can conclude that the number of tickets that were sold on day 4 was also the number of tickets sold on day 10.

Learn more about the average rate of change here:

https://brainly.com/question/8728504

#SPJ1

Answer:

Answer:

All of the expressions

Step-by-step explanation:

A rational number is one that can be written as a ratio, or a number with a terminating decimal.

All of the expressions are whole numbers, so they are all rational.

Answer:

b:  irrational

Step-by-step explanation:

  (√5+2)

--------------  is given.

  (√5 - 2)

If we multiply numerator and denominator by (√5+2), we succeed in removing the square root symbol from the denominator:

(√5+2)(√5+2)

---------------------

(√5+2)(√5- 2)

and the denominator becomes 5 - 2, or 3.  The denominator is now rational, but the numerator still involves the square root symbol, so overall the given number is irrational.

Answer:

D. (90, 60)

Step-by-step explanation:

A proportional relationship is a relationship in which the ratios of two variables are equivalent.

If we take two points on the graph such as (45, 30) and (30, 20), we can see that they can both be simplified to the ratio 3:2. Using this we can find the correct answer. From looking at all the points we can see that only (90,60) would also form a ratio of 3:2, thus d would be the correct answer.

Answer:

30 i think please be right

Answer:

its 30

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

visual wise: you mirror it

Step-by-step explanation:

The average change in Michelle's position per minute is 3.27 meters per minute.

Initial position of Michelle is -2.1 m.Final position of Michelle is -38.6 m.Time taken is 6 min and 14 sec.Time taken = 6 minutes and 14 seconds= 6 + 14/60 minutes= 6.23 minutes

Change in position= Final position - Initial position= (-38.6) - (-2.1)= -38.6 + 2.1= -36.5 metersAverage change in position per minute = Total change in position / Total time taken in minutes= -36.5 / 6.23= -5.8589 ≈ -5.86 meters per minuteWe take the magnitude of the displacement because it is the distance between the two positions. Therefore, the average change in position per minute is 5.86 meters per minute.If we consider the displacement as negative then the average change in position per minute is 3.27 meters per minute.

To know more about average change visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/30299107

#SPJ11

Answer: Step-by-step explanation:

11.39°

12.∠DOC=180-63-39=78

13.∠EOA=180-39=141

14.mAB=m∠AOB=39

15.mDC=m∠DOC=180-63-39=78

16.mAE=m∠EOA=180-39=141

17.mAED=m∠AOD=180

18.mBED=m∠EOD+m∠AOD=180+39=219

19.mEDA=m∠BOE+m∠AOD=180+39=219

Answer:

  the SSS similarity theorem

Step-by-step explanation:

The triangles are not indicated as being right triangles (even though we know they are), so we cannot use the HL theorem.

The ratios of corresponding sides are the same, so the applicable theorem is ...

  the SSS similarity theorem

__

3/(3+6) = 4/(4+8) = 5/15 = 1/3 . . . the ratio of shorter sides to corresponding longer sides.

_____

Additional comment

You recognize the smaller triangle as a 3-4-5 right triangle, and notice that the larger triangle is 3 times that size. If angle C were marked as the right angle it is, then the HL similarity theorem could also be used.

Answer:

the percentage did the stock decline is 4%

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation of the percentage did the stock decline as follows:

= Lost value ÷ original price

= $1.18 ÷ ($1.18 + $28.32)

= $1.18 ÷ $29.50

= 4% decline

Hence, the percentage did the stock decline is 4%

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helped

Answer:

√65 (units)

Step-by-step explanation:

A(3, -2) and B(7, 5)

AB=√ [(xB-xA)²+(yB-yA)²]

AB=√ [(7-3)²+(5+2)²]=√(16+49)

AB=√65 (units)

The volume of the helium-filled balloon at 0.855 atm and 10.0 °C will be approximately 42.81 L, calculated using the ideal gas law equation.

To compute this problem, we can use the ideal gas law, which states that PV = nRT, where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin.

First, we need to convert the initial temperature of 25 °C to Kelvin:

T1 = 25 + 273.15 = 298.15 K

Next, we can rearrange the ideal gas law equation to solve for V2:

V2 = (P1 * V1 * T2) / (P2 * T1)

We have:

P1 = 1.08 atm (initial pressure)

V1 = 50.0 L (initial volume)

P2 = 0.855 atm (final pressure)

T2 = 10.0 °C (final temperature)

Converting the final temperature to Kelvin:

T2 = 10 + 273.15 = 283.15 K

Substituting the values into the equation:

V2 = (1.08 * 50.0 * 283.15) / (0.855 * 298.15)

V2 ≈ 42.81 L

Therefore, the volume of the helium-filled balloon at 0.855 atm and 10.0 °C will be approximately 42.81 L.

To know more about ideal gas law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30458409#

#SPJ11

Answer:

8 slices per pizza

Step-by-step explanation:

96 divided by 12 is 8

Independent system of linear equations that do not rely on each other for the algebraic or graphic form of equations.

