Answers
A group of white women believes that a college admissions test that is used by a public university discriminates against them. Strict Scrutiny legal standard the courts will use in deciding their case.
If the government can convince the court that the rule or regulation is required to fulfill a "compelling state interest," a court may adopt the strict scrutiny standard to hold the law or policy constitutional even when it violates a core constitutional right. The government must also show that the law is "narrowly tailored" to accomplish the important goal and that it employs the "least restrictive methods" to do so. A judge may declare a legislation invalid if these requirements are not met.
The standard is the strictest and highest level of judicial review, and it is one of the methods courts use to assess whether a constitutional right or
To learn more about strict scrutiny click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ4
Related Questions
From a comparison of statistics a criminologist detected what he thought was a correlation between fluctuations in the employment rate and in crimes of theft. For every 2 percent increase in the employment rate, the rate of theft decreased by 1 percent, and for every 2 percent decrease in the employment rate, the theft rate increased by 1 percent. The criminologist concluded that unemployment causes crimes of theft. Which one of Mill’s methods did the criminologist use?
Answers
The criminologist used the Method of Agreement, one of Mill's methods of induction, to arrive at the conclusion that unemployment causes crimes of theft.
How to use the Method of AgreementThe Method of Agreement involves identifying a factor or condition that is consistently present when the phenomenon under study occurs.
In this case, the criminologist observed a consistent pattern: for every 2 percent increase in the employment rate, the theft rate decreased by 1 percent, and for every 2 percent decrease in the employment rate, the theft rate increased by 1 percent.
By comparing these statistics and noticing the correlation, the criminologist inferred a causal relationship between unemployment and crimes of theft.
Learn more about criminologist at
https://brainly.com/question/14317864
#SPJ1
What is the common term for a political party that exists that is not the Republicans or Democrats?
a
Outside Force
b
There is not such thing.
c
Third Party
d
Dealbreaker
Answers
Answer:
Third Party.
Explanation:
The other common term is 3rd party.
C). Third party
The state tax incentive is an example of":
Answers
Answer:
mortgage interest deduction
in john 10 who are the sheep
Answers
Answer:
In this case, He contrasts His spiritual leadership with that of false teachers, including the hypocritical religious critics of His own era. Jesus previously identified Himself as "the Good Shepherd," saying that He was willing to die for the sake of His flock. This is a very different approach from a typical "hired" shepherd, who is inclined to run when there is danger. Spiritually, Jesus is the ultimate example of a shepherd willing to sacrifice Himself for the safety and health of His flock.
In the prior verse, Jesus echoed an important point made in His first analogy (John 10:1–6). There He referred to the way sheep instinctively learn to recognize the voice of their own shepherd. This reflects the close, knowing, personal relationship a "good shepherd" has with the sheep. Here, Jesus compares that closeness and intimacy with the relationship between God the Son and God the Father. This echoes other statements in the New Testament which imply that salvation through Jesus Christ brings us into an intimate family relationship with God (1 John 3:1; Romans 8:16–17).
Compare and contrast the legal concepts of Due Process of Law and Equal Protection under the Law.
Answers
Answer:
The equal protection clause prevents the state government from enacting criminal laws that discriminate in an unreasonable and unjustified manner. The Fifth Amendment due process clause prohibits the federal government from discrimination if the discrimination is so unjustifiable that it violates due process of law.
Explanation:
Some police terminology has become part of mainstream slang. True or False?
Answers
Answer:
true beacuse there always part of the mainstream
daniel's failure to deliver ice-cream makers and waffle makers on time resulted in a two-week delay in the opening of sheena's new ice-cream parlor. sheena incurred a heavy loss since she had to pay the rent for those two weeks as well as salaries to the personnel hired. in this case, which of the following remedies is a court most likely to award sheena for these expenses?
Answers
In this case, a court is most likely to award Sheena compensatory damages for the expenses incurred due to the two-week delay in the opening of her ice-cream parlor.
In the case of Daniel's failure to deliver ice-cream makers and waffle makers on time resulting in a two-week delay in the opening of Sheena's new ice-cream parlor, the court is most likely to award Sheena consequential damages for the expenses incurred. Consequential damages are those losses that arise due to the failure of a party to meet their contractual obligations.
The losses are not direct losses that were agreed upon in the contract, but they arise as a natural result of the breach of the contract.For Sheena, the two-week delay in the opening of her ice-cream parlor led to a heavy loss since she had to pay rent for those two weeks as well as salaries to the personnel hired. Sheena can file a lawsuit against Daniel and seek compensation for the consequential damages that she incurred. The court is likely to award Sheena the consequential damages as a remedy for the expenses incurred.
To know more about consequential damages:
https://brainly.com/question/28012702
#SPJ11
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) said that Group of answer choices a key escrow system must be provided so that communications can be decrypted (with a court order) agents of a foreign power may be wiretapped with authorization from a secret court telecommunications equipment must be designed to allow the interception of telephone calls (with a court order) e-mail should have the same degree of legal protection as telephone calls
Answers
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) requires that telecommunications equipment be designed to allow the interception of telephone calls, with a court order.
The CALEA states that telecommunications equipment must be designed to allow the interception of telephone calls (with a court order).
This ensures that law enforcement agencies can access necessary information to conduct investigations while still protecting the privacy of individuals by requiring a court order for interception.
Additionally, CALEA mandates that a key escrow system must be provided so that communications can be decrypted, with a court order. Furthermore, agents of a foreign power may be wiretapped with authorization from a secret court.
However, CALEA does not specifically address the legal protection of email, though some argue that it should have the same degree of legal protection as telephone calls.
To know more on CALEA visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28095101
#SPJ11
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
Answers
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
How has the Supreme Court dealt with cases of affirmative action in the United States?
a) it has ruled that the practice of affirmative action is unconstitutional because it includes a race test.
b) it has ruled that the practice of affirmative action is lawful because it helps a specific group of people
c) it first ruled that the practice was unlawful but it overturned precedence to then say it is lawful under the constitution
d) it has ruled that the practice of affirmative action can be either lawful or unlawful depending on the individual circumstances of a case
Answers
Explanation:
D i think if not its b hope this helps!
in its written form, the criminal law is also known as ________.
Answers
Answer:
Statutes.
Explanation:
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
HELP!! ASAP!!!!!!!!!!
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
on edge 2021
According to Section 33 of the Texas Bill of Rights (Article 1 of the Texas Constitution), Texans are guaranteed the right to use and access public beaches. This is not a right that is protected under the U.S. Constitution. Which concept allows Texas to grant its citizens more rights than those listed in the U.S. Constitution?
the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments
Equal Rights Amendment
independent state grounds
Answers
According to Section 33 of the Texas Bill of Rights (Article 1 of the Texas Constitution), Texans are guaranteed the right to use and access public beaches.
This is not a right that is protected under the U.S. Constitution. Independent state grounds allow Texas to grant its citizens more rights than those listed in the U.S. Constitution. This concept is the right answer.A state cannot take away rights that are protected under the U.S. Constitution. However, the U.S. Constitution allows the states to grant their citizens more rights than those listed in the federal Constitution. Independent state grounds concept allows states to provide additional rights to their citizens than the ones protected under the U.S. Constitution. This idea permits state courts to interpret their state constitutions and statutes to expand protections beyond those granted by the federal Constitution.
To know more about Constitution , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ11
11. Write a short story of a fictitious crime and describe how soil evidence
helped link a suspect to the crime scene or victim.
12. Describe physical characteristics of soil that could heln distinguish
Answers
Answer:
Here is the short story:
The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.
Explanation:
The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off. The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was developed by the U.S. to assess the effects a significant federal action will have on the environment, and seek to mitigate this impact. This concept has been adopted by many developed and some developing nations. Which of the following is NOT a major aspect of an EIA?
Group of answer choices
To predict and evaluate environmental effects.
To avoid or mitigate negative impacts.
To examine alternative approaches that may be environmentally preferrable.
To collect data to deny the project form moving forward.
Answers
The following is NOT a major aspect of an EIA: option (D) correct To collect data to deny the project from moving forward. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is the method for determining how the environment may be influenced by a proposed activity or project.
EIA is used to forecast environmental effects at an early stage in project planning and design, and to identify ways to minimize adverse effects and improve positive effects. The four major aspects of an EIA are: To predict and evaluate environmental effects.
To avoid or mitigate negative impacts. To examine alternative approaches that may be environmentally preferable. To collect data to help make a decision.
To know more about Environmental Impact Assessment visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16326960
#SPJ11
letter of credit a good or service ?
Answers
Answer:
Good
Explanation:
because service is just the thing ir place attending you and good is when someone is givibg a good credit
16.
The Founding Fathers built into the Constitution the principle of
to make sure that no one branch of the federal government
gained too much power over the other two.