The collection of two or more linear equations involving the same variables is known as a system of linear equations. The number of orders in a system of linear equations can range from one to n.

If a consistent system only has one solution, it is regarded as independent.

Elimination or substitution are two algebraic methods for solving a system of linear equations. and was also graphically solved.

Hence Independent system of linear equations that do not rely on each other for the algebraic or graphic form of equations.

to more learn about click here.System of linear equations.

https://brainly.com/question/20379472

#SPJ4

The task involves modifying the given code to implement binary search on an array in descending order. The logic of the code needs to be adjusted accordingly.

The task requires modifying the existing code to perform binary search on an array sorted in descending order. In the original code, the logic for the ascending order was based on comparing the key with the middle element of the list. However, in the descending order case, we need to adjust the logic.

To implement binary search on a descending array, we need to swap the order of the conditions in the code. Instead of checking if the key is less than the middle element, we need to check if the key is greater than the middle element. Similarly, the condition for equality also needs to be adjusted.

The modified code for binary search in descending order would look like this:

public static int binarysearch2(int[] list, int key) {

   int low = 0;

   int high = list.length - 1;

   while (high >= low) {

       int mid = (low + high) / 2;

       if (key > list[mid])

           high = mid - 1;

       else if (key < list[mid])

           low = mid + 1;

       else

           return mid;

   }

   return -1; // Not found

}

By swapping the conditions, we ensure that the algorithm correctly searches for the key in a descending ordered array.

For more information on array visit: brainly.com/question/30891254

#SPJ11

Example that demonstrates the contrapositive of the limit comparison test. Let's consider a pair of series an and bn with positive terms, where lim(n→∞)(an/bn) = 0, bn diverges, but an converges.

Let's define the series an and bn as follows:
- an = 1/\(n^2\)
- bn = 1/n

Now, let's examine the limit:
lim(n→∞)(an/bn) = lim(n→∞)((1/\(n^2\)) / (1/n))

To simplify the limit expression, we multiply both numerator and denominator by \(n^2\):
lim(n→∞)(\(n^2\)(1/\(n^2\)) / \(n^2\)(1/n)) = lim(n→∞)(n/\(n^2\)) = lim(n→∞)(1/n)

As n approaches infinity, the limit becomes:
lim(n→∞)(1/n) = 0

Now, let's check the convergence of the series an and bn:
- an = Σ(1/\(n^2\)) is a convergent p-series with p = 2 > 1.
- bn = Σ(1/n) is a divergent p-series with p = 1.

Thus, we have provided an example of a pair of series an and bn with positive terms, where lim(n→∞)(an/bn) = 0, bn diverges, but an converges. This demonstrates the contrapositive of the limit comparison test, as requested.

To know more about "Limit" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30761744#

#SPJ11

The equivalent equation for the expression y = 3x-6 is none.

Equivalent equation:

If the two equations are said to be equivalent when they have the same solution set. Then it is called as Equivalent equation.

Given,

Here we have the expression y = 3x-6

Now, we need to find the equivalent equation.

In order to find the equivalent equation, we have to take some sample values for x,

The sample value of x as 1, 2, 3

Now, we have to apply these values on the given expression first,

Then we get,

x = 1 => y = 3(1) - 6 = -3

x = 2 => y = 3(2) - 6 = 0

x = 3 => y = 3(3) -6 = 9

Now, we have to apply these to the given equation and which has the same value of the given expression,

x = 1 => 3(1) - 2y = 6 = -2y = 6 - 3 => y = -3/2

x = 2 => 3(2) - 2y = 6 = -2y = 6 - 6 => y = 0

x = 3 => 3(3) - 2y = 6 = -2y = 6 - 9 => y = 3/2

This is not equal one.

Move on to the second one,

x = 1 => 2(1) + 3y = -6 => 3y = -6 - 2 => y = -8/3

x = 2 =>  2(2) + 3y = -6 = 3y = -6 - 4 => y = -10/3

x = 3 =>  2(3) + 3y = -6 = 3y = -6 - 6 => y = -4

This is not a equivalent one.

Move on to the third expression,

x = 1 => 3(1) - 2y = 12 = -2y = 12 - 3 => y = -9/2

x = 2 => 3(2) - 2y = 12 = -2y = 12 - 6 => y = -3

x = 3 => 3(3) - 2y = 12 = -2y = 12 - 9 => y = -3/2

This is not a equivalent one.

Finally we have to use the last one, then  we get,

x = 1 => 2(1) - 3y = 18 => -3y = 18 - 2 => y = -16/3

x = 2 =>  2(2) - 3y = 18 => -3y = 18 - 4 => y = -14/3

x = 3 =>  2(3) - 3y = 18 => -3y = 18 - 6 => y = -4

Therefore, none of them are the equivalent one.

To know more about Equivalent equation here.

https://brainly.com/question/17357101

#SPJ1