A. separation of powers
B. checks and balances
C. inherent rights of individuals
D. states rights
E government by the people
Answers
Answer:
system of checks and balances
The system of checks and balances in government was developed to ensure that no one branch of government would become too powerful.
a legal wrong that is committed against a person or property is known as
Answers
A legal wrong that is committed against a person or property is known as a "tort."
Property refers to both the set of rights that grant individuals legal authority over valuable items as well as the actual valuable items themselves. Depending on the property's nature, the owner may be able to consume, modify, shares, redefine, fees, financing, pawn, trade, exchange, the transfer, give away, or eliminate it, or to prevent others from doing so, as well as possibly abandon it; however, regardless of the property's nature, the owner is always entitled to use it in accordance with the rights to property that have been granted to them.
A tort is an administrative wrong that exposes the perpetrator to legal responsibility resulting in loss or harm to the claimant. Criminal law, that deals with crimes that the state has the power to punish, can be compared with tort law.
To learn more about Tort, click here;
https://brainly.com/question/31306738
#SPJ11
A legal wrong that is committed against a person or property is known as a "tort."
Property refers to both the set of rights that grant individuals legal authority over valuable items as well as the actual valuable items themselves. Depending on the property's nature, the owner may be able to consume, modify, shares, redefine, fees, financing, pawn, trade, exchange, the transfer, give away, or eliminate it, or to prevent others from doing so, as well as possibly abandon it; however, regardless of the property's nature, the owner is always entitled to use it in accordance with the rights to property that have been granted to them.
A tort is an administrative wrong that exposes the perpetrator to legal responsibility resulting in loss or harm to the claimant. Criminal law, that deals with crimes that the state has the power to punish, can be compared with tort law.
To learn more about Tort, click here;
brainly.com/question/31306738
#SPJ11
Joe is overheard stating that he could make a lot of money robbing a local bank that has no security guards on duty. Joe may be criminally charged with
Answers
Answer:
yes he can get locked up for life if and add more things if he has drugs or guns on him make sure that he gets the money for the back also tell him to tell the tellers to get away from the desks so they do not push the button goof luck and FTP
Explanation:
Joe is overheard stating that he could make a lot of money robbing a local bank that has no security guards on duty. Joe may be criminally charged with no crime.
What is a criminal charge?A criminal charge is a formal accusation levelled by a governmental authority that someone has committed a crime.
A charge in a criminal case is a formal accusation of criminal activity. After reviewing police reports, witness statements, and any other evidence of wrongdoing, the prosecuting attorney decides on the charges. At the arraignment of an arrested person, formal charges are announced.
As, Joe is just overheard stating that he could make a lot of money robbing a local bank that has no security guards on duty, but he has still not committed that crime, he has no criminal charge.
Thus, Joe is not charged for any crime.
To learn more about criminal charge, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10387458
#SPJ2
to establish res ipsa loquitur in most states, the plaintiff must demonstrate all but which of the following?
Answers
To establish res ipsa loquitur in most states, the plaintiff must demonstrate all but there is no requirement of direct evidence of the defendant's lack of due care.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine within the Anglo-American not unusual regulation and Roman-Dutch regulation that announces in a tort or civil lawsuit a court docket can infer negligence from the very nature of a coincidence or damage in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved.
Under res ipsa loquitur doctrine, the plaintiff needs to reveal:
The harm more often than not could no longer arise within the absence of negligenceThe plaintiff or any other third party had no position in causing the damageThe defendant had different management of the element that triggered the damage.Various examples of res ipsa loquitur consist of the following: a piano falling from a window and touchdown on a character, a barrel falling from a skyscraper and harming someone below, a sponge left interior a patient following a surgical operation or the carcass of an animal is observed inner a meals can.
Learn more about res ipsa loquitur here brainly.com/question/12177938
#SPJ4
today, most workplaces are becoming more closed off and independent. T/F ?
Answers
False. Today, most workplaces are actually becoming more open and collaborative rather than closed off and independent.
The traditional model of closed offices, cubicles, and hierarchical structures is giving way to open office layouts, shared spaces, and collaborative work environments. This shift is driven by various factors such as changing work cultures, the rise of technology-enabled collaboration, and a focus on fostering innovation and teamwork.
Open office layouts, characterized by shared workspaces and fewer physical barriers, aim to promote communication, interaction, and collaboration among employees. They facilitate easier information sharing, idea exchange, and teamwork, creating a more inclusive and dynamic work environment.
Furthermore, there is a growing emphasis on breaking down hierarchical structures and encouraging greater employee participation and engagement. Organizations are adopting flatter hierarchies, promoting cross-functional teams, and implementing initiatives that empower employees to contribute their ideas, take ownership of projects, and have a voice in decision-making processes.
Technological advancements have also played a significant role in facilitating collaboration and connectivity in the workplace. Tools such as video conferencing, instant messaging, and project management software enable employees to collaborate and communicate effectively, regardless of their physical location. This has allowed for greater flexibility, remote work options, and virtual teamwork, fostering a more interconnected and collaborative work environment.
Additionally, the recognition of the value of diverse perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches has led to increased emphasis on teamwork and cross-functional collaboration. Many organizations are leveraging the benefits of different skill sets and backgrounds to drive innovation, problem-solving, and creativity.
While there may still be some workplaces that maintain a more closed-off and independent culture, the overall trend in today's workplaces is towards openness, collaboration, and interconnectedness. These characteristics are seen as essential for promoting productivity, employee engagement, and organizational success in an increasingly interconnected and dynamic business landscape.
In summary, the statement that most workplaces are becoming more closed off and independent is false. The prevailing trend in modern workplaces is towards openness, collaboration, and interconnectedness, with a focus on fostering teamwork, communication, and employee engagement.
Learn more about independent here
https://brainly.com/question/82796
#SPJ11
Choose the response that correctly describes a due diligence...Choose the response that correctly describes a due diligence requirement a paid tax preparer should take when preparing a return for a taxpayer claiming the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC).
Answers
To ensure that a party is not held legally responsible for any loss or harm, due diligence is the process or effort of gathering and analyzing information prior to making a decision or carrying out a transaction. The phrase is used in a variety of contexts, particularly economic transactions.
Before buying an issuer, an underwriter audits its operations and company. Before starting a merger, one company thoroughly assesses another to see if it is a wise investment. Online reviews are examined by customers before making a purchase of a good or service.
A thorough review of all relevant contracts, such as partnership agreements, license agreements, guarantees, loan agreements, and agreements for bank funding, is often part of legal due diligence. In your next deal, guard against important risks.
To learn more about due diligence
https://brainly.com/question/29807625
#SPJ4
the clayton act was enacted in 1914 to strengthen the antitrust laws under the sherman act. true/false
Answers
The statement that 'the Clayton Act was enacted in 1914 to strengthen the antitrust laws under the Sherman Act' is true. It complemented the Sherman Act by providing a more comprehensive framework to address anticompetitive practices.
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 is a United States antitrust law that regulates competition and monopolies. It is named after Senator William Alden Smith and Representative Henry De Lamar Clayton, who were the act's authors. It bans monopolistic behaviour, price fixing, and exclusive dealings and ties. It made illegal a variety of business activities that the Supreme Court had previously stated were not covered by the Sherman Antitrust Act.
The Clayton Act also stipulated that businesses could not acquire the stock of competing corporations if doing so would result in reduced competition. It stipulated that if a company's merger or acquisition activity would "substantially lessen competition," the government had the authority to halt the activity.
Hence, the Clayton Act aimed to prevent specific business practices that could potentially lead to a reduction in competition, such as price discrimination, exclusive dealing agreements, and corporate mergers that could lessen competition. Thus, the statement is true.
Learn more about Clayton Antitrust Act:
https://brainly.com/question/14684775
#SPJ11
Jordan and Critina know you are familiar with the role of the 9-1-1 dipatcher. They have aked you to write a brief ummary. Thi ummary hould decribe the type of information you would gather a a 9-1-1 dipatcher on a call about the recent theft of all phyical evidence from the police tation. Write a brief ummary (100–150 word) for Jordan and Critina, imagining you were a 9-1-1 dipatcher for thi call. What quetion would you ak about the tolen phyical evidence?
Answers
A 9-1-1 dispatcher would ask for the following details if they received a call concerning the recent loss of all tangible evidence from the police station: you, please, from which you are phoning.
This relates to the person in charge of receiving citizen distress calls and dispatching assistance. Consequently, it is clear that the following types of information would be requested by a 9-1-1 dispatcher in response to a call concerning the recent theft of all tangible evidence from the police station: you, please from which you are phoning. Ask you to calm down and confirm that what you are saying is true. Inform you that assistance is on the way. A dispatcher should also: As much information as you can regarding the event should be gathered. Help and assist the caller by doing so. In this situation, the dispatcher will need to gather as much data as they can regarding what happened before, during, and after the theft occurrence because the police may utilize this data to track down the thief.
Learn more about A 9-1-1 dispatcher here:
https://brainly.com/question/28388562
#SPJ4
NEED HELP!!! 50 POINTS
Question : Please Define the following forms of government. Explain each of these forms of government or governmental philosophies their economic policies,social welfare policies and human right practices.
Capitalism
Communism
Socialism
Marxism
Answers
Answer: I scratch your back... you scratch mine?
I need some help too so could you look at my question after these answers?
Explanation:
In simple terms:
Capitalism is a type of economic system mostly in which the rich own and control private property and "private actors" according to their interests for and in society.
Communism: Also can be considered an "Economic system" except this one individual people do not own land or factories or anything. The whole community and government own these things. Everyone shares the wealth everyone creates.
Socialism: Also an economic system and political one too. This one is a type of way to "organize society"
In this one, the overall goal is to spread the wealth in fair amounts. If Im rich with 2 in the household and you're poor with 2 in the household and their a scarce in food. The government will evenly divide the food to all. The rich will get a total of 3 potatoes and the poor as well. Because I am rich I will not get more, because you are poor, you will not get less. It's about fairness and being even. What a nice government :)
Marxism:
There si no type of class in this government. Everyone in society works for a common good and the casual "class struggle" is no longer in existence. No labels, we are all one.
Good answer? If not lmk and Ill help you out a little more
list the steps in maintaining chain of custody for digital evidence.
Answers
Maintaining the chain of custody for digital evidence involves several steps to ensure its integrity and admissibility in legal proceedings:
Identification: The evidence should be clearly identified, including details such as its source, description, and location.Collection: The evidence should be collected using proper techniques and tools to prevent tampering or alteration. It may involve creating a forensic copy or image of the original data.Documentation: Detailed documentation should be maintained throughout the process, including the date, time, location, individuals involved, and any relevant observations or actions taken.Sealing and Packaging: The evidence should be securely sealed and packaged to protect it from physical damage or contamination. Tamper-evident seals may be used to ensure its integrity.Transportation: During transportation, appropriate safeguards should be implemented to prevent unauthorized access or tampering. Chain of custody documentation should accompany the evidence.Storage: The evidence should be stored in a secure environment, such as a locked facility with controlled access, to maintain its integrity and prevent unauthorized handling.Access and Handling: Only authorized individuals should have access to the evidence, and any handling or examination should be documented to track the chain of custody.Monitoring: Regular monitoring and supervision should be conducted to ensure compliance with procedures and prevent unauthorized access or tampering.Learn more about the Chain of custody at ; brainly.com/question/13827226
#SPJ11
Which passage from the Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution?
A.Most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions. The U.S. Constitution didn't even do that. What it did do was say that the Constitution was the "supreme law of the land" and was superior to state laws and constitutions.
B.Some of these were in the Magna Carta, and others were in the English Bill of Rights, which had been written fewer than 100 years before America's revolution. The rights in these documents were citizens' only protection from a government that could be both abusive and unpredictable and over which citizens had almost no control.
C.The Bill of Rights was a gesture of goodwill that was meant to bring everyone together around the new Constitution. Above all, the goal was to see the United States become a nation of unified people.
D.So not only did the Constitution fail to protect individual rights, but it also overruled the protections in state constitutions. It seemed that a bill of rights would be needed to ensure that the federal government could not overstep its bounds.
Answers
The Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution is that, most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions.
The supporters of the Constitution, who were the Federalists, thought that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and even dangerous. So, the authors of The Federalist Papers, including James Madison, argued for the ratification of the Constitution without Bill of Rights.
Federalists argued that the Constitution was not in need of a Bill of Rights, as the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10618576
#SPJ1
Create a want ad for a member of Congress. In the ad, include qualifications, benefits and salary, and skills needed.
Answers
Answer:
wdym
Explanation:
offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake
Answers
The term that means "offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake" is a forgery.
Forgery is the act of producing, adapting, or imitating objects, statistics, or documents with the intention to deceive. Forgery typically entails the creation of a fabricated written document or another item with the intention to deceive an individual or company. This may include the creation of counterfeit currency or personal documents, such as passports and driver's licenses.
Forgery may also include the signing of a document by someone who does not have the authority to do so. It's important to note that forgery is a crime, and those found guilty of forgery may face legal consequences such as imprisonment or fines.
Hence, the term that means "offering to another person as genuine a document known to be a fake" is a forgery.
Read more about Forgery at https://brainly.com/question/13582375
#SPJ